Or maybe because of Coinssource.com shitty attempt at journalism and was called out for it?
butthurt much?
so exposing facts that are visible on the blockchain for everyone to see & prove is a "shitty attempt at journalism"? When I read that article I found it indeed interesting as it
CAN be relevant when you want to know what kind of person runs ARCH. Strange move from Coinssource in my opinion, whatever the reason is. Maybe they will make a statement about it.