Bitcoin Forum
October 23, 2019, 10:27:50 PM
 Home Help Search Login Register More
 Pages: 1 ... 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 [772] 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797
 Author Topic: Flat Earth  (Read 1082402 times)
odolvlobo
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1425

 June 25, 2019, 01:28:06 AM

Keep in mind that I'm combining angles from both physical space and optical space and the diagram is less than clear in this regard. R & T also need to be moved over to the left side.

First point, the distance to the sun can't be calculated from the sun's apparent size alone. As you can see I didn't use "I" or "U" at all in my calculation at all, only "Q" and "A".

You can if you know the effect of refraction. Do you know how to compute that?

...
Finally the sun is always 32 minutes wide due to refraction and maintains the same diameter as if it was at 90° because of it. As you can see the calculations for the angular size (X) have not been completed yet. In the case of the sun and moon here X will equal U and refraction plays a role such that a refracted optical space is created in addition to the physical and optical spaces.

I see. The sun appears to have the same size because of refraction. That raises a question for me. Why are the sun and moon affected by refraction in this way, but other objects are not?

Buy stuff on Amazon at a discount with bitcoins or convert Amazon points to bitcoins: Purse.io
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
1571869670
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1571869670

Ignore
 1571869670

1571869670
 Report to moderator
1571869670
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1571869670

Ignore
 1571869670

1571869670
 Report to moderator
1571869670
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1571869670

Ignore
 1571869670

1571869670
 Report to moderator
WEEKLY BONUS Unlimited Faucet&Fastest Dice PLINKO DICE CRASH ROULETTE PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124

 June 25, 2019, 01:49:41 AM

Finally the sun is always 32 minutes wide due to refraction and maintains the same diameter as if it was at 90° because of it.

Even if the sun is always 32 minutes wide, using a telescope directed at the sun shows far greater perspective than using the eyes alone. You have agreed with this in former posts.

This shows that neither the eyes or the telescope are necessarily accurate. A different method is necessary, one that determines either the distance or the size of the sun. It has to be far more accurate than the eyes or even the telescope. This is what modern astronomy has accomplished. It is also why your calc fails.

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
BobLawblaw
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 2044

Bitcointalk's Friendly Gay Negro from Outer Space

 June 25, 2019, 02:28:40 AM

Fundamentalist Christian and self-proclaimed founder of the “Biblical Flat Earth Society,” Phillip Stephen Stallings, was arrested this week and charged with 56 counts of child sexual exploitation, as reported by local news station WTDV.

The 40-year-old Durham, North Carolina resident is facing dozens of charges for sexually exploiting minors for allegedly downloading media that involved minors engaged in sexual situations and sharing this illegal media on social platforms.

He was arrested on Wednesday morning at his home by Durham County deputies as a part of a U.S. Department of Homeland Security investigation, according to WRAL.com.

“It’s part of an investigation across the nation right now for possession of child pornography and creation of child pornography,” said Durham County Assistant District Attorney Kendra Montgomery-Blinn during a short court hearing on Thursday morning. “They had information that Mr. Stallings was sharing his materials on a social media platform.”

Stallings faces 28 counts of second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor and 28 counts of third-degree sexual exploitation of a minor after being caught with child pornography. He has also been served with a warrant related to both cyberstalking and financial card theft.
Astargath
Hero Member

Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 634

 June 25, 2019, 06:25:22 AM

Fundamentalist Christian and self-proclaimed founder of the “Biblical Flat Earth Society,” Phillip Stephen Stallings, was arrested this week and charged with 56 counts of child sexual exploitation, as reported by local news station WTDV.

The 40-year-old Durham, North Carolina resident is facing dozens of charges for sexually exploiting minors for allegedly downloading media that involved minors engaged in sexual situations and sharing this illegal media on social platforms.

He was arrested on Wednesday morning at his home by Durham County deputies as a part of a U.S. Department of Homeland Security investigation, according to WRAL.com.

“It’s part of an investigation across the nation right now for possession of child pornography and creation of child pornography,” said Durham County Assistant District Attorney Kendra Montgomery-Blinn during a short court hearing on Thursday morning. “They had information that Mr. Stallings was sharing his materials on a social media platform.”

Stallings faces 28 counts of second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor and 28 counts of third-degree sexual exploitation of a minor after being caught with child pornography. He has also been served with a warrant related to both cyberstalking and financial card theft.

Not a surprise really, these people and religious extremists are the same scum. They are able to believe in stupid shit easily, they probably think its totally fine or even good to have sex with children, they are all degenerates and this not even an isolated case, priests abuse children all the time, its not a coincidence.
I also wonder where is god when all that happens, perhaps busy taking care of the projectors of the sun and the moon.
notbatman
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1018

 June 25, 2019, 06:39:37 AM

Keep in mind that I'm combining angles from both physical space and optical space and the diagram is less than clear in this regard. R & T also need to be moved over to the left side.

First point, the distance to the sun can't be calculated from the sun's apparent size alone. As you can see I didn't use "I" or "U" at all in my calculation at all, only "Q" and "A".

You can if you know the effect of refraction. Do you know how to compute that?

...
Finally the sun is always 32 minutes wide due to refraction and maintains the same diameter as if it was at 90° because of it. As you can see the calculations for the angular size (X) have not been completed yet. In the case of the sun and moon here X will equal U and refraction plays a role such that a refracted optical space is created in addition to the physical and optical spaces.

I see. The sun appears to have the same size because of refraction. That raises a question for me. Why are the sun and moon affected by refraction in this way, but other objects are not?

No, no, no and no! You can not calculate the distance to the sun or moon from just apparent size you have to have another object, in this case I used the horizon. Atmospheric refraction is not another object.

Refraction can be determined by calculating the sun or moon's apparent size and position then comparing them with measured values. The difference will be the effect of refraction.

The sun and moon are affected by atmospheric refraction because there are layers of different density gases below them and they causes the light to change direction.

Other objects, what other objects? Stars are points of light and remain points of light after being refracted.

Accuracy is irrelevant for determining approximate values. The fact you throw the baby out with the bathwater showcases your intellectual dishonesty.
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124

 June 25, 2019, 07:19:53 AM

Accuracy is irrelevant for determining approximate values. The fact you throw the baby out with the bathwater showcases your intellectual dishonesty.

Accuracy in approximations of approximations is always relevant. Regarding the distances we are talking about, you are off by about 93 million miles or so, which means you are off by around 3 million percent or so.

But this is totally acceptable for anyone who wants to believe the earth is flat. Notice that I said "wants to." I could be wrong. You might simply be a promoter of something you don't believe in, for nefarious reasons.

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
notbatman
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1018

 June 25, 2019, 08:13:56 AM

^^^ You think it's fucking reasonable to believe that we're stuck to the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum orbiting a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb in an endless virtually empty universe created by nothing exploding for no reason?

The only way anybody could possibly believe any of that shit is if they were indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth.
lightlord
Donator
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1042

 June 25, 2019, 11:57:10 AMLast edit: June 25, 2019, 12:26:01 PM by lightlord

^^^ You think it's fucking reasonable to believe that we're stuck to the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum orbiting a million-mile wide thermonuclear bomb in an endless virtually empty universe created by nothing exploding for no reason?

The only way anybody could possibly believe any of that shit is if they were indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth.

Occam's Razor, the universe as a quantum fluctuation, that at some point in 10^10^10^10 years, however, there is no time before the universe, so the concept of this is rather meaningless. That the right quantum fluctuation created an explosion so large known as the big bang. The asymmetry between anti-matter and matter, "The LHCb data revealed a significant level of asymmetries in those CP-violation-sensitive quantities for the Λb0and Λb0-bar baryon decays, with differences in some cases as large as 20%." as in regards to the Large Hadron Collider. However the preliminary findings are level of 3.3 standard deviations, so about 99.9%+ usually it warrants a 5 standard deviation.

Explains why the result isn't 1-1 or a total of 0, but something other than 0. Hence you get stars, galaxies. Billions of years and trillions of planets to conduct random mixing paves the way for the chance of life. And a documentary shows that mixing a bunch of elements together in a certain fashion and environment can arrive at a pre-state for life. Do this a trillion-trillion times, it becomes much more likely that one time results in the needed outcome for life. From 100 billion possible places on a single planet to 100 billion in a galaxy, to 100 billion galaxies in the universe. So you got 10^11*10^11*10^11, or 10^33 as in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Possible attempts at achieving life.

From there, replication, and variation paves the way to life, and evolution to us. A single-thing as pre-cell replicates a billion times, say 99.9999% dies, you are left with 1000, which are just different enough in variation to survive, and they copy themselves. Some are losing the ability to copy, and others maintaining it, over time, you get variation and change. Where some change and variation is better than others. These better variations take over and continue, ones that find consuming another within their cluster as an energy source is an more optimal method, paves for more complex versions, of them running away from each other, and a form of competition, speed, and shape (Survival of the fittest). Which continues and cointunes, perhaps in size, and cooperation is more optimal, which paves the way to the first simple organisms.

Size, is more optimal, which keeps going on for 100s of millions of years, as it takes a loooooong time to get anywhere. You get simple sex-tiny things and a form of cooperation, in a way to life. Paves to larger, and larger, then eventually fish like life. Life can tend to want to spread around, so one that escaped and went on to land, at a start had that advantage, that the one in the sea didn't. These again, competition, speed, shape, form, eventually intelligence to plan against another became an advantage. To simple creatures, to mammals, to larger faster. Upright, cooperation, and eventually early humans, humans, civilization, and us today.
*I skipped like 99.999999% in between here, but basically the concept.

To say that we are existing in a beginning state of the universe a magical super being, that created this dome around a flat planet, is starting from a top-down approach saying that God created everything. And why specifically this super-being created Flat Earth only and nothing else? Why not square earth, Cube Earth, alternate dimension, etc? Why a complicated metallic dome holographic around a flat plane? And nothing else? And why is your concept right, and no others is?

When bottom-up, from a single point, skipping the need for the convenience and explanation of how everything works. So out of nowhere, this so-called being popped into existence said "Hey" I want to create flat earth, with a dome around it, and it will be populated by a 5 pointed intelligent organism, 1 head, 2 arms, 2 legs, for the lols.

It's the same as if you threw 50 coins on a table at once, and expected all of them to land on the side. It will tend to result in the simplest most common approach. You are the one that is brained washed with all this nonsense.

 ███████████████████   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★   ███████████████████BITVEST ║★║ ..BIG WINNER!. [15.00000000 BTC] ║★║ ▄████████████████████▄████████████████████████████████▀▀███████████████████░░░░███████████████████▄▄█████████████████▀▀████▀▀█████████████░░░░██░░░░█████████████▄▄████▄▄███████████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀███████░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄██████████████████████████▀████████████████████▀ ▄████████████████████▄███████████████████████████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█████████░░▄███▄░░░░███████████▄▄███▀░░░░▄███████████████░░░░░░███████████████░░░░░░░██████████████░░░░░░░░██████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████████████████████████████▀████████████████████▀ ▄████████████████████▄███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░██████████▀░░█████░░░░████████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄██████████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█████░████▄░███████░░░░███░█████░█████████░░████░░░▀█░██████████░░████░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░▀██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░ ▄████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄█████████████░█▀▀▀█░█████████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░█████░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄▀██░████████░███████░█▀ ▄████████████████████▄████████▀▀░░░▀▀██████████▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀████░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀████░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░████░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░████░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░████░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░████░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░████▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░███████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄█████████████▄▄█▄▄████████▀████████████████████▀ ║★║ INVESTOR PLINKO & CASINO GAMES..● PLINKO   |7| SLOTS   (+) ROULETTE   ▼ BIT SPIN   ■ DICE... ║★║ ✔ Rainbot✔ Daily Quests✔ Faucet
notbatman
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1018

 June 25, 2019, 12:43:38 PMLast edit: June 25, 2019, 03:07:44 PM by notbatman

^^^ You're wandering off-topic and I've been advised not to cast pearls before swine, so I'll just let you wallow in your own crapulence. If you want to prove a pressurized atmosphere can be maintained within a hard vacuum environment without a container be my guest.

Here's Stephen Hawking pictured on Jeffrey Epsteins Island of Sin:

lightlord
Donator
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1042

 June 25, 2019, 02:04:54 PM

If want to prove a pressurized atmosphere can be maintained within a hard vacuum environment without a container be my guest.

Rather simple, Gravity but then again you don't believe in gravity

 ███████████████████   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★   ███████████████████BITVEST ║★║ ..BIG WINNER!. [15.00000000 BTC] ║★║ ▄████████████████████▄████████████████████████████████▀▀███████████████████░░░░███████████████████▄▄█████████████████▀▀████▀▀█████████████░░░░██░░░░█████████████▄▄████▄▄███████████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀███████░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄██████████████████████████▀████████████████████▀ ▄████████████████████▄███████████████████████████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█████████░░▄███▄░░░░███████████▄▄███▀░░░░▄███████████████░░░░░░███████████████░░░░░░░██████████████░░░░░░░░██████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████████████████████████████▀████████████████████▀ ▄████████████████████▄███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░██████████▀░░█████░░░░████████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄██████████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█████░████▄░███████░░░░███░█████░█████████░░████░░░▀█░██████████░░████░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░▀██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░ ▄████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄█████████████░█▀▀▀█░█████████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░█████░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄▀██░████████░███████░█▀ ▄████████████████████▄████████▀▀░░░▀▀██████████▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀████░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀████░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░████░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░████░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░████░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░████░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░████▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░███████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄█████████████▄▄█▄▄████████▀████████████████████▀ ║★║ INVESTOR PLINKO & CASINO GAMES..● PLINKO   |7| SLOTS   (+) ROULETTE   ▼ BIT SPIN   ■ DICE... ║★║ ✔ Rainbot✔ Daily Quests✔ Faucet
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124

 June 25, 2019, 02:07:58 PM

^^^ You think it's fucking reasonable to believe that we're stuck to the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum orbiting a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb in an endless virtually empty universe created by nothing exploding for no reason?

The only way anybody could possibly believe any of that shit is if they were indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth.

Oh, come on. Tell us what you are really doing with this thread.

There probably isn't anyone in the world that believes those things you say... spinning ball, thermonuclear bomb.

Yet you try to make us believe, that you believe, that there are people who believe that way.

You aren't that dumb. You are way too smart to believe that there are people who believe that way. We know it. You know it. Your FE buddies know it. So, why don't you tell us your real purpose in this thread? Or would telling us destroy your purpose?

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
ðºÞæ
Sr. Member

Offline

Activity: 1105
Merit: 287

 June 25, 2019, 02:40:00 PM

......... Gravity

Gravity is a funny bitch, does funny things to legs/shoes.

Does it effect everyone? maybe not

A picture says........

notbatman
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1018

 June 25, 2019, 03:01:24 PM

If you want to prove a pressurized atmosphere can be maintained within a hard vacuum environment without a container be my guest.

Rather simple, Gravity but then again you don't believe in gravity

So if I have a 1L beaker that contains 1L of air at standard temperature and pressure, and I place it in a vacuum chamber with a hard vacuum, the force of gravity will keep the air from rising up and escaping the beaker?

Astargath
Hero Member

Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 634

 June 25, 2019, 03:38:57 PM

If you want to prove a pressurized atmosphere can be maintained within a hard vacuum environment without a container be my guest.

Rather simple, Gravity but then again you don't believe in gravity

So if I have a 1L beaker that contains 1L of air at standard temperature and pressure, and I place it in a vacuum chamber with a hard vacuum, the force of gravity will keep the air from rising up and escaping the beaker?

Gravity has been tested for decades and it works, every single time, all the predictions done on gravity are accurate. The black hole that was recently "photographed" was also predicted to look that way.
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124

 June 25, 2019, 04:01:56 PM

^^^ You think it's fucking reasonable to believe that we're stuck to the surface of a spinning ball in a vacuum orbiting a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb in an endless virtually empty universe created by nothing exploding for no reason?

The only way anybody could possibly believe any of that shit is if they were indoctrinated and brainwashed from birth.

Oh, come on. Tell us what you are really doing with this thread.

There probably isn't anyone in the world that believes those things you say... spinning ball, thermonuclear bomb.

Yet you try to make us believe, that you believe, that there are people who believe that way.

You aren't that dumb. You are way too smart to believe that there are people who believe that way. We know it. You know it. Your FE buddies know it. So, why don't you tell us your real purpose in this thread? Or would telling us destroy your purpose?

Notice how notbatman ignores what I say above^^? All he's doing is playing a game with this entire thread.

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
lightlord
Donator
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1042

 June 25, 2019, 04:05:19 PMLast edit: June 25, 2019, 04:18:14 PM by lightlord

If you want to prove a pressurized atmosphere can be maintained within a hard vacuum environment without a container be my guest.

Rather simple, Gravity but then again you don't believe in gravity

So if I have a 1L beaker that contains 1L of air at standard temperature and pressure, and I place it in a vacuum chamber with a hard vacuum, the force of gravity will keep the air from rising up and escaping the beaker?

Quite the misconception, a vacuum is the ABSENT of anything, it doesn't exert any force, and doesn't pull.

Two Principles, Inversion and non-Inversion

1#) A vacuum chamber on earth with compromised Integrity, can implode in on itself, due to air pressure equalization.
2#) A air'd in the container in space with 1 atmospheric pressure/surface with compromised Integrity, can Explode, as positive pressure, and escape outwards.

If the pressure is at 0.2 atmospheric pressure, less outward force. Like the atmosphere around Earth, the higher up you go from the sea, the lower the atmospheric pressure. On Mountains it's lower, go up even higher it's even lower. Thus less outward force.

The Force of gravity is stronger then the outward force of the much lower pressure, hence it doesn't escape into space.

Edit: *Actually some does escape but much slooower due to the less pressure, and replacement is on-par with the loss, thus our planet isn't like mars, bad example: But think of it like this: An hose that inserts air into the beaker, and the vacuum chamber maintains it's vacuum by sucking air out. While air rushes out of the beaker, it still gets replaced at par with the loss, so it stays in the beaker.

However, the scale is much longer for the earth.

 ███████████████████   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★   ███████████████████BITVEST ║★║ ..BIG WINNER!. [15.00000000 BTC] ║★║ ▄████████████████████▄████████████████████████████████▀▀███████████████████░░░░███████████████████▄▄█████████████████▀▀████▀▀█████████████░░░░██░░░░█████████████▄▄████▄▄███████████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀███████░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄██████████████████████████▀████████████████████▀ ▄████████████████████▄███████████████████████████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█████████░░▄███▄░░░░███████████▄▄███▀░░░░▄███████████████░░░░░░███████████████░░░░░░░██████████████░░░░░░░░██████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████████████████████████████▀████████████████████▀ ▄████████████████████▄███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░██████████▀░░█████░░░░████████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄██████████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█████░████▄░███████░░░░███░█████░█████████░░████░░░▀█░██████████░░████░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░▀██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░ ▄████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄█████████████░█▀▀▀█░█████████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░█████░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄▀██░████████░███████░█▀ ▄████████████████████▄████████▀▀░░░▀▀██████████▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀████░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀████░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░████░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░████░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░████░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░████░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░████▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░███████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄█████████████▄▄█▄▄████████▀████████████████████▀ ║★║ INVESTOR PLINKO & CASINO GAMES..● PLINKO   |7| SLOTS   (+) ROULETTE   ▼ BIT SPIN   ■ DICE... ║★║ ✔ Rainbot✔ Daily Quests✔ Faucet
odolvlobo
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1425

 June 25, 2019, 04:46:36 PM

Keep in mind that I'm combining angles from both physical space and optical space and the diagram is less than clear in this regard. R & T also need to be moved over to the left side.
First point, the distance to the sun can't be calculated from the sun's apparent size alone. As you can see I didn't use "I" or "U" at all in my calculation at all, only "Q" and "A".
You can if you know the effect of refraction. Do you know how to compute that?
...
Finally the sun is always 32 minutes wide due to refraction and maintains the same diameter as if it was at 90° because of it. As you can see the calculations for the angular size (X) have not been completed yet. In the case of the sun and moon here X will equal U and refraction plays a role such that a refracted optical space is created in addition to the physical and optical spaces.
I see. The sun appears to have the same size because of refraction. That raises a question for me. Why are the sun and moon affected by refraction in this way, but other objects are not?

No, no, no and no! You can not calculate the distance to the sun or moon from just apparent size you have to have another object, in this case I used the horizon. Atmospheric refraction is not another object.

Refraction can be determined by calculating the sun or moon's apparent size and position then comparing them with measured values. The difference will be the effect of refraction.

The sun and moon are affected by atmospheric refraction because there are layers of different density gases below them and they causes the light to change direction.

Sure you can. It is simple trigonometry. Given the either the distance or the size, it is easy to compute the other.

As for calculating the effect of refraction, I meant this: "Given the angle above the horizon and the distance, what is the amount of magnification?"

Buy stuff on Amazon at a discount with bitcoins or convert Amazon points to bitcoins: Purse.io
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
zhekinsp
Full Member

Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 126

 June 25, 2019, 08:33:42 PM

This theory is very confusing for me however I think about this theory I had the doubt so much how people can live in the flat Earth also if it possible then there is some end is also available in this world that's why it is so much confusion

notbatman
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1018

 June 26, 2019, 02:45:04 AMLast edit: June 26, 2019, 02:45:35 PM by notbatman

Keep in mind that I'm combining angles from both physical space and optical space and the diagram is less than clear in this regard. R & T also need to be moved over to the left side.
First point, the distance to the sun can't be calculated from the sun's apparent size alone. As you can see I didn't use "I" or "U" at all in my calculation at all, only "Q" and "A".
You can if you know the effect of refraction. Do you know how to compute that?
...
Finally the sun is always 32 minutes wide due to refraction and maintains the same diameter as if it was at 90° because of it. As you can see the calculations for the angular size (X) have not been completed yet. In the case of the sun and moon here X will equal U and refraction plays a role such that a refracted optical space is created in addition to the physical and optical spaces.
I see. The sun appears to have the same size because of refraction. That raises a question for me. Why are the sun and moon affected by refraction in this way, but other objects are not?

No, no, no and no! You can not calculate the distance to the sun or moon from just apparent size you have to have another object, in this case I used the horizon. Atmospheric refraction is not another object.

Refraction can be determined by calculating the sun or moon's apparent size and position then comparing them with measured values. The difference will be the effect of refraction.

The sun and moon are affected by atmospheric refraction because there are layers of different density gases below them and they causes the light to change direction.

Sure you can. It is simple trigonometry. Given the either the distance or the size, it is easy to compute the other.

As for calculating the effect of refraction, I meant this: "Given the angle above the horizon and the distance, what is the amount of magnification?"

NO!

You don't know either the actual size or the distance! Hold a dime at arms length and it's size is 32 minuets wide, does that mean it's 3,000 miles away? Fuck no!

In your diagram you label the sun's diameter as 32 nautical miles (nm) how do you know this? How do you know that the 1 nautical mile per 1 minute applies to the 32 minuets you measured the sun at?

If you want to prove a pressurized atmosphere can be maintained within a hard vacuum environment without a container be my guest.

Rather simple, Gravity but then again you don't believe in gravity

So if I have a 1L beaker that contains 1L of air at standard temperature and pressure, and I place it in a vacuum chamber with a hard vacuum, the force of gravity will keep the air from rising up and escaping the beaker?

Quite the misconception, a vacuum is the ABSENT of anything, it doesn't exert any force, and doesn't pull.

Two Principles, Inversion and non-Inversion

1#) A vacuum chamber on earth with compromised Integrity, can implode in on itself, due to air pressure equalization.
2#) A air'd in the container in space with 1 atmospheric pressure/surface with compromised Integrity, can Explode, as positive pressure, and escape outwards.

If the pressure is at 0.2 atmospheric pressure, less outward force. Like the atmosphere around Earth, the higher up you go from the sea, the lower the atmospheric pressure. On Mountains it's lower, go up even higher it's even lower. Thus less outward force.

The Force of gravity is stronger then the outward force of the much lower pressure, hence it doesn't escape into space.

Edit: *Actually some does escape but much slooower due to the less pressure, and replacement is on-par with the loss, thus our planet isn't like mars, bad example: But think of it like this: An hose that inserts air into the beaker, and the vacuum chamber maintains it's vacuum by sucking air out. While air rushes out of the beaker, it still gets replaced at par with the loss, so it stays in the beaker.

However, the scale is much longer for the earth.

Where does the hose leading into the earth come from?
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1124

 June 26, 2019, 03:12:39 AM

^^^ This is so humorous. You get someone who essentially agrees with notbatman, and he argues with them about it. How funny.

Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz !
 Pages: 1 ... 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 [772] 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797
 « previous topic next topic »