Why do Atheists Hate Religion?

[organofcorti]

Since nobody has been able to show the flaws in the so-called crap I say, my so-called crap is less crap than things that are opposite of it.

This is another example of wooly thinking. The validity of a statement is not contingent on its opposite. For example, two statements can both be invalid and opposing.

Validity or invalidity, the point was the difference in quality.   

Perhaps you didn't really mean this? By denying the importance of validity you deny the importance of truth.

[1713404437]

1713404437

[1713404437]

1713404437

[1713404437]

1713404437

[BADecker]

Since nobody has been able to show the flaws in the so-called crap I say, my so-called crap is less crap than things that are opposite of it.

This is another example of wooly thinking. The validity of a statement is not contingent on its opposite. For example, two statements can both be invalid and opposing.

Validity or invalidity, the point was the difference in quality.   

Perhaps you didn't really mean this? By denying the importance of validity you deny the importance of truth.

By ignoring the quality of something, you are easily ignoring whether or not it is valid.

[organofcorti]

Since nobody has been able to show the flaws in the so-called crap I say, my so-called crap is less crap than things that are opposite of it.

This is another example of wooly thinking. The validity of a statement is not contingent on its opposite. For example, two statements can both be invalid and opposing.

Validity or invalidity, the point was the difference in quality.   

Perhaps you didn't really mean this? By denying the importance of validity you deny the importance of truth.

By ignoring the quality of something, you are easily ignoring whether or not it is valid.

Not really. "Quality" can mean anything. Means whatever you want it to really. It's just your subjective opinion. I would hope your concept of truth was more objective than that.

[BADecker]

Since nobody has been able to show the flaws in the so-called crap I say, my so-called crap is less crap than things that are opposite of it.

This is another example of wooly thinking. The validity of a statement is not contingent on its opposite. For example, two statements can both be invalid and opposing.

Validity or invalidity, the point was the difference in quality.   

Perhaps you didn't really mean this? By denying the importance of validity you deny the importance of truth.

By ignoring the quality of something, you are easily ignoring whether or not it is valid.

Not really. "Quality" can mean anything. Means whatever you want it to really. It's just your subjective opinion. I would hope your concept of truth was more objective than that.

When you say that theory necessarily shows fact, you are essentially saying that "validity" can mean anything as well.

[Moloch]

When you say that theory necessarily shows fact, you are essentially saying that "validity" can mean anything as well.

How do you define fact?

I define fact as a piece of information that conforms to consensus reality

I haven't really thought about where to draw the line with regards to consensus, but I'd say if 99% of informed people believe something, it is a fact (like evolution for example)

[organofcorti]

Since nobody has been able to show the flaws in the so-called crap I say, my so-called crap is less crap than things that are opposite of it.

This is another example of wooly thinking. The validity of a statement is not contingent on its opposite. For example, two statements can both be invalid and opposing.

Validity or invalidity, the point was the difference in quality.   

Perhaps you didn't really mean this? By denying the importance of validity you deny the importance of truth.

By ignoring the quality of something, you are easily ignoring whether or not it is valid.

Not really. "Quality" can mean anything. Means whatever you want it to really. It's just your subjective opinion. I would hope your concept of truth was more objective than that.

When you say that theory necessarily shows fact, you are essentially saying that "validity" can mean anything as well.

If you don't accept the meaning of the word "validity", I'll restate:

"The truth of a statement is not contingent on its opposite"

[BitNow]

By ignoring the quality of something, you are easily ignoring whether or not it is valid.

That is not true: a thing can be valid in a system and not in another.

The quality of a thing doesn't screw up the validity of the same thing.

Validity is absolute in a system, quality is relative in that system.

Although we are humans.


Best regards.

[organofcorti]

By ignoring the quality of something, you are easily ignoring whether or not it is valid.

That is not true: a thing can be valid in a system and not in another.

The quality of a thing doesn't screw up the validity of the same thing.

Validity is absolute in a system, quality is relative in that system.

Although we are humans.


Best regards.

Someone has hijacked BitNow's account.

[McDonalds5]

Hate is an emotion and atheists hate because they are unable to control their emotions 

[Moloch]

Hate is an emotion and atheists hate because they are unable to control their emotions

I only hate stupidity and ignorant assertions of fact... like this for example

However, this does not mean I hate you as a person... I feel sad for you

[organofcorti]

Hate is an emotion and atheists hate because they are unable to control their emotions

I only hate stupidity and ignorant assertions of fact... like this for example

However, this does not mean I hate you as a person... I feel sad for you

I see more examples of "religionists hate because they are unable to control their emotions" than of atheists doing the same.

[BitNow]

Hate is an emotion and atheists hate because they are unable to control their emotions

I only hate stupidity and ignorant assertions of fact... like this for example

However, this does not mean I hate you as a person... I feel sad for you

I see more examples of "religionists hate because they are unable to control their emotions" than of atheists doing the same.

You call Moloch a "religionists"?


Best regards.

[organofcorti]

Hate is an emotion and atheists hate because they are unable to control their emotions

I only hate stupidity and ignorant assertions of fact... like this for example

However, this does not mean I hate you as a person... I feel sad for you

I see more examples of "religionists hate because they are unable to control their emotions" than of atheists doing the same.

You call Moloch a "religionists"?


Best regards.

I call people who believe in a god "religionists". It's a fair enough term, although I could have just used the term "theist" instead, I suppose.

[Melech]

I call people who believe in a god "religionists". It's a fair enough term, although I could have just used the term "theist" instead, I suppose.

I prefer sheeple, or sometimes religitard, depending on their level of ineptitude

For example... I would consider BitNow sheeple, but BADecker a religitard... do you see the subtlety?

[Tyrantt]

I call people who believe in a god "religionists". It's a fair enough term, although I could have just used the term "theist" instead, I suppose.

I prefer sheeple, or sometimes religitard, depending on their level of ineptitude

For example... I would consider BitNow sheeple, but BADecker a religitard... do you see the subtlety?

ahaha yes, BADecker looks like a very delusional guy, but that's him, he can think what he wants and suites him still delusional to me. But his persistency is rather amusing.

[Tyrantt]

Hate is an emotion and atheists hate because they are unable to control their emotions 

uhhhh no. Don't generalize people like that, it's stupid. I control my emotions quite well. I've never started a fight, never yell or any other outburst of negative emotions, so your statement is false. Also, as much as I've seen in my life, religious people tend to outburst just like that when you mention something about their religion.
That reminds me, I've had a pass time game whre I'd go to some muslim website with live support and I'd try to annoy them, troll them if you will, until they start writing incorrect grammar and in all caps. Once I've did it in one "word", if you will, and it was"9/11?". He disconnected immediately. 

[Moloch]

Hate is an emotion and atheists hate because they are unable to control their emotions  

uhhhh no. Don't generalize people like that, it's stupid. I control my emotions quite well. I've never started a fight, never yell or any other outburst of negative emotions, so your statement is false. Also, as much as I've seen in my life, religious people tend to outburst just like that when you mention something about their religion.
That reminds me, I've had a pass time game where I'd go to some muslim website with live support and I'd try to annoy them, troll them if you will, until they start writing incorrect grammar and in all caps. Once I've did it in one "word", if you will, and it was"9/11?". He disconnected immediately.  

That is what people do when they are backed into a corner...

When people have no evidence for what they believe, and you challenge them on their unfounded beliefs... they get angry and blow up a building...

(hopefully we don't read about BADecker in the news)

[srinikethan]

well atheists donot believe in religion...wic is why they hate religion!

[Moloch]

well atheists donot believe in religion...wic is why they hate religion!

I bet you don't believe in unicorns...

1) Does that mean you hate unicorns?

2) Do you hate people who do believe in unicorns, or do you think they are silly?

[organofcorti]

well atheists donot believe in religion...wic is why they hate religion!

Non sequitur. Not believing in something doesn't mean you hate it. Well, for rational people, anyway.

I don't believe in UFOs. I don't hate them.
I don't believe in the Easter bunny. I don't hate it.
I don't believe in Destiny. I don't hate it.

You get the idea - you can think up other examples yourself.