Flat Earth

[sirazimuth]

^^^ The Earth is stationary, it does not move. The Earth is also covered by a steel dome, so there is no "universe" out there, just a solid barrier. "Planets" are just stars that "wander", small close lights made of plasma.

We are on a motionless plain not a "planet". You have to throw out the entire Copernican model, it's all garbage.

Gawd bless you!!! What a gem of a theory.

Einstein was right. Human stupidity surpasses the known & the unknown Universe.
Seriously now, you must be fucking joking. The joke is on us right?

Discard the Copernican model? OK, give me another one that makes sense.
Cos what you just wrote is "The Truman Show", not reality.

The movement of the Earth  compared to the movement of the Moon, is also responsible for the tides & the winds.
What's your approach on the matter? A huge fan on the ceiling & a little pump on the ocean floor?

~ Meltdown initiated ~

Dude!
Welcome to batty's four year+  april fools joke of flat earth trolling lunacy.
And once batty tells you to go rope yourself or get in an oven or some such nonsense, you are in the club.

FYI ... fellow lunatic exemplaar (or "xempy" as I like to refer to him as) posts hilarious idiotic memes and bonus farcical vids.
Not sure if he is in on the joke or a total whacko nutjob. Probably a batty sockpuppet.

[1714046822]

1714046822

[1714046822]

1714046822

[1714046822]

1714046822

[1714046822]

1714046822

[BADecker]

'Bout time they got a solar sail into action. Now we can really see what the solar system is like, and how flat the earth really is, right?


Stunning image captured by Planetary Society's spacecraft show its ultra-thin solar sail unfurled against the backdrop of Earth as it begins 'sailing on sunlight'

Stunning new images snapped in orbit show LightSail 2's solar sail outstretched and ready to take on the next phase of its mission.

The Planetary Society announced that the 18-foot-wide Mylar sail had successfully deployed earlier this week, following a late-June launch atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket.

It's just one five-thousandth of an inch thick, or about the width of a human hair.

The milestone could pave the way for lower-cost spacecraft propulsion, allowing small craft to be driven by sunlight.

The Planetary Society's crowdfunded craft consists of a CubeSat roughly the size of a loaf of bread, and a now-unfurled solar sail that stretches more than 18 feet wide.

Scientists revealed the mission's progress minute-by-minute in a live-streamed event on Tuesday afternoon.

'Sail deployment complete! We're sailing on sunlight!' the Planetary Society tweeted after confirming the feat.

Images released later in the week confirmed the sail was unfurled and doing well.

[notbatman]

^^^ Fraud.

[BADecker]

^^^ Fraud.

^^^ Self-proven fraud.     

[Astargath]

^^^ The Earth is stationary, it does not move. The Earth is also covered by a steel dome, so there is no "universe" out there, just a solid barrier. "Planets" are just stars that "wander", small close lights made of plasma.

We are on a motionless plain not a "planet". You have to throw out the entire Copernican model, it's all garbage.

"Planets" are just stars that "wander"

How difficult is it to buy a telescope and observe the planets? Ah, nvm, I remember you don't actually like to perform any kind of experiments, you simply like to repeat what you read about sextants and shit even though you admitted to have never used one lol

[sirazimuth]

^batty knows that a sextant proves the sun is 30 miles wide as he is an expert on these matters.
He also knows Coulomb's law too . So that means he's a  fart smeller smart feller, so there ya go...the earth is a pancake
surrounded by ice protected by mean soldiers and there's a dome made out of onyx or some such thing and all the stars
are projected on it and there's also a sky fairy who created the firmament.  Sounds legit...

[Cryptotourist]

^. David Lynch?
Or Lynch observatory? Source? Can't find anything on that.

To answer your question, emmm - yes!
You can also see planets/stars which are way further - with a naked eye no? Not to mention satellites in orbit.

Speaking of which, yo batty, check this out:



Surprise!!!

[sirazimuth]

^Cue batty's response...

"that's all fake, just like the ISS and the moon landings...now go rope yourself"...

in 3...2....

[notbatman]

@Cryptotourist,



(A) I have an IQ of 60 so I can't distinguish reality from fantasy movies and TV.

(B) I'm a sack of shit who knows space is fake and I'm going to gaslight notbatman with CGI images from NASA; gotta keep that $50 million USD a day in taxpayer money rollin' in ya know.

Choose one.

[Astargath]

@Cryptotourist,



(A) I have an IQ of 60 so I can't distinguish reality from fantasy movies and TV.

(B) I'm a sack of shit who knows space is fake and I'm going to gaslight notbatman with CGI images from NASA; gotta keep that $50 million USD a day in taxpayer money rollin' in ya know.

Choose one.

Claiming all images are CGI doesn't make them CGI. Are you an expert in CGI? Of course not. Why do you keep claiming this is CGI, that is CGI if you are not an expert?

[notbatman]

^^^ [frame 0] CGI image confirmed:



http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=8ca8c9967563c41cbb03002b4ae85f13b1c99166.47527&show=ela -- http://archive.is/kB3GV

[BADecker]

^^^ [frame 0] CGI image confirmed:



http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=8ca8c9967563c41cbb03002b4ae85f13b1c99166.47527&show=ela -- http://archive.is/kB3GV

Thanks. There's a GE picture I missed.     

[exemplaar]

^. David Lynch?
Or Lynch observatory? Source? Can't find anything on that.

To answer your question, emmm - yes!
You can also see planets/stars which are way further - with a naked eye no? Not to mention satellites in orbit.

Speaking of which, yo batty, check this out:



Surprise!!!

Nothing new here, just another poor guy who has been bamboozled by naza.



bonus:

[notbatman]

After staring at the lights on the ceiling "scientists" decide Newton was wrong and Einstein is a clown. How long before they realize the lights in sky are only small bits of plasma a few thousand miles away?


Newton’s Law Of Gravity Was Wrong, Claim Scientists; Target Einstein’s ‘General Relativity’ Next



The world knew the famous law of gravity when an apple fell on Isaac Newton’s head, prompting him to form the earliest theory of universal gravitation. The 17th-century gravitational law is a landmark in physics and has held true up until now. The theory of universal gravity has been dismissed in the study of black holes. Scientists conducted research on a star called ‘S0-2’ which is at its closest to black hole Sagittarius A* (abbreviated to Sgr A*) that lies at the centre of the Milky Way 26,000 light-years away from the Earth. The study put the law of universal gravitation to test and it did not hold true. Not in relation to the black hole at least.

As per new findings, scientists are now placing their bets on Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton’s discoveries are pillars of modern physics but, the black hole has put both theories by the legendary physicists to test. The black hole study found that the intermingling of space and time near Sagittarius A* doesn’t comply with Newton’s law. According to professor Andrea Ghez of the University of California, Los Angeles Einstein’s theory, however, found fresh evidence.

“Newton had the best description of gravity for a long time but it started to fray around the edges. And Einstein provided a more complete theory. Today we are seeing Einstein’s theories starting to fray around the edges,”

Observations of light from S0-2 prove Einstein’s 1915 theory that describes the law of gravity and the relation to other forces. It proves that what we perceive as gravity is the curvature of space and time. S0-2 has a mass that’s 10 times larger than the sun. It orbits around the black hole in an ellipse taking 16 years for an orbit. Studies found that the star's light escaped the black hole’s gravitaional pull. The black hole’s mass is 4 million times more than the sun’s.

Researchers studied the particles of light that travelled from the S0-2 to the Earth. Einstein had predicted that light finds it harder to resist the black hole’s gravitational pull, expending more photons to escape it. But, scientists think it won’t take long to disprove the long-standing theory as well.

“We can absolutely rule out Newton’s law of gravity. Our observations are consistent with Einstein’s general theory of relativity. However, his theory is definitely showing vulnerability. It cannot fully explain gravity inside a black hole, and at some point, we will need to move beyond Einstein’s theory to a more comprehensive theory of gravity that explains what a black hole is.”

Black holes are extraordinarily dense and have gravitational fields so strong that light and matter cannot escape. This is why Einstein’s theory cannot fully explain the way gravity works in and around the black hole. Scientists will soon have to find a much more comprehensive theory that can be applied to the study of black holes. Ghez thinks Einstein is right but, the theory can fall apart too.

The research on S0-2 is co-led by Andrea Ghez is titled ‘Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic centre supermassive black hole’. The science journal is considered to be the most detailed study on the black hole.

-- https://in.mashable.com/science/5270/newtons-law-of-gravity-was-wrong-claim-scientists-target-einsteins-general-relativity-next

[BADecker]

After staring at the lights on ceiling "scientists" decide Newton was wrong and Einstein is a clown. How long before they realize the lights in sky are only small bits of plasma a few thousand miles away?


Newton’s Law Of Gravity Was Wrong, Claim Scientists; Target Einstein’s ‘General Relativity’ Next



The world knew the famous law of gravity when an apple fell on Isaac Newton’s head, prompting him to form the earliest theory of universal gravitation. The 17th-century gravitational law is a landmark in physics and has held true up until now. The theory of universal gravity has been dismissed in the study of black holes. Scientists conducted research on a star called ‘S0-2’ which is at its closest to black hole Sagittarius A* (abbreviated to Sgr A*) that lies at the centre of the Milky Way 26,000 light-years away from the Earth. The study put the law of universal gravitation to test and it did not hold true. Not in relation to the black hole at least.

As per new findings, scientists are now placing their bets on Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton’s discoveries are pillars of modern physics but, the black hole has put both theories by the legendary physicists to test. The black hole study found that the intermingling of space and time near Sagittarius A* doesn’t comply with Newton’s law. According to professor Andrea Ghez of the University of California, Los Angeles Einstein’s theory, however, found fresh evidence.

“Newton had the best description of gravity for a long time but it started to fray around the edges. And Einstein provided a more complete theory. Today we are seeing Einstein’s theories starting to fray around the edges,”

Observations of light from S0-2 prove Einstein’s 1915 theory that describes the law of gravity and the relation to other forces. It proves that what we perceive as gravity is the curvature of space and time. S0-2 has a mass that’s 10 times larger than the sun. It orbits around the black hole in an ellipse taking 16 years for an orbit. Studies found that the star's light escaped the black hole’s gravitaional pull. The black hole’s mass is 4 million times more than the sun’s.

Researchers studied the particles of light that travelled from the S0-2 to the Earth. Einstein had predicted that light finds it harder to resist the black hole’s gravitational pull, expending more photons to escape it. But, scientists think it won’t take long to disprove the long-standing theory as well.

“We can absolutely rule out Newton’s law of gravity. Our observations are consistent with Einstein’s general theory of relativity. However, his theory is definitely showing vulnerability. It cannot fully explain gravity inside a black hole, and at some point, we will need to move beyond Einstein’s theory to a more comprehensive theory of gravity that explains what a black hole is.”

Black holes are extraordinarily dense and have gravitational fields so strong that light and matter cannot escape. This is why Einstein’s theory cannot fully explain the way gravity works in and around the black hole. Scientists will soon have to find a much more comprehensive theory that can be applied to the study of black holes. Ghez thinks Einstein is right but, the theory can fall apart too.

The research on S0-2 is co-led by Andrea Ghez is titled ‘Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic centre supermassive black hole’. The science journal is considered to be the most detailed study on the black hole.

-- https://in.mashable.com/science/5270/newtons-law-of-gravity-was-wrong-claim-scientists-target-einsteins-general-relativity-next

Yep. The laws of physics that make gravity work are tricky. It has been known for a long time that gravity is a fundamental force that ties into the whole universe. Once they understand everything about the universe, they will have the correct law of gravity, as well.

[notbatman]

Gravity is the Elmer's glue that holds all the lies together.

[BADecker]

Gravity is the Elmer's glue that holds all the lies together.

Gravity kept them from floating off the moon. Do you think they used Elmer's in any of their equipment?

[notbatman]

^^^ Copious amounts on the LEM.

[Cryptotourist]

@Cryptotourist,

https://i.imgur.com/AB8LVTI.jpg

(A) I have an IQ of 60 so I can't distinguish reality from fantasy movies and TV.

(B) I'm a sack of shit who knows space is fake and I'm going to gaslight notbatman with CGI images from NASA; gotta keep that $50 million USD a day in taxpayer money rollin' in ya know.

Choose one.

Batty, my man!

Gosh, difficult question, emmmm, I'll go with (A).
If not, then I'll go with (C).  

Other than that, forget NASA, buy a telescope ffs.
Oh & thanks for the morning giggles.

[notbatman]

^^^ How will getting a telescope to stare at the lights on the ceiling prove the Earth is a globe, your IQ really is ~60 isn't it? If I'm gonna blow $$$ on optics I'll get a P1000 and rub the flat Earth in your face all day long!

BTW, why do you collectivist cock smokers all have to make excessive use of emoji's with all of your shill/shit posts?