Bitcoin Forum
April 07, 2020, 07:31:49 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 [833] 834 835 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Flat Earth  (Read 1092518 times)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 2244



View Profile
February 22, 2020, 03:33:38 AM
 #16641

NASA's spokesman says it's photoshopped because it has to be, there are no real photographs of the globe.

show us that spokesperson making that statement.


I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1586287909
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1586287909

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1586287909
Reply with quote  #2

1586287909
Report to moderator
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 11:45:16 AM
Last edit: February 22, 2020, 12:48:41 PM by BADecker
 #16642

NASA's spokesman says it's photoshopped because it has to be, there are no real photographs of the globe.

show us that spokesperson making that statement.



Right. And show us the court documents where it was proven to be the truth. If not, maybe it is all hearsay.

17) “Olber’s Paradox” states that if there were billions of stars which are suns the night sky would be filled completely with light. As Edgar Allen Poe said, “Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present us a uniform luminosity, since there could exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star.” In fact Olber’s “Paradox” is no more a paradox than George Airy’s experiment was a “failure.” Both are actually excellent refutations of the heliocentric spinning ball model.

We don't know what stars are. We are so far away from stars, that for all we know, the ones we see are black holes that we see from one of the poles where light escapes. And the others are black holes we see from the equator, where light doesn't escape because of centrifugal force.

We don't know enough to even guess why we don't see the stars that exist out there.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
serbad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 421
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 01:26:08 PM
 #16643

Imagination not data keeps you dreaming.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umeHIxIdKxE
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1032



View Profile
February 22, 2020, 04:12:07 PM
Last edit: February 22, 2020, 05:16:12 PM by notbatman
 #16644

NASA's spokesman says it's photoshopped because it has to be, there are no real photographs of the globe.

show us that spokesperson making that statement.




Audio Interview: https://youtu.be/Qghv4en5res

Link: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 04:57:06 PM
 #16645

NASA's spokesman says it's photoshopped because it has to be, there are no real photographs of the globe.

show us that spokesperson making that statement.




Audio Interview: https://youtu.be/Qghv4en5res

Link: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html

LOL! You are such a puzzle. You find a NASA guy who takes the photos of the globe, and makes them into a video that displays the whole globe better. You make him out to be your hero. Then you try to say that the earth is flat.

Maybe you are like a quantum computer qubit... off at the same time you are on, and on at the same time you are off. Cheesy

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 05:04:27 PM
 #16646

Imagination not data keeps you dreaming.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umeHIxIdKxE

Around the World In 80 Days (1956) Official Trailer - Cantinflas, Jules Verne Movie HD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjiCO8k6Jhg


Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1032



View Profile
February 22, 2020, 05:06:01 PM
 #16647

When the clouds are painted on it's, it's not a photograph.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 05:15:45 PM
 #16648

When the clouds are taken off a photograph so that the ground can be colored a bit better, and then the clouds are replaced onto the photo... who cares? It's simply a better picture of what was there in the first place.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1032



View Profile
February 22, 2020, 05:25:27 PM
 #16649

When the clouds are painted on it's, it's not a photograph.
.
serbad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 421
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 05:28:43 PM
Last edit: February 22, 2020, 10:11:36 PM by serbad
 #16650

He got alot of Faith.!................... but only in nasa.

edit:
(and certain artists)


I sometimes dig for buttered rolls,
Or set limed twigs for crabs;
I sometimes search the grassy knolls
For wheels of hansom-cabs.
And that's the way" (he gave a wink)
"By which I get my wealth--
And very gladly will I drink
Your honor's noble health


I heard him then, for I had just
Completed my design
To keep the Menai bridge from rust
By boiling it in wine.
I thanked him much for telling me
The way he got his wealth,
But chiefly for his wish that he
Might drink my noble health.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1547



View Profile
February 22, 2020, 10:31:07 PM
 #16651

I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation

Buy stuff on Amazon at a discount with bitcoins or convert Amazon points to bitcoins: Purse.io
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 10:47:25 PM
 #16652

When the clouds are painted on it's, it's not a photograph.
.

When you photograph a painting, it is a photograph.     Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
serbad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 421
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 10:56:44 PM
 #16653

I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
From where ever you are on earth up is up:    plants grow up in the material world.. its where we are on this earth...or  this density... things above this density are of less density and things below us are of more density in relation to Aether
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 11:06:34 PM
 #16654

I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
From where ever you are on earth up is up:    plants grow up in the material world.. its where we are on this earth...or  this density... things above this density are of less density and things below us are of more density in relation to Aether


But if you are up in America, Chinese and Aussies are down. Of course, they don't know it.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
serbad
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 421
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 22, 2020, 11:07:48 PM
 #16655

I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
From where ever you are on earth up is up:    plants grow up in the material world.. its where we are on this earth...or  this density... things above this density are of less density and things below us are of more density in relation to Aether


But if you are up in America, Chinese and Aussies are down. Of course, they don't know it.

Cool
Only on a globe.!
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 23, 2020, 12:23:44 AM
 #16656

I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
From where ever you are on earth up is up:    plants grow up in the material world.. its where we are on this earth...or  this density... things above this density are of less density and things below us are of more density in relation to Aether


But if you are up in America, Chinese and Aussies are down. Of course, they don't know it.

Cool
Only on a globe.!

Or a cube.      Grin

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1032



View Profile
February 23, 2020, 09:29:39 AM
Last edit: February 23, 2020, 09:44:53 AM by notbatman
 #16657

I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
 |
  |


"Space and time", "planets", "galaxies" and "gravity"? In other words fucking nonsense!

The Coulomb force (electromagnetism) ultimately drives any material particles in motion. "Space and time" along with relativistic "gravity" is a concept from Relativity (1905) and was falsified by D&P Sagnac (1939) at the University of Paris. What was proven, is that there is a static aether.

The concept of "planets" as giant heavenly spheres reflecting sunlight over a distances of up to six billion miles and, the idea that the Earth is one of those balls of shit is batshit insanity! "galaxies" trillions upon trillions miles away? Go back to sleep man!

The small lights you see moving in the sky are, #1 just small lights (not giant balls of shit) and, #2 are actually moving. To claim the stars are stationary and it's you that that's moving is nonsense, like the legs of your horse moving the ground below them.

Le Sage's theory goes in the same basket as BADecker, who is permanently cucked on the heavenly spheres! If your answer to anything about the earth or the heavens involves ideas, concepts and theories from the satanic priests and their giant balls of shit then, you also go into that basket!

These satanic priests are part of a cabal created by the Kabbalists. Einstein was both a Jew and a Jesuit!
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 23, 2020, 02:17:01 PM
 #16658

I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
 |
  |
https://i.imgur.com/nRzj0Ru.jpg

"Space and time", "planets", "galaxies" and "gravity"? In other words fucking nonsense!

The Coulomb force (electromagnetism) ultimately drives any material particles in motion. "Space and time" along with relativistic "gravity" is a concept from Relativity (1905) and was falsified by D&P Sagnac (1939) at the University of Paris. What was proven, is that there is a static aether.

The concept of "planets" as giant heavenly spheres reflecting sunlight over a distances of up to six billion miles and, the idea that the Earth is one of those balls of shit is batshit insanity! "galaxies" trillions upon trillions miles away? Go back to sleep man!

The small lights you see moving in the sky are, #1 just small lights (not giant balls of shit) and, #2 are actually moving. To claim the stars are stationary and it's you that that's moving is nonsense, like the legs of your horse moving the ground below them.

Le Sage's theory goes in the same basket as BADecker, who is permanently cucked on the heavenly spheres! If your answer to anything about the earth or the heavens involves ideas, concepts and theories from the satanic priests and their giant balls of shit then, you also go into that basket!

These satanic priests are part of a cabal created by the Kabbalists. Einstein was both a Jew and a Jesuit!

Since you don't seem to think that there is much beyond what your eyes can see (except with a Nikon camera fitted with a telescopic lens), your life can be peaceful. After all, your faith is in the idea that ignorance is bliss. And as long as nothing painful comes to you because of your ignorance, you might have quite a comfortable life.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1032



View Profile
February 23, 2020, 03:36:36 PM
 #16659

^^^ I can't say what's beyond the firmament with any certainty, so I'll go with "outer space" is not a vacuum and probably contains 99.999...% liquid water because God says so. Yup, good ol' H2O!

Your hard vacuum violates the second law of thermodynamics, have a good day.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1166


View Profile
February 23, 2020, 07:39:27 PM
 #16660

^^^ I can't say what's beyond the firmament with any certainty, so I'll go with "outer space" is not a vacuum and probably contains 99.999...% liquid water because God says so. Yup, good ol' H2O!

Your hard vacuum violates the second law of thermodynamics, have a good day.

The second law of thermodynamics is relative to what we understand as standard material and energy. Go beyond that into the aether, the second law of thermodynamics doesn't apply in the same way. You are the one who says that the aether exists. This absolutely means that you don't accept the second law of thermodynamics anyway. No vacuum. The aether fills everything.

If beyond the firmament means outside of the firmament for you, you are talking about outside of the universe.

Cool

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
Pages: « 1 ... 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 [833] 834 835 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!