Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering any possibility

[Twipple]

Quickseller Gave me this trust :

"Alt of tacoman71, scammer.

tacoman71 posted the address 1Fz6xXind3Kovsw4ArW6u7oMXRZTUSBj1G (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=812533.msg10239935#msg10239935) which signed https://blockchain.info/tx/bfd3ec181aeae8abd8da9e63f6c4772ff8fceb6d4c0f3472cac66b6c77649353 that was also signed by 1Fo6Uy8JWnV9SnDM5LBnYA8nnCQgbfbyDT and Twipple posted 15ZX2yUZio9HeSWUeWubxznQyaYcYFBFzB https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=924856.msg10255801#msg10255801 which signed d515a082b1df9b515e8f826cae84f41629183f26575bd014ba3d32ecddc9b633"

Now before I say anything, what I believe is that those addresses were in the same transaction as the spending addresses because the exchange or gambling site sweeped those addresses. I would also like you to read my second post on this thread, as based on his logic I prove how a user Baro is Dicenow,or someone with that address can have a case like this .  Keeping that in mind, here is why I think so:

Now at : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=924856.msg10255801#msg10255801
Twipple requested a loan on 25th Jan to the address 15ZX2yUZio9HeSWUeWubxznQyaYcYFBFzB .

This address has no previous deposit. And the loan amount was the first(which can be that its his newly generated localbitcoins or something like that wallet address). Also, it seems Twipple never used the amount until 1st Feb from the loan(which would be weird), but I feel its the sweep that was done then, and Twipple would have got the balance elsewhere like you do in an exchange. Now Quickseller claims Twipple account to be an alt of tacoman, and belives it was dumped or gotten rid of on purpose by defaulting on the loan , Now If Twipple wanted to get rid of the account, he would easily sell it for over 0.05 , instead of going for a loan of 0.025, which probably could mean a loan for gambling and he lost it, hence didn't pay back.


Now the other address used by tacoman : 1Fz6xXind3Kovsw4ArW6u7oMXRZTUSBj1G
Has transactions , like you would do in an address that is usually a deposit address to a site. Even the single transfer out of that address  https://blockchain.info/tx/bfd3ec181aeae8abd8da9e63f6c4772ff8fceb6d4c0f3472cac66b6c77649353
goes to 1MmVUQEtwWXgQV9WKhL6sKPBDENJgBkoqn , which has a mixer/Exchange kind of pattern.


The third address he mentioned https://blockchain.info/address/1Fo6Uy8JWnV9SnDM5LBnYA8nnCQgbfbyDT , is also like an exchange address with inputs and outputs to addresses, with only 2 transactions like in an exchange.

So basically none of the addresses are actually like personal addresses which would have normal transactions .All of them maybe under the control of a single entity(the exchange or a gambling site) , but they show no signs of being under a person based on the transactions. Also, this is the only transaction, that they have been used in together, with no other transaction occurring together or elsewhere.

If it was one individual in control of the private keys, then he would not be only using this for that one particular transaction, and its almost certain thats it the exchange which had them under control.

I sent it to Quickseller, but he just arrogantly refused to accept it, and also blocked me from PM. And replied back with a quote  
When you buy an account, you are buying the reputation associated with the account.

"You should be more careful about what you spend your money on in the future.  Clearly purchasing a forum account was a bad idea."  which is basically what he has always done.

I want to know what you guys think of it. I had bought this account from Ume in an auction, who sold it after the original account defaulted on a 0.025 loan. I even started a scam accusation towards Ume for other things, and all this was before receiving the negative trust from Quickseller on Twipple 2 months later.


See the other post on this thread as a follow up: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035687.msg11171949#msg11171949

[1713977186]

1713977186

[Blazr]

Do you remember which exchange it was?

I don't think it's an exchange, though I cannot be sure. First off, the wallet has payments to/from a number of different websites, including localbitcoins.com, which is strange. It's transactions don't appear automated at all, they all happen during the day between 09:02am and 20:17pm GMT and not 24/7 as you would expect. There are not many tx's and there are none with multiple recipients - something most exchanges do. In addition the wallet isn't tainted by any known website. Also each payment empties the wallet, if it was an exchange it'd be very convenient how each withdrawal was exactly the balance, which also leads me to believe this isn't a part of a wallet either but the full thing. I would guess this is most likely an Electrum wallet based on some clues. If you tell me the name of the website I may be able to confirm whether it is their wallet or not.

In case you are wondering, here are all the websites I checked it for taint: (though this is not 100%)

Code:

10xBitco.in
1Coin.com
50BTC.com   
777Coin.com
796.com
999Dice.com
ActionCrypto.com
AdmiralCoin.com
AgoraMarket
AllCoin.com
AllCrypt.com
AnoniBet.com
AntPool.com 
AnxPro.com
ASICMiner
Atomic-Trade.com
BetChain.com
Betcoin.ag 
BetcoinDice.tm
Betcoins.net
Betcoin.tm
BetMoose.com
BetsOfBitco.in
BetVIP.com-and-MyDailyCoin.com
Birwo.com
BitAces.me 
BitBargain.co.uk
BitBay.net
Bitbond.net
Bitcash.cz
Bitcoin-24.com  
BitcoinCloudServices.com
Bitcoin.de
BitcoinFog
Bitcoinica.com 
BitcoinPay.com
Bitcoin-Roulette.com
BitcoinVideoCasino.com 
BitcoinWeBank.com
Bitcurex.com
BitDoubler.org
BitElfin.com
Bitfinex.com 
BitKonan.com
BitLaunder.com
BitLendingClub.com
BitMillions.com
BitMinter.com
Bitmit.net
BIToomBa.com
BitPay.com 
BitSleep.com
Bitstamp.net 
BitStarz.com
Bittrex.com
Bit-x.com
BitX.co.za
BitYes.com
BitZillions.com
BitZino.com
BlackBankMarket
Bleutrade.com
BlueSkyMarketplace
BraveBunny
Brawker.com
Btc38.com
Btc-Arbs.com
BTCChina.com 
BTCChinaPool
BtcDice.com
BtcEur.eu
BtcExchange.ro
BTCGuild.com
BTCJam.com
BtcMarkets.net
BTCOracle.com
BtcSmart.net
Btcst.com-pirateat40
BTCt.com
BtcTrade.com
Bter.com    
BTradeAustralia.com 
BuyBtc.cz
BX.in.th
CampBX.com 
CannabisRoad
CasinoBum.com	
Cavirtex.com
C-Cex.com 
Cex.io
Chainroll.com
ChangeTip.com
ChBtc.com
CloudBet.com
CloudHashing.com
CoinBox.me
Coinbroker.io
CoinCafe.com
CoinDrafts.com
CoinGaming.io
CoinHub.cz
Coinichiwa.com
CoinJar.com
Coinmate.io
CoinMkt.com
Coin.mx
Coinomat.com
CoinPayments.net
Coinroll.com
CoinRoyale.com 
Coins-E.com
CoinSpot.com.au
Coin-Swap.net
Coin-Sweeper.com
CoinURL.com
CoinVault
CryptcoMiner.com
CryptoBounty.com
CryptoLocker
Cryptomine.io
Cryptonator.com
Cryptonit.net
Cryptopay.me
Cryptorush.in
CryptoSexToys.com
Crypto-Trade.com
Cryptsy.com 
DaDice.com
Dagensia.eu
DeepBit.net
Dgex.com 
DiceBitco.in
DiceCoin.io
DiceNow.com
DiceOnCrack.com
EclipseMC.com 
Eligius.st
EmpoEX.com
Europex.eu
EveryDice.com
EvolutionMarket
Exchange-Credit.ru
Exchanging.ir
FairProof.com
FortuneJack.com
Foxbit.exchange 
FYBSG.com
GHash.io
HappyCoins.com
Hashnest.com
HitBtc.com
HolyTransaction.com
Huobi.com 
Ice-Dice.com
Igot.com
Indacoin.com
Inputs.io
Instawallet.org
InvestBTC.org
JetWin.com
Justcoin.com
Just-Dice.com   
K8Poker.net
KnCMiner.com
Korbit.co.kr
Kraken.com
LakeBTC.com
Leancy.com
LiteBit.eu
LocalBitcoins.com 
LuckyB.it 
LuckyHash.com
MaiCoin.com
Masterxchange.com
Matbea.com
McxNOW.com
MercadoBitcoin.com.br
MineField.BitcoinLab.org
mining.bitcoin.cz  
MintPal.com
MoonBit.co.in
MPEx.co
MyBitcoin.com
NitrogenSports.eu
NucleusMarket
OKCoin.com 
OrderBook.net
PandoraOpenMarket 
Paymium.com
Peerbet.org
PinballCoin.com
Playt.in
PocketDice.io
PocketRocketsCasino.eu
Polmine.pl
Poloniex.com
PonziCoin.co
PrimeDice.com  
Purse.io
QuadrigaCX.com
Rollin.io
SafeDice.com
SatoshiBet.com
SatoshiDice.com
Satoshi-Karoshi.com
SatoshiRoulette.com
SealsWithClubs.eu
SecondsTrade.com
SecureVPN.to
ShapeShift.io
SheepMarketplace
SilkRoad2
SilkRoadMarketplace
SimpleCoin.cz 
SmenarnaBitcoin.cz
StrongCoin.com-fee
SuzukiDice.com
TheRockTrading.com 
UpDown.BT
UseCryptos.com
VaultOfSatoshi.com
Vic-Socks.to
Vircurex.com
VirWoX.com
WatchMyBit.com
Xapo.com
YABTCL.com
Zyado.com

[Alt441]

I agree with all those things from Twipple .. but i want to clear somethings now . i dont know what is wrong with twipple but i think i had to say something . i got negative feedback without any reason saying that alt of tacoman ? huh ?
I Am.
Ume

Now at : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=924856.msg10255801#msg10255801
Twipple requested a loan on 25th Jan to the address 15ZX2yUZio9HeSWUeWubxznQyaYcYFBFzB .

I Agree that i provided loan to twipple . He asked for a loan of 0.025 and the collateral was his btctalk account . i sent him 0.025 as soon as he sent me his accounts detail . and the terms was that he will pay me 0.04 after 5 days. but he never spents his money . here is original quote from me .

Ok I gave you the account, waiting for the btc

ok Thanks sent you exact 0.025

https://blockchain.info/address/15ZX2yUZio9HeSWUeWubxznQyaYcYFBFzB

repayment will be on the same address 0.04 just tell me after sending !

you have total 5 days you will repay me on 30 jan on 6 PM from now !

Have a nice day !

Whatever the matter was he did`nt spent his money which is not an issue for me i just want 0.04 with the end of the time period of loan . but he was enable to pay me back . so i created a thread what to do abotu this should i sell ? or not ? and i got point of views from different peoples .
so i started posting like 10-15 posts i think because i know that his account has some potential of earning activity when it become near to 110 Activity i sold the account to Tdowns (which is now Twipple)
https://i.imgur.com/pdmPR59.png

Here are original screenshot of Twipple that he asked for the loan he asked me twice for the loan and after that i agreed to give him so i m not the alt of him as Quickseller says that you are loaning to yourself lol

https://i.imgur.com/82Ucp8M.png

After all of that Twipple pm`ed me saying that i got banned and that is your fault ! after posting for a week or so he got banned .

Quickseller gave me negative trust too.

In short ,

Likely giving loans to accounts that he controls/owns, which builds up both trust for himself and for the accounts that he lends to. Additionally Ume is a likely alt of tacoman71, scammer

Quickseller give me this negative trust reason .
Whereas, i m not the alt of tacoman71 i dont know this bitch. also he says that i m giving loan to account which own myself ..

I provided a total of 3 (loans) 2 of em paid me back and 1 ( twipple ) did`nt paid me back .

User          :  Eddy
Collateral    :  account btc
Amount Loaned : 0.02BTC
Repayment By  : 31 jan 2:29 pm
Interest  : Nothing (only tip)

User          : virtapayseller666
Collateral    : NIL
Amount Loaned : 0.01BTC
Repayment By  : January 27
Interest  : Nothing (only tip)

@Twipple you think i m scammer and you think i m asshole ? no way . you think totally wrong about me . i dont know what is wrong with the quickseller . but i really want him off the defaualt trust .

And about the trust.?

While providing loan to Twipple , we setted terms that and in the terms twipple said that he will leave +rep after the loan duration . that`s why i gave myself rep. i know i did wrong and i got first time negative rep from quickseller and i aplogized to quick that remove the negative trust i m removing the rep of twipple i dont know after that he removed the neg turst to neutral .
then after one month or so twipple make a thread agains me saying that bought account from Ume and got banned ? which is a foolish reason .
from that day i stopped loaning coz i think i m not able to handle it peoples are too clever . and the default trust person give neg rep without knowing anything .

To all those , who thinks i m a scammer just show me one person whom i scammed

I have much to say but i want a full stop .

If you have further question about me let me know .

[Twipple]

Do you remember which exchange it was?

I don't think it's an exchange. First off, the wallet has payments to/from a number of different websites, including localbitcoins.com, which is strange. It's transactions don't appear automated at all, they all happen during the day between 09:02am and 20:17pm GMT and not 24/7 as you would expect. There are not many tx's and there are none with multiple recipients - something most exchanges do. In addition the wallet isn't tainted by any known website. Also each payment empties the wallet, if it was an exchange it'd be very convenient how each withdrawal was exactly the balance, which also leads me to believe this isn't a part of a wallet either but the full thing. I would guess this is most likely an Electrum wallet based on some clues. If you tell me the name of the website I may be able to confirm whether it is their wallet or not, but I think I know the answer already.

I bought the account, so I wouldn't know what exchange it is. But it seemed much more probably from all the transactions that it is an exchange.

I was digging up some things, and here is a Solid example of this.

1.
https://blockchain.info/tx/058577bdcdeb4368940c0fb631a083f3e8eef5edad1fd765e6c5d9a4551d3ea8
In this transaction 1LuckyRd42yF6jLEvodcj8LT6VF1GEhJQk   sends to 19nH4oqV546NDHGAhQgNRSXJiGraD5mEt2

Now 1LuckyRd42yF6jLEvodcj8LT6VF1GEhJQk was used here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873587.msg10408527#msg10408527

The address it sends to 19nH4oqV546NDHGAhQgNRSXJiGraD5mEt2 , is probably his deposit address on Pocketrocketcasino .

PART 1: Lets Assume The personal who posted that address : Baro , requests for a loan to that address 19nH4oqV546NDHGAhQgNRSXJiGraD5mEt2


2. In this transaction : https://blockchain.info/tx/d698387aa7b2088fb618015400b583dae47239a5728f1503d9095ddb2d7e902a


We Know that 19nH4oqV546NDHGAhQgNRSXJiGraD5mEt2    and  1pBfXgrTKqW7EUTET3dg8quNjyB2fSREH are part of the same transaction and the owner has keys to both .

But lets have a closer look to the address 1pBfXgrTKqW7EUTET3dg8quNjyB2fSREH  .
We see it is also a deposit address on Pocketrocketcasino , as someone from Dicenow, requested a withdrawal to that address. https://blockchain.info/tx/9076dec8026d97ae09c8e6a8d7fd80ca71575b3c100a986925a38b658f8ad31a

PART 2 :
Now lets say another person Tacoman , a scammer requests loan to be sent to 1pBfXgrTKqW7EUTET3dg8quNjyB2fSREH  .




3. PART 3 : Now just because Baro , and Tacoman requested loans to their deposit addresses , and those addresses are owned by the same person, that is the website in this case, Quickseller is claiming Baro and tacoman are the same people.






Read Parts 1 , 2, and 3
Now how would Baro defend himself ? In this case Baro is Twipple and is being targetted.

[godmode3D]

not surprised, known for trust abuse (and a lot of other things)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1034655.0

this board is clogged with his bullshit

its absolutely ridiculous that he is still on default trust list, can some-one have positive trust but not be on the list?
quickseller and his alt acctseller are the only two persons excluded from my default trust list

[Lauda]

not surprised, known for trust abuse (and a lot of other things)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1034655.0

this board is clogged with his bullshit

its absolutely ridiculous that he is still on default trust list, can some-one have positive trust but not be on the list?
quickseller and his alt acctseller are the only two persons excluded from my default trust list

As long as BadBear trusts him nothing can be done. This case isn't similar to the one with Vod. Remember that not so long ago Vod was being called out in meta. Vod was right in his cases; Quickseller not so much. Recently there was a thread about the selective enforcement of rules (takes a while to read through).

Update: Thank you theymos for clearing this up, I wasn't aware of it.

Not true. If 2 other people on the default trust list exclude him, then he will no longer be in the default trust network.

[Twipple]

not surprised, known for trust abuse (and a lot of other things)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1034655.0

this board is clogged with his bullshit

its absolutely ridiculous that he is still on default trust list, can some-one have positive trust but not be on the list?
quickseller and his alt acctseller are the only two persons excluded from my default trust list

As long as BadBear trusts him nothing can be done. This case isn't similar to the one with Vod. Remember that not so long ago Vod was being called out in meta. Vod was right in his cases; Quickseller not so much. Recently there was a thread about the selective enforcement of rules (takes a while to read through).

Even though I'm in no position to judge, I think that it is quite a possibility that you're innocent. Although I might be wrong.

The problem is he won't just listen, I have tried to explain my case to him , but he just has that arrogant attitude he won't let go of. As for others being called out in the threads like this complaining about Vod and all, on reading a conclusion can be made, but it doesn't mean people avoid reading such threads .

I have clearly shown him all the proof, and in this thread have also shown accordingly to his logic, how Baro would be Dicenow according to him. But he just won't listen.

[Quickseller]

Your addresses are not those of an exchange. I sent you a list of addresses that are likely part of the wallet file none of which are associated with an exchange; Blazr did a much more in-depbth analysis of each of the addresses giving additional evidence that they are not exchange addresses.

Furthermore, you opened up a scam accusation against Ume at most two hours prior to contacting him to buy the account. This means one of two things, one - you faked the sale in order to attempt to protect the trust rating of your account, or more likely, two - opened the scam accusation in order to put pressure on Ume to sell any account he had in his possession cheaply, which according to your screenshots you were able to do. Regardless it is more then appropriate to let the negative trust remain on the account.

[Astargath]

not surprised, known for trust abuse (and a lot of other things)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1034655.0

this board is clogged with his bullshit

its absolutely ridiculous that he is still on default trust list, can some-one have positive trust but not be on the list?
quickseller and his alt acctseller are the only two persons excluded from my default trust list

As long as BadBear trusts him nothing can be done. This case isn't similar to the one with Vod. Remember that not so long ago Vod was being called out in meta. Vod was right in his cases; Quickseller not so much. Recently there was a thread about the selective enforcement of rules (takes a while to read through).

Even though I'm in no position to judge, I think that it is quite a possibility that you're innocent. Although I might be wrong.

Come on... all the people that complain about quickseller or Vod or you name it because they have negative trust, 99% of them deserved it and they are just crying for no reason, the trust ratings can be made if someone is suspicious, no need to be a scammer

[Twipple]

Your addresses are not those of an exchange. I sent you a list of addresses that are likely part of the wallet file none of which are associated with an exchange; Blazr did a much more in-depbth analysis of each of the addresses giving additional evidence that they are not exchange addresses.

Furthermore, you opened up a scam accusation against Ume at most two hours prior to contacting him to buy the account. This means one of two things, one - you faked the sale in order to attempt to protect the trust rating of your account, or more likely, two - opened the scam accusation in order to put pressure on Ume to sell any account he had in his possession cheaply, which according to your screenshots you were able to do. Regardless it is more then appropriate to let the negative trust remain on the account.

No, it might not be of an exchange, could very well be a gambling site.

I contacted him prior to 2 hours,yes, and that was after I realized he was trying to scam. I also posted about a possible alternate account. All what you are saying is speculation, and does not prove a scam, my other account has been pointing out various scams on the forum.

Read my posts above, All I am saying is what you are posting about me being a scammer is based on a possbility , and it in no way proves a scam. I am open to Badbear or any other admin and do IP checks/Tor use/etc anything to prove that.

[GannickusX]

Your addresses are not those of an exchange. I sent you a list of addresses that are likely part of the wallet file none of which are associated with an exchange; Blazr did a much more in-depbth analysis of each of the addresses giving additional evidence that they are not exchange addresses.

Furthermore, you opened up a scam accusation against Ume at most two hours prior to contacting him to buy the account. This means one of two things, one - you faked the sale in order to attempt to protect the trust rating of your account, or more likely, two - opened the scam accusation in order to put pressure on Ume to sell any account he had in his possession cheaply, which according to your screenshots you were able to do. Regardless it is more then appropriate to let the negative trust remain on the account.

No, it might not be of an exchange, could very well be a gambling site.

I contacted him prior to 2 hours,yes, and that was after I realized he was trying to scam. I also posted about a possible alternate account. All what you are saying is speculation, and does not prove a scam, my other account has been pointing out various scams on the forum.

Read my posts above, All I am saying is what you are posting about me being a scammer is based on a possbility , and it in no way proves a scam. I am open to Badbear or any other admin and do IP checks/Tor use/etc anything to prove that.

Hmm i agree that you shouldnt give negative trust to anyone without any proofs or evidence but he has indeed proofs and evidence, maybe he should have made the trust neutral but still..

[Quickseller]

Your addresses are not those of an exchange. I sent you a list of addresses that are likely part of the wallet file none of which are associated with an exchange; Blazr did a much more in-depbth analysis of each of the addresses giving additional evidence that they are not exchange addresses.

Furthermore, you opened up a scam accusation against Ume at most two hours prior to contacting him to buy the account. This means one of two things, one - you faked the sale in order to attempt to protect the trust rating of your account, or more likely, two - opened the scam accusation in order to put pressure on Ume to sell any account he had in his possession cheaply, which according to your screenshots you were able to do. Regardless it is more then appropriate to let the negative trust remain on the account.

No, it might not be of an exchange, could very well be a gambling site.

I contacted him prior to 2 hours,yes, and that was after I realized he was trying to scam. I also posted about a possible alternate account. All what you are saying is speculation, and does not prove a scam, my other account has been pointing out various scams on the forum.

Read my posts above, All I am saying is what you are posting about me being a scammer is based on a possbility , and it in no way proves a scam. I am open to Badbear or any other admin and do IP checks/Tor use/etc anything to prove that.

The address is not that of a gambling site. The reason it is not a gambling site is similar to the reason why it is not that of an exchange.

You purchased the account from an alt after less then two hours after opening a scam accusation against Ume. Your admission of this fact is confirmation that the intention of opening the scam accusation was nothing more then to try to buy an account at a lower price then what the market would normally otherwise allow, and you did

[smoothie]

not surprised, known for trust abuse (and a lot of other things)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1034655.0

this board is clogged with his bullshit

Looks like you are just butthurt that you were outed as a scammer.

It's only bullshit when calling a scammer a scammer lol

[nor9865]

I find it so amusing everday when I look in meta at the people that Quickseller has outted. 9/10 of them are in some way scam affiliated. The other 1/10 is nubs that say Quickseller has misjudged them, only to later show that they themselves are in the wrong. Half of the people are jumping to conclusion because they no not of the forum rules or how they pertain to everyday situtations here on bitcointalk. The other half are legit scammers that try to debunk the system. I have not seen 1 person on here that's called out Quickseller and proved him to be wrong. Until that time comes, keep doing what you do Quickseller. Everytime they make some babbling post about how you destroyed their rep, just make another of how you destroyed it and got paid at the same time. Hurt their feelings a little more.

[PistolPete]

I find it so amusing everday when I look in meta at the people that Quickseller has outted. 9/10 of them are in some way scam affiliated. The other 1/10 is nubs that say Quickseller has misjudged them, only to later show that they themselves are in the wrong. Half of the people are jumping to conclusion because they no not of the forum rules or how they pertain to everyday situtations here on bitcointalk. The other half are legit scammers that try to debunk the system. I have not seen 1 person on here that's called out Quickseller and proved him to be wrong. Until that time comes, keep doing what you do Quickseller. Everytime they make some babbling post about how you destroyed their rep, just make another of how you destroyed it and got paid at the same time. Hurt their feelings a little more.

Q: What do you do when you can't suck up enough^[1]?

A: Buy another account^[2] and suck off even more.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1032755.msg11153411#msg11153411
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1007178.msg11191250#msg11191250

[nor9865]

I find it so amusing everday when I look in meta at the people that Quickseller has outted. 9/10 of them are in some way scam affiliated. The other 1/10 is nubs that say Quickseller has misjudged them, only to later show that they themselves are in the wrong. Half of the people are jumping to conclusion because they no not of the forum rules or how they pertain to everyday situtations here on bitcointalk. The other half are legit scammers that try to debunk the system. I have not seen 1 person on here that's called out Quickseller and proved him to be wrong. Until that time comes, keep doing what you do Quickseller. Everytime they make some babbling post about how you destroyed their rep, just make another of how you destroyed it and got paid at the same time. Hurt their feelings a little more.

Q: What do you do when you can't suck up enough^[1]?

A: Buy another account^[2] and suck off even more.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1032755.msg11153411#msg11153411
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1007178.msg11191250#msg11191250

And? I like Quickseller. Have since I got to know him. Done a bunch of transactions with him. Always helps me if I need it. So whats the issue? Quickseller not like you or marked a account you had? Sounds like you got a personal issue with him and anybody that associates with him.

EDIT: Wal-Mart sells KyJelly everyday. Even if you got your butthurt once, you can be prepared for it the next time so it won't hurt quite as bad.

[TerminatorXL]

[...]
And? I like Quickseller. Have since I got to know him. Done a bunch of transactions with him. Always helps me if I need it. So whats the issue? [...]

That's so nice!
From this we can soundly extrapolate that you also got to know & like ACCTSeller, and ACCTSeller is good friends with Tidus1097, and Tidus1097 likes Neonecrox13, and Neonecrox13 is palls with Quickseller, who, in turn, has no trust issues vis-a-vis nor9865.

Once it was said that it takes a village to raise an idiot. Here, we have proof that an idiot can become a village!
Excelsior!


Edit: The village, she grows and grows! Apparently Mr. Tidus1097 (and hence Mr. nor9865, Mr. Neonecrox13, etc., etc.) is also http://s22.postimg.org/stifdla6p/Capture.png

[assbot] Amazing Community!

[nor9865]

[...]
And? I like Quickseller. Have since I got to know him. Done a bunch of transactions with him. Always helps me if I need it. So whats the issue? [...]

That's so nice!
From this we can soundly extrapolate that you also got to know & like ACCTSeller, and ACCTSeller is good friends with Tidus1097, and Tidus1097 likes Neonecrox13, and Neonecrox13 is palls with Quickseller, who, in turn, has no trust issues vis-a-vis nor9865.

Once it was said that it takes a village to raise an idiot. Here, we have proof that an idiot can become a village!
Excelsior!


Edit: The village, she grows and grows! Apparently Mr. Tidus1097 (and hence Mr. nor9865, Mr. Neonecrox13, etc., etc.) is also

[assbot] Amazing Community!

Well yeah? Your the only one that didn't know this? You must not be in the right loop. But I am not Acctseller though. Nor have ever stoke to that user. If it is Quickseller, then I have talked to "Quickseller" before. But never spoke a word to "Acctseller"


Edit: Also, the ones that I see complaining about Quickseller are on newbie accounts? Why is that? I mean why hide? Apparently you want to be heard so why not use your real account to post with? I could understand if your account was banned, but to me, looks like "chickenshit" is the right answer.

[TerminatorXL]

[...]
And? I like Quickseller. Have since I got to know him. Done a bunch of transactions with him. Always helps me if I need it. So whats the issue? [...]

That's so nice!
From this we can soundly extrapolate that you also got to know & like ACCTSeller, and ACCTSeller is good friends with Tidus1097, and Tidus1097 likes Neonecrox13, and Neonecrox13 is palls with Quickseller, who, in turn, has no trust issues vis-a-vis nor9865.

Once it was said that it takes a village to raise an idiot. Here, we have proof that an idiot can become a village!
Excelsior!


Edit: The village, she grows and grows! Apparently Mr. Tidus1097 (and hence Mr. nor9865, Mr. Neonecrox13, etc., etc.) is also http://s22.postimg.org/stifdla6p/Capture.png

[assbot] Amazing Community!

Well yeah? Your the only one that didn't know this? You must not be in the right loop. But I am not Acctseller though. Nor have ever stoke to that user. If it is Quickseller, then I have talked to "Quickseller" before. But never spoke a word to "Acctseller"

ACCTSeller is Quickseller, so yeah, you've talked to him.

Edit: Also, the ones that I see complaining about Quickseller are on newbie accounts? Why is that? I mean why hide? Apparently you want to be heard so why not use your real account to post with? I could understand if your account was banned, but to me, looks like "chickenshit" is the right answer.

The reason for using a throwaway account is this: Don't want my main account to get banned

http://s11.postimg.org/up85p4sw3/Capture.png

Edit: If I purchased a hero account from you, would my words carry more weight?

[Muhammed Zakir]

-snip-

The reason for using a throwaway account is this: Don't want my main account to get banned

Are you the author of this article?