Bitcoins - Trial Run for Cashless Currency

[Fuck NWO]

"Money Scarcity is, together with Usury, the hallmark of Money Power control."

CONCLUSION

"Bitcoin is driven by greed, it's in no way a rational solution to our monetary problems. It's global, scarce, cashless and soon the first banks will provide usurious lending.

The lesson is: as long as we hope to breed money from money, not realizing it's usually our own labor that breeds money for those holding a lot of it, we will be fooled by units like this.

Money must be cheap (interest-free) and plentiful, but stable. Only then can it be a good medium of exchange, allowing the producers of society the benefits of their labor, instead of the providers of capital.

Bitcoin offers none of these features. It has the Money Power's fingerprints all over it."



- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2014/01/bitcoin-paving-the-way.html#sthash.3Fr0KfIV.dpuf

[1713914971]

1713914971

[1713914971]

1713914971

[1713914971]

1713914971

[1713914971]

1713914971

[1713914971]

1713914971

[1713914971]

1713914971

[pattu1]

Money must be cheap (interest-free) and plentiful, but stable. Only then can it be a good medium of exchange, allowing the producers of society the benefits of their labor, instead of the providers of capital.

Bitcoin offers none of these features. It has the Money Power's fingerprints all over it."[/b]

Bitcoin is plentiful. Do you know the total amount of Satoshis that can ever be? 

[Nemo1024]

Money must be cheap (interest-free) and plentiful, but stable. Only then can it be a good medium of exchange, allowing the producers of society the benefits of their labor, instead of the providers of capital.

Bitcoin offers none of these features. It has the Money Power's fingerprints all over it."[/b]

Bitcoin is plentiful. Do you know the total amount of Satoshis that can ever be? 

Yep, the author of that article seems to be another one of those talking about Bitcoin without bothering to understand its workings first.

I'd give him BTC0.000000000000000001, but I doubt he'd understand the point.