You’re raising a valid point. Governments often take a cautious stance because blockchain security lapses—bridge exploits, poor audits, private key leaks, and flawed token contracts—continue to cause large-scale losses. Even if the technology offers real advantages, regulators tend to focus on the risk surface first.
Strengthening security standards, improving smart-contract auditing, enforcing transparency around code updates, and building more resilient bridging mechanisms would go a long way toward gaining broader governmental confidence. Blockchain doesn’t need to compromise decentralization to improve safety; it just needs more mature infrastructure and security-first development practices.
The more the industry prioritizes secure architecture over hype, the easier it becomes for governments, institutions, and mainstream users to trust the environment.
