Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 02:56:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Vanillacoin's Chainblender: Technical analyse  (Read 1757 times)
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
January 11, 2016, 08:33:40 PM
 #21

Quote
My main grip with John Conner is he doesn't put all the technical details in a white paper, because he is apparently wants to avoid peer review.


Could it be John doesn't put all the technical details in his whitepaper because people would just shameless copy-paste his technology?

Irony meter just exploded
1715266591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715266591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715266591
Reply with quote  #2

1715266591
Report to moderator
1715266591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715266591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715266591
Reply with quote  #2

1715266591
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715266591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715266591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715266591
Reply with quote  #2

1715266591
Report to moderator
1715266591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715266591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715266591
Reply with quote  #2

1715266591
Report to moderator
1715266591
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715266591

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715266591
Reply with quote  #2

1715266591
Report to moderator
TPTB_need_war
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 262


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 08:42:20 PM
 #22

On a sidenote people need to understand that not only 100% anonimity sollution can be viable as ringsigs for example, anything coming close to the 99% range is good enough if it can solve bloat and speed issues for real world use compatibility. Numbers are examples obv.

Anything less than 100% is worthless IMO. It only takes one crack in the design and suddenly everything is onymous again.

Show me how you would deanonymize ChainBlender. It might not be the most advanced sollution in your eyes (compared to something like zerocash - which is still vapor), but if it works and if its fast and if it doesn't do bloat, it's good enough for real world use.

Why should I bother? Are you paying me?

I will be trying to earn the $300+ per hour that smooth can earn instead of wasting my time on fools.

traumschiff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001


180 BPM


View Profile
January 12, 2016, 06:07:41 AM
 #23

On a sidenote people need to understand that not only 100% anonimity sollution can be viable as ringsigs for example, anything coming close to the 99% range is good enough if it can solve bloat and speed issues for real world use compatibility. Numbers are examples obv.

Anything less than 100% is worthless IMO. It only takes one crack in the design and suddenly everything is onymous again.

Show me how you would deanonymize ChainBlender. It might not be the most advanced sollution in your eyes (compared to something like zerocash - which is still vapor), but if it works and if its fast and if it doesn't do bloat, it's good enough for real world use.

Why should I bother? Are you paying me?

I will be trying to earn the $300+ per hour that smooth can earn instead of wasting my time on fools.

Does theymos pay you 300$/hr to use spam bitcointalk? Sign me up.

crypto jerk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 236
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 12, 2016, 04:10:55 PM
 #24

Dang it smooth, beat me to it.

But a dev accused of plagiarism who is afraid of being plagarized is quite funny.

Quote
My main grip with John Conner is he doesn't put all the technical details in a white paper, because he is apparently wants to avoid peer review.


Could it be John doesn't put all the technical details in his whitepaper because people would just shameless copy-paste his technology?

Irony meter just exploded

Nxtblg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
January 12, 2016, 05:38:38 PM
 #25

But a dev accused of plagiarism who is afraid of being plagarized is quite funny.

Much like a revolutionary who stomps on folks he considers insurrectionist.






██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄███████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀▀████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████





...INTRODUCING WAVES........
...ULTIMATE ASSET/CUSTOM TOKEN BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORM...






Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!