I'm sure your morals are not affected by child porn. You are against putting money with the pirate, but you are OK with an exchange run by a child pornographer, turned morals teacher on the Internet.
You sure make a lot of sense.
You continue to have problems correlating loosely- or non-correlated items. Plus, you make weird assumptions that are easily disproven.
1. I have never, ever, said I was against putting money with the pirate.
2. I cannot confirm your claim about child pornography, because eww. I have your claim and no one else's. I admit I would also find myself weighing whether I wanted to reward a "child pornographer" with my trading. However, it would help me if you would define (do not give me images or other illegal material) what you mean by the term.
3. If he does have child pornography on his site, why have you not observed the categorical imperative, which is to report him to the authorities? This should be easy, as he uses a US TLD.
4. I know he's a pervert and an asshole. I know his mouthpiece fancies herself eloquent to the point of logorrhea. The market has determined that it's willing to ignore serious personal moral failings (Steve Jobs?) if professional ethics are productive. Christ, look at Michael Jackson.
Nobody knew about the morals of that people from the begining, but we know very well about Mircea.
I did report him, we will see what is happening. If anybody wants to help please let his webspace provider know at
abuse@gnax.net.
(NSFW)
http://polimedia.us/dtng/f/
