.

[SalimNagamato]

can you fix POS?

[1713578837]

1713578837

[Phantas]

and could you send me my new coins ? thank you.

http://forums.deoxyribose.cf/showthread.php?tid=2&pid=64#pid64

[james42]

Yup this coin is a joke, dev doesn't know what he's doing I'm afraid

[NoobKidOnTheBlock]

Alright so am I to understand that the new wallet version is mandatory and that as soon as block 2500 hits that the POS will start?  Also with the new wallet do we need a new .conf file or do we need to delete anything? Will our wallet.dat from the last version still be compatible and our coins will still be there when we load the new wallet? I'm just curious because I actually lucked out and hit some coins for once lmao wouldn't want to lose these ones as well lmao.  So pretty much what I am asking is when we start the new wallet version 2.1.2 will we have to start a whole new %appdata% roaming folder for this wallet or will it be compatible with the one we have going right now for wallet version 2.1.1? I would like to know ASAP so I know what to do Thanks and Keep your chin up Dev you're working hard buddy

[feldenthorne]

Alright so am I to understand that the new wallet version is mandatory and that as soon as block 2500 hits that the POS will start?  Also with the new wallet do we need a new .conf file or do we need to delete anything? Will our wallet.dat from the last version still be compatible and our coins will still be there when we load the new wallet? I'm just curious because I actually lucked out and hit some coins for once lmao wouldn't want to lose these ones as well lmao.  So pretty much what I am asking is when we start the new wallet version 2.1.2 will we have to start a whole new %appdata% roaming folder for this wallet or will it be compatible with the one we have going right now for wallet version 2.1.1? I would like to know ASAP so I know what to do Thanks and Keep your chin up Dev you're working hard buddy

You should wait a few minutes - he fixed PoS and is probably building the updated Windows wallet right now.

That being said, you should use whatever new addnode he lists with the release and make sure you're on the 2500 block blockchain. I have a copy that I can upload once the wallet it released, if anyone needs it.

Wallet.dat files should be compatible, even if your chain has gone over 2500. Simply type repairwallet in the GUI wallet's console and it'll clean up the mess (once you're on the proper blockchain).

Edit:
addnode=182.56.93.41
is already running the new wallet

[NoobKidOnTheBlock]

Done! The OP Is Updated!

So everything on the OP now is exactly what we should have for the new wallet? And will we have to download a new blockchain or anything? Also is the .conf file on the OP the one that we should be using now? Thanks in advance

[tamara163]

patience comes to an end

[james42]

Current block approx please?

[tamara163]

DEV-MUTANT

[james42]

Staked 7000 and got 0.007

[Phantas]

OK dev, thanks, but when is my new coins?, I dont` need it but I want it.

http://forums.deoxyribose.cf/showthread.php?tid=2&pid=64#pid64


EDIT, I have it in new wallet, thanks

[james42]

Staked 7000 and got 0.007

Yup! Interest has changed to 572%

Can't see it working

[james42]

What I mean is, 7000 coins at that rate should generate 40k a year, it's not going to happen. I have 27k coins in my wallet btw

[feldenthorne]

What I mean is, 7000 coins at that rate should generate 40k a year, it's not going to happen. I have 27k coins in my wallet btw

Yeah... 2-9% would have been a lot more sustainable. But at least staking works. *shrugs*

[james42]

The coins simply aren't going to be able to stake enough to generate the rewards, nowhere close

[feldenthorne]

What I mean is, 7000 coins at that rate should generate 40k a year, it's not going to happen. I have 27k coins in my wallet btw

Don't get jumped up yet, there will be HardFork in ~ 1 Week with I2P Implementation, SECP256k1 Implementation, Bug Fixes and Most Importantly switching to HiPoS (10 Coins per Block)

I would think very carefully about hardforking again. It's very bad practice unless it's absolutely necessary and kind of a pain in the butt for users.

The coins simply aren't going to be able to stake enough to generate the rewards, nowhere close

And that's fantastic if they all keep doing that! During testing, piles of 7000 were staking for ~200-400, so that's a great improvement. For sustainability. Not so much for the 572% reward, I guess.

[NoobKidOnTheBlock]

Hey can't we just be happy that already there is a community that was willing to stick it through while the Dev was going through the complications and that we have all lost coins and gained coins and finally the Dev has gotten everything to work? I applaud you Dev for everything you have done here and hope for the best with the future of this coin Cheers

[feldenthorne]

No, that kind of Version one, The Block one..... @ Block X -----> Y Will Happen, Not Update to X ----------> Forced to use Y

Something happening at block X that the current wallets do not have in their code constitutes a hard fork, which means every user will be required to update their wallet to continue staking on the correct blockchain. Which is a pain in the butt. A week turnover for mandatory wallet updates is a bit much.

I would suggest putting together a roadmap for your ideas on the coin and putting it in the original post, then asking the userbase what features they think are important before deciding that the wallet should make the blockchain do Y at block X.

Also, you should probably clean up the first post. The formatting is kind of... off-putting.

[NoobKidOnTheBlock]

No, that kind of Version one, The Block one..... @ Block X -----> Y Will Happen, Not Update to X ----------> Forced to use Y

Something happening at block X that the current wallets do not have in their code constitutes a hard fork, which means every user will be required to update their wallet to continue staking on the correct blockchain. Which is a pain in the butt. A week turnover for mandatory wallet updates is a bit much.

I would suggest putting together a roadmap for your ideas on the coin and putting it in the original post, then asking the userbase what features they think are important before deciding that the wallet should make the blockchain do Y at block X.

Also, you should probably clean up the first post. The formatting is kind of... off-putting.

I agree a solid roadmap so people can expect when things are going to happen will help this coin a lot and also help it getting listed on other exchanges as well

[NoobKidOnTheBlock]

No, that kind of Version one, The Block one..... @ Block X -----> Y Will Happen, Not Update to X ----------> Forced to use Y

Something happening at block X that the current wallets do not have in their code constitutes a hard fork, which means every user will be required to update their wallet to continue staking on the correct blockchain. Which is a pain in the butt. A week turnover for mandatory wallet updates is a bit much.

I would suggest putting together a roadmap for your ideas on the coin and putting it in the original post, then asking the userbase what features they think are important before deciding that the wallet should make the blockchain do Y at block X.

Also, you should probably clean up the first post. The formatting is kind of... off-putting.

I agree a solid roadmap so people can expect when things are going to happen will help this coin a lot and also help it getting listed on other exchanges as well

On next update (After a week) there will be a roadmap...

Okay that sounds good Boss, just make sure that you give everyone more than enough time to prepare for the update like don't just spring it on us like that please and thank you Gotta run and get hay for the parents horses now so hopefully I'll be staking when I get back