Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 10:12:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: does anyone have cgminer reporting hash rates properly with gs blades  (Read 951 times)
jjj0923 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2014, 03:42:57 PM
 #1

I am not sure if I'm really hashing at full speed or not since the latest cgminer is not reporting my hash rates properly with my 3 gridseed blades.

I have these setting in my cgminer.conf

"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"gridseed-options" : "baud=115200,freq=850,chips=80",
"expiry" : "120",
"hotplug" : "5",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"scrypt" : true,
"shares" : "0"

ideas?

 cgminer version 3.7.2 - Started: [2014-05-04 17:01:06]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):3.472M (avg):3.422Mh/s | A:495509  R:0  HW:5  WU:0.9/m
 ST: 97  SS: 0  NB: 586  LW: 758  GF: 115  RF: 0
 Connected to 192.168.1.14 diff 67.5K with LP as user ninja
 Block: fad643b8...  Diff:0  Started: [17:42:20]  Best share: 151K   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GSD 0: 48DA54503731  850 MHz | 578.8K/571.6Kh/s | A: 71646 R:0 HW:0 WU:  0.0/m
 GSD 1: 49024F5A3135  850 MHz | 578.8K/571.7Kh/s | A:201305 R:0 HW:0 WU:  0.1/m
 GSD 2: 48F0606E3135  850 MHz | 578.8K/571.7Kh/s | A:109260 R:0 HW:1 WU:  0.3/m
 GSD 3: 48F0733E3135  850 MHz | 578.7K/571.6Kh/s | A: 91263 R:0 HW:1 WU:  0.1/m
 GSD 4: 48FE854D3831  850 MHz | 578.8K/571.5Kh/s | A:   128 R:0 HW:2 WU:  0.1/m
 GSD 5: 48ED61673030  850 MHz | 578.8K/571.6Kh/s | A: 21907 R:0 HW:1 WU:  0.2/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I think it should be showing a lot more as my hash rate

Lifeforce Pools : http://www.lifeforce.info
Earthcoin :http://eac.lifeforce.info -  Netcoin:  http://net.lifeforce.info - Hundred Coin Pool : http://100.lifeforce.info
Redoakcoin Pool : http://roc.lifeforce.info Guldencoin http://nlg.lifeforce.info also Worldcoin, Guncoin, NOBL, USDe, Tagcoin, Topcoin , Tagcoin , Credits, Goldcoin & Hobonickels
DiggerPhil
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 04, 2014, 04:40:29 PM
 #2

Try chips=40
jjj0923 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2014, 04:44:07 PM
 #3

Try chips=40

tried that - no change

UGH!

"gridseed-options" : "baud=115200,freq=850,chips=40,modules=1,usefifo=0,btc=0",

Lifeforce Pools : http://www.lifeforce.info
Earthcoin :http://eac.lifeforce.info -  Netcoin:  http://net.lifeforce.info - Hundred Coin Pool : http://100.lifeforce.info
Redoakcoin Pool : http://roc.lifeforce.info Guldencoin http://nlg.lifeforce.info also Worldcoin, Guncoin, NOBL, USDe, Tagcoin, Topcoin , Tagcoin , Credits, Goldcoin & Hobonickels
DiggerPhil
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 04, 2014, 05:04:58 PM
 #4

That is pretty much what I have, although mine is clocked lower. My cgminer reports 2.722M per blade, which is also reflected in the stats at the pool I mine at.

--gridseed-options=baud=115200,freq=800,chips=40,modules=1,usefifo=0

Have you tried pointing it at a pool and seeing what their stats report?
jjj0923 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2014, 05:28:08 PM
 #5

That is pretty much what I have, although mine is clocked lower. My cgminer reports 2.722M per blade, which is also reflected in the stats at the pool I mine at.

--gridseed-options=baud=115200,freq=800,chips=40,modules=1,usefifo=0

Have you tried pointing it at a pool and seeing what their stats report?

the pool does report that correct has rate - over 15 mhs in my case but I'd like cgminer to report it properly also - especially since I've seen examples my people whose cgminer is reporting properly - case in point:


Lifeforce Pools : http://www.lifeforce.info
Earthcoin :http://eac.lifeforce.info -  Netcoin:  http://net.lifeforce.info - Hundred Coin Pool : http://100.lifeforce.info
Redoakcoin Pool : http://roc.lifeforce.info Guldencoin http://nlg.lifeforce.info also Worldcoin, Guncoin, NOBL, USDe, Tagcoin, Topcoin , Tagcoin , Credits, Goldcoin & Hobonickels
DiggerPhil
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 04, 2014, 06:13:18 PM
 #6

Are you running the cgminer that has been optimized for use with blades? The posting linked below indicates that some people were having issues with cgminer reporting the wrong hashrate with blades.

http://cryptomining-blog.com/1990-updated-cgminer-3-7-2-with-support-for-gridseed-5-chip-and-80-chip-gc3355-asics/
jjj0923 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2014, 07:47:41 PM
 #7

Are you running the cgminer that has been optimized for use with blades? The posting linked below indicates that some people were having issues with cgminer reporting the wrong hashrate with blades.

http://cryptomining-blog.com/1990-updated-cgminer-3-7-2-with-support-for-gridseed-5-chip-and-80-chip-gc3355-asics/

I actually downloaded a slighly different one found here:

https://bitcointa.lk/threads/guide-gridseed-blade-80-chip-miner-support-tuning.299402/page-3


Lifeforce Pools : http://www.lifeforce.info
Earthcoin :http://eac.lifeforce.info -  Netcoin:  http://net.lifeforce.info - Hundred Coin Pool : http://100.lifeforce.info
Redoakcoin Pool : http://roc.lifeforce.info Guldencoin http://nlg.lifeforce.info also Worldcoin, Guncoin, NOBL, USDe, Tagcoin, Topcoin , Tagcoin , Credits, Goldcoin & Hobonickels
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!