Ok so from reading this forum I get that the general consensus is that Monero is flawed technology. However, I haven't had the chance to read a lot about this from a technological point of view. Why is it that the Bitcoin developers claim Monero is flawed in its very core?
Could some of the technology-affine folks dive into this here please? I want to learn more.
Perhaps a link or a quote or anything, on that ^^^ ?
Some solid investment advise: Never go only for one coin.
An example: Taking some NXT and some NEM. Since NXT is the more established coin, and NEM somehow the not-so-young newcomer, you took 2/3 NXT + 1/3 NEM. Current situation? Well NEM is heading for parity with DOGE
but NXT was like 4000sat weeks ago now 4500sat, that's a plus. Sell some, stock up NEM on an unbelieveable level. Time continues, the ballance between these two will be shifting again.
But on the long scale we really need coins that rise in value, and that means good old Bitcoin first and foremost. There is no flawed technology, there only is flawed mass adoption out there. Was looking for how PayPal embraces Bitcoin now, great news on it's own. Just ... was looking for buying BTC with PayPal, and there still the same old problems continue to exist.
Monero did very well in 2015 so far. You could have bought at 0.0011 and sold at 0.0035 nearly trippling your portfolio in value. Perhaps this thread should be renamed, "Why is Monero BULLish 2015"