The jury wouldn't allow it. Apple is controlling its consumers' minds. Anyone holding an iPhone has a direct bias towards Apple and the worst part is that we can't do anything since there isn't one person that is completely neutral.
On the other hand, Samsung got much less respect. It would have been somewhat fair for Samsung to pay the $1 bil to Apple, but only if it wasn't such a double standard. Apple had unfair patents, and yet Samsung didn't receive any reimbursements for the 5 patents APPLE infringed on. Damn juries.
This is why (IMO, Go ahead and beat me to death over this) I think USA law SUCKS.
It's all upto a handful of people WHO DONT WANT TO BE THIER, Who were all LEAGALLY FORCED to sit there on "Jury Duty" None of them want to be there, They are all just gonna agree ASAP and gtfo, They wont give a flying fuck, And also, Majority of people these days seem to carry "iStuff" So the Jury is most likely going to fucking side with apple, The company that the JURY wants to succeed. The jurys are almost always compleatly inadequet
Does 100% of the jury hold atleast on peice of "iStuff"? BAM apple wins
Does the jury NOT hold ANY "iStuff"? BAM google wins.
It's that fucking stupidly simple