Flat Earth

[BADecker]

Jesus said that if a person does not become like a little child, he won't be able to get into the kingdom of Heaven. You have the child part in your favor, anyway.

So sick of your pedophile religion. 

That's okay. You would have to have something like that ^^^ as part of your fake religion.

[1714040399]

1714040399

[Vod]

Jesus said that if a person does not become like a little child, he won't be able to get into the kingdom of Heaven. You have the child part in your favor, anyway.

So sick of your pedophile religion. 

That's okay. You would have to have something like that ^^^ as part of your fake religion.

You have it as part of your fake one....   

[notbatman]

The Netflix documentary Behind the Curve isn't available to me.

Netflix: nope,
iTunes: nope,
Prime Video (Amazon): nope,
Youtube (paid): nope,
Google Play: nope.

[bigvito19]

New documentary movie just came out about flat Earth called Behind the Curve.

https://5movies.to/movie/behind-the-curve-90423/

[Vod]

The Netflix documentary Behind the Curve isn't available to me.

Netflix: nope,
iTunes: nope,
Prime Video (Amazon): nope,
Youtube (paid): nope,
Google Play: nope.

Sorry to type, but all those services are lying to you.   

[notbatman]

^^^ Face it you're a confused NPC i.e. a goyim, most likely a shitty one.

They're asking for money (fiat for a digital product?) to watch a shitty "hit piece" documentary and I'm, neither subscribed to any of the above video on demand services, nor am I willing to pay, especially in fiat.

New documentary movie just came out about flat Earth called Behind the Curve.

https://5movies.to/movie/behind-the-curve-90423/

[Vod]

^^^ Face it you're a confused NPC i.e. a goyim, most likely a shitty one.

Maybe, but it doesn't change the fact there is a giant conspiracy to lie to you, because you are blessed by god and should not know the evil truth. 

Consider yourself lucky.  I have to believe in science. 

[notbatman]

^^^ When something is purposefully labeled science in order to trick a stupid animal it's called pseudoscience. An animal doesn't possess the critical thinking skills need to debunk the shit he's being fed and just eats it up.

[peonminer]

^^^ Why do you even continue. It has been shown over and over, tight in this thread, that the earth definitely is not flat... and that you are not notbatman, but are really notflatman.

prob the same reason you continue with your fantasy?

I love and hate the fact that this thread is still going on years later, lmao. I am glad though for that special Netflix just released on flat earth. Literally toward the end you realize the director made an hour and half documentary just to troll the big names in flat earth. Putting small clues in the film about the fallacy of it all. Then at the very end.... well. I'm not going to ruin it for you. Go watch for yourself lol. You will love (or hate) it!

Jesus said that if a person does not become like a little child, he won't be able to get into the kingdom of Heaven. You have the child part in your favor, anyway.

So sick of your pedophile religion. 

That's okay. You would have to have something like that ^^^ as part of your fake religion.

You have it as part of your fake one....   

Good fking god. This is still going on too? Haha my word I missed you loco fawkers.

[Vod]

I love and hate the fact that this thread is still going on years later, lmao.

Me too!  Every year millions of children mature enough to avoid church, and just sit on the fence waiting for new information.   These lies posted by notbatman make them realize how stupid religion is, and they become atheists. 

[nutildah]

New documentary movie just came out about flat Earth called Behind the Curve.

https://5movies.to/movie/behind-the-curve-90423/

Awesome! Will have something to look forward to after work.



notbatman seems to be avoiding having to intake this knowledge, which means it must be pretty good.

[notbatman]

^^^ Why do you even continue. It has been shown over and over, tight in this thread, that the earth definitely is not flat... and that you are not notbatman, but are really notflatman.

prob the same reason you continue with your fantasy?

I love and hate the fact that this thread is still going on years later, lmao. I am glad though for that special Netflix just released on flat earth. Literally toward the end you realize the director made an hour and half documentary just to troll the big names in flat earth. Putting small clues in the film about the fallacy of it all. Then at the very end.... well. I'm not going to ruin it for you. Go watch for yourself lol. You will love (or hate) it!

... [VOMIT REDACTED] ...

How about I show the findings of the Michelson–Morley experiment instead of giving money to Jews for a documentary intended to slander the truth?

"The Experiments on the relative motion of the Earth and aether have been completed and the result decidedly negative. The expected deviation of the interference fringes from the zero should have been 0.40 of a fringe – the maximum displacement was 0.02 and the average much less than 0.01 – and then not in the right place. As displacement is proportional to squares of the relative velocities it follows that if the ether does slip past the relative velocity is less than one sixth of the earth’s velocity." -- Albert Abraham Michelson, 1887

This "displacement" with "the average much less than 0.01" is what fiber-optic and ring-laser gyroscopes are measuring. It was first measured by Michelson by in 1887 and constitutes a NULL "decidedly negative" result, it's too small! The Earth is motionless!

[presduterte]

Wish I could be so selective in what physics studies I chose to believe in. It must be nice, though terribly confusing. Frankly I don't know how notbatman can even tie his shoes without contradicting his weird, carefully construed web of reality. He must wear Velcro.
 

[notbatman]

^^^ We're going to use the fact my sandals adhere with Velcro to discredit the M&M experiment are we?

   The M&M experiment was reproduced with modern equipment by the UASF in 1984 and the results are still negative. The Earth is motionless and yet we have shitheads running around screaming the displacement measured and I quote, "The expected deviation of the interference fringes from the zero should have been 0.40 of a fringe – the maximum displacement was 0.02", the same displacement (aether drift) measured by modern fiberoptic and ring-laser gyroscopes somehow proves Earth's rotation?

I've got an idea, how about the liars go rope themselves instead of asking money for a shitty documentary that's intended to slander the truth?

Albert Michelson is the man, Albert Einstein was the Jew! Your fucking smartphone wouldn't be smart if it didn't use aether displacement in it's Sagnac interferometer, just FYI.



Bonus:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.flatearthsun ($4.09)

Vs.

https://itunes.apple.com/movie/behind-the-curve/id1439651893?ls=1 ($9.99)

Vs.

Dr. Scholl's Men's Gaston Fisherman Sandal Brown ($55.01)

[Astargath]

^^^ Why do you even continue. It has been shown over and over, tight in this thread, that the earth definitely is not flat... and that you are not notbatman, but are really notflatman.

prob the same reason you continue with your fantasy?

I love and hate the fact that this thread is still going on years later, lmao. I am glad though for that special Netflix just released on flat earth. Literally toward the end you realize the director made an hour and half documentary just to troll the big names in flat earth. Putting small clues in the film about the fallacy of it all. Then at the very end.... well. I'm not going to ruin it for you. Go watch for yourself lol. You will love (or hate) it!

... [VOMIT REDACTED] ...

How about I show the findings of the Michelson–Morley experiment instead of giving money to Jews for a documentary intended to slander the truth?

"The Experiments on the relative motion of the Earth and aether have been completed and the result decidedly negative. The expected deviation of the interference fringes from the zero should have been 0.40 of a fringe – the maximum displacement was 0.02 and the average much less than 0.01 – and then not in the right place. As displacement is proportional to squares of the relative velocities it follows that if the ether does slip past the relative velocity is less than one sixth of the earth’s velocity." -- Albert Abraham Michelson, 1887

This "displacement" with "the average much less than 0.01" is what fiber-optic and ring-laser gyroscopes are measuring. It was first measured by Michelson by in 1887 and constitutes a NULL "decidedly negative" result, it's too small! The Earth is motionless!

How about I show the findings of that experiment don't mean what you say they do? Oh wait, science already did that, oops.

[notbatman]

^^^ A maximum displacement of 0.02 is a negative result no matter how you skin it. You're obviously some kind of animal if you can't accept this result; rejection of imperial measure does not follow from logic.


you: "The readings are non-zero!"

me: "The interferometer is so ridiculously sensitive that it's picking up the motion of the stars sweeping past us. The cycle measured is 23h 56m (sidereal time), does the Earth no-longer rotate once every 24 hours?"

you (I know you're too much of an animal to articulate this so I'll help you out): "the Earth rotates once every 24 hours with respect to the Sun and, once every 23h 56m with respect to the stars."

me: "You've already deviated from logic when you rejected the direct measurement made by the Michelson interferometer, it's little wonder you claim the Earth rotates twice with two separate periods."

you: [NO RESPONSE]

me: A fatal flaw in the heliocentric model exposed i.e the requirement of a single physical object to make two separate rotations simultaneously, on top of showing the model is falsified by direct measurement.

you: [NO RESPONSE]

me: "He's dead Jim."

Jim: "The NPC was never truly alive."

[Vod]

Poor notbatman is a NPC everyone is lying to.   

[odolvlobo]

^^^ We're going to use the fact my sandals adhere with Velcro to discredit the M&M experiment are we?

I don't think anyone would dispute the results of the M-M experiment itself, but I think your conclusion based on that experiment is debatable.

1. The experiment shows that the Earth is motionless with respect to what?
2. Is idea that the Earth is motionless the only possible explanation for the results of the experiment?

[notbatman]

^^^ We're going to use the fact my sandals adhere with Velcro to discredit the M&M experiment are we?

I don't think anyone would dispute the results of the M-M experiment itself, but I think your conclusion based on that experiment is debatable.

1. The experiment shows that the Earth is motionless with respect to what?
2. Is idea that the Earth is motionless the only possible explanation for the results of the experiment?

1. With respect to the static aether.
2. The attempt to explain the results with relativity were falsified by the Sagnac experiment, more specifically the Dufour & Prunier replication in which a rotating frame of reference was accounted for. So yes, a motionless Earth with a static aether have been proven experimentally.

We've been going around the merry-go-round riding a dead horse for 132 years, have you seen the Monty Python episode with the parrot? The globe hasn't been a viable scientific argument since the 19th century!

[Vod]

^^ Idiot NPC using debunked arguments.