BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3724
Merit: 1362
|
|
October 12, 2019, 02:52:02 PM |
|
^^^ The point isn't evolution in this thread, the point is flat earth. Flat earth can easily be proven false by doing the following in many places on the earth. Since you claim the sun is about 3,000 miles in diameter, stand a person directly under the middle of the sun when it is directly overhead. Have him look straight up, so that he sees the mid-point of the sun. Next, stand a couple of guys 3,000 miles apart, so that a straight line between the two guys passes through the guy in the middle, and so that both of the guys are 1,500 miles from the guy in the middle. When the two guys look straight up, they don't see the edges of the sun as geometry says they should on a flat earth. Rather, they always see the middle of the sun just like the guy in the middle. This shows that the sun is way larger than the 3,000 miles FE people suggest. In fact, it is so large that it has to be well beyond any possible height that would make it to be inside any possible dome that would cover a flat earth in the way FE people suggest. Whatever calculations FE people are using to determine that the GE is really a FE, those calculations are missing all kinds of important parts to make them realistic. The earth is a globe (GE). But even if it isn't a globe, it absolutely isn't anything like flat, or anything like FE people suggest it to be.
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
October 12, 2019, 03:12:13 PM Last edit: October 12, 2019, 03:43:58 PM by notbatman |
|
^^^ BTW champ I claim now and have argued with you multiple times that, the Sun is directly measured to be 32 nautical miles across.
|
|
|
|
FlamingFingers
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 288
Trident Protocol | Simple «buy-hold-earn» system!
|
|
October 12, 2019, 05:18:56 PM |
|
Any new photoshopped NASA photos ? keep the thread alive
scientifically it has been proven that the earth is not flat, with some evidence and not photoshopped photos, but as usual there will definitely be an objection to it, a flat earth cannot revolve round a sun, that alone should have cleared the doubt of L those doubting that earth is spherical
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3724
Merit: 1362
|
|
October 12, 2019, 10:46:17 PM Last edit: October 13, 2019, 03:26:29 AM by BADecker |
|
Thank you for destroying flat earth for us. It's so much easier when you help us do it. Simply go to my post here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52735246#msg52735246, and replace the 3,000 miles with 32 miles. And replace the 1,500 miles with 16 miles, and use transits for accuracy, and whoopie doo! You get the same proof that FE doesn't exist. Except that it is easier to do with your 32 nm. So, thanks for explaining.
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
October 13, 2019, 08:05:18 AM |
|
@FlamingFingers, the earth is motionless; it does not revolve.
|
|
|
|
hornetsnest
|
|
October 13, 2019, 11:59:36 AM |
|
I took a measurement of the sun today and it was no more than 1 inch across in diameter if that helps with todays theories
|
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
October 13, 2019, 12:39:19 PM |
|
@FlamingFingers, the earth is motionless; it does not revolve.
I thought we had that covered, only your brain cells are truly motionless in the entire universe Batty. Brain dead to be exact, but still breathing. I see it as mere confirmation that the universe is expanding along with your amazing stupidity which seems to also be endless. I took a measurement of the sun today and it was no more than 1 inch across in diameter if that helps with todays theories Ha, try to make a measurement of Batty's brain cell activity - you fucking can't - it's a trap - there isn't any.
|
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
October 13, 2019, 03:02:20 PM Last edit: October 13, 2019, 05:26:58 PM by notbatman |
|
@hornetsnest, 0.53°. edit: Alex, I'll take triangles for $500 please! edit2: No wait Alex, you don't even need to ask, I've already got it! What is the angular resolution limit of the human eye?
|
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
October 13, 2019, 11:16:14 PM |
|
What is the angular resolution limit of the human eye?
|
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
October 14, 2019, 01:25:09 AM Last edit: October 14, 2019, 07:35:38 AM by notbatman |
|
^^^ If you want to make a claim about what is being observed it helps to understand how vision works. The angular resolution limit of the eye, camera, etc.. making the observation can be and is a factor for some observations. Assuming 20/20 vision, at distances beyond 1/2 nautical miles a 1 foot object is too small to see; its angular size is smaller than 1 minute and it's not visible. When observing the Sun its angular size appears to be ~0.53°. Knowing that the human eye has an angular resolution limit of 1 minute allows for the calculation of the diameter of the Sun. If perspective and atmospheric refraction are accounted for then ~0.53° equates to a solar diameter of 32 nautical miles (36.8 statute miles or 59.3 kilometres) at a ratio of 1 nautical mile per minute. Ref: Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. p. 54. ISBN 978-0444511416.
|
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
October 14, 2019, 08:54:27 AM |
|
I get dumber every time I read one of your lobotomized epic posts Batty.
- Does the donkey fly? - Of course it flies, and it's got 2 fucking huge wings Batty.
|
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4256
Merit: 3154
|
|
October 14, 2019, 09:56:47 AM |
|
Knowing that the human eye has an angular resolution limit of 1 minute allows for the calculation of the diameter of the Sun.
I don't understand how the angular resolution of the eye can be a factor in the diameter of the sun. Also, every eye's angular resolution is different and a camera can have a higher resolution than the eye, so, wouldn't that affect the diameter? Sorry if you have explained it already. A summary would suffice.
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
October 14, 2019, 10:12:19 AM |
|
A summary would suffice.
From Batty? Batty has major comprehension problems, he can't get his head straight, let alone write a credible summary of anything. There: Assuming 20/20 vision, at distances beyond 1/2 nautical miles a 1 foot object is too small to see; its angular size is smaller than 1 minute and it's not visible.
I mean what kind of idiot misreads this: The human eye has an angular resolution of about 1 arcminute (0.02 degrees or 0.0003 radians) which enables us to distinguish things that are 30 centimetres apart at a distance of 1 kilometer.
|
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
October 14, 2019, 10:33:02 AM Last edit: October 14, 2019, 04:00:02 PM by notbatman |
|
@Cryptotourist, Here's a picture, it's flies in the face of a donkey. If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine. @odolvlobo, The diameter of the Sun is obviously a fixed value, only the minimum maximum distance you can observe a 1 foot object changes with a change in the resolution limit. It's like measuring a an object with yard stick and a metric pair of calipers, you end up with about the same result it's just that one has a higher resolution.
|
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
October 14, 2019, 11:39:59 AM |
|
If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine.
It is visible, you twat. Sorry Batty, I can't really argue with a fool (yeah, you).
|
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
October 14, 2019, 12:07:38 PM |
|
The horizon line is everything squished together, the distance to this line if it's not obscured by a narrow band superior mirage changes depending on the angular resolution limit. Atmospheric refraction not withstanding no objects are visible past this line.
|
|
|
|
Cryptotourist
|
|
October 14, 2019, 01:02:56 PM |
|
You sound like a fucking genius there Batty, too bad you understand zip shit of the things you write.
|
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.
|
|
|
sirazimuth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3304
Merit: 3407
born once atheist
|
|
October 14, 2019, 03:16:03 PM |
|
You sound like a fucking genius there Batty, too bad you understand zip shit of the things you write.
Actually I beg to differ. Batty understands the shit he writes is just that... shit...bullshit. Pure utter bullshit. He just has this obsession with trolling and getting attention...and what better way to elicit responses to his nonsense than to have a 4 year long farcical thread claiming the earth is a dome covered pancake and the sun is 32 miles wide. Can you imagine this character IRL blathering on about flat earth proof, fish eyed lenses, perspective, NASA conspiracies, curved water and all the other retarded drivel he's been banging on about for past 4 plus years in here? He'd be thrown in the frickin loony bin.
|
Bitcoin...the future of all monetary transactions...and always will be
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3724
Merit: 1362
|
|
October 14, 2019, 03:47:07 PM |
|
@Cryptotourist, Here's a picture, it's flies in the face of a donkey. If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine. @odolvlobo, The diameter of the Sun is obviously a fixed value, only the minimum distance you can observe a 1 foot object changes with a change in the resolution limit. It's like measuring a an object with yard stick and a metric pair of calipers, you end up with about the same result it's just that one has a higher resolution. We are having so much fun, aren't we... LOL! Doctors remove 4 bees found living under woman’s eyelid — they survived on her tears - https://globalnews.ca/news/5151715/bees-living-eyelid-drinking-tears/. All your "eye" talk doesn't have anything to do with FE, when you check out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52735246#msg52735246 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52738726#msg52738726. But it is fun playing, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
October 14, 2019, 04:12:39 PM Last edit: October 14, 2019, 06:26:19 PM by notbatman |
|
^^^ I actually meant to say maximum distance in the statement above. The angular resolution limit can be used as standard to gauge an objects actual size with. Sailors use the ratio of 1 minute for every 1 nautical mile, this rule of thumb is standard practice.
|
|
|
|
|