Flat Earth

[FlamingFingers]

Any new photoshopped NASA photos ? keep the thread alive

scientifically it has been proven that the earth is not flat,  with some evidence and not photoshopped photos,  but as usual there will definitely be an objection to it, a flat earth cannot revolve round a sun, that alone should have cleared the doubt of L those doubting that earth is spherical

[1713585413]

1713585413

[1713585413]

1713585413

[1713585413]

1713585413

[BADecker]

^^^

https://i.imgur.com/u3NaJ5V.jpg


BTW champ I claim now and have argued with you multiple times that, the Sun is directly measured to be 32 nautical miles across.


https://i.imgur.com/aykktdS.jpg

Thank you for destroying flat earth for us. It's so much easier when you help us do it.

Simply go to my post here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52735246#msg52735246, and replace the 3,000 miles with 32 miles. And replace the 1,500 miles with 16 miles, and use transits for accuracy, and whoopie doo! You get the same proof that FE doesn't exist. Except that it is easier to do with your 32 nm.

So, thanks for explaining.

[notbatman]

@FlamingFingers, the earth is motionless; it does not revolve.

[hornetsnest]

I took a measurement of the sun today and it was no more than 1 inch across in diameter if that helps with todays theories 

[Cryptotourist]

@FlamingFingers, the earth is motionless; it does not revolve.

I thought we had that covered, only your brain cells are truly motionless in the entire universe Batty. Brain dead to be exact, but still breathing.
I see it as mere confirmation that the universe is expanding along with your amazing stupidity which seems to also be endless.

I took a measurement of the sun today and it was no more than 1 inch across in diameter if that helps with todays theories  

Ha, try to make a measurement of Batty's brain cell activity - you fucking can't - it's a trap - there isn't any.

[notbatman]

@hornetsnest, 0.53°.



edit:
Alex, I'll take triangles for $500 please!



edit2:
No wait Alex, you don't even need to ask, I've already got it! What is the angular resolution limit of the human eye?

[Cryptotourist]

What is the angular resolution limit of the human eye?

[notbatman]

^^^ If you want to make a claim about what is being observed it helps to understand how vision works. The angular resolution limit of the eye, camera, etc.. making the observation can be and is a factor for some observations.

Assuming 20/20 vision, at distances beyond 1/2 nautical miles a 1 foot object is too small to see; its angular size is smaller than 1 minute and it's not visible. When observing the Sun its angular size appears to be ~0.53°. Knowing that the human eye has an angular resolution limit of 1 minute allows for the calculation of the diameter of the Sun. If perspective and atmospheric refraction are accounted for then ~0.53° equates to a solar diameter of 32 nautical miles (36.8 statute miles or 59.3 kilometres) at a ratio of 1 nautical mile per minute.



Ref:
Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. p. 54. ISBN 978-0444511416.

[Cryptotourist]

I get dumber every time I read one of your lobotomized epic posts Batty.

- Does the donkey fly?
- Of course it flies, and it's got 2 fucking huge wings Batty.

[odolvlobo]

Knowing that the human eye has an angular resolution limit of 1 minute allows for the calculation of the diameter of the Sun.

I don't understand how the angular resolution of the eye can be a factor in the diameter of the sun. Also, every eye's angular resolution is different and a camera can have a higher resolution than the eye, so, wouldn't that affect the diameter? Sorry if you have explained it already. A summary would suffice.

[Cryptotourist]

A summary would suffice.

From Batty?
Batty has major comprehension problems, he can't get his head straight, let alone write a credible summary of anything.

There:

Assuming 20/20 vision, at distances beyond 1/2 nautical miles a 1 foot object is too small to see; its angular size is smaller than 1 minute and it's not visible.

I mean what kind of idiot misreads this:

The human eye has an angular resolution of about 1 arcminute (0.02 degrees or 0.0003 radians) which enables us to distinguish things that are 30 centimetres apart at a distance of 1 kilometer.

[notbatman]

@Cryptotourist,

Here's a picture, it's flies in the face of a donkey.



If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine.



@odolvlobo,

"...Assuming 20/20 vision..."
"...let pupil diameter be 2.4 mm..." -- https://i.imgur.com/qFO5tSL.jpg

The diameter of the Sun is obviously a fixed value, only the minimum maximum distance you can observe a 1 foot object changes with a change in the resolution limit. It's like measuring a an object with yard stick and a metric pair of calipers, you end up with about the same result it's just that one has a higher resolution.

[Cryptotourist]

If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine.

It is visible, you twat.



Sorry Batty, I can't really argue with a fool (yeah, you).

[notbatman]

The horizon line is everything squished together, the distance to this line if it's not obscured by a narrow band superior mirage changes depending on the angular resolution limit. Atmospheric refraction not withstanding no objects are visible past this line.

[Cryptotourist]

You sound like a fucking genius there Batty, too bad you understand zip shit of the things you write.

[sirazimuth]

You sound like a fucking genius there Batty, too bad you understand zip shit of the things you write.

Actually I beg to differ.
Batty understands the shit he writes is just that... shit...bullshit. Pure utter bullshit.
He just has this obsession with trolling and getting attention...and what better way to elicit
responses to his nonsense than to have a 4 year long farcical thread claiming the earth is a dome covered pancake and the sun is 32 miles wide.
Can you imagine this character IRL blathering on about flat earth proof, fish eyed lenses, perspective, NASA conspiracies,
curved water and all the other retarded drivel he's been banging on about for past 4 plus years in here?
He'd be thrown in the frickin loony bin.

[BADecker]

@Cryptotourist,

Here's a picture, it's flies in the face of a donkey.



If I can't perceive an object then it's not visible, your comprehension of the word 'distinguish' is at fault here not mine.



@odolvlobo,

"...Assuming 20/20 vision..."
"...let pupil diameter be 2.4 mm..." -- https://i.imgur.com/qFO5tSL.jpg

The diameter of the Sun is obviously a fixed value, only the minimum distance you can observe a 1 foot object changes with a change in the resolution limit. It's like measuring a an object with yard stick and a metric pair of calipers, you end up with about the same result it's just that one has a higher resolution.

We are having so much fun, aren't we... LOL!

Doctors remove 4 bees found living under woman’s eyelid — they survived on her tears - https://globalnews.ca/news/5151715/bees-living-eyelid-drinking-tears/.

All your "eye" talk doesn't have anything to do with FE, when you check out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52735246#msg52735246 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52738726#msg52738726.

But it is fun playing, isn't it?

[notbatman]

^^^ I actually meant to say maximum distance in the statement above. The angular resolution limit can be used as standard to gauge an objects actual size with. Sailors use the ratio of 1 minute for every 1 nautical mile, this rule of thumb is standard practice.

[BADecker]

^^^ The point of what you meant to say is this. All you need is one little flaw in your calc or applicationof it, and the whole thing goes out the window. Watch the video.

Michio Kaku: What If Einstein Is Wrong?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XjS4I4oQDY

Notice that it is as you said for sailors, a rule of thumb. Never, ever, ever does it take sailors to a pin-point position. Rather, it gives them enough of a position that once they are in the area, they can use radar, sonar, soundings, visual sight, etc., to go the rest of the way. In the old days, before radar and sonar, sailors frequently piled their boats up on reefs, rocks, the shore, other boats, etc. This still happens even with the pin-point precision of radar and sonar. It's as you say, a rule of thumb, that gets sailors into the general area.

As far as flat earth goes, read my above post to see that flat earth is geometrically proven impossible according to anything that you say - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg52757422#msg52757422.

[Cryptotourist]

Actually I beg to differ.
Batty understands the shit he writes is just that... shit...bullshit. Pure utter bullshit.
He just has this obsession with trolling and getting attention...and what better way to elicit
responses to his nonsense than to have a 4 year long farcical thread claiming the earth is a dome covered pancake and the sun is 32 miles wide.
Can you imagine this character IRL blathering on about flat earth proof, fish eyed lenses, perspective, NASA conspiracies,
curved water and all the other retarded drivel he's been banging on about for past 4 plus years in here?
He'd be thrown in the frickin loony bin.

It depends what gravity you give to the word "understanding". He can read - I'll give him that.

We can agree to disagree on this one. I pondered about it when I came across this thread. You can get attention without playing dumb.
Nah, he's above the average stupid, he must be!