Flat Earth

[notbatman]

^^^ Lets stay on the topic of Earth and its claimed motion instead; your checkmate is showing.

Flat Earth Origins: The Michelson-Morley Experiments -- https://youtu.be/fxB5vY-RpGo

[1714056859]

1714056859

[1714056859]

1714056859

[1714056859]

1714056859

[1714056859]

1714056859

[lightlord]

[BADecker]

... you can't even come up with bullshit to explain the acceleration from the change in speed every 12 hours due to the 66.6k MPH claimed orbit around the Sun.

At a certain time at the equator, you are traveling in a direction at about 65.6k mph, and then about 67.6k mph in that direction 12 hours later. The change in speed is about 2000 mph over 43200 seconds, which is an overall acceleration of about 0.0463 mph/s. That's nothing compared to falling, at 21.8 mph/s, which is why we don't fly off the earth. If we accelerated at that rate when we started walking, it would take over a minute just to get to a normal pace of 3 mph.

^^^ Quit your bullshit!

The claim Earth is in motion has been experimentally falsified by Michaelson & Morley, the rebuttal by globalists of "muh relativity" has also been experimentally falsified by Dufour & Prunier. That the Earth is stationary is established science that can be proven by anybody with a gyroscope (reactive to a 15 deg/hr rotation).

The claimed rotation of the Earth would cause everybody to get seasick if it were true, we can most certainly feel the ~14 grams of force that would be present if we were spinning, not to mention all the other claimed motions and accelerations we're supposedly experiencing.

I know that the earth is in motion, in all kinds of directions. I drive down the road, but I and the car are quite motionless. The earth just zooms by.

[Astargath]

^^^ Lets stay on the topic of Earth and its claimed motion instead; your checkmate is showing.

Flat Earth Origins: The Michelson-Morley Experiments -- https://youtu.be/fxB5vY-RpGo

Yeah, lets not focus on the non existence of the dome, fuck that, better to link old failed experiments instead of a simple picture/video of the ''mirrored'' dome. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.

[notbatman]

^^^ We're not discussing the dome, stop changing the subject fucking cocksucker.

I've got actual proof to back up my claims:

"Special Relativity," Nature vol. 322 (August 1986): p. 590. <--- NOT AN OLD FAILED EXPERIMENT | Replication and results of the M&M experiment sponsored by the U.S. Air Force.

Seriously, go hang yourself faggot!

[Astargath]

^^^ We're not discussing the dome, stop changing the subject fucking cocksucker.

I've got actual proof to back up my claims:

"Special Relativity," Nature vol. 322 (August 1986): p. 590. <--- NOT AN OLD FAILED EXPERIMENT | The results of an experiment sponsored by the U.S. Air Force.

Seriously, go hang yourself faggot!

We have scientific evidence for the past few hundred of years showing the earth is not flat. Again, why is it so hard to photograph the dome? Perhaps because it doesn't exist?

[notbatman]

^^^ I've got proof beyond a reasonable doubt the Earth is motionless and all you can do is change the subject.

The USAF replication of the M&M experiment and, Dufour & Prunier's replication of the Sagnac experiment both irrefutably falsify relativity. Without relativity there is no globe.

I've got the scientific evidence bruh, all you've got is white knighting for organized criminals that need to be stuffed into a gas chamber. BTW I learned new slang today, "gaytheist" wear your new label with pride fag.  

[lightlord]

Notbatman, why does your construct of an ideology flat earth only exist, and it's the only 100% right one? Alternate thread, different race, one similar to you would say "It's not a globe", it's this shape. Why is his wrong, and your concept is the only true and right one?

When you think about it, why does the entire model/universe/construct have to be conveniently shaped around what you believe, and think is, in fact, the truth.

[notbatman]

^^^ When one takes a reading with a caliper the reading is true, it is the truth. The reading is not faith based, it's not conjecture,  it's not arbitrary, it's not opinion, it's not the result of consensus, it's not the product of ideology, it's not a belief and, it's not a concept.

The same applies when one takes a reading with a sextant; it measures angles on a plane. If you disagree with direct measurement then you've got a problem with the truth.

A rope around your neck can help you overcome this problem you have with the truth.

[lightlord]

^^^ When one takes a reading with a caliper the reading is true, it is the truth. The reading is not faith based, it's not conjecture,  it's not arbitrary, it's not opinion, it's not the result of consensus, it's not the product of ideology, it's not a belief and, it's not a concept.

The same applies when one takes a reading with a sextant; it measures angles on a plane. If you disagree with direct measurement then you've got a problem with the truth.

A rope around your neck can help you overcome this problem you have with the truth.

What about the alien on another planet, on an alternate thread, that say his world is a flat triangle with a triangle dome on top. Why is he wrong, and you are right?

[notbatman]

^^^ Not an argument, the terrain is flat and covered by an artifical structure in both cases. The hypothetical existence of other planes of existence have no bering on what can be observed, tested and measured here.

BTW the asymmetrical electric field a polarized angled triangular structure creates between it and the ground would cause falling objects to accelerate at inconsistent speeds and stationary objects to weigh differently depending on their locations, the dome minamizes this effect. The magnetic field would be inconsistent, pressure & temperature differences would also make the weather hellish. The triangular structure is also not as strong as a dome and would be subject to deformation and other catastrophic effects over time. The projection of celestial lights (sun, moon, stars...) is also an issue with the triangle roof.

[Astargath]

^^^ Not an argument, the terrain is flat and covered by an artifical structure in both cases. The hypothetical existence of other planes of existence have no bering on what can be observed, tested and measured here.

BTW the asymmetrical electric field a polarized angled triangular structure creates between it and the ground would cause falling objects to accelerate at inconsistent speeds and stationary objects to weigh differently depending on their locations, the dome minamizes this effect. The magnetic field would be inconsistent, pressure & temperature differences would also make the weather hellish. The triangular structure is also not as strong as a dome and would be subject to deformation and other catastrophic effects over time. The projection of celestial lights (sun, moon, stars...) is also an issue with the triangle roof.

Can the dome be tested, observed or measured? Show us then.

[notbatman]

^^^ Asking for a picture of a mirror in darkened room without a flash powerful enough to illuminate even a small section is a tall order. There's evidence for the dome but mostly in the form indirect observations and measurements.

Meteorites made from manufactured steel could be considered direct evidence of an engineered structure above us. Lasers can be bounced off the dome as a method of directly measuring the shape.

As far a pictures go a rainbow takes the shape of the dome.

There's lots of indirect evidence such as the holographic nature of the celestial objects and their measured (sextant) values, the electric field it produces, the requirement of pressure vessel needed to hold the atmosphere and, microwave & high energy cosmic rays. This is just to name a few.

[Astargath]

^^^ Asking for a picture of a mirror in darkened room without a flash powerful enough to illuminate even a small section is a tall order. There's evidence for the dome but mostly in the form indirect observations and measurements.

Meteorites made from manufactured steel could be considered direct evidence of an engineered structure above us. Lasers can be bounced off the dome as a method of directly measuring the shape.

As far a pictures go a rainbow takes the shape of the dome.

There's lots of indirect evidence such as the holographic nature of the celestial objects and their measured (sextant) values, the electric field it produces, the requirement of pressure vessel needed to hold the atmosphere and, microwave & high energy cosmic rays. This is just to name a few.

Darkened room? What do you mean by that, just take the picture when the sun is shining, also what is the dome, transparent glass or a mirror?

[nutildah]

Gravity is bullshit.



PS; Suck the hot knob of Lucifer.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=gravity+is+a+lie+buoyancy+density+atmospheric+pressure

Man, so much history in this forum.

Do you miss your counterpart notbatman? Don't bother responding, I have you on ignore.

[notbatman]

^^^ Asking for a picture of a mirror in darkened room without a flash powerful enough to illuminate even a small section is a tall order. There's evidence for the dome but mostly in the form indirect observations and measurements.

Meteorites made from manufactured steel could be considered direct evidence of an engineered structure above us. Lasers can be bounced off the dome as a method of directly measuring the shape.

As far a pictures go a rainbow takes the shape of the dome.

There's lots of indirect evidence such as the holographic nature of the celestial objects and their measured (sextant) values, the electric field it produces, the requirement of pressure vessel needed to hold the atmosphere and, microwave & high energy cosmic rays. This is just to name a few.

Darkened room? What do you mean by that, just take the picture when the sun is shining, also what is the dome, transparent glass or a mirror?

1. During the day you'll observe the sky is generally blue or overcast and very much opaque, however as you can see from the above image there are some phenomenon that can still be photographed.

2. Based on my analysis of meteorite fragments the dome (firmament) is manufactured from a nickel-iron long-grain damascus type steel alloy with a gold colour optically reflective oxide layer. Measurements of the Sun and Moon's elevation with a sextant indicates they reflect off of the dome at a height of about ~3,000 miles.




[meteorite cross section]




[meteorite nickel-iron oxide]

[BADecker]

... only because Batman understands that the earth is a globe.

[lightlord]

And if the sun was 10x further, and 10x bigger, it would appear the same size in the sky, and your saxtant would have the same measurement on it, including
the angles on the airplane.

[BADecker]

If you use a sextant or a transit to triangulate with the sun and several different stars at a particular time of the year, and then triangulate with the same stars and the sun 90 days later, and then triangulate the triangulations, together, the distance of the sun from the earth can be ascertained to be about 90 million miles. You can use the calc to find the rough diameter of the sun to be +/- 800,000 miles.

[notbatman]

And if the sun was 10x further, and 10x bigger, it would appear the same size in the sky, and your saxtant would have the same measurement on it, including
the angles on the airplane.

Angular size requires the horizon and two sextant readings!
ANGULAR SIZE:

^{[source: http://www.thechironcenter.com/grade-7-perspective-drawing.html]}



Apparent size does not require the horizon and only needs a single sextant reading!
APPARENT SIZE:

^{[source: re-purposed pseudoscience image]}



With angular size the angle never changes so long as it hasn't past the vanishing point, it's a constant that correlates with physical size; 1 mile = 1 minute.








 

If it turns out that airplanes do in fact catalyze air into fuel and they're scamming everybody on fuel cost, then what was the source of the kerosene accelerated fire that melted all those steel beams on 9/11?

If you use a sextant or a transit to triangulate with the sun and several different stars at a particular time of the year, and then triangulate with the same stars and the sun 90 days later, and then triangulate the triangulations, together, the distance of the sun from the earth can be ascertained to be about 90 million miles. You can use the calc to find the rough diameter of the sun to be +/- 800,000 miles.

Your margin of error is about ~89,999,666 miles if you factor refraction (WARNING: DO NOT USE REFRACTION TABLES FROM NASA!) into the equation. You're also assuming the Earth is a sphere, the fact you made an assumption limits the validity of your evidence; petitio principii, or at least a variant thereof.

Try measuring the Sun's size directly with the sextant (32 minutes in diameter) and you'll get much more accurate results.