Bitcoin Forum
June 04, 2024, 01:11:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 600Gh/s What's the Best Pool for the Buck  (Read 790 times)
pixskull (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


We support you for as long as you need.


View Profile
July 30, 2014, 06:00:59 PM
 #1

Have been using Eligius but want to make the most amount of money for the small investment we have.  What are the suggested pools, and is there a place to compare the potential differences on what you can make daily on avg per pool?

Thanks!
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023


Mine at Jonny's Pool


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2014, 07:15:54 PM
 #2

Have been using Eligius but want to make the most amount of money for the small investment we have.  What are the suggested pools, and is there a place to compare the potential differences on what you can make daily on avg per pool?

Thanks!
In the long run there won't be much difference in payouts between the different pools.  Some charge fees, others don't.

You could always set your miners to load balance across a number of pools to diversify your hashing power.  Here's a good thread that shows a long-running experiment on three different pools (BTCGuild, Eligius and p2pool): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=416933.0

Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow!  Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets!  No SPV cheats.  No empty blocks.
pixskull (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


We support you for as long as you need.


View Profile
July 30, 2014, 08:29:08 PM
 #3

Have been using Eligius but want to make the most amount of money for the small investment we have.  What are the suggested pools, and is there a place to compare the potential differences on what you can make daily on avg per pool?

Thanks!
In the long run there won't be much difference in payouts between the different pools.  Some charge fees, others don't.

You could always set your miners to load balance across a number of pools to diversify your hashing power.  Here's a good thread that shows a long-running experiment on three different pools (BTCGuild, Eligius and p2pool): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=416933.0

Awesome, thanks!  I guess that's in January so not too far behind but yea looks like that answers my question.  I wish I had that many miners back then....ha.  So are they all the same type of pool, like PPLNS?

Why are there so many people on Ghash?  I personally would never go use them, but interesting non the least.
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023


Mine at Jonny's Pool


View Profile WWW
July 30, 2014, 09:13:21 PM
 #4

Have been using Eligius but want to make the most amount of money for the small investment we have.  What are the suggested pools, and is there a place to compare the potential differences on what you can make daily on avg per pool?

Thanks!
In the long run there won't be much difference in payouts between the different pools.  Some charge fees, others don't.

You could always set your miners to load balance across a number of pools to diversify your hashing power.  Here's a good thread that shows a long-running experiment on three different pools (BTCGuild, Eligius and p2pool): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=416933.0

Awesome, thanks!  I guess that's in January so not too far behind but yea looks like that answers my question.  I wish I had that many miners back then....ha.  So are they all the same type of pool, like PPLNS?

Why are there so many people on Ghash?  I personally would never go use them, but interesting non the least.
Yeah, having about 3.6TH/s 6 months ago would have been nice Smiley (About 56BTC nice).

BTCGuild is PPLNS (I believe they had a PPS pool previously that you could mine for a fee... I'd have to let someone else clarify here)
P2Pool is also PPLNS, but works based on a share chain.  When a block is found, payouts are calculated for the previous 8640 shares.
Eligius is a variant of PPS (CPPSRB) that wizkid devised.

Why are so many people on GHash.io?  I don't know... why do so many people use Microsoft products?  Some things just defy logic Tongue

Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow!  Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets!  No SPV cheats.  No empty blocks.
DrG
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1035


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 12:13:06 AM
 #5

Have been using Eligius but want to make the most amount of money for the small investment we have.  What are the suggested pools, and is there a place to compare the potential differences on what you can make daily on avg per pool?

Thanks!
In the long run there won't be much difference in payouts between the different pools.  Some charge fees, others don't.

You could always set your miners to load balance across a number of pools to diversify your hashing power.  Here's a good thread that shows a long-running experiment on three different pools (BTCGuild, Eligius and p2pool): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=416933.0

Awesome, thanks!  I guess that's in January so not too far behind but yea looks like that answers my question.  I wish I had that many miners back then....ha.  So are they all the same type of pool, like PPLNS?

Why are there so many people on Ghash?  I personally would never go use them, but interesting non the least.
Yeah, having about 3.6TH/s 6 months ago would have been nice Smiley (About 56BTC nice).

BTCGuild is PPLNS (I believe they had a PPS pool previously that you could mine for a fee... I'd have to let someone else clarify here)
P2Pool is also PPLNS, but works based on a share chain.  When a block is found, payouts are calculated for the previous 8640 shares.
Eligius is a variant of PPS (CPPSRB) that wizkid devised.

Why are so many people on GHash.io?  I don't know... why do so many people use Microsoft products?  Some things just defy logic Tongue

Off topic but it ended up, for me at least, easier to undervolt and adjust card speeds and settings in Windows than it was in BAMT.  Linux required flashing the cards while with Windows I was able to go from stock to optimal settings in about 3 minutes.  Came in handy when switching between SHA/Scrypt and now other algos.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!