Flat Earth

[Vod]

The distance to the Sun as measured by a sextant is 3,000 miles, guess what that proves?

No, it's 93 million miles.  Guess what that proves?  You're a liar.  

Radar uses radio waves which are the same as light but with longer wavelengths and they are affected by perspective the same as light. The pencil beam radar used in navy missile targeting systems can paint a target ship at over 100 miles; only possible on a flat Earth.

Radar is not affected by perspective.  Read that chart in this link again, made from the people who use the technology.  They must be in the conspiracy as well!
https://midimagic.sgc-hosting.com/radarfaq.htm

 

[1714063777]

1714063777

[1714063777]

1714063777

[1714063777]

1714063777

[1714063777]

1714063777

[Vod]

Check out this awesome photo taken during the last solar eclipse.



I know you probably weren't cowering in your house like they did thousands of years ago, thinking the world was coming to an end...

You saw the eclipse.  They happen regularly.  And it proves the flat earth model with the moon and sun on opposite side is impossible.  Are you part of the conspiracy?

Pay attention to that word - impossible.  You're going to be reading that a lot until you start telling the truth.

Possibility a woman will get pregnant after sex:  15%-25%
Possibility a coin will land heads:  51%
Possibility there is no god:  99% (you can't disprove a fairy tale)
Possibility the earth is flat:  0%

Now - what kind of idiot continues to investigate something that has a 0% chance of being true - something impossible by definition?

 

[notbatman]

The distance to the Sun as measured by a sextant is 3,000 miles, guess what that proves?

"... No, it's 93 million miles. ..."

Just rope yourself. Anybody else who thinks a sextant lies about the angles it measures please kill yourself too, thanks.

[Vod]

The distance to the Sun as measured by a sextant is 3,000 miles, guess what that proves?

"... No, it's 93 million miles. ..."

Just rope yourself. Anybody else who thinks a sextant lies about the angles it measures please kill yourself too, thanks.

The sextant shows the sun at 93 million miles.  It doesn't lie.  No one needs to kill themselves over your lies.

I'm sorry for providing so many facts that prove you wrong, but you've been trolling for 600 pages.  I know proof and facts won't stop your lies, but at least it gives me something to reference instead of typing the same thing over and over.

Now that we know the sun is 93 million miles away, let's chat about the moon!

Moon soil is not very reflective.  Luckily the men who walked on the moon left a mirror there.  Anyone can shoot a laser at the moon and have it bounce back.

If you try it, you expect the light to be returned in 0.03 seconds right?  (3,000 miles)

But it takes the light 1.3 seconds to return, showing the moon a LOT further away - much less distance than the sun, but still far outside the imaginary dome.

Maybe light is part of the conspiracy as well?  

 

[Vod]

Don't know where you live, but I guess you have never see the northern lights.

They are caused by ions from the sun interacting with the earth's magnetic field.

Sphere Earth is filled with liquid metal, and it rotates inside turning our planet into a giant magnet.

I have seen the northern lights thousands of times.  That's yet another experiment I have done myself that proves the earth is rotating.

You have never done any experiment that proves the earth is flat, because they don't exist.

 

[notbatman]

The distance to the Sun as measured by a sextant is 3,000 miles, guess what that proves?

"... No, it's 93 million miles. ..."

Just rope yourself. Anybody else who thinks a sextant lies about the angles it measures please kill yourself too, thanks.

"... The sextant shows the sun at 93 million miles. ..."

What part of rope yourself don't you understand?

Anybody with a sextant can confirm it's about 3,000 miles, this is documented and there's nothing left for you to argue, please kill yourself.

[Vod]

What part of rope yourself don't you understand?

I understand you are as truthful with that comment as you are with the rest of this thread.  I'm feeding you - you'd miss me.   

Anybody with a sextant can confirm it's about 3,000 miles, this is documented and there's nothing left for you to argue, please kill yourself.

Anybody with a sextant can confirm it's about 93,000,000 miles, actually.  You can buy a sextant and try it yourself.  That would be a good experiment for you, as you would learn that not everything you read is the truth.

I can tell you are getting tired - want to continue our discussion tomorrow?

 

[Astargath]

Check out this awesome photo taken during the last solar eclipse.



I know you probably weren't cowering in your house like they did thousands of years ago, thinking the world was coming to an end...

You saw the eclipse.  They happen regularly.  And it proves the flat earth model with the moon and sun on opposite side is impossible.  Are you part of the conspiracy?

Pay attention to that word - impossible.  You're going to be reading that a lot until you start telling the truth.

Possibility a woman will get pregnant after sex:  15%-25%
Possibility a coin will land heads:  51%
Possibility there is no god:  99% (you can't disprove a fairy tale)
Possibility the earth is flat:  0%

Now - what kind of idiot continues to investigate something that has a 0% chance of being true - something impossible by definition?

 

Notice how he avoids talking about this.

[notbatman]

... You saw the eclipse.  They happen regularly.  And it proves the flat earth model ...

Notice how he avoids talking about this.

It took a few minuets to brew the coffee. Did you know that monkeys giving birth to humans only happens on a globe Earth?


Image: Monkey

So you not going to push the Moon bounce LASER test, smart move considering they were bouncing LASERs off the Moon before Apollo 11. I'm not sure how you were going prove their LIDAR isn't fucking pwned with the latest Intel Management Engine 0-day exploit straight outta Israel. Also it's not like just anybody can afford to get a giant LASER.


Image: Giant LASER

OK, so a selenelion eclipse or so-called horizontal eclipse with the Sun and Moon both visible in the sky above the viewer is evidence (although not completely conclusive) the Earth is flat and motionless. I suspect atmospheric refraction on a globe can't fully explain the documented position of the eclipsed Moon together with the Sun in the sky.


^{Image Source: https://mashable.com/2014/10/06/total-lunar-eclipse-selenelion-october-2014/}

"Wednesday's Lunar Eclipse Is Technically Impossible" --  Joe Rao, SPACE.com

In regards to the Solar eclipse there's nothing about it that excludes a flat Earth, the Sun is a projected object and is being obscured by something. This object causing the eclipse is referred to as the "Black Sun" and is unknown. It could be a filter or some kind of function of the projector. What I can say as fact is that the Moon is missing in photographs of the partial phase and that falsifies the globe.


^{Image Source: https://youtu.be/PrWM0lpEKrk}

[exemplaar]

Don't know where you live, but I guess you have never see the northern lights.

They are caused by ions from the sun interacting with the earth's magnetic field.

Sphere Earth is filled with liquid metal, and it rotates inside turning our planet into a giant magnet.

I have seen the northern lights thousands of times.  That's yet another experiment I have done myself that proves the earth is rotating.

You have never done any experiment that proves the earth is flat, because they don't exist.

 

Thanks for the beautiful pic of aurora borealis - great proof of flat earth,The Firmament and God's Throne above.
And nice fairy tale copy pasted from monkeyman science(description below). More lies from nasa.

Learn here what aurora borealis really is:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P86E3_CJhG8

And immediately I was in the spirit: and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne.
And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.

[Vod]

Notice how he avoids talking about this.

What can he say?   Unless he denies the northern lights exist, he has been proven a liar, again.

I can keep going for pages on how flat earth is impossible.  

Learn here what aurora borealis really is:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P86E3_CJhG8

Did you watch that video?  He says over and over "I think" and "I believe".

Billions of people believe in a sky fairy.  We've shown that possibility is so close to zero it might as well be zero.

We know the northern lights form because the earth is rotating.

 

[notbatman]

"We"

Hang yourself.

[Vod]

It took a few minuets to brew the coffee. Did you know that monkeys giving birth to humans only happens on a globe Earth?

The only place that would happen would be in a fairy tale - like the bible.  Monkeys give birth to monkeys....

So you not going to push the Moon bounce LASER test, smart move considering they were bouncing LASERs off the Moon before Apollo 11. I'm not sure how you were going prove their LIDAR isn't fucking pwned with the latest Intel Management Engine 0-day exploit straight outta Israel. Also it's not like just anybody can afford to get a giant LASER.

Bounce it off what?  Do you understand what light is and how it reflects?

OK, so a selenelion eclipse or so-called horizontal eclipse with the Sun and Moon both visible in the sky above the viewer is evidence the Earth is flat and motionless. I suspect atmospheric refraction on a globe can't fully explain the documented position of the eclipsed Moon together with the Sun in the sky.

According to what you've posted many times, the sun cannot be seen at night because of the atmospheric density.  So if you can see the dimmer moon during the day, you were lying about the density, weren't you?  This simple fact proves your flat earth map is impossible.

In regards to the Solar eclipse there's nothing about it that excludes a flat Earth, the Sun is a projected object and is being obscured by something.

So you haven't made up magic yet for why that happens?

Hang yourself.

Sorry - don't be mad up me for calling you a liar.  At least think of some believable lies...

I have won the argument liar.  Give it up.

 

[exemplaar]

Haha vod, your "attempts" are futile.

There is no single proof for a spinning ball earth flying through imaginary space with ridiculous speeds. Heliocentric model is a lie. Earth is flat motionless realm covered by a dome-firmament, The Handywork of God.  

Bonus video for vod - nasa's creepy disused factory with Canadian astronot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kmLC7siBt4&t

Bottom line, nasa lies:

[Vod]

Haha vod, your "attempts" are futile.

There is no single proof for a spinning ball earth flying through imaginary space with ridiculous speeds. Heliocentric model is a lie. Earth is flat motionless realm covered by a dome-firmament, The Handywork of God.  

Futile? What I said can be proven over and over, and I keep winning every conversation.

I can't help you if you believe in magical sky fairy.  You can just explain anything away as "god did it".  That's imagination - not proof.

Thank goodness people like you are dropping in numbers due to the internet and the easy spread of knowledge.  Your copy/paste "no thought needed" memes are boring.

 

[notbatman]

"... The only place that would happen would be in a fairy tale - like the bible.  Monkeys give birth to monkeys.... ..."

A glimmer of hope, a partial application of logic?

"... Bounce it off what?  Do you understand what light is and how it reflects? ..."

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

"... According to what you've posted many times, the sun cannot be seen at night because of the atmospheric density.  So if you can see the dimmer moon during the day, you were lying about the density, weren't you?  This simple fact proves your flat earth map is impossible. ..."

Wow selective memory, awesome. My answer is the same as the last time you tried frame my statement by omitting perspective and convergence. If you've accounted for those two effects via altitude and magnification only then will the atmosphere be your limiting factor. There's a lot more atmosphere to look through when viewing objects on the horizon then there is looking up in regards to your dim Moon hypothesis.

"... So you haven't made up magic yet for why that happens? ..."

The Black Sun isn't mystical enough for you?

[Vod]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

[BADecker]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

Now Vod. It was his grandfather who started the green cheese theory. Then the green mold turned brown, and it wouldn't work anymore. The whole FE idea is there to get around the idea that the moon isn't moldy cheese after all.

[notbatman]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

As the number of experiments you suggest approaches infinity, the possibility of a globe approaches zero. Also you seem to conflate researching documented information and facts with stories written by hacks, quacks and crackpot scientists. You keep repeating these same stories that are beamed into your head via TV, can't you understand everything on TV is fake news and the government is in on it? Can you tell me the official 911 narrative resembles anything that looks like a fact? Do you think that corporations put fluoride and roundup in your beer because it helps increase your testosterone level?

[joerogers8]

How many times have I explained the Moon is an object holographically projected off of a concave mirrored dome? Your memory is so short it's almost non-existent, the keyword here is "mirror".

How many times have I explained we know the moon orbits a sphere earth at 240,000 miles?  Is your memory that short?  The keyword is "gravity".

How many experiments do I have to suggest to you before you get curious enough to investigate yourself?

Next you will claim the moon is made of green cheese, because you read that somewhere.

 

Can you guess the distance to the Moon when you bust out the sextant and measure it? Gravity is an unproven theory like the big bang, outer space, heliocentrism, the globe, dinosaurs, evolution and historical time-frames greater than 10,000 years.

As the number of experiments you suggest approaches infinity, the possibility of a globe approaches zero. Also you seem to conflate researching documented information and facts with stories written by hacks, quacks and crackpot scientists. You keep repeating these same stories that are beamed into your head via TV, can't you understand everything on TV is fake news and the government is in on it? Can you tell me the official 911 narrative resembles anything that looks like a fact? Do you think that corporations put fluoride and roundup in your beer because it helps increase your testosterone level?

Shit.  I have my crash helmet on for when Vod tells us 9/11 was done by Arab Hijackers and we are complete lunatics for not believing the government on that one.  

So far badecker is in the lead with the claim that water in a glass is on the exterior of the interior of my glass.  Thus proving liquids take the form of the exterior of a shape.  

Vod you can do it!!  Get back in the lead.  

Somehow Suchmoon is looking to be the smartest in all of this by proving a globe earth because he is able to see ships disappear behind the water curve while standing at sea level.  Even though we all know they can be brought back into view with binoculars or a zoom camera.  In the world of globe earth just being wrong by the least amount can put you in 1st place.  Well done Suchmoon!