| 
			| 
					
								| cuz0882 (OP) | 
								|  | July 22, 2012, 11:28:03 PMLast edit: August 05, 2012, 08:04:48 PM by cuz0882
 |  | 
 
 This week's payment?
 Payments sent. |  
						|  |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| chunglam 
								Donator 
								Full Member
								    Offline 
								Activity: 229 
								Merit: 106
								   | 
								|  | July 22, 2012, 11:41:37 PM |  | 
 
 This week's payment?
 Payments sent.Received, thanks. |  
						|  |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| Shadow383 | 
								|  | July 30, 2012, 01:51:35 AM |  | 
 
 In an ideal world, what I (and I suspect many others) are looking for in mining assets is something very much like this, but as a share  rather than a bond. IPO it, set it so that half the mining proceeds (less the cost of your cheap power + 5% or so for yourself) get paid out as dividends and the rest get spent on new hardware for the company. You'd end up with quite a large hashrate quite quickly. I'd certainly be happy to invest    There's no reason why you couldn't do a second IPO    |  
						|  |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| cuz0882 (OP) | 
								|  | July 30, 2012, 04:02:25 AM |  | 
 
 In an ideal world, what I (and I suspect many others) are looking for in mining assets is something very much like this, but as a share  rather than a bond. IPO it, set it so that half the mining proceeds (less the cost of your cheap power + 5% or so for yourself) get paid out as dividends and the rest get spent on new hardware for the company. You'd end up with quite a large hashrate quite quickly. I'd certainly be happy to invest    There's no reason why you couldn't do a second IPO   You can always reinvest your dividends. If you reinvested half your dividends you should end up with nearly the same result.   |  
						|  |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| cuz0882 (OP) | 
								|  | August 05, 2012, 08:02:45 PM |  | 
 
 Payments Issued 8-5 |  
						|  |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| sunnankar 
								Legendary    Offline 
								Activity: 1031 
								Merit: 1000
								     | 
								|  | August 06, 2012, 05:52:40 AM |  | 
 
 I have made a update regarding the ASIC announcement. I set the bond price at 1.73 btc.
 Is there something unclear about the announcement that would lead to uncertainty or are these currently undervalued compared to GIGAMINING or BITBONDS? GIGAMINING    - 1.13 - .226 BITBONDS        - 0.45 - .214 HYDRO.BONDS  - 1.335 - .1335 |  
						| 
 |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| cuz0882 (OP) | 
								|  | August 06, 2012, 06:58:14 AMLast edit: August 09, 2012, 07:45:14 PM by cuz0882
 |  | 
 
 I have made a update regarding the ASIC announcement. I set the bond price at 1.73 btc.
 Is there something unclear about the announcement that would lead to uncertainty or are these currently undervalued compared to GIGAMINING or BITBONDS? GIGAMINING    - 1.13 - .226 BITBONDS        - 0.45 - .214 HYDRO.BONDS  - 1.335 - .1335Some of the older more popular bonds are being overvalued.  It's hard to believe bonds invested in gpu's would hold a value that high with ASIC's coming out.  |  
						|  |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| Jurek 
								Member     Offline 
								Activity: 117 
								Merit: 10
								   | 
								|  | August 09, 2012, 09:58:18 PM |  | 
 
 So you are offering free upgrade to 215Mh/s per bond, right? That's 1.325/215Mh/s ~ 0.006BTC per 1Mh/s after upgrade. That's about two times cheaper than what Bitbond offers. What's the catch? * Free:  2M/s BITBOND converts to 12.5Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for free* Small upgrade:  2M/s BITBOND converts to 45Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 0.25 btc
 * Large upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 450Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 5.5 btc
 
 In other words, assuming a value of 0.50BTC  per BITBOND share: Free: 12.5 Mh/s for 0.50BTC  = 25 Mh/s per BTC , or 0.0400BTC  / 1 Mh/s Small: 45 Mh/s for 0.75BTC  = 60 Mh/s per BTC , or 0.0167BTC  / 1 Mh/s Large: 450 Mh/s for 6BTC  = 75 Mh/s per BTC , 0.0133BTC  / 1 Mh/s |  
						| 
 |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| labestiol | 
								|  | August 09, 2012, 10:17:27 PM |  | 
 
 So you are offering free upgrade to 215Mh/s per bond, right? That's 1.325/215Mh/s ~ 0.006BTC per 1Mh/s after upgrade. That's about two times cheaper than what Bitbond offers. What's the catch? * Free:  2M/s BITBOND converts to 12.5Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for free* Small upgrade:  2M/s BITBOND converts to 45Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 0.25 btc
 * Large upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 450Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 5.5 btc
 
 In other words, assuming a value of 0.50BTC  per BITBOND share: Free: 12.5 Mh/s for 0.50BTC  = 25 Mh/s per BTC , or 0.0400BTC  / 1 Mh/s Small: 45 Mh/s for 0.75BTC  = 60 Mh/s per BTC , or 0.0167BTC  / 1 Mh/s Large: 450 Mh/s for 6BTC  = 75 Mh/s per BTC , 0.0133BTC  / 1 Mh/sThat's an easy one, bitbond & gigamining are making a profit from the transition to asics, he's not. (disclosure, I own some hydromining bonds) |  
						| 
 1BestioLC7YBVh8Q5LfH6RYURD6MrpP8y6 |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| cuz0882 (OP) | 
								|  | August 11, 2012, 05:57:36 AM |  | 
 
 So you are offering free upgrade to 215Mh/s per bond, right? That's 1.325/215Mh/s ~ 0.006BTC per 1Mh/s after upgrade. That's about two times cheaper than what Bitbond offers. What's the catch? * Free:  2M/s BITBOND converts to 12.5Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for free* Small upgrade:  2M/s BITBOND converts to 45Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 0.25 btc
 * Large upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 450Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 5.5 btc
 
 In other words, assuming a value of 0.50BTC  per BITBOND share: Free: 12.5 Mh/s for 0.50BTC  = 25 Mh/s per BTC , or 0.0400BTC  / 1 Mh/s Small: 45 Mh/s for 0.75BTC  = 60 Mh/s per BTC , or 0.0167BTC  / 1 Mh/s Large: 450 Mh/s for 6BTC  = 75 Mh/s per BTC , 0.0133BTC  / 1 Mh/sThis bond is only invested in butterfly singles. The bonds you are talking about are invested in gpu equipment. It's a whole different situation for them. |  
						|  |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| Jurek 
								Member     Offline 
								Activity: 117 
								Merit: 10
								   | 
								|  | August 11, 2012, 08:03:33 AM |  | 
 
 Thanks for pointing this out. I got to the bitcoin game a bit late, there is a lot to catch up! |  
						| 
 |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| Jurek 
								Member     Offline 
								Activity: 117 
								Merit: 10
								   | 
								|  | August 20, 2012, 04:47:40 AM |  | 
 
 Dividends? |  
						| 
 |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| kidgorgeous 
								Member     Offline 
								Activity: 75 
								Merit: 10
								
								
								
								
								   | 
								|  | October 01, 2012, 07:08:31 PM |  | 
 
 If the announced increase in hashrate of the butterfly SC singles does pan out (60GH versus 40 GH) will the bonds get the extra increase included in their hash rate? Would it work out to something like 320MH per bond. Also what's you SC upgrade order number? -A happy Hydrobond holder.
 
 |  
						| 
 1KHxCRniFNmS7ChiPqaewmokuCABk2PRQn |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| Jurek 
								Member     Offline 
								Activity: 117 
								Merit: 10
								   | 
								|  | October 01, 2012, 09:39:25 PM |  | 
 
 There is no such thing as a happy BOND holder... |  
						| 
 |  |  | 
| 
			| 
					
								| kjlimo 
								Legendary    Offline 
								Activity: 2142 
								Merit: 1037
								
								
								
								
								     | 
								|  | October 02, 2012, 03:36:19 AM |  | 
 
 If the announced increase in hashrate of the butterfly SC singles does pan out (60GH versus 40 GH) will the bonds get the extra increase included in their hash rate? Would it work out to something like 320MH per bond. Also what's you SC upgrade order number? -A happy Hydrobond holder.
 
 
 Yeah, I'm surprised there has been no increase in the price of this bond... guess it's time to get some more on the cheap   |  
						| 
 |  |  | 
	|  |