Bitcoin Forum
December 08, 2019, 02:17:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 [804] 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Flat Earth  (Read 1085964 times)
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1442



View Profile
November 12, 2019, 04:11:52 AM
Last edit: November 12, 2019, 04:29:27 AM by odolvlobo
Merited by TwitchySeal (2)
 #16061

^^^ Can you give an example of a ridiculous assertion that he made? What exactly do you feel annoyed you the most?

The only thing that annoyed me was near the end when he started rattling off observations made by other people and expected her to accept them. I enjoyed the placement of the clip the Big Short.

Anyway, here are some of the ridiculous assertions:

22:19 — Gravity is strong enough to hold the moon in orbit but astronauts can float about.

29:05 - There’s a problem with it because the earth is too small.

30:20 - The moon was photographed at the same time in Australia and Florida. How is that possible? … One of these locations shouldn’t be able to see it.

33:12 - This is the only phenomenon in our experience here in this reality where the shade is smaller than the object casting it. So you can do a million experiments  with shadows. The shadow is never smaller than the object casting it.

50:35 - I’m not claiming anything … I'm just asking questions (which was not true) ...

He asserted that the earth was flat.
can you back that claim with a video timestamp? I'm curious as I don't recall him directly making that assertion.

While he may not have directly asserted that the earth is flat, he certainly was presenting evidence that it is flat.

Buy stuff on Amazon at a discount with bitcoins or convert Amazon points to bitcoins: Purse.io
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
1575814634
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575814634

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575814634
Reply with quote  #2

1575814634
Report to moderator
1575814634
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575814634

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575814634
Reply with quote  #2

1575814634
Report to moderator
1575814634
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575814634

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575814634
Reply with quote  #2

1575814634
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1575814634
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575814634

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575814634
Reply with quote  #2

1575814634
Report to moderator
1575814634
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575814634

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575814634
Reply with quote  #2

1575814634
Report to moderator
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1442



View Profile
November 12, 2019, 04:26:28 AM
Merited by TwitchySeal (2)
 #16062

^^^ Odd, I don't recall him mentioning NASA during the interview. Can you provide a timestamp for when he talks about them?

29:02 - I’m sure this is just an error with NASA.

40:07 - You say its healthy to trust photos and images from bodies like NASA.

56:50 - NASA said they can’t go to the moon because they lost the data.

Buy stuff on Amazon at a discount with bitcoins or convert Amazon points to bitcoins: Purse.io
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1029



View Profile
November 12, 2019, 12:39:48 PM
Last edit: November 12, 2019, 01:58:16 PM by notbatman
 #16063

^^^ Well I stand corrected, it looks like NASA did get mentioned a few times. However, the instances don't really back up TwitchySeal's assertions regarding the interviewer. Clearly Twitchy was just talking shit to dissuade anybody from clicking on the video and seeing one of his high priestesses dragged through the mud. But hey, good work standing up for your little buddy and finding those timestamps skipper!

That interview was a beautiful example IMO of an astrophysicist getting called out on their absolute nonsense; it showed how they can't defend against even modest criticism. If she wasn't totally full of horse pucky then she could have just answered the questions instead of rage-quitting and demanding that nobody ever see the interview.

These vampires burst into flames under direct sunlight, cheers to the author of the video!
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1138


View Profile
November 12, 2019, 03:16:14 PM
 #16064

^^^ Well I stand corrected, it looks like NASA did get mentioned a few times. However, the instances don't really back up TwitchySeal's assertions regarding the interviewer. Clearly Twitchy was just talking shit to dissuade anybody from clicking on the video and seeing one of his high priestesses dragged through the mud. But hey, good work standing up for your little buddy and finding those timestamps skipper!

That interview was a beautiful example IMO of an astrophysicist getting called out on their absolute nonsense; it showed how they can't defend against even modest criticism. If she wasn't totally full of horse pucky then she could have just answered the questions instead of rage-quitting and demanding that nobody ever see the interview.

These vampires burst into flames under direct sunlight, cheers to the author of the video!

This shows nothing. She might have been having an off day. Astrophysicist aren't necessarily expert debaters. She might be a plant. Much of every field of physics isn't known. So, saying something is proven because other things aren't known is simply foolish.

Why do you constantly use political science to try to proof other science? Political science says that you should lie as cleverly as you can... but anything to outtalk your opponent. That's about all you do regarding FE. You don't have any FE proof of FE.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1029



View Profile
November 12, 2019, 03:32:21 PM
 #16065

^^^ That's where you're wrong friendo, a simple distance to the horizon test is enough proof to debunk the globe. Everything out of an astrophysicist's mouth after that is falsified nonsense.

NASA is a propaganda agency run by satanists.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1138


View Profile
November 12, 2019, 05:20:52 PM
 #16066

^^^ That's where you're wrong friendo, a simple distance to the horizon test is enough proof to debunk the globe. Everything out of an astrophysicist's mouth after that is falsified nonsense.

NASA is a propaganda agency run by satanists.

Assuming that you are simply making a mistake, and not being a troll or deceptive in some way, your quoted post^^ is exactly why you are wrong. People long ago saw anomalies in the simple tests. So they developed complex ones. The complex tests prove emphatically that the earth is a globe, or nearly such.

Forget the simple tests. They are misleading you.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
Ucy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 298



View Profile
November 12, 2019, 06:04:24 PM
 #16067

Could the Flat Earth be in a bubble(shield) placed by its CREATOR for our total protection?

Could what I perceived as dome be a bubble for full protection? Was told about the protection, and I immediately perceived a transparent dome shaped stuff... Maybe I didn't perceive the full picture...



BIG WINNER!
[15.00000000 BTC]


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄███
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████
██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░
▀██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
▄████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄
▀██░████████░███████░█▀
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████
▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1138


View Profile
November 12, 2019, 07:23:58 PM
 #16068

Could the Flat Earth be in a bubble(shield) placed by its CREATOR for our total protection?

Could what I perceived as dome be a bubble for full protection? Was told about the protection, and I immediately perceived a transparent dome shaped stuff... Maybe I didn't perceive the full picture...

The bubble is the envelope of the atmosphere. The Van Allen Belts protect from the radiation of the sun. The gigantic size of space makes the odds of a large body hitting the earth to be unlikely.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1029



View Profile
November 13, 2019, 02:18:17 AM
 #16069

^^^ That's where you're wrong friendo, a simple distance to the horizon test is enough proof to debunk the globe. Everything out of an astrophysicist's mouth after that is falsified nonsense.

NASA is a propaganda agency run by satanists.

Assuming that you are simply making a mistake, and not being a troll or deceptive in some way, your quoted post^^ is exactly why you are wrong. People long ago saw anomalies in the simple tests. So they developed complex ones. The complex tests prove emphatically that the earth is a globe, or nearly such.

Forget the simple tests. They are misleading you.

Cool

OK boomer,

   The super-zoom cameras used in the "simple" test are complex new technology, your "but, but, long ago goy" doesn't cut it. We've measured the distance to the horizon with a P900 and it's not consistent with the globe model.

TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 877



View Profile
November 13, 2019, 03:41:03 AM
 #16070

We've measured the distance to the horizon with a P900 and it's not consistent with the globe model.

Who is 'we'.

notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1029



View Profile
November 13, 2019, 03:47:52 AM
 #16071

Those of us who know the earth is flat.

TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 877



View Profile
November 13, 2019, 04:01:15 AM
 #16072

Those of us who know the earth is flat.



Na, not everyone that 'knows' the earth is flat has actually done any experiments.  But those that did, what are their qualifications?
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1029



View Profile
November 13, 2019, 04:35:10 AM
Last edit: November 13, 2019, 04:59:04 AM by notbatman
 #16073

^^^ Whatever you need them to be, the scientific method isn't biased. The earth is observably flat as far as the eye can see and the P900 has 83x optical zoom.

A. the earth is 83x times bigger

B. the earth is flat

Choose one and only one!



hint:

  "...but it's, it's has to be"
TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 877



View Profile
November 13, 2019, 05:19:31 AM
Last edit: November 13, 2019, 05:33:33 AM by TwitchySeal
 #16074

^^^ Whatever you need them to be, the scientific method isn't biased. The earth is observably flat as far as the eye can see and the P900 has 83x optical zoom.

A. the earth is 83x times bigger

B. the earth is flat

Choose one and only one!



hint:

  "...but it's, it's has to be"

I guess I have to choose A since it's an incomplete statement and B is false.

How do you know that the Nikon has an 83x zoom?  


Now your turn:

A. The Earth is round

B. The Earth is not flat

Choose one and only one!
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1138


View Profile
November 13, 2019, 11:30:02 AM
 #16075

^^^ Whatever you need them to be, the scientific method isn't biased. The earth is observably flat as far as the eye can see and the P900 has 83x optical zoom.

A. the earth is 83x times bigger

B. the earth is flat

Choose one and only one!

https://i.gyazo.com/c9a61bdf7cc2379dc04b0e1b95cb24e3.jpg

hint:

  "...but it's, it's has to be"

I guess I have to choose A since it's an incomplete statement and B is false.

How do you know that the Nikon has an 83x zoom?  


Now your turn:

A. The Earth is round

B. The Earth is not flat

Choose one and only one!

But "A" above can mean flat or globe. Consider a pizza or a coin. You gotta be more exact with notbatman.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
styca
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 326


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile WWW
November 13, 2019, 09:18:33 PM
Last edit: November 13, 2019, 09:33:18 PM by styca
 #16076

^^^ Whatever you need them to be, the scientific method isn't biased. The earth is observably flat as far as the eye can see and the P900 has 83x optical zoom.

A. the earth is 83x times bigger

B. the earth is flat

Choose one and only one!



hint:

  "...but it's, it's has to be"

I guess I have to choose A since it's an incomplete statement and B is false.

How do you know that the Nikon has an 83x zoom?  


Now your turn:

A. The Earth is round

B. The Earth is not flat

Choose one and only one!

But "A" above can mean flat or globe. Consider a pizza or a coin. You gotta be more exact with notbatman.

Cool


Fallen bananas prove that the surface of the Earth is curved. Unfortunately they also prove that it has a circumference of, well, about 4 or 5 banana lengths.
Unless you find relatively straight bananas - but then that evidence would contradict my own theory, so I would be tempted to dismiss it without any consideration.



BIG WINNER!
[15.00000000 BTC]


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄███
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████
██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░
▀██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
▄████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄
▀██░████████░███████░█▀
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████
▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
hornetsnest
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 485
Merit: 173


View Profile
November 13, 2019, 11:10:46 PM
 #16077

notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1029



View Profile
November 14, 2019, 12:11:05 AM
Last edit: November 14, 2019, 12:22:16 AM by notbatman
 #16078

^^^ Well it's definitely round, it looks kinda flat though.



What Mars really looks like. Nikon P900 -- https://youtu.be/G1lAYpT-dyw



@TwitchySeal The P900 has 83x optical zoom, it's in the specifications...  Roll Eyes
TwitchySeal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 877



View Profile
November 14, 2019, 12:31:58 AM
 #16079

@TwitchySeal The P900 has 83x optical zoom, it's in the specifications...  Roll Eyes

So because it says it on the box you assume it must be true?

You sure Nikon isn't run by a bunch of Satanists that want to make people believe the earth is flat?
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1029



View Profile
November 14, 2019, 01:39:19 AM
 #16080

^^^ They must be collaborating with gyroscope manufactures if that's the case, because a mechanical gyroscope proven to respond to a 15 deg/hr rotation shows the earth does not spin.

The idea of rotating 1k/mph while moving in an elliptical orbit at 67k/mph is fucking mad.
Pages: « 1 ... 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 [804] 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!