Flat Earth

[Vod]

Coulombs Law is testable, measurable established science. Gravity on the other hand is un-testable, un-measurable bullshit

So you have never leaned forward and moved your foot to catch yourself as gravity pulled you down?

Watch people walk on TV then.  It will blow your mind. 

[1713582620]

1713582620

[1713582620]

1713582620

[exemplaar]

There we go again with that imaginary invisible force called gravity, purposefully "invented" to hold all heliocentric lies together.

These ball earth believers always repeat the same nonsense again and again. Boats disappearing..., fish eye lens curve from 10ft, and nasa bad cgi cartoon pictures which indicates obvious mockery. And when all this fails then they will start screaming gravity.







bonus video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni6ZUXkNL-8

[Astargath]

Im an idiot

Why does it go down, though? Density likes going down for no reason?

[notbatman]

^^^ Coulomb's Law.

The inner surface of the dome is polarized and forms the anode, the ground is the cathode. In terms of electron flow the ground (-) is the source of electrons and they flow to the dome (+).

Since electrons are the lightest they flow up (+) to the positively charged surface and as they flow up more dense matter flows down (-) towards the negatively charged ground. This force acting on dense materials is what "modern science" is fraudulently claiming to be gravity.

[presduterte]

^^^ Coulomb's Law.

Coulomb's law doesn't work for every single object in existence.
 

There are three conditions to be fulfilled for the validity of Coulomb's law:

The charges must have a spherically symmetric distribution (e.g. be point charges, or a charged metal sphere).
The charges must not overlap (e.g. they must be distinct point charges).
The charges must be stationary with respect to each other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law

So why is every single object in existence subject to the forces of gravity but not Coulomb's law?

Why do you have to rub a balloon against your hair or fabric in order for it to stick to something?

[notbatman]

^^^ Look how aggressively they perpetrate and promote the fraud that is "the globe"!

$57,000,000 USD a day is taken by force (tax) and given to NASA whose sole goal it would seem is perpetrate fraud against these same taxpayers.

[presduterte]

^^^ Look how aggressively they perpetrate and promote the fraud that is "the globe"!

$57,000,000 USD a day is taken by force (tax) and given to NASA whose sole goal it would seem is perpetrate fraud against these same taxpayers.

Don't skirt the question.

^^^ Coulomb's Law.

Coulomb's law doesn't work for every single object in existence.
 

There are three conditions to be fulfilled for the validity of Coulomb's law:

The charges must have a spherically symmetric distribution (e.g. be point charges, or a charged metal sphere).
The charges must not overlap (e.g. they must be distinct point charges).
The charges must be stationary with respect to each other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law

So why is every single object in existence subject to the forces of gravity but not Coulomb's law?

Why do you have to rub a balloon against your hair or fabric in order for it to stick to something?

[notbatman]

^^^ Gravity is a fraud (see full quote below) and I'm suppose to answer questions that assume it's real? You should cut yourself and bleed to death.

...

...
People are so brainwashed...it is mind boggling or should I say mind blowing.
...

I'm denser than the air therefore I fall down because magic, you are the brainwashed idiot mate.

Coulombs Law is testable, measurable established science. Gravity on the other hand is un-testable, un-measurable bullshit that's required to claim we're on a spinning sphere in a vacuum orbiting a thermonuclear bomb.
...

So you have never leaned forward and moved your foot to catch yourself as gravity pulled you down?

Watch people walk on TV then.  It will blow your mind.  

There we go again with that imaginary invisible force called gravity, purposefully "invented" to hold all heliocentric lies together.

These ball earth believers always repeat the same nonsense again and again. Boats disappearing..., fish eye lens curve from 10ft, and nasa bad cgi cartoon pictures which indicates obvious mockery. And when all this fails then they will start screaming gravity.


...

Why does it go down, though? Density likes going down for no reason?

^^^ Coulomb's Law.

The inner surface of the dome is polarized and forms the anode, the ground is the cathode. In terms of electron flow the ground (-) is the source of electrons and they flow to the dome (+).

Since electrons are the lightest they flow up (+) to the positively charged surface and as they flow up more dense matter flows down (-) towards the negatively charged ground. This force acting on dense materials is what "modern science" is fraudulently claiming to be gravity.

[Astargath]

^^^ Coulomb's Law.

The inner surface of the dome is polarized and forms the anode, the ground is the cathode. In terms of electron flow the ground (-) is the source of electrons and they flow to the dome (+).

Since electrons are the lightest they flow up (+) to the positively charged surface and as they flow up more dense matter flows down (-) towards the negatively charged ground. This force acting on dense materials is what "modern science" is fraudulently claiming to be gravity.

''The inner surface of the dome is polarized and forms the anode'' Where is the evidence for this?

[notbatman]

^^^ The Earth's measured electric field is indirect evidence of induction from a source that by virtue can only be a polarized surface. Analysis of the nickel-iron oxide on meteorite fragmets should provide the tangible evidence of perminent electrical polarization of the domes oxide surface that you're asking for.

Perhaps this analysis may already exist as part of existing data from meteorite samples...




The preceeding image is a meteorite fragmet manufactured from extra-long grain Damascus type steel, this is the highest quality steel known to man and it falls out of the sky.

[presduterte]

^^^ Gravity is a fraud (see full quote below) and I'm suppose to answer questions that assume it's real? You should cut yourself and bleed to death.

Hey, violently stupid asshole.

If you can't answer these questions, it means you lose.

1. Why is every single object in existence subject to the forces of gravity but not Coulomb's law? Don't cherry pick that one law is valid and the other is not. That's just stupid. You're not a physicist. You're an asshole troll behind a keyboard, so just answer the question.

2. Why do you have to rub a balloon against your hair or fabric in order for it to stick to something? Why do balloons that don't do this just fall to the ground?

[Astargath]

^^^ The Earth's measured electric field is indirect evidence of induction from a source that by virtue can only be a polarized surface. Analysis of the nickel-iron oxide on meteorite fragmets should provide the tangible evidence of perminent electrical polarization of the domes oxide surface that you're asking for.

Perhaps this analysis may already exist as part of existing data from meteorite samples...




The preceeding image is a meteorite fragmet manufactured from extra-long grain Damascus type steel, this is the highest quality steel known to man and it falls out of the sky.

''The Earth's measured electric field is indirect evidence of induction from a source that by virtue can only be a polarized surface.'' Why?

''The natural electric field of the Earth refers to the planet Earth having a natural direct current (DC) electric field or potential gradient from the ground upwards to the ionosphere. The static fair-weather electric field in the atmosphere is ~150 volts per meter (V/m) near the Earth's surface, but it drops exponentially with height to under 1 V/m at 30 km altitude, as the conductivity of the atmosphere increases.''

''Analysis of the nickel-iron oxide on meteorite fragmets'' That proves meteorites are real?

[notbatman]

^^^ Why? That's like asking why a nail can't be picked up without a magnet. Just try and induce a magnetic field (paramagnetism) with a block of wood, you can't. The nail doesn't just spontaneously develop a magnetic field it needs a magnet, same with Earth's electric field it doesn't exist without a polarized object or surface to induce the charge.






To give an analogy of how gravity is fraudulent one can observe how electroplating works; two DC electrodes in a gold containing solution and the gold moves and sticks to the negative electrode.

Now if I was to claim the force moving the gold particles was called gravity and it was caused by the mass of the negative electrode pulling the gold particles to it then I'd be wrong. This idea of gravity is wrong and deceptive as it neglects the positive electrode, the electrical circuit and the conductive liquid solution replacing them all with a ubiquitous magic pulling force inherent to only one electrode.

Gravity is fraudulent science and uses the same trickery as the above example.

[Astargath]

^^^ Why? That's like asking why a nail can't be picked up without a magnet. Just try and induce a magnetic field (paramagnetism) with a block of wood, you can't. The nail doesn't just spontaneously develop a magnetic field it needs a magnet, same with Earth's electric field it doesn't exist without a polarized object or surface to induce the charge.






To give an analogy of how gravity is fraudulent one can observe how electroplating works; two DC electrodes in a gold containing solution and the gold moves and sticks to the negative electrode.

Now if I was to claim the force moving the gold particles was called gravity and it was caused by the mass of the negative electrode pulling the gold particles to it then I'd be wrong. This idea of gravity is wrong and deceptive as it neglects the positive electrode, the electrical circuit and the conductive liquid solution replacing them all with a ubiquitous magic pulling force inherent to only one electrode.

Gravity is fraudulent science and uses the same trickery as the above example.

''Right at the heart of the Earth is a solid inner core, two thirds of the size of the Moon and composed primarily of iron. At a hellish 5,700°C, this iron is as hot as the Sun’s surface, but the crushing pressure caused by gravity prevents it from becoming liquid.

Surrounding this is the outer core, a 2,000 km thick layer of iron, nickel, and small quantities of other metals. Lower pressure than the inner core means the metal here is fluid.

Differences in temperature, pressure and composition within the outer core cause convection currents in the molten metal as cool, dense matter sinks whilst warm, less dense matter rises. The Coriolis force, resulting from the Earth’s spin, also causes swirling whirlpools.

This flow of liquid iron generates electric currents, which in turn produce magnetic fields. Charged metals passing through these fields go on to create electric currents of their own, and so the cycle continues. This self-sustaining loop is known as the geodynam''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field

Again, you are proven wrong, as usual.

[BADecker]

^^^ Why? That's like asking why a nail can't be picked up without a magnet. Just try and induce a magnetic field (paramagnetism) with a block of wood, you can't. The nail doesn't just spontaneously develop a magnetic field it needs a magnet, same with Earth's electric field it doesn't exist without a polarized object or surface to induce the charge.






To give an analogy of how gravity is fraudulent one can observe how electroplating works; two DC electrodes in a gold containing solution and the gold moves and sticks to the negative electrode.

Now if I was to claim the force moving the gold particles was called gravity and it was caused by the mass of the negative electrode pulling the gold particles to it then I'd be wrong. This idea of gravity is wrong and deceptive as it neglects the positive electrode, the electrical circuit and the conductive liquid solution replacing them all with a ubiquitous magic pulling force inherent to only one electrode.

Gravity is fraudulent science and uses the same trickery as the above example.

"Gravity" is simply a word that people give to certain physical operations in the universe. Their descriptions of why or how gravity works may be wrong. They might be entirely wrong about the extent that gravity goes to. But, their term for things that happen in everyday lives is "gravity."

Change the word if you want. Change the understanding of how it works if you want. But guess what. It is still gravity. Your terminology changes are only for you and those who want to accept your changes. The things that happen are still gravity for the rest of us, no matter how you want to change the terminology.

[notbatman]

^^^ Why? That's like asking why a nail can't be picked up without a magnet. Just try and induce a magnetic field (paramagnetism) with a block of wood, you can't. The nail doesn't just spontaneously develop a magnetic field it needs a magnet, same with Earth's electric field it doesn't exist without a polarized object or surface to induce the charge.






To give an analogy of how gravity is fraudulent one can observe how electroplating works; two DC electrodes in a gold containing solution and the gold moves and sticks to the negative electrode.

Now if I was to claim the force moving the gold particles was called gravity and it was caused by the mass of the negative electrode pulling the gold particles to it then I'd be wrong. This idea of gravity is wrong and deceptive as it neglects the positive electrode, the electrical circuit and the conductive liquid solution replacing them all with a ubiquitous magic pulling force inherent to only one electrode.

Gravity is fraudulent science and uses the same trickery as the above example.

''Right at the heart of the Earth is a solid inner core, two thirds of the size of the Moon and composed primarily of iron. At a hellish 5,700°C, this iron is as hot as the Sun’s surface, but the crushing pressure caused by gravity prevents it from becoming liquid.

Surrounding this is the outer core, a 2,000 km thick layer of iron, nickel, and small quantities of other metals. Lower pressure than the inner core means the metal here is fluid.

Differences in temperature, pressure and composition within the outer core cause convection currents in the molten metal as cool, dense matter sinks whilst warm, less dense matter rises. The Coriolis force, resulting from the Earth’s spin, also causes swirling whirlpools.

This flow of liquid iron generates electric currents, which in turn produce magnetic fields. Charged metals passing through these fields go on to create electric currents of their own, and so the cycle continues. This self-sustaining loop is known as the geodynam''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field

Again, you are proven wrong, as usual.

At the very least I can show you a piece of the dome, a provably manufactured fragment of steel alloy that fell out of the sky. Show me a piece of core motherfucker!

You can't even prove we're on a sphere, every so-called proof you've got is either not proof at all, actually proves it's flat or relies on manufactured evidence and mathematical equations with no relationship to reality. There's literally a mountain of established science and documented experiments and observations that proves we're on a stationary plane.

Your heavy spherical ball is a pure fantasy along with this molten core of iron. The Curie temperature of iron is about 770°C, stop this fucking conspiracy!

[Astargath]

^^^ Why? That's like asking why a nail can't be picked up without a magnet. Just try and induce a magnetic field (paramagnetism) with a block of wood, you can't. The nail doesn't just spontaneously develop a magnetic field it needs a magnet, same with Earth's electric field it doesn't exist without a polarized object or surface to induce the charge.






To give an analogy of how gravity is fraudulent one can observe how electroplating works; two DC electrodes in a gold containing solution and the gold moves and sticks to the negative electrode.

Now if I was to claim the force moving the gold particles was called gravity and it was caused by the mass of the negative electrode pulling the gold particles to it then I'd be wrong. This idea of gravity is wrong and deceptive as it neglects the positive electrode, the electrical circuit and the conductive liquid solution replacing them all with a ubiquitous magic pulling force inherent to only one electrode.

Gravity is fraudulent science and uses the same trickery as the above example.

''Right at the heart of the Earth is a solid inner core, two thirds of the size of the Moon and composed primarily of iron. At a hellish 5,700°C, this iron is as hot as the Sun’s surface, but the crushing pressure caused by gravity prevents it from becoming liquid.

Surrounding this is the outer core, a 2,000 km thick layer of iron, nickel, and small quantities of other metals. Lower pressure than the inner core means the metal here is fluid.

Differences in temperature, pressure and composition within the outer core cause convection currents in the molten metal as cool, dense matter sinks whilst warm, less dense matter rises. The Coriolis force, resulting from the Earth’s spin, also causes swirling whirlpools.

This flow of liquid iron generates electric currents, which in turn produce magnetic fields. Charged metals passing through these fields go on to create electric currents of their own, and so the cycle continues. This self-sustaining loop is known as the geodynam''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field

Again, you are proven wrong, as usual.

At the very least I can show you a piece of the dome, a provably manufactured fragment of steel alloy that fell out of the sky. Show me a piece of core motherfucker!

You can't even prove we're on a sphere, every so-called proof you've got is either not proof at all, actually proves it's flat or relies on manufactured evidence and mathematical equations with no relationship to reality. There's literally a mountain of established science and documented experiments and observations that proves we're on a stationary plane.

Your heavy spherical ball is a pure fantasy along with this molten core of iron. The Curie temperature of iron is about 770°C, stop this fucking conspiracy!

''At the very least I can show you a piece of the dome'' Where are all the pictures of the dome then? We certainly have cameras right? How come no one has photographed it yet?

[notbatman]

For all you struggling with the information I present, you're not alone.



Owen Benjamin I don't want to be a FLAT EARTH person ! -- https://youtu.be/5p7CSpC1jCo

"Watch in real time as an intelligent person struggles with the undeniable fact that our world is not a spinning rock water ball."

[notbatman]

^^^ Coulomb's Law isn't up for debate, it's proven empirically. Gravity on the other hand is an unproven theory whose sole existence is to support the fraudulent claim of heliocentrism and the globe. Gravity is unprovable because it is a deception and part of a conspiracy, calling it a law is a bad joke. Sure things fall/sink in predictable manner, that's not the fucking point here however.

[stevenirons21]

^^^ Coulomb's Law isn't up for debate, it's proven empirically. Gravity on the other hand is an unproven theory whose sole existence is to support the fraudulent claim of heliocentrism and the globe. Gravity is unprovable because it is a deception and part of a conspiracy, calling it a law is a bad joke. Sure things fall/sink in predictable manner, that's not the fucking point here however.

Totally agree, there's only density.