Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 02:38:49 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 [704] 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 ... 799 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Flat Earth  (Read 1095062 times)
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
February 28, 2019, 12:17:12 AM
 #14061

^^^ How do you plan on proving that dark matter isn't comprised entirely of giant invisible pink elephants? You're a filthy animal rolling around in his own crapulence!

Science can't explain observations being made because they're actually pseudoscience muggles. They invent matter that can't be seen, and energy that can't be measured all while claiming they've made a new discovery. Of course the person who originally reported the inconsistency gets told to fuck off.

Not all of the "scientists" out there are retarded pseudoscience lolcows, some of them are very clever and well organized criminals who understand how things work. There's a correct version for the chosen people and some broken or fucked version for the goyim animals, that's how shit works.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
peonminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 531


Crypto is King.


View Profile
February 28, 2019, 12:24:33 AM
 #14062

^^^ How do you plan on proving that dark matter isn't comprised entirely of giant invisible pink elephants? You're a filthy animal rolling around in his own crapulence!

Science can't explain observations being made because they're actually pseudoscience muggles. They invent matter that can't be seen, and energy that can't be measured all while claiming they've made a new discovery. Of course the person who originally reported the inconsistency gets told to fuck off.

Not all of the "scientists" out there are retarded pseudoscience lolcows, some of them are very clever and well organized criminals who understand how things work. There's a correct version for the chosen people and some broken or fucked version for the goyim animals, that's how shit works.
What the heck did I just read???

Have you ever heard of a large hadron colliderHuh

It does all that neat-o stuff you claim isn't possible. Have you been living under a rock for the past decade? Smiley
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 3010


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2019, 01:19:03 AM
 #14063

^^^ How do you plan on proving that dark matter isn't comprised entirely of giant invisible pink elephants? You're a filthy animal rolling around in his own crapulence!

Science can't explain observations being made because they're actually pseudoscience muggles. They invent matter that can't be seen, and energy that can't be measured all while claiming they've made a new discovery. Of course the person who originally reported the inconsistency gets told to fuck off.

Not all of the "scientists" out there are retarded pseudoscience lolcows, some of them are very clever and well organized criminals who understand how things work. There's a correct version for the chosen people and some broken or fucked version for the goyim animals, that's how shit works.

Just keep writing your open letters and believing someone/anyone cares about your fantasy...  lol

https://nastyscam.com - landing page up     https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon!

OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 1363


View Profile
February 28, 2019, 01:24:23 AM
 #14064

^^^ How do you plan on proving that dark matter isn't comprised entirely of giant invisible pink elephants? You're a filthy animal rolling around in his own crapulence!

Science can't explain observations being made because they're actually pseudoscience muggles. They invent matter that can't be seen, and energy that can't be measured all while claiming they've made a new discovery. Of course the person who originally reported the inconsistency gets told to fuck off.

Not all of the "scientists" out there are retarded pseudoscience lolcows, some of them are very clever and well organized criminals who understand how things work. There's a correct version for the chosen people and some broken or fucked version for the goyim animals, that's how shit works.

Just keep writing your open letters and believing someone/anyone cares about your fantasy...  lol

But you still think the earth is round, don't you... LOL!

Cool

BUDESONIDE essentially cures Covid symptoms in one day to one week >>> https://budesonideworks.com/.
Hydroxychloroquine is being used against Covid with great success >>> https://altcensored.com/watch?v=otRN0X6F81c.
Masks are stupid. Watch the first 5 minutes >>> https://www.bitchute.com/video/rlWESmrijl8Q/.
Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin. Thank you. >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
February 28, 2019, 01:40:56 AM
 #14065

^^^ How do you plan on proving that dark matter isn't comprised entirely of giant invisible pink elephants? You're a filthy animal rolling around in his own crapulence!

Science can't explain observations being made because they're actually pseudoscience muggles. They invent matter that can't be seen, and energy that can't be measured all while claiming they've made a new discovery. Of course the person who originally reported the inconsistency gets told to fuck off.

Not all of the "scientists" out there are retarded pseudoscience lolcows, some of them are very clever and well organized criminals who understand how things work. There's a correct version for the chosen people and some broken or fucked version for the goyim animals, that's how shit works.
What the heck did I just read???

Have you ever heard of a large hadron colliderHuh

It does all that neat-o stuff you claim isn't possible. Have you been living under a rock for the past decade? Smiley

Actually I've been tinkering with electro-mechanical machines, magnets and circuits for a long time now. The LHC is a big multi-purpose electromagnet. They do some experiment, apply some buzzword to centuries old fluid mechanic equations describing the aether and everybody is baffled by all the bullshit. They've got a facade of mathematical equations plastered to the output of two atoms smashed together; these guys are doing other shit with all that hardware.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4270
Merit: 3160



View Profile
February 28, 2019, 08:11:32 AM
 #14066

2. The attempt to explain the results with relativity were falsified by the Sagnac experiment, more specifically the Dufour & Prunier replication in which a rotating frame of reference was accounted for. So yes, a motionless Earth with a static aether have been proven experimentally.

You have an interesting conundrum here. I watched the movie, Behind The Curve, which documented an experiment by some flat-earthers. They did an experiment with a laser gyroscope, which is based on the Sagnac Effect that you say proves that the Earth is motionless. However, in their experiment, the gyroscope showed that the Earth rotates once every 24 hours!

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
presduterte
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 58

They call me Rad Rody.


View Profile
February 28, 2019, 09:23:08 AM
 #14067

I'm going to fucking deny there's giant invisible pink elephants in the sky, I'm going to deny their trunks are holding onto invisible black holes keeping them from flying apart!

But you won't deny that there's an invisible man in the sky, so what's the difference really? Sheesh man this is getting kind of embarrassing for you.
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
February 28, 2019, 09:25:51 AM
Last edit: February 28, 2019, 11:55:38 AM by notbatman
 #14068

2. The attempt to explain the results with relativity were falsified by the Sagnac experiment, more specifically the Dufour & Prunier replication in which a rotating frame of reference was accounted for. So yes, a motionless Earth with a static aether have been proven experimentally.

You have an interesting conundrum here. I watched the movie, Behind The Curve, which documented an experiment by some flat-earthers. They did an experiment with a laser gyroscope, which is based on the Sagnac Effect that you say proves that the Earth is motionless. However, in their experiment, the gyroscope showed that the Earth rotates once every 24 hours!

Fuck, I just made multiple posts addressing this issue; it's the same aether drift as measured in the M&M experiment. This is what the fiberoptic gyro is picking up and just as documented in the M&M experiment it can't account for the missing displacement predicted by the Copernican model.

"The Experiments on the relative motion of the Earth and aether have been completed and the result decidedly negative. The expected deviation of the interference fringes from the zero should have been 0.40 of a fringe – the maximum displacement was 0.02 and the average much less than 0.01 – and then not in the right place. As displacement is proportional to squares of the relative velocities it follows that if the ether does slip past the relative velocity is less than one sixth of the earth’s velocity." -- Albert Abraham Michelson, 1887

The clowns behind the curve the movie are a bunch of Jews charging $9.99 on iTunes for the privilege of watching them slander the truth.



I'm going to fucking deny there's giant invisible pink elephants in the sky, I'm going to deny their trunks are holding onto invisible black holes keeping them from flying apart!

But you won't deny that there's an invisible man in the sky, so what's the difference really? Sheesh man this is getting kind of embarrassing for you.

The difference is God isn't invisible just really tall, that and there's a barrier blocking the view. Dark matter on the other hand is made up bullshit to explain why observations don't match the predictions made by the current astronomical model.
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
February 28, 2019, 01:39:53 PM
 #14069

^^^ Thanks for the copy & paste, fucking retard.

A close small Sun with divergent rays over a flat surface yields the same results. You can add a 3rd stick but after refraction is factored in the results are consistent with a flat earth and falsify the globe.

BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 1363


View Profile
February 28, 2019, 03:59:36 PM
 #14070

^^^ This is why you use a telescope. So you can see where the distortion limits are, and make an accurate observation.

Cool

BUDESONIDE essentially cures Covid symptoms in one day to one week >>> https://budesonideworks.com/.
Hydroxychloroquine is being used against Covid with great success >>> https://altcensored.com/watch?v=otRN0X6F81c.
Masks are stupid. Watch the first 5 minutes >>> https://www.bitchute.com/video/rlWESmrijl8Q/.
Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin. Thank you. >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz
exemplaar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 978
Merit: 506



View Profile
February 28, 2019, 09:54:53 PM
 #14071

^^^ Thanks for the copy & paste, fucking retard.

A close small Sun with divergent rays over a flat surface yields the same results. You can add a 3rd stick but after refraction is factored in the results are consistent with a flat earth and falsify the globe.



Sometimes you must present reality in pictures to these globofans:



Flat earth realm, not object:



+bonus:




notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
March 01, 2019, 12:10:40 AM
 #14072

^^^ Just don't forget to mention refraction! That illustration is great at getting the point across but, it omits refraction and is in fact a variation on the original Eratosthenes experiment using more sticks. If you don't understand that, a shill can use real world observations to claim he's measuring a curve. The shill will be able to embarrass you while at the same time convince any observers that the globe has been proven. Be warned the illustration comes from the controlled opposition group The Flat Earth Society.

In reality refraction produces a lensing effect that causes image distortion. The distortion is at a maximum closest to the horizon and at a minimum directly above you creating a concave lens. After passing through this atmospheric lens the image of the Sun will project shadows that can be interpreted as proving a globe if, the lens is omitted (an act of deception) during calculation.
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4270
Merit: 3160



View Profile
March 01, 2019, 01:35:32 AM
 #14073

^^^ Just don't forget to mention refraction! That illustration is great at getting the point across but, it omits refraction and is in fact a variation on the original Eratosthenes experiment using more sticks.

As you stated, refraction is necessary in order to explain the values of the observed angles. If you omit refraction, then the predicted angles wouldn't match reality. I assume that the refraction is understood to be caused by the increasing density of the atmosphere as you get closer to the surface. It should be possible to compute the amount of refraction based on the densities of the atmosphere at different heights and see if that matches the observed refraction based on a flat earth model.

Another possible experiment would be to measure the angle of the sun at a very high altitude and compare it to the angle at a low altitude. If the angles don't match, it would be evidence for both refraction and a nearby sun. If the angles do match, it would be evidence against those ideas.

Has any of that been done and documented? If so, I would be interested in seeing it.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
March 01, 2019, 01:48:19 AM
Last edit: March 01, 2019, 02:08:39 AM by notbatman
 #14074

^^^ There's a relationship between temperature and pressure, this means that cold air at high altitudes is more dense than warm air close to the surface.



edit:

Perfect Gas Law:

   "This law is a generalization containing both Boyle's law and Charles's law as special cases and states that for a specified quantity of gas, the product of the volume v and pressure p is proportional to the absolute temperature t; i.e., in equation form, pv = kt, in which k is a constant." -- https://www.britannica.com/science/perfect-gas




sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 3427


born once atheist


View Profile
March 01, 2019, 02:10:33 AM
 #14075

So the other day I was out on a walk and noticed this fat Pavorotti type dude
sporting a funny feathered hat and holding up a turkey drumstick.
I was like...”hey, it’s not flat man!”

Padda boom...pshhhhh....

^^^ But the best liars are the ones who tell an sufficient amount of truth at the same times they tell their lies.

For example. Truth + lie: "... everything you're told about who you are, where you come from, where you live and where you're going is a lie." Lie + truth: "Rockets go into the Bermuda Triangle and visible objects converge to a point on the horizon. I'm sorry but... ."

So, I guess this makes you notflatman rather than notbatman.

Cool


^^^ Why do you even continue. It has been shown over and over, tight in this thread, that the earth definitely is not flat... and that you are not notbatman, but are really notflatman.

Cool

Hmmmmm...

Bitcoin...the future of all monetary transactions...and always will be
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
March 01, 2019, 02:45:54 AM
 #14076


[Lava Lamp]



[Special Snowflake]
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 3010


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile WWW
March 01, 2019, 07:48:49 AM
 #14077

^^^ There's a relationship between temperature and pressure, this means that cold air at high altitudes is more dense than warm air close to the surface.

that relationship relies on gravitySmiley


https://nastyscam.com - landing page up     https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon!

OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
March 01, 2019, 09:35:08 AM
 #14078

If you stick a stick in the (sticky) ground, it will produce a shadow. The shadow moves as time passes (which is the principle for ancient Shadow Clocks). If the world had been flat, then two sticks in different locations would produce the same shadow:


Imagine the Sun's rays (represented by yellow lines) hitting two sticks (white lines) some distance apart. If the Earth were flat, the resulting shadows would be the same length, no matter how far apart you place the sticks.

But they don’t. This is because the Earth is round, and not flat


Lyrics | Seo Company in India


^^^ Thanks for the copy & paste, fucking retard.

A close small Sun with divergent rays over a flat surface yields the same results. You can add a 3rd stick but after refraction is factored in the results are consistent with a flat earth and falsify the globe.



Sometimes you must present reality in pictures to these globofans:



Flat earth realm, not object:

https://i0.wp.com/flatearthscienceandbible.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/image16.jpeg?resize=672%2C372&ssl=1

+bonus:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-N6xYNVYAAwfCZ.jpg

^^^ Just don't forget to mention refraction! That illustration is great at getting the point across but, it omits refraction and is in fact a variation on the original Eratosthenes experiment using more sticks. If you don't understand that, a shill can use real world observations to claim he's measuring a curve. The shill will be able to embarrass you while at the same time convince any observers that the globe has been proven. Be warned the illustration comes from the controlled opposition group The Flat Earth Society.

In reality refraction produces a lensing effect that causes image distortion. The distortion is at a maximum closest to the horizon and at a minimum directly above you creating a concave lens. After passing through this atmospheric lens the image of the Sun will project shadows that can be interpreted as proving a globe if, the lens is omitted (an act of deception) during calculation.

As you stated, refraction is necessary in order to explain the values of the observed angles. If you omit refraction, then the predicted angles wouldn't match reality. I assume that the refraction is understood to be caused by the increasing density of the atmosphere as you get closer to the surface. It should be possible to compute the amount of refraction based on the densities of the atmosphere at different heights and see if that matches the observed refraction based on a flat earth model.

Another possible experiment would be to measure the angle of the sun at a very high altitude and compare it to the angle at a low altitude. If the angles don't match, it would be evidence for both refraction and a nearby sun. If the angles do match, it would be evidence against those ideas.

Has any of that been done and documented? If so, I would be interested in seeing it.


^^^ There's a relationship between temperature and pressure, this means that cold air at high altitudes is more dense than warm air close to the surface.



edit:

Perfect Gas Law:

   "This law is a generalization containing both Boyle's law and Charles's law as special cases and states that for a specified quantity of gas, the product of the volume v and pressure p is proportional to the absolute temperature t; i.e., in equation form, pv = kt, in which k is a constant." -- https://www.britannica.com/science/perfect-gas




https://i.imgur.com/yBl5PQn.jpg

that relationship relies on gravitySmiley

No, no it doesn't.
presduterte
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 222
Merit: 58

They call me Rad Rody.


View Profile
March 01, 2019, 10:33:53 AM
 #14079

I'm going to fucking deny there's giant invisible pink elephants in the sky, I'm going to deny their trunks are holding onto invisible black holes keeping them from flying apart!

But you won't deny that there's an invisible man in the sky, so what's the difference really? Sheesh man this is getting kind of embarrassing for you.

The difference is God isn't invisible just really tall, that and there's a barrier blocking the view. Dark matter on the other hand is made up bullshit to explain why observations don't match the predictions made by the current astronomical model.

Oh right, God is tall and hidden by a barrier, physics is made up bullshit, right, got it now. Between that and the lava lamp picture I'm sold.  Roll Eyes

I suppose bacteria didn't exist either before we could see it on a microscope.

Fucking idiot.


notbatman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
March 02, 2019, 12:53:29 AM
 #14080

I'm going to fucking deny there's giant invisible pink elephants in the sky, I'm going to deny their trunks are holding onto invisible black holes keeping them from flying apart!

But you won't deny that there's an invisible man in the sky, so what's the difference really? Sheesh man this is getting kind of embarrassing for you.

The difference is God isn't invisible just really tall, that and there's a barrier blocking the view. Dark matter on the other hand is made up bullshit to explain why observations don't match the predictions made by the current astronomical model.

Oh right, God is tall and hidden by a barrier, physics is made up bullshit, right, got it now. Between that and the lava lamp picture I'm sold.  Roll Eyes

I suppose bacteria didn't exist either before we could see it on a microscope.

Fucking idiot.




Is physics and the scientific method bullshit? No, "modern science" isn't based on the scientific method, it's based on authority and engineered consensus; there's no basis for it in any physical reality. Their model of heavy exploding balls in a vacuum doesn't match observation and they're telling you, "oh, it's all held together by invisible matter goy", "you can't see it or weight it but trust us goy, it's really there".

No mate, you're the fucking retarded cuckold here!

Pages: « 1 ... 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 [704] 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 ... 799 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!