Bitcoin Forum
March 30, 2024, 06:25:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Unfair Blackjack  (Read 1726 times)
apriyani420
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2015, 03:09:46 PM
 #21

Maaan you played just 69 hands and call it unfair and to stay away, you never played even 1% of what you needed to make the claim of unfairness. Your test was flawed as you never got a proper average just a few bad hands. Come back with them unfair and cheat claims after playing 2000+ hands not 69 Smiley Was the site you played provably fair?
i agree only 69 hands can have too much coincidence to call it already unfair, you should have played at least 1000

1711779929
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711779929

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711779929
Reply with quote  #2

1711779929
Report to moderator
1711779929
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711779929

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711779929
Reply with quote  #2

1711779929
Report to moderator
1711779929
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711779929

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711779929
Reply with quote  #2

1711779929
Report to moderator
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
muhrohmat
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 26, 2015, 03:13:40 PM
 #22

well as we can see if the blckjack was something to be lost for the house wouldnt be there would it? its just a 40% change to doulbe and 60% of losing like most of casino schemes.

Dennis7777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 640
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 26, 2015, 03:18:24 PM
 #23

Maaan you played just 69 hands and call it unfair and to stay away, you never played even 1% of what you needed to make the claim of unfairness. Your test was flawed as you never got a proper average just a few bad hands. Come back with them unfair and cheat claims after playing 2000+ hands not 69 Smiley Was the site you played provably fair?
i agree only 69 hands can have too much coincidence to call it already unfair, you should have played at least 1000

Nope he shouldn't try to play on that site, not even 1 hand, since he knows it is not provably fair and there are multiple provably fair BJ sites out there for him to choose from.

Malin Keshar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 26, 2015, 03:30:36 PM
 #24

Maaan you played just 69 hands and call it unfair and to stay away, you never played even 1% of what you needed to make the claim of unfairness. Your test was flawed as you never got a proper average just a few bad hands. Come back with them unfair and cheat claims after playing 2000+ hands not 69 Smiley Was the site you played provably fair?
i agree only 69 hands can have too much coincidence to call it already unfair, you should have played at least 1000

1000 hands in a not provably fair casino just to prove they are not fair? And spend at least 1BTC in your experiment?

No, thanks.  I would prefer be forever in doubt
anderson00673
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2015, 03:35:22 PM
 #25

I think it is better to only play at online casinos with a good reputation.  There are some pretty well established ones, and they stand to earn far more from their customers by having a fair system in place.  These small guys might just be in it for a quick buck.

Speaking of fair, does anyone think the dice is rigged at yobit?  I do, but I only play with their free coins anyway, so its not a big deal.
yoloer808
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 113


Web dev for hire


View Profile
June 26, 2015, 04:12:10 PM
 #26

If you have concerns about a site, why not just name it? I think it would put your accusations in context, because now you're not saying anything with you small sample size.
jambola2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1038


View Profile
June 26, 2015, 05:36:17 PM
 #27

Well, if the minimum bet is small enough, 0.0001 to 0.0005, you could try a few hundred at without a large loss and try to get a good sample size.
The question is though, why not reveal the casino?
If it is a scam, others will know.
If it isn't a scam, people can defend it, or the casino owner could try to justify.

No longer active on bitcointalk, however, you can still reach me via PMs if needed.
trafficolaa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 26, 2015, 06:10:19 PM
 #28

What OP want to prove about blackjack because he did not name it any website there where he tested that method or he want to prove that all website that have blackjack games are rigged, in my opinion i am playing blackjack at live casino and till now i have made very good profit from that site with this games so if some sites are rigged than OP must named it and it can be helpful for new players to stay away from this scam site.

FanEagle
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 1112


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
June 26, 2015, 06:15:06 PM
 #29

Please OP, are you being sarcastic with those 69 hands? or you wanted to refer it as sexual like BJ can appear to mean.
I've played so many hands like for days both on live dealing and software one, and I prefer the live dealing ofc but still, 69 hands is relatively extremely small to compare a % of busting or something.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
BKT217 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2015, 07:37:13 PM
Last edit: June 26, 2015, 07:47:47 PM by BKT217
 #30

Please OP, are you being sarcastic with those 69 hands? or you wanted to refer it as sexual like BJ can appear to mean.
I've played so many hands like for days both on live dealing and software one, and I prefer the live dealing ofc but still, 69 hands is relatively extremely small to compare a % of busting or something.

I disagree, % to bust or % of dealer upcards are fixed percentages, when a game deviates from expectations to a significant extent it can signal that there is something WRONG and it can be proven in FAR fewer hands then would be believed.

For example: If I had a bag with 99 red marbles and 1 blue marble and drew the blue marble 20 times in a row you could prove something to be statstically wrong in that game in very few trials!

I may run some more tests this weekend, I don't expect much to come from it, there is no accountability in a "bitcoin" casino.

Even look at casinos such as 5Dimes(reputable casino) they ran rigged craps for 2 years before someone decided to test it.. Roll Eyes



Only takeaway from this thread is to stick to live or provably fair casinos and always change client seed  Wink
grendel25
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1031



View Profile
June 26, 2015, 11:50:42 PM
 #31

Yep, to get a fair statistical analysis requires playing millions of rounds and is best left to tailorable simulation computers.  Plus, there are games with better odds and lower house edge compared to Blackjack and there is a lot less risk of human betting errors to optimize the result.  Baccarat is one example but even that still has a house edge and it's not uncommon to get 25+ losses in a row despite having nearly 50/50 odds.

..EPICENTRAL .....
..EPIC: Epic Private Internet Cash..
.
.
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄████████████████▀▀█████▄
▄████████████▀▀▀    ██████▄
████████▀▀▀   ▄▀   ████████
█████▄     ▄█▀     ████████
████████▄ █▀      █████████
▀████████▌▐       ████████▀
▀████████ ▄██▄  ████████▀
▀█████████████▄███████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
.
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄█████████████████████▄
▄████████▀█████▀████████▄
▄██████▀  ▀     ▀  ▀██████▄
██████▌             ▐██████
██████    ██   ██    ██████
█████▌    ▀▀   ▀▀    ▐█████
▀█████▄  ▄▄     ▄▄  ▄█████▀
▀██████▄▄███████▄▄██████▀
▀█████████████████████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
.
.
[/center]
subSTRATA
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043


:^)


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 03:00:32 AM
 #32

Yep, to get a fair statistical analysis requires playing millions of rounds and is best left to tailorable simulation computers.  Plus, there are games with better odds and lower house edge compared to Blackjack and there is a lot less risk of human betting errors to optimize the result.  Baccarat is one example but even that still has a house edge and it's not uncommon to get 25+ losses in a row despite having nearly 50/50 odds.

people need to understand that there is something called probability; too many people fall to gambler's fallacy and consider something like this "impossible" when its just a series of bad picks.

theres nothing here. message me if you want to put something here.
yoloer808
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 113


Web dev for hire


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 06:24:10 AM
 #33

Please OP, are you being sarcastic with those 69 hands? or you wanted to refer it as sexual like BJ can appear to mean.
I've played so many hands like for days both on live dealing and software one, and I prefer the live dealing ofc but still, 69 hands is relatively extremely small to compare a % of busting or something.

I disagree, % to bust or % of dealer upcards are fixed percentages, when a game deviates from expectations to a significant extent it can signal that there is something WRONG and it can be proven in FAR fewer hands then would be believed.

For example: If I had a bag with 99 red marbles and 1 blue marble and drew the blue marble 20 times in a row you could prove something to be statstically wrong in that game in very few trials!

I may run some more tests this weekend, I don't expect much to come from it, there is no accountability in a "bitcoin" casino.

Even look at casinos such as 5Dimes(reputable casino) they ran rigged craps for 2 years before someone decided to test it.. Roll Eyes



Only takeaway from this thread is to stick to live or provably fair casinos and always change client seed  Wink

How would this manifest itself in blackjack? There are no extremely high or low probabilities for getting any of the cards. Apart from a situation where the dealer get blackjack 69 times in a row, I really fail to see what could give away that it is manipulated in so few hands.
ajareselde
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000

Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 06:41:04 AM
 #34

Maaan you played just 69 hands and call it unfair and to stay away, you never played even 1% of what you needed to make the claim of unfairness. Your test was flawed as you never got a proper average just a few bad hands. Come back with them unfair and cheat claims after playing 2000+ hands not 69 Smiley Was the site you played provably fair?

So what you are saying is that he should loose 30 times more money before he is allowed to say something? He said it multiple times that the sample range is small,
 it's not like he doesn't realize that,but the thing is how the results are unrealistic.

@op stay away from non-provably fair gambling sites

cheers
yoloer808
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 288
Merit: 113


Web dev for hire


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 06:46:53 AM
 #35

Maaan you played just 69 hands and call it unfair and to stay away, you never played even 1% of what you needed to make the claim of unfairness. Your test was flawed as you never got a proper average just a few bad hands. Come back with them unfair and cheat claims after playing 2000+ hands not 69 Smiley Was the site you played provably fair?

So what you are saying is that he should loose 30 times more money before he is allowed to say something? He said it multiple times that the sample range is small,
 it's not like he doesn't realize that,but the thing is how the results are unrealistic.

@op stay away from non-provably fair gambling sites

cheers

How are the results unrealistic? But ok, I think he should just come out and name the site here.
lexuz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500

Me, myself and I


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 10:39:33 AM
 #36

Maaan you played just 69 hands and call it unfair and to stay away, you never played even 1% of what you needed to make the claim of unfairness. Your test was flawed as you never got a proper average just a few bad hands. Come back with them unfair and cheat claims after playing 2000+ hands not 69 Smiley Was the site you played provably fair?
i agree only 69 hands can have too much coincidence to call it already unfair, you should have played at least 1000

1000 hands in a not provably fair casino just to prove they are not fair? And spend at least 1BTC in your experiment?

No, thanks.  I would prefer be forever in doubt
agree with your argument, for me first 5 hand arrow in blackjack for show this casino provably fair or not. no need much balance for to know fair or not. just need in 5 game
shogdite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


LIR Dev. www.letitride.io


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 08:48:17 PM
 #37

So guys.. Who has the best blackjack for bitcoins going on?


                     ▀▀█████████▀████████████████▄
                        ████▄      ▄████████████████
                     ▄██████▀  ▄  ███████████████████
                  ▄█████████▄████▄███████████████████
                ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████████
                                               ▀▀███▀
    ▄█▀█       ▄▀  ▄▀▀█  ▄▀   █████████████████▄ ██▀         ▄▀█
   ▄█ ▄▀      ▀█▀ █▀ █▀ ▀█▀  ███████████████████ █▀ ▀▀      ▄▀▄▀
  ▄█    ▄███  █     █   █   ████████████████████  ▄█     ▄▀▀██▀ ▄███
███▄▄▄  █▄▄▄ █▄▄ ▄▄▀   █▄▄ ██████████████████▀▀   █▄▄ ▄▄ █▄▄█▄▄▄█▄▄▄
                           ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
                            ▀▀█████████████▄
                                █████████████▄
                                  █████████████▄
                                    ▀███████▀▀▀▀▀
                                      ▀████▀
                                        ▀█▀
LetItRideINNOVATIVE ▬▬▬
DICE GAME
                        ▄███████████▄
                       ██  ██████████▄
                     ▄█████████████  ██▄
            ▄▄▀█▄▄▄▄▄████████████████████▄
        ▄▄█▀   ███████████  █████  ████  █
    ▄██████ ▄▄███████████████████████████▀
 ▄▀▀ ██████████████████████████  ████  █
█  ▄███████████▀▀▀█████████████████████
██████████████    ████████▀▀██████  █▀
██████████████▄▄▄██████████   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███▀ ▀██████████████████████
██    ███████████████████████
██▄▄██████████████████████████
██████████████▀   ██████████
  █████████████   ▄██████▀▀
     ▀▀██████████████▀▀
         ▀▀██████▀▀
PROVABLY
F A I R
▄█████████████▀ ▄█
██            ▄█▀
██          ▄██ ▄█
██ ▄█▄    ▄███  ██
██ ▀███▄ ▄███   ██
██  ▀███████    ██
██    █████     ██
██     ███      ██
██      ▀       ██
██              ██
▀████████████████▀
BUY  BACK
PLANS
[BTC]
waterpile
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 10:41:19 PM
 #38

How are the results unrealistic? But ok, I think he should just come out and name the site here.

Don't take newbie's post seriously, he didn't provide any proofs and he didn't named which site it is Smiley


So guys.. Who has the best blackjack for bitcoins going on?

For me its CoinRoyale.com
Alvin Fahriza
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 27, 2015, 10:45:09 PM
 #39

How are the results unrealistic? But ok, I think he should just come out and name the site here.

Don't take newbie's post seriously, he didn't provide any proofs and he didn't named which site it is Smiley


So guys.. Who has the best blackjack for bitcoins going on?

For me its CoinRoyale.com
ok i Try

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!