nuke went off in Yemen

[Morbid]

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/21/358343/

[1713569480]

1713569480

[1713569480]

1713569480

[1713569480]

1713569480

[Aggressor66]

Before the conspiracy theorists and whack-jobs arrive, any sufficiently large explosion will cause a mushroom cloud the heat generated by the detonation causes it  

Sincerely
Mr. I know all about bombs smarty pants  

EDIT:
It's probably the Saudis bombed weapon arsenal of the houties.

[Morbid]

Before the conspiracy theorists and whack-jobs arrive, any sufficiently large explosion will cause a mushroom cloud the heat generated by the detonation causes it  

Sincerely
Mr. I know all about bombs smarty pants  

EDIT:
It's probably the Saudis bombed weapon arsenal of the houties.

thank you for the input. your assumptions have surely more weight to it.

[Lauda]

Well this is interesting. I see that there is no confirmation of that being a nuke but rather speculation. I mean I'm just surprised that I haven't actually heard this yet even thought it has happened 6 days ago?
It's horrible what they're doing down there.
Much better video in case someone misses it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_L5nq-2Lxo

[ThEmporium]

Well that sounds like a stretch. How did Saudi Arabia get Isreali nukes? And we know for sure it was Israel. It could of been russia, pakistan, india, etc. And being a nuclear explosion? Possible, not probable.

[pedrog]

Well this is interesting. I see that there is no confirmation of that being a nuke but rather speculation. I mean I'm just surprised that I haven't actually heard this yet even thought it has happened 6 days ago?
It's horrible what they're doing down there.
Much better video in case someone misses it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_L5nq-2Lxo

That video was published on the 16th, if it's the same explosion someone got the date wrong in the article.

[Spendulus]

Before the conspiracy theorists and whack-jobs arrive, any sufficiently large explosion will cause a mushroom cloud the heat generated by the detonation causes it  

Sincerely
Mr. I know all about bombs smarty pants  

EDIT:
It's probably the Saudis bombed weapon arsenal of the houties.

Neither does this explosion resemble a nuclear explosion.  

And neither would the camera video exist if it had been one.

Or the guy holding the camera...

or any of the buildings between the detonation and the camera...

[RodeoX]

Who would believe this? 

[Ludi]

Who would believe this? 

Conspiracy theory whack jobs no doubt? I'm sure Alex Jones is working on a video about it as we speak (or type).

[dothebeats]

Neutron bomb dropped by IAF plane with Saudi markings...

Lol. The plane must be on a high enough altitude to drop a neutron bomb, and the explosion per se could possibly wipe a whole city--the one who took the video included--without a trace (clue: Hiroshima and Nagasaki).

Jeff Smith is a nuclear physicist and former IAEA inspector.

Even a man without that much of a technical knowledge in the field of nuclear physics could easily differentiate what a nuclear explosion is from just a normal bomb explosion.

[tvbcof]

Pfft.  Not a nuke, and not even one of the smallest tactical ones (used to bust into a bunkers...and being spun as 'safe' and 'humane' by our recent Western propaganda efforts which should put us on the alert.)

This is (or was) an ammo dump or magazine and not even a terribly large one.  The reaction is clearly chemical from conventional explosives.

[criptix]

i think you guys should understand that the theories are about a mini nuke or neutron bomb as far as i understand.
both of them exist and they have a much smaller explosive power then for example the "fat man" and the "little boy"/ regular nukes.


example for mini nukes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crockett_%28nuclear_device%29 build 1956

*edit ha even found a nice video from the DoD about it: https://youtu.be/eiM-RzPHyGs

maximum explosive power ~1 kt tnt.

neutron bombs have also a maximum explosive power ~1 kt tnt.

in relation "fat man" and "little boy" had an explosive power of 21 kt tnt or respectively 12,5 kt tnt

[countryfree]

Hey, we need more proof than this low-res video to get scared or raise alarm. There are still a few journalists in Yemen, how come nobody reported anything about an atomic explosion, if this was real?

[Morbid]

all world's media is controlled by few. if you have invested into this war only the 'right' info would get out. ether way, innocent people are caught up in this. what difference does it make how powerful the explosion is or whether its a nuke or not? i just literally passed on the info that i read - not trying to prove anything here to be honest. the reaction i get here is exactly the problem with this world today. we just accept these thing trying to argue who is right or wrong - it frankly doesnt matter as long as our taxes and actions support the empire's killing machine. the sheer ignorance of some indoctrinated masses is just unbearable sometimes. its easy to put people into the 'conspiracy nut job' box and be done with it. too easy. imagine an explosion like this in your neighbourhood - just imagine..

[RodeoX]

For your notes:
A neutron bomb is a tactical nuke that beams neutrons to kill everything it shines on. At the same time it yields a smaller explosion than most nukes and so it kills the population without destroying the city. Small nukes like "suitcase bombs" are low yield atom bombs that destroy dams, bridges, military bases. They are still big explosions and spread radioactive dust everywhere.

This video is most definitely not a nuke of any kind. If a nuke had gone off you would not be at work today and the countries emergency alert system would be on, schools would be closed; you really can't exaggerate how big a deal it would be. It could quite easily lead to an Earth ending nuclear exchange by the end of the week.  

EDIT: Also, if a nuke of any kind went off then the entire world would know within hours. There is no way to hide the unique isotopes that would be produced. Every university with a physics department would detect this.

[Morbid]

remember how many died in japan's 2011 tsunami? about 18000 if i remember correctly. there is compelling evidence now present that it might have been a sabotage. especially the fact that fukushima is all hush hush and covered up dont serve them any purpose. anyone interested can take a look here:
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukureport1b.pdf

[tvbcof]

remember how many died in japan's 2011 tsunami? about 18000 if i remember correctly. there is compelling evidence now present that it might have been a sabotage. especially the fact that fukushima is all hush hush and covered up dont serve them any purpose. anyone interested can take a look here:
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukureport1b.pdf

I was watching Fukushima like a hawk as it unfolded.  There is no reason to believe other than that a natural tsunami damaged the power systems needed to control the plants and they melted down.

Prior to Fukushima I basically bought the propaganda that even these old BW (boiling water) designs were safe in that they would shut down safely in all circumstances but deliberate and involved sabotage.  That was dead wrong.  We see now that these plants can do nothing other than experience a core meltdown if they lose power.

Worse still, even an un-fueled plant of this design (of which we have plenty here in the U.S.) can and will suffer a spent fuel pool fire in the simple absense of loss of power if it persists long enough, or in the event that a sufficiently large hole in the pool container is produced.  These pools hold many years worth of cooling spent fuel.  Our Western design geniuses use this design (spent fuel on the roof) because it makes fuel rod handling cheaper.

Something I already knew is that in most ways a nuclear power facility is much more dangerous than a nuclear weapon because a weapon needs to be deliverable and thus contains MUCH less radioactive material by mass.

Even before Diachi-3 (burning MOX fuel containing plutonium) exploded I was arguing that it should be deliberately demolished because it was much better to have shattered material around the site than fire atomized material going into the atmosphere.  I could not help but notice that the U.S. helped out be sending in a barge with 'water' in a small-ish tote container to 'help with cooling'.  Not long after (iirc) there was an explosion which was absolutely not a hydrogen explosion (as Diachi-1 probably was) and fractured fuel rods strewn around the site.  I still don't know if they came from the core or the pools, but they came from one or the other.  If they demo'd Diachi-3 it was a heroic effort which may well have saved Tokyo and it would be a shame that whoever performed it did not get appropriate recognition.

edit: plural meltdowns

[Morbid]

remember how many died in japan's 2011 tsunami? about 18000 if i remember correctly. there is compelling evidence now present that it might have been a sabotage. especially the fact that fukushima is all hush hush and covered up dont serve them any purpose. anyone interested can take a look here:
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukureport1b.pdf

I was watching Fukushima like a hawk as it unfolded.  There is no reason to believe other than that a natural tsunami damaged the power systems needed to control the plants and they melted down.

Prior to Fukushima I basically bought the propaganda that even these old BW (boiling water) designs were safe in that they would shut down safely in all circumstances but deliberate and involved sabotage.  That was dead wrong.  We see now that these plants can do nothing other than experience a core meltdown if they lose power.

Worse still, even an un-fueled plant of this design (of which we have plenty here in the U.S.) can and will suffer a spent fuel pool fire in the simple absense of loss of power if it persists long enough, or in the event that a sufficiently large hole in the pool container is produced.  These pools hold many years worth of cooling spent fuel.  Our Western design geniuses use this design (spent fuel on the roof) because it makes fuel rod handling cheaper.

Something I already knew is that in most ways a nuclear power facility is much more dangerous than a nuclear weapon because a weapon needs to be deliverable and thus contains MUCH less radioactive material by mass.

Even before Diachi-3 (burning MOX fuel containing plutonium) exploded I was arguing that it should be deliberately demolished because it was much better to have shattered material around the site than fire atomized material going into the atmosphere.  I could not help but notice that the U.S. helped out be sending in a barge with 'water' in a small-ish tote container to 'help with cooling'.  Not long after (iirc) there was an explosion which was absolutely not a hydrogen explosion (as Diachi-1 probably was) and fractured fuel rods strewn around the site.  I still don't know if they came from the core or the pools, but they came from one or the other.  If they demo'd Diachi-3 it was a heroic effort which may well have saved Tokyo and it would be a shame that whoever performed it did not get appropriate recognition.

edit: plural meltdowns

just read the document and you'll encounter an extra angle to this matter. very insightful.

[RodeoX]

Here is another angle of the ammo dump in Sanaa blowing up. That is what you are seeing. It happened a few weeks ago, if I remember correctly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep3c8Xe0FRU

[Spendulus]

all world's media is controlled by few. if you have invested into this war only the 'right' info would get out. ether way, innocent people are caught up in this. what difference does it make how powerful the explosion is or whether its a nuke or not? i just literally passed on the info that i read - not trying to prove anything here to be honest. the reaction i get here is exactly the problem with this world today. we just accept these thing trying to argue who is right or wrong - it frankly doesnt matter as long as our taxes and actions support the empire's killing machine. the sheer ignorance of some indoctrinated masses is just unbearable sometimes. its easy to put people into the 'conspiracy nut job' box and be done with it. too easy. imagine an explosion like this in your neighbourhood - just imagine..

Bah.  None of this have to do with the subject. 

Assertion.  It was asserted to be a nuclear explosion.

And that was false.

Has nothing to do with media being controlled, who accepts what, what the problems with the world are, or the ignorance of some indoctrinated masses.