Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 05:04:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: In China, more journalists--even former ones--vulnerable to government wrath  (Read 358 times)
liyueyue8964 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 12, 2016, 09:14:55 AM
 #1

In China, more journalists--even former ones--vulnerable to government wrath

By Yaqiu Wang/CPJ Northeast Asia Correspondent

https://cpj.org/blog/2016/06/in-china-more-journalists-even-former-ones-vulnerabl.php


Most of the journalists imprisoned in China reported or commented on issues that the Chinese government finds threatening to its rule. They were likely aware that their work could invoke the wrath of the Chinese Communist Party at any time, but still choose to go ahead for the sake of truth and the public interest. Other journalists choose to stay away from the political red lines, writing and speaking within the realm of what is believed to be allowed--and they have generally been spared persecution. However, such certainty has increasingly eroded. Since Xi Jinping assumed the presidency in 2013, more and more journalists are vulnerable.

One recent example concerns Wujie News. On March 4, an open letter criticizing Xi for concentrating power in his own hands and calling for him to resign was published on the news website--a joint venture between private companies and the government of the Xinjiang region in northwest China. The letter was removed soon after it was posted and it received scant attention in the tightly-censored local media and Chinese Internet. Yet, in the wake of such critical material appearing on a partially government-owned website, authorities launched a broad operation to determine who was behind the offense, affecting former as well as current employees of Wujie News.

In the ensuing days, over a dozen people disappeared or were detained, including family members of two journalists based overseas, out of the government's reach. Most of those detained have been released, but at least three senior managers at Wujie News are still in police custody, according to news reports and a former journalist for the website who asked not to be named for fear of reprisal. Around April, the government also ordered Wujie News to be dissolved, and everyone was let go, according to news reports. (CPJ was unable to access the website). What's more, nearly 150 people--all employees of Wujie and its affiliate technology company Wujie-Xinhui, as well a number of former employees who had left Wujie News before the letter was published--have been banned from leaving the mainland, according to the former journalist.

"About two months ago, I went to the Beijing Capital Airport, planning to go to a foreign country on a tourist visa. I was stopped by the border police and told that 'we have received notice. The Beijing Public Security Bureau prohibits you from leaving the country because you have a case pending,'" the former journalist told CPJ. "I asked what the case was, when the travel ban would be lifted, who should compensate the lost value of my plane ticket. The police could not answer any of the questions."

The former journalist told CPJ that many former colleagues have encountered the same problem: "We first found out about the travel ban on March 28 when an international correspondent was stopped at the airport. Later, my former colleagues who tried to go abroad to claim awards, to go on vacation, to participate in exchange programs, have all been prohibited from leaving mainland China. No one knows when the travel ban started or when it will end." Wujie News's former general manager confirmed that all previous employees are banned from traveling, according to the former journalist. CPJ was unable to reach the general manager directly. The employees sent several applications to the Beijing police requesting the travel ban be lifted but have not received a response, the former journalist said.

A police officer at the Beijing Public Security Bureau told CPJ over the phone that he did not have information regarding the travel ban. The officer also questioned the work of CPJ, referring to it as part of "American hegemonic power" that tries to "interfere in China's internal affairs."

The former journalist expressed surprised at being caught up in the world of political dissent. "I had not thought this was a big deal because I had no experience in such things. When I realized that I was banned from leaving the country and the company was facing dissolution, I became very very angry. I am not angry at whoever published the letter, nor the management of Wujie News, but the all-powerful state," the former journalist said. "Just as the saying goes--even if you don't go after politics, politics will come after you."

You could say that veteran journalist Gao Yu "went after politics." Before she was jailed in May 2014 on accusations of leaking state secrets and was paraded on state TV appearing to confess without having been tried, Gao knew the risk when she continuously published articles critical of the Chinese government on news outlets based overseas. Gao had no illusion about the authoritarian nature of the state or that China's press environment would change for the better, as she told CPJ in 2008. Gao learned this from hard personal experience, having been jailed previously for five years for leaking state secrets and for 15 months for participating in the 1989 Tiananmen democracy protests.

But business reporter Wang Xiaolu, who also appeared on state TV making a confession in August 2015, may not have expected to be in such a position. He was not known for critical reporting, and the article for which he was held in an undisclosed location for six months--about a regulator examining ways for securities companies to withdraw funds from the stock market--was not on a topic traditionally considered delicate. (If it were, it would not have been published in a mainstream magazine, given how stringently print media in China is controlled). Yet, as China's economic growth slows and its markets become more volatile, reporting on financial issues has taken on new sensitivity.

In a similar situation is blogger Wei Manyi, who has been detained since May 17 over an article he published on the Chinese social media service WeChat saying Buddhist temples were linked to allegedly corrupt businessmen. Reading through Wei's previous articles online, CPJ did not find them to be overtly critical of the Chinese government. In fact, some were passionately nationalistic and in praise of the Communist Party. Titles of his articles include "China will inevitably lead the world in the next 20 years;" "From revolution to violent revolt, the Western world is collapsing," and "GDP growth hits record low, but China is due for the best era."

Zhang Ping, a Germany-based journalist whose family members in China were detained for several days in connection to the open letter on Wujie News, told CPJ that he believed that in a country where press freedom is not guaranteed, no journalist, regardless whether one reports critically of the government or not, is truly safe. "Though journalists have different beats, be they entertainment reporters or financial reporters, we should all speak for free speech, information freedom, and social justice. We can only be safe through fighting for such rights and causes as a whole."
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Daniel91
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824



View Profile
June 12, 2016, 09:31:13 AM
 #2

It's sad reality, unfortunately, that there is no real freedom or democracy in such countries like China or Russia.
People are free to work or start business but not free to express their political viewpoint or criticize government.
It's sad that there is no real pressure from outside, USA, EU, UN that China policy change and allow real political freedom in public, media etc.
China is to important trade partner so it's best not to make them angry about some talks about freedom and democracy Smiley
Political interest is always more important that democracy and freedom.


.freebitcoin.       ▄▄▄█▀▀██▄▄▄
   ▄▄██████▄▄█  █▀▀█▄▄
  ███  █▀▀███████▄▄██▀
   ▀▀▀██▄▄█  ████▀▀  ▄██
▄███▄▄  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▄▄██████
██▀▀█████▄     ▄██▀█ ▀▀██
██▄▄███▀▀██   ███▀ ▄▄  ▀█
███████▄▄███ ███▄▄ ▀▀▄  █
██▀▀████████ █████  █▀▄██
 █▄▄████████ █████   ███
  ▀████  ███ ████▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████   ████▀▀
BITCOIN
DICE
EVENT
BETTING
WIN A LAMBO !

.
            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████▄▄▄▄▄
▄▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
▀██████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
▄▄████▄█████▄████████████████████████████▄█████▄████▄▄
▀████████▀▀▀████████████████████████████████▀▀▀██████████▄
  ▀▀▀████▄▄▄███████████████████████████████▄▄▄██████████
       ▀█████▀  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
.PLAY NOW.
liyueyue8964 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 12, 2016, 09:47:07 AM
 #3

It's sad reality, unfortunately, that there is no real freedom or democracy in such countries like China or Russia.
People are free to work or start business but not free to express their political viewpoint or criticize government.
It's sad that there is no real pressure from outside, USA, EU, UN that China policy change and allow real political freedom in public, media etc.
China is to important trade partner so it's best not to make them angry about some talks about freedom and democracy Smiley
Political interest is always more important that democracy and freedom.




maybe you are right

right now Merkel in Beijing without Michael Brand

but dont make me angry since i care less political interest than democracy and freedom.
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217


View Profile
June 13, 2016, 03:24:25 AM
 #4

right now Merkel in Beijing without Michael Brand

lol.. are you hoping that Merkel is going to take up the cause of the journalists in China? She is actively harassing the journalists in her home country, Germany. Anyone who is perceived to be against Turkey and Erdogan can attract government persecution in Germany. The media is banned from reporting migrant crime, and a number of media outlets were closed for breaking this rule.
liyueyue8964 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2016, 11:34:31 AM
 #5

right now Merkel in Beijing without Michael Brand

lol.. are you hoping that Merkel is going to take up the cause of the journalists in China? She is actively harassing the journalists in her home country, Germany. Anyone who is perceived to be against Turkey and Erdogan can attract government persecution in Germany. The media is banned from reporting migrant crime, and a number of media outlets were closed for breaking this rule.

please show us your news resource, thanks
Slow death
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1100


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
June 13, 2016, 01:17:34 PM
 #6

It's sad reality, unfortunately, that there is no real freedom or democracy in such countries like China or Russia.
People are free to work or start business but not free to express their political viewpoint or criticize government.
It's sad that there is no real pressure from outside, USA, EU, UN that China policy change and allow real political freedom in public, media etc.
China is to important trade partner so it's best not to make them angry about some talks about freedom and democracy Smiley
Political interest is always more important that democracy and freedom.




It's really sad, Cry but also this Chinese to destroy the world.

Many countries of the third world, mainly africa look china like a good Business partner, but the truth is that china are exploiters and destroyers.

In my country I had many forests, but today in the forests include the number of existing trees. all because cheneses fells the trees indiscriminately.

Many constructions that cheneses made are with cracks and collapsed, were people who died, but the Chinese were not liable for the loss of human lives resulting from poor quality that the works have them.

There are many accidents on the roads for the works done on the roads do not have quality.

No one has the courage to say that the Chinese must have responsibilities in the things they do.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!