Astargath
|
|
January 01, 2019, 07:30:55 PM |
|
The Globe Trolls are strong in this thread.
Tellme how gravity works again.
When it can hold Millions of tonnes of water on a ball from flying into space but cant hold down a fucking mosquito ! Omg the magic of gravity
So heavy yet so light OMg ..... Grabbity ! The GoD free Mason Symbol G
Wow Gravity Helium forgot about it.
Wow Gravity couldnt pull u down the ocean kept u a float.
Let me explain it to you, knucklehead. ''When it can hold Millions of tonnes of water on a ball from flying into space but cant hold down a fucking mosquito ! Omg the magic of gravity ''https://indianapublicmedia.org/amomentofscience/insects-respect-law-gravity/Wow Gravity Helium forgot about ithttps://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/2415/why-do-helium-filled-balloons-move-away-from-the-earthBasically all the air particles are on the ground attracted by gravity will ''push'' the helium balloon up Now stop being an uneducated knucklehead and go study something useful, retard. So a bunch of impossible theories are supposed to prove another bunch of impossible theories ?. In Flat Earth is quite simple . Objects Heavier than their medium surrounding them go sink. just how happens in water and air. No Theory Of Spinning Ball Gluing us on to it while it travels 10k miles per her around a vaccum in space which we cant feel and cant prove except for animated pics and stories. You gotta be dumb to believe the bullshit you are talking. How can a force which holds millions of tonnes of water on a ball be so weak to let something fly off of it ? Proves who is the real knuclehead and gullibble kid. Objects Heavier than their medium surrounding them go sink. How do you know when an object is heavier and why? Why would heavier objects sink if nothing is attracting them? How can a force which holds millions of tonnes of water on a ball be so weak to let something fly off of it I already gave you an explanation for that, are you having memory problems? The spin of a thousand miles per hour is really slow, you can check how slow it is, using a shadow of a tree, pick a tree, sit down at 12 noon and watch the shadow for 1 hour, that's what 1000 miles per hour look on something as big as the earth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the
first distributed timestamping system.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
RussaX
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 11
|
|
January 01, 2019, 07:40:45 PM Last edit: January 01, 2019, 07:53:05 PM by RussaX |
|
What is the point of arguing with them? Whatever you tell them they will continue with ignorance. Same like religin, there are so many religions and gods and jet people beleve that their god is the only one. But infact religion was used throughout whole history to keep spirit and discipline. (It was important and usefull for kingdoms in the past, nowdays just money scam) Let people beleve whatever they want to. If someone feels fulfilled with that, great for them. There will always be all different kinds of people and beliefs and that is great, imagine how boring world would be if everyone thought the same.
In this case with flat earth it is ignorat but first before arguing with that you need to step back and look from their perspective, what would make someone think that and on a such a level that there are so many of them. I would give a short answer by saying: failed education, government issues, influencial people affecting large masses, proffesional trolls (that make use of it) etc. When you combine all of that you get the perfect formula. Earth is globe!PS. This post was sponsored by Illuminati
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
January 01, 2019, 09:00:04 PM |
|
^^^ "we don't have to do it this way" <--- It's obvious you don't want to be shot in the head.
15 deg/hr is enough you can visually perceive the platform rotating, the gyroscope isn't moving. This isn't manufactured evidence like the globe relies on.
Rather, one thing is obvious, and another is apparent. Apparently I don't even want to entertain your silly thinking. Obviously, the way the gyroscope behaves seems different at different latitudes. The test is of a gyroscope and whether it (A.) rotates with a 15 deg/hr rotating platform or (B.) maintains its position in space, where it takes place is irreverent. The answer is B, go use this proven gyroscope at the equator if it suits your fancy, test the globe. If the Earth is rotating then it's rotating, if it's not then it's not and there's no detectable motion. You have to explain why the proven gyroscope can't detect any motion of the Earth. You can't claim it's not sensitive enough, that's not an available option. The answer is that the Sun is a small object relative to a stationary surface and that it travels across the sky just as it appears.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1363
|
|
January 01, 2019, 09:07:45 PM |
|
^^^ "we don't have to do it this way" <--- It's obvious you don't want to be shot in the head.
15 deg/hr is enough you can visually perceive the platform rotating, the gyroscope isn't moving. This isn't manufactured evidence like the globe relies on.
Rather, one thing is obvious, and another is apparent. Apparently I don't even want to entertain your silly thinking. Obviously, the way the gyroscope behaves seems different at different latitudes. The test is of a gyroscope and weather it (A.) rotates with a 15 deg/hr rotating platform or (B.) maintains its position in space, where it takes place is irreverent. The answer is B, go use this proven gyroscope at the equator if it suits your fancy, test the globe. If the Earth is rotating then it's rotating, if it's not then it's not and there's no detectable motion. You have to explain why the proven gyroscope can't detect any motion of the Earth. You can't claim it's not sensitive enough, that's not an available option. The answer is that the Sun is a small object relative to a stationary surface and that it travels across the sky just as it appears. Many people have shown that the sun is not a small object only a few thousand miles away. You haven't been able to refute my trig/parallax point. The fact that you are looking to do damage to people who have shown you where you are wrong, shows that you have a religious cult in your beliefs. Why? Because it hurts when you are wrong, and you want to get even with the people who you blame. But please don't go out and commit suicide just to get even with yourself, once you finally figure out where you are wrong.
|
|
|
|
firenine
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 0
|
|
January 01, 2019, 09:09:55 PM |
|
I will subscribe this thread now to read it later when I finish my brand new tin foil hat. Happy New Year!
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
January 02, 2019, 01:20:51 AM |
|
^^^ "we don't have to do it this way" <--- It's obvious you don't want to be shot in the head.
15 deg/hr is enough you can visually perceive the platform rotating, the gyroscope isn't moving. This isn't manufactured evidence like the globe relies on.
Rather, one thing is obvious, and another is apparent. Apparently I don't even want to entertain your silly thinking. Obviously, the way the gyroscope behaves seems different at different latitudes. The test is of a gyroscope and weather it (A.) rotates with a 15 deg/hr rotating platform or (B.) maintains its position in space, where it takes place is irreverent. The answer is B, go use this proven gyroscope at the equator if it suits your fancy, test the globe. If the Earth is rotating then it's rotating, if it's not then it's not and there's no detectable motion. You have to explain why the proven gyroscope can't detect any motion of the Earth. You can't claim it's not sensitive enough, that's not an available option. The answer is that the Sun is a small object relative to a stationary surface and that it travels across the sky just as it appears. Many people have shown that the sun is not a small object only a few thousand miles away. You haven't been able to refute my trig/parallax point. The fact that you are looking to do damage to people who have shown you where you are wrong, shows that you have a religious cult in your beliefs. Why? Because it hurts when you are wrong, and you want to get even with the people who you blame. But please don't go out and commit suicide just to get even with yourself, once you finally figure out where you are wrong. I've refuted it multiple times; the measurements for stellar parallax are smaller than the margin of error caused by refraction or star twinkle. You're not dealing with the gyroscopic observation that the Earth is stationary. Instead of valid reasons why no motion can be detected, you've decided to make "but what about this?" arguments, gaslight and concern troll. The Devil's left hand, is this the behavior of somebody who is right?
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1363
|
|
January 02, 2019, 12:02:49 PM |
|
I've refuted it multiple times; the measurements for stellar parallax are smaller than the margin of error caused by refraction or star twinkle.
You're not dealing with the gyroscopic observation that the Earth is stationary. Instead of valid reasons why no motion can be detected, you've decided to make "but what about this?" arguments, gaslight and concern troll.
The Devil's left hand, is this the behavior of somebody who is right?
You haven't refuted parallax measurements. You have only SAID that yo have refuted. You can't refute them. Why not? Because anybody who is a bit of an amateur astronomer can and does prove you wrong. There are so many gyroscope miscalculations in your figures that you are laughable. Number 1 is, get a kid's gyroscope that you can buy in the store. Wrap the cord around it, and fire it up with a good pull on the cord. Then set it on its pedestal. Watch it weave about this way and that, as it slows down due to friction. Laugh your head off at all those jokers who tried your experiment and died. They were street people anyway, right? Bringing satanism into it shows that you can barely think outside your occultic box.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
January 02, 2019, 12:10:03 PM |
|
More than likely, gravity is simply inertia, acting on the material whole, as the universe expansion speeds up continually.
The would work on the front of the accelerating object, but on the back you would have anti-gravity... Fairy tales fall apart when you shine light on them. :/
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
vosixu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2019, 05:20:02 PM |
|
Yes! Thank you!
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1363
|
|
January 02, 2019, 06:11:34 PM |
|
More than likely, gravity is simply inertia, acting on the material whole, as the universe expansion speeds up continually.
The would work on the front of the accelerating object, but on the back you would have anti-gravity... Fairy tales fall apart when you shine light on them. :/ Except that the expanding universe is simply an astronomy thing for the most part. Astronomers see the stars flying farther apart, and they don't generally think to apply this to everything. If they applied this principle to the atoms and the subatomic particles, the resulting effect would be gravity without actual gravity at all. It would really be inertia, but it would feel and look like gravity. Maybe that is all gravity really is... inertia in an expanding universe, that has expansion accelerating. Maybe it's not gravity we should be looking for, but rather the reason for the expansion acceleration.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
January 02, 2019, 11:51:41 PM |
|
Except that the expanding universe is simply an astronomy thing for the most part. Astronomers see the stars flying farther apart, and they don't generally think to apply this to everything. If they applied this principle to the atoms and the subatomic particles, the resulting effect would be gravity without actual gravity at all. It would really be inertia, but it would feel and look like gravity. Maybe you should stick to quoting a book and leave the thinking to more intelligent people?
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
sirazimuth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 3430
born once atheist
|
|
January 05, 2019, 02:04:55 AM |
|
I see we have another FE troll (probably a batty sock) in the thread seeking attention. Not gonna quote the idiot. That's what strokes their ego and gives them a woody.
|
Bitcoin...the future of all monetary transactions...and always will be
|
|
|
riski123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
January 06, 2019, 09:36:25 AM |
|
Flat Earth is consipiration
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
January 07, 2019, 01:39:05 AM |
|
When asked why an object falls the globalist will tell you "gravity", he then proceeds to describe how an object falls with multiple volumes (Newton) of mathematical formulae without ever explaining the why. What causes gravity?
The FE explanation for how an object falls is density and buoyancy; the object sinks. The answer for why it is pushed down is because of electricity and the Coulomb Force.
|
|
|
|
presduterte
Member
Offline
Activity: 222
Merit: 58
They call me Rad Rody.
|
|
January 07, 2019, 02:04:47 AM |
|
When asked why an object falls the globalist will tell you "gravity", he then proceeds to describe how an object falls with multiple volumes (Newton) of mathematical formulae without ever explaining the why. What causes gravity?
The FE explanation for how an object falls is density and buoyancy; the object sinks. The answer for why it is pushed down is because of electricity and the Coulomb Force.
Well that sounds pretty fucking stupid. Why does shit with a neutral charge "sink" at the same rate as charged shit then dummy? Boo. I came here to be entertained.
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
January 07, 2019, 04:06:03 AM Last edit: January 07, 2019, 04:31:08 AM by notbatman |
|
^^^ If you rub a balloon in your hair does it do "ani-gravity"? Answer yes, you can pick up bits of paper and foil so your statement about charged objects is obviously wrong; objects are rising not falling in this case. The coulomb force acts on the atmosphere that, in turn acts on the object, hence why density and buoyancy is used to explain how things fall.
|
|
|
|
presduterte
Member
Offline
Activity: 222
Merit: 58
They call me Rad Rody.
|
|
January 07, 2019, 04:45:34 AM |
|
If you rub a balloon in your hair does it do "ani-gravity"? Answer yes,
Answer no. Its 100% explained by static electricity. you can pick up bits of paper and foil so your statement about charged objects is obviously wrong; objects are rising not falling in this case.
What are you talking about? This is all due to static electricity. I suggest you read up on it: https://www.education.com/activity/article/balloon-science-charge-balloon-stick/The coulomb force acts on the atmosphere that, in turn acts on the object, hence why density and buoyancy is used to explain how things fall.
You really don't understand how positive and negative charges work. Try again.
|
|
|
|
mich
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1032
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
January 07, 2019, 06:43:50 AM |
|
Imagine you are on a date with this hottie and she shows up at your door like this: I think some of you would have a change of heart!
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
January 07, 2019, 07:09:48 AM |
|
If you rub a balloon in your hair does it do "ani-gravity"? Answer yes,
Answer no. Its 100% explained by static electricity. you can pick up bits of paper and foil so your statement about charged objects is obviously wrong; objects are rising not falling in this case.
What are you talking about? This is all due to static electricity. I suggest you read up on it: https://www.education.com/activity/article/balloon-science-charge-balloon-stick/The coulomb force acts on the atmosphere that, in turn acts on the object, hence why density and buoyancy is used to explain how things fall.
You really don't understand how positive and negative charges work. Try again. There is no gravity; the falling object is ultimately explained by the medium it's in and the electrical forces acting on them. I also do understand that positive and negative charges are the result of polarization of a material. In the case of Earth it's the inner surface of the dome or firmament that's the source.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
January 07, 2019, 09:06:00 AM |
|
There is no gravity; the falling object is ultimately explained by the medium it's in and the electrical forces acting on them. I also do understand that positive and negative charges are the result of polarization of a material. In the case of Earth it's the inner surface of the dome or firmament that's the source.
Hope for a smarter new year is wasted on this idiot.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
|