Repasting sp20 spoondolies?

[Sweminer777]

I have repasted the chips, but i am unsure if i should repaste around the block where there small circuits on the sides of the rockfox chip?

there was some white paste as it had felloff from the original one, i did clean all that.


I used Silver artic 5.


Atm is runing at 35 c  and 70c at backplate, it's not on orignal case, putteed 3 x120fans artic cooling silence, front back and one under in a computer case

[1715048224]

1715048224

[1715048224]

1715048224

[1715048224]

1715048224

[Sweminer777]

2.6.14
Uptime:1830 | FPGA ver:100 | BIST in 137
-----BOARD-0-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(111w/111w)[111 111 111] (->111w[111 111 111]) (lim=272) 0c 233GH cooling:0/0xff
-----BOARD-1-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(79w/79w)[79 79 79] (->79w[79 79 79]) (lim=272) 0c 179GH cooling:0/0xff
-----BOARD-2-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(173w/173w)[173 173 173] (->173w[173 173 173]) (lim=272) 0c 322GH cooling:0/0xff
-----BOARD-3-----
PSU[UNKNOWN]: 0->(125w/125w)[125 125 125] (->125w[125 125 125]) (lim=272) 0c 250GH cooling:0/0xff
LOOP[0] ON TO:0 (w:167)
 0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:625 vlt2:629(DCl:794 Tl:629 Ul:688) 54W  87A  73c] ASIC:[110c (125c) 720hz(BL: 720)   91 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:572 vlt2:576(DCl:794 Tl:576 Ul:688) 32W  56A  75c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 490hz(BL: 490)   76 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[1] ON TO:0 (w:139)
 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:562 vlt2:565(DCl:794 Tl:565 Ul:688) 26W  47A  66c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 440hz(BL: 440)   58 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:603 vlt2:608(DCl:794 Tl:608 Ul:688) 34W  57A  61c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 490hz(BL: 490)   81 (E:191) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[2] ON TO:0 (w:226)
 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:666 vlt2:672(DCl:794 Tl:672 Ul:688) 80W 119A  88c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 900hz(BL: 900)  116 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:625 vlt2:629(DCl:794 Tl:629 Ul:688) 59W  94A  90c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 770hz(BL: 770)  110 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:195)
 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:587 vlt2:592(DCl:794 Tl:592 Ul:688) 32W  55A  73c] ASIC:[100c (125c) 480hz(BL: 480)   94 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:646 vlt2:650(DCl:794 Tl:650 Ul:688) 66W 102A  76c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 820hz(BL: 820)  101 (E:192) F:0 L:0]

[H:HW:986Gh (500),DC-W:387,L:0,A:8,MMtmp:0 TMP:(37/37)=>=>=>(52/52 , 58/58)]
Pushed 11 jobs , in HW queue 4 jobs (sw:2, hw:2)!
min:25 wins:727[this/last min:8/32] bist-fail:242, hw-err:20
leading-zeroes:41 idle promils[s/m]:0/0, rate:1118gh/s asic-count:256 (wins:2+6)
wall watts:535
Fan:90, conseq:200
AC2DC BAD: 0 0
R/NR: 1816/0
RTF asics: 0
FET: 0:9 1:9
 0 restarted      0 reset          0 reset2         0 fake_wins
 0 stuck_bist     0 low_power      0 stuck_pll      0 runtime_dsble
 0 purge_queue    0 read_timeouts  0 dc2dc_i2c       0 read_tmout2    0 read_crptn
 0 purge_queue3   0 bad_idle
 0 err_murata
Adapter queues: rsp=1, req=24

Temp Front / Back T,B
    37 °C / 53,58 °C
Fan Speed
    Auto
Start Voltage
    0.67 / 0.67 / 0.67 / 0.67
Max Voltage
    0.69
Max Watts
    272 / 272 / 272 / 272

i don't understand why it keeps pulling down to 1thz?

[macgyver007]

For starters, you should NOT have used anything with SILVER near ASIC and I think that is half of the problem...I also noticed that you are not running it in the enclosure it came in
You should only have a very small amount of grease on the top of the chip and nothing anywhere else...I see in the data you posted that the volts are very low on 3 of the chips

Use another form of thermal compound without metal in it like MX-4.
Keep in mind that due to the half-assed grease job there may be leftover grease in places it was never meant to be...at least on my miners it was everywhere..the sides of the heatsinks, between the chips, everywhere...very messy and the dust loves to stick to that grease too...
I used MG chemicals non conductive grease as it calls for quite a bit of it if you remove the grease between the copper shim and the aluminum during the process.
I re-did a couple of machines which were throttling at .62v prior to pasting and they run a lot better now...I have pics somewhere of the process will upload when I can..the original job was horrible 

Are these the same settings you had prior to re-pasting and you were getting around 1400GH/s before this?
Also since you are undervolting there is no reason to have such a spread from .67 start to .69 max unless you are in a hot location..if that is the case just drop the max voltage to .68
In the field "restart miner if rate below" ... what do you have in that field, and why do you have 272w for the max watts on all 4 loops when the realistic value you should have for that voltage is more like 230w per loop

Why did you take the boards out of the original case BTW...there is a reason the airflow is over the boards in the way they are laid out..you may be cooling the top of the board ok but the back with all the power components needs cooling as well
You have 22 hardware errors in half an hour...u definitely did something wrong in the process...did u get rid of the glue that was holding the heatsinks down? possibly damaging something in the process?

[goxed]

I repasted one of the chips, because I had pried open the heatsink to take a picture.
Arctic Silver 5 is not a conductive thermal compound so you are good.

 But I wonder how did you stick the heatsink back? Since a good amount of pressure and a strong epoxy is needed to make sure thermal conductivity is restored between the chip, the copper plate and the aluminum heatsink.

[macgyver007]

I repasted one of the chips, because I had pried open the heatsink to take a picture.
Arctic Silver 5 is not a conductive thermal compound so you are good.

Not Electrically Conductive:
Arctic Silver 5 was formulated to conduct heat, not electricity.
(While much safer than electrically conductive silver and copper greases, Arctic Silver 5 should be kept away from electrical traces, pins, and leads. While it is not electrically conductive, the compound is very slightly capacitive and could potentially cause problems if it bridges two close-proximity electrical paths.)

Here is what it should look like after:


This is the mess that was before:

[goxed]

I repasted one of the chips, because I had pried open the heatsink to take a picture.
Arctic Silver 5 is not a conductive thermal compound so you are good.

Not Electrically Conductive:
Arctic Silver 5 was formulated to conduct heat, not electricity.
(While much safer than electrically conductive silver and copper greases, Arctic Silver 5 should be kept away from electrical traces, pins, and leads. While it is not electrically conductive, the compound is very slightly capacitive and could potentially cause problems if it bridges two close-proximity electrical paths.)

Ofcourse a thermal compound is thermally conductive, it's apparent in the definition.

Second holds true for almost all thermal compounds. Likely SP20  does not have high speed (GHz) data buses on the PCB, where a drop of AS5 can close the eye.

[macgyver007]

I just pulled that warning from the AS5 site...I don't know what the hype is all about with that anyways there are much better thermal compounds out now and cheaper than silver as well
I still don't think its a good idea to use AS5 on top of the ASIC, that could likely be the reason why they have other compounds which are not capacitive ...likely and maybe are just guessing that it wont screw anything up and better safe than sorry I always say...that warning is there for a reason, keeping in mind that not everyone knows how to even apply grease we could assume its likely though  

[goxed]

I still don't think its a good idea to use AS5 on top of the ASIC...likely and maybe are just guessing that it wont screw anything up...better safe than sorry I always say...and that warning is there for a reason, keeping in mind that not everyone knows how to even apply grease we could assume its likely though  

Nice scientific opinion here. thanks!

[macgyver007]

as scientific as "likely" ....cheers  
If we are to be scientists we should perhaps quote guy who said that epoxy is not necessary to re-secure the heatsinks as the glue was there to hold them in place during shipping but I digress...just trying to give SAFE advice to someone who clearly has no idea what they are doing (OP)

[goxed]

as scientific as "likely" ....cheers  
If we are to be scientists we should perhaps quote guy who said that epoxy is not necessary to re-secure the heatsinks as the glue was there to hold them in place during shipping but I digress...just trying to give SAFE advice to someone who clearly has no idea what they are doing (OP)

SAFE advice could be just an opinion without proper scientific evidence backing it up.  

The evidence points that the voltage for some chips are not at their desired levels. It is more likely that it's a SP20 voltage configuration settings or a  power supply issue.

0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:625 vlt2:629(DCl:794 Tl:629 Ul:688) 54W  87A  73c] ASIC:[110c (125c) 720hz(BL: 720)   91 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:572 vlt2:576(DCl:794 Tl:576 Ul:688) 32W  56A  75c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 490hz(BL: 490)   76 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[1] ON TO:0 (w:139)
 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:562 vlt2:565(DCl:794 Tl:565 Ul:688) 26W  47A  66c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 440hz(BL: 440)   58 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:603 vlt2:608(DCl:794 Tl:608 Ul:688) 34W  57A  61c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 490hz(BL: 490)   81 (E:191) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[2] ON TO:0 (w:226)
 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:666 vlt2:672(DCl:794 Tl:672 Ul:688) 80W 119A  88c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 900hz(BL: 900)  116 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:625 vlt2:629(DCl:794 Tl:629 Ul:688) 59W  94A  90c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 770hz(BL: 770)  110 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:195)
 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:587 vlt2:592(DCl:794 Tl:592 Ul:688) 32W  55A  73c] ASIC:[100c (125c) 480hz(BL: 480)   94 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:646 vlt2:650(DCl:794 Tl:650 Ul:688) 66W 102A  76c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 820hz(BL: 820)  101 (E:192) F:0 L:0]

[macgyver007]

as scientific as "likely" ....cheers  
If we are to be scientists we should perhaps quote guy who said that epoxy is not necessary to re-secure the heatsinks as the glue was there to hold them in place during shipping but I digress...just trying to give SAFE advice to someone who clearly has no idea what they are doing (OP)

SAFE advice could be just an opinion without proper scientific evidence backing it up. 

Now you are just talking shit.
u took 1 heatsink off and reapplied grease to it and call it safe without having the board schematics...try doing what the OP did and post your results ...have you re and re an entire machine to base your results on? I have... and the OP has fucked up his machine as you can clearly see from his results so please put your ego aside...or paste up an entire SP20 with AS5 and post your results like the OP

[goxed]

as scientific as "likely" ....cheers  
If we are to be scientists we should perhaps quote guy who said that epoxy is not necessary to re-secure the heatsinks as the glue was there to hold them in place during shipping but I digress...just trying to give SAFE advice to someone who clearly has no idea what they are doing (OP)

SAFE advice could be just an opinion without proper scientific evidence backing it up. 

Now you are just talking shit.
u took 1 heatsink off and reapplied grease to it and call it safe without having the board schematics...try doing what the OP did and post your results ...have you re and re an entire machine to base your results on? I have... and the OP has fucked up his machine as you can clearly see from his results so please put your ego aside...or paste up an entire SP20 with AS5 and post your results like the OP

I am trying to make sense of evidence provided without being overtly opinionated. It's your ego that is getting bruised without a specific reason.
I donot see a plausible explanation as how AS5 can screw a SP20.

[macgyver007]

as scientific as "likely" ....cheers  
If we are to be scientists we should perhaps quote guy who said that epoxy is not necessary to re-secure the heatsinks as the glue was there to hold them in place during shipping but I digress...just trying to give SAFE advice to someone who clearly has no idea what they are doing (OP)

SAFE advice could be just an opinion without proper scientific evidence backing it up.  

The evidence points that the voltage for some chips are not at their desired levels. It is more likely that it's a SP20 voltage configuration settings or a  power supply issue.

0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:625 vlt2:629(DCl:794 Tl:629 Ul:688) 54W  87A  73c] ASIC:[110c (125c) 720hz(BL: 720)   91 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:572 vlt2:576(DCl:794 Tl:576 Ul:688) 32W  56A  75c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 490hz(BL: 490)   76 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[1] ON TO:0 (w:139)
 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:562 vlt2:565(DCl:794 Tl:565 Ul:688) 26W  47A  66c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 440hz(BL: 440)   58 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:603 vlt2:608(DCl:794 Tl:608 Ul:688) 34W  57A  61c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 490hz(BL: 490)   81 (E:191) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[2] ON TO:0 (w:226)
 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:666 vlt2:672(DCl:794 Tl:672 Ul:688) 80W 119A  88c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 900hz(BL: 900)  116 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:625 vlt2:629(DCl:794 Tl:629 Ul:688) 59W  94A  90c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 770hz(BL: 770)  110 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:195)
 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:587 vlt2:592(DCl:794 Tl:592 Ul:688) 32W  55A  73c] ASIC:[100c (125c) 480hz(BL: 480)   94 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:646 vlt2:650(DCl:794 Tl:650 Ul:688) 66W 102A  76c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 820hz(BL: 820)  101 (E:192) F:0 L:0]

Again here you go with your science of LIKELY which is by no means evidence lol
as you can see from his post his start volts are .67 which is much higher than the ones doing .5x hmmmm wonder why they aren't getting the proper volts...you should know that the start volts are within .005 of the setting in the gui... could there be a short somewhere  
He could have also damaged the boards taking the heatsinks off...so many variables but back on topic AS5 is not really the best choice to use based on price and composition

Arctic Silver 5 3.5G tube is $10
MG Chemicals non-conductive grease which gives the same result is $15 for 150g and how many grams does it take to re-do an entire machine hmmmm....

[goxed]

as scientific as "likely" ....cheers  
If we are to be scientists we should perhaps quote guy who said that epoxy is not necessary to re-secure the heatsinks as the glue was there to hold them in place during shipping but I digress...just trying to give SAFE advice to someone who clearly has no idea what they are doing (OP)

SAFE advice could be just an opinion without proper scientific evidence backing it up.  

Now you are just talking shit.
u took 1 heatsink off and reapplied grease to it and call it safe without having the board schematics...try doing what the OP did and post your results ...have you re and re an entire machine to base your results on? I have... and the OP has fucked up his machine as you can clearly see from his results so please put your ego aside...or paste up an entire SP20 with AS5 and post your results like the OP

The board schematics are not necessary since I am NOT pasting up the whole board, just the die.

[goxed]

as scientific as "likely" ....cheers  
If we are to be scientists we should perhaps quote guy who said that epoxy is not necessary to re-secure the heatsinks as the glue was there to hold them in place during shipping but I digress...just trying to give SAFE advice to someone who clearly has no idea what they are doing (OP)

SAFE advice could be just an opinion without proper scientific evidence backing it up.  

The evidence points that the voltage for some chips are not at their desired levels. It is more likely that it's a SP20 voltage configuration settings or a  power supply issue.

0: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:625 vlt2:629(DCl:794 Tl:629 Ul:688) 54W  87A  73c] ASIC:[110c (125c) 720hz(BL: 720)   91 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 1: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:572 vlt2:576(DCl:794 Tl:576 Ul:688) 32W  56A  75c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 490hz(BL: 490)   76 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[1] ON TO:0 (w:139)
 2: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:562 vlt2:565(DCl:794 Tl:565 Ul:688) 26W  47A  66c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 440hz(BL: 440)   58 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 3: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:603 vlt2:608(DCl:794 Tl:608 Ul:688) 34W  57A  61c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 490hz(BL: 490)   81 (E:191) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[2] ON TO:0 (w:226)
 4: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:666 vlt2:672(DCl:794 Tl:672 Ul:688) 80W 119A  88c] ASIC:[120c (125c) 900hz(BL: 900)  116 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 5: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:625 vlt2:629(DCl:794 Tl:629 Ul:688) 59W  94A  90c] ASIC:[115c (125c) 770hz(BL: 770)  110 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
LOOP[3] ON TO:0 (w:195)
 6: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:587 vlt2:592(DCl:794 Tl:592 Ul:688) 32W  55A  73c] ASIC:[100c (125c) 480hz(BL: 480)   94 (E:193) F:0 L:0]
 7: DC2DC/1/:[vlt1:646 vlt2:650(DCl:794 Tl:650 Ul:688) 66W 102A  76c] ASIC:[ 85c (125c) 820hz(BL: 820)  101 (E:192) F:0 L:0]

Again here you go with your science of LIKELY which is by no means evidence lol
as you can see from his post his start volts are .67 which is much higher than the ones doing .5x hmmmm wonder why they aren't getting the proper volts...you should know that the start volts are within .005 of the setting in the gui... could there be a short somewhere  
He could have also damaged the boards taking the heatsinks off...so many variables but back on topic AS5 is not really the best choice to use based on price and composition

Science is the art of Likelyhood.

Well the start voltage is a good observation. It's possible that OP did not apply the epoxy adhesive to close the thermal gap between the chip, copper plate and the heatsink.

Thanks for introducing another irrelevant angle, one that of price. Lets compare their thermal conductivity. I think thermal conductivity of AS5 is ~8X that of MG grease.

[macgyver007]

we must have gone to different schools

science    
1.
a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws:
the mathematical sciences.
2.
systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3.
any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4.
systematized knowledge in general.
5.
knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6.
a particular branch of knowledge.
7.
skill, especially reflecting a precise application of facts or principles; proficiency.

I guess your science is...if you cant convince them with facts, then baffle them with bullshit? Of course PRICE and composition have no bearing on anything...lets buy 150G worth of AS5 and re-do all our miners...NOT
Science..the art of bullshit?

Im still waiting for you to re-paste the other 7 chips on your SP20 and post the before and after results Mr Scientist

[goxed]

we must have gone to different schools

science   
1.
a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws:
the mathematical sciences.
2.
systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3.
any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4.
systematized knowledge in general.
5.
knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6.
a particular branch of knowledge.
7.
skill, especially reflecting a precise application of facts or principles; proficiency.

I guess your science is...if you cant convince them with facts, then baffle them with bullshit? Of course PRICE and composition have no bearing on anything...lets buy 150G worth of AS5 and re-do all our miners...NOT
Science..the art of bullshit?

systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation. 
(What do you think systematic knowledge is buddy?)
Have you ever heard of experimental errors; nothing that one measures is totally accurate, there is a probability associated with every scientific observation.

[goxed]

we must have gone to different schools


Im still waiting for you to re-paste the other 7 chips on your SP20 and post the before and after results Mr Scientist

Not before you leap down that cliff and let us know the gravitation acceleration that was measured.  

[macgyver007]

we must have gone to different schools


Im still waiting for you to re-paste the other 7 chips on your SP20 and post the before and after results Mr Scientist

Not before you leap down that cliff and let us know the gravitation acceleration that was measured.  

Some scientist you are...you should know that gravity is a constant  ...want an apple to race with?

Back to topic...what were your results from before and after with your "8x as conductive as MG grease" AS5 ...I am very curious to know your results as you actually went through all the trouble to remove 1 whole heatsink assembly...soooo what were the results from using your super duper AS5...was it 8x cooler? any numbers at all from your clearly extensive testing to back anything up or just another lame signature spam campaign hmmmm Im done ...thanks for the laugh

[goxed]

we must have gone to different schools


Im still waiting for you to re-paste the other 7 chips on your SP20 and post the before and after results Mr Scientist

Not before you leap down that cliff and let us know the gravitation acceleration that was measured.  

Some scientist you are...you should know that gravity is a constant  ...want an apple to race with?

Back to topic...what were your results from before and after with your 8x as conductive as MG grease...I am very curious to know your results as you actually went through all the trouble to remove 1 whole heatsink assembly...soooo what were the results from using your super duper AS5...was it 8x cooler? any numbers at all from your clearly extensive testing to back anything up or just another lame signature spam campaign hmmmm Im done ...thanks for the laugh

Glad that you found humor in this thread. Sigs are cool, and a fact on this group

I do not think I compared MG thermal stuff with AS5.
All I did was remove one heatsink, took a pic, replaced the grease with AS5, screwed it back in.
The voltage on the said chip did not rise immediately to the intended level of 0.65V because the thermal gap did not close.
 Then I applied epoxy adhesive and put pressure of the heatsink until the epoxy cured. It closed the thermal gap and the chip worked fine at 0.65V. Just like it did before the heatsink was removed. What I can say is that most likely AS5 has equal thermal conductivity compared to the OEM grease. 8X thermal conductivity does not imply that temps will be reduced by 8X.
 (Final temps also depends on the temperature differential between chip and heatsink). I think it means that AS5 will conduct 8X the amount of heat than MG paste.

[alh]

Putting aside the various types of thermal paste and such, how do I determine the physical location of a specific ASIC based on it's number and Loop number? I have one ASIC (i.e. ASIC #7) that runs hotter than all the others. I am pretty sure that 0-3 are one board, and 4-7 are on the other. I am almost certain that ASIC #7 is the "last before the" hot air exits the SP20. I have though that when I ramp back up after the summer months here in the USA, I might consider doing a "paste job", but would like to do it on the correct one.

Ant specific guidance or diagrams on this?

[sidehack]

I'll be honest, I have nothing productive at all to add to this discussion. But I read the subject title every time I refresh the forum page and it's making me hungry.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/repast

[Sweminer777]

For starters, you should NOT have used anything with SILVER near ASIC and I think that is half of the problem...I also noticed that you are not running it in the enclosure it came in
You should only have a very small amount of grease on the top of the chip and nothing anywhere else...I see in the data you posted that the volts are very low on 3 of the chips

Use another form of thermal compound without metal in it like MX-4.
Keep in mind that due to the half-assed grease job there may be leftover grease in places it was never meant to be...at least on my miners it was everywhere..the sides of the heatsinks, between the chips, everywhere...very messy and the dust loves to stick to that grease too...
I used MG chemicals non conductive grease as it calls for quite a bit of it if you remove the grease between the copper shim and the aluminum during the process.
I re-did a couple of machines which were throttling at .62v prior to pasting and they run a lot better now...I have pics somewhere of the process will upload when I can..the original job was horrible 

Are these the same settings you had prior to re-pasting and you were getting around 1400GH/s before this?
Also since you are undervolting there is no reason to have such a spread from .67 start to .69 max unless you are in a hot location..if that is the case just drop the max voltage to .68
In the field "restart miner if rate below" ... what do you have in that field, and why do you have 272w for the max watts on all 4 loops when the realistic value you should have for that voltage is more like 230w per loop

Why did you take the boards out of the original case BTW...there is a reason the airflow is over the boards in the way they are laid out..you may be cooling the top of the board ok but the back with all the power components needs cooling as well
You have 22 hardware errors in half an hour...u definitely did something wrong in the process...did u get rid of the glue that was holding the heatsinks down? possibly damaging something in the process?

'
I have 4 fans on it, one in front, 1 on back, one at top and one under, they are set parallel. i am on a closed envirement where sound is issue thats why i opted for taking it of the case i will post some pictures..

I have only put paste on the chips like you said, i was considering the AS5 own warning.

I am running a 1000w cooler master m1000 that could be the issue as some one said here?.

I bought my sp20 for 250us whit an rm1000 included, wich was more than a bargain. but now i am quite low to upgrade the PSU but im still considering getting a server psu maybe.

So i guess that psu is main reason for such low voltages, it wont pull more than 700w from wall at any voltage i have tested, it's been very instable aswell on some volts.

[Sweminer777]

we must have gone to different schools


Im still waiting for you to re-paste the other 7 chips on your SP20 and post the before and after results Mr Scientist

Not before you leap down that cliff and let us know the gravitation acceleration that was measured.  

Some scientist you are...you should know that gravity is a constant  ...want an apple to race with?

Back to topic...what were your results from before and after with your 8x as conductive as MG grease...I am very curious to know your results as you actually went through all the trouble to remove 1 whole heatsink assembly...soooo what were the results from using your super duper AS5...was it 8x cooler? any numbers at all from your clearly extensive testing to back anything up or just another lame signature spam campaign hmmmm Im done ...thanks for the laugh

Glad that you found humor in this thread. Sigs are cool, and a fact on this group

I do not think I compared MG thermal stuff with AS5.
All I did was remove one heatsink, took a pic, replaced the grease with AS5, screwed it back in.
The voltage on the said chip did not rise immediately to the intended level of 0.65V because the thermal gap did not close.
 Then I applied epoxy adhesive and put pressure of the heatsink until the epoxy cured. It closed the thermal gap and the chip worked fine at 0.65V. Just like it did before the heatsink was removed. What I can say is that most likely AS5 has equal thermal conductivity compared to the OEM grease. 8X thermal conductivity does not imply that temps will be reduced by 8X.
 (Final temps also depends on the temperature differential between chip and heatsink). I think it means that AS5 will conduct 8X the amount of heat than MG paste.

i did not remove the thermal greese from the blates between the heatsinks and the copper, i left that, as i read on some treadh that someone had a big issue whit that.

The greese looks fine ,its alot and it keeps dripping when its hot , the boards were full of greese but didnt seem to have any bad effect, i still cleaned it, i just repasted the chip between the copper plate but nothing more than that, i put just a drip as it said that the AS5 is very think and it was really consistent , i had to press abit to get some good spreading on the chips

[goxed]

we must have gone to different schools


Im still waiting for you to re-paste the other 7 chips on your SP20 and post the before and after results Mr Scientist

Not before you leap down that cliff and let us know the gravitation acceleration that was measured.  

Some scientist you are...you should know that gravity is a constant  ...want an apple to race with?

Back to topic...what were your results from before and after with your 8x as conductive as MG grease...I am very curious to know your results as you actually went through all the trouble to remove 1 whole heatsink assembly...soooo what were the results from using your super duper AS5...was it 8x cooler? any numbers at all from your clearly extensive testing to back anything up or just another lame signature spam campaign hmmmm Im done ...thanks for the laugh

Glad that you found humor in this thread. Sigs are cool, and a fact on this group

I do not think I compared MG thermal stuff with AS5.
All I did was remove one heatsink, took a pic, replaced the grease with AS5, screwed it back in.
The voltage on the said chip did not rise immediately to the intended level of 0.65V because the thermal gap did not close.
 Then I applied epoxy adhesive and put pressure of the heatsink until the epoxy cured. It closed the thermal gap and the chip worked fine at 0.65V. Just like it did before the heatsink was removed. What I can say is that most likely AS5 has equal thermal conductivity compared to the OEM grease. 8X thermal conductivity does not imply that temps will be reduced by 8X.
 (Final temps also depends on the temperature differential between chip and heatsink). I think it means that AS5 will conduct 8X the amount of heat than MG paste.

i did not remove the thermal greese from the blates between the heatsinks and the copper, i left that, as i read on some treadh that someone had a big issue whit that.

The greese looks fine ,its alot and it keeps dripping when its hot , the boards were full of greese but didnt seem to have any bad effect, i still cleaned it, i just repasted the chip between the copper plate but nothing more than that, i put just a drip as it said that the AS5 is very think and it was really consistent , i had to press abit to get some good spreading on the chips

Did you put some Epoxy glue to the heatsink in order to make it stick back to the glued in portion and not be wobbly?

[Sweminer777]

Did you put some Epoxy glue to the heatsink in order to make it stick back to the glued in portion and not be wobbly?
[/quote]


I did not remove the copper plate from the heatsink.

I only put AS5 on the cores and it did well the job for them sticking to it.

[goxed]

Did you put some Epoxy glue to the heatsink in order to make it stick back to the glued in portion and not be wobbly?

I did not remove the copper plate from the heatsink.

I only put AS5 on the cores and it did well the job for them sticking to it.
[/quote]

AS5 is a non adhesive thermal compound, it does not have good adhesive properties.
There are 2 diagonally opposite screws to tighten the heatsink, ideally there should be 4, in order to apply adequate pressure and close the thermal gap.
if you are not using glue on the white spots where the heatsink was factory glued, your heatsink might not have good thermal contact with the chip.

[Sweminer777]

Did you put some Epoxy glue to the heatsink in order to make it stick back to the glued in portion and not be wobbly?

I did not remove the copper plate from the heatsink.

I only put AS5 on the cores and it did well the job for them sticking to it.

AS5 is a non adhesive thermal compound, it does not have good adhesive properties.
There are 2 diagonally opposite screws to tighten the heatsink, ideally there should be 4, in order to apply adequate pressure and close the thermal gap.
if you are not using glue on the white spots where the heatsink was factory glued, your heatsink might not have good thermal contact with the chip.
[/quote]

My temps are fine on closed enviroment. is even better than before repaste. i was doing 80-85.

Dropped to 68-69 after this, i have not glued anything, it just sits whit preasure.

[goxed]

Did you put some Epoxy glue to the heatsink in order to make it stick back to the glued in portion and not be wobbly?

I did not remove the copper plate from the heatsink.

I only put AS5 on the cores and it did well the job for them sticking to it.

AS5 is a non adhesive thermal compound, it does not have good adhesive properties.
There are 2 diagonally opposite screws to tighten the heatsink, ideally there should be 4, in order to apply adequate pressure and close the thermal gap.
if you are not using glue on the white spots where the heatsink was factory glued, your heatsink might not have good thermal contact with the chip.

What was your hashing rate and chip voltages before repasting?

My temps are fine on closed enviroment. is even better than before repaste. i was doing 80-85.

Dropped to 68-69 after this, i have not glued anything, it just sits whit preasure.
[/quote]

[Sweminer777]

1250~

Doing about same . voltages i have been swapping, from 0.66 up to 0.74. but doing the same it wont go for more.

I only got a 1000w psu so that might be the isssue. i bought the sp20 for 250us included a rm1000 psu, and i am running on an old m1000 from cooler master wich has been more stable than the RM1000.

I am looking onto server psu for upgrade , not sure if i should spend my bitcoins on one or save them and work for some real money .


As said previous the SP20 is not inside the original case as it was to loud, i will take photos later on the night to show my uggly setup haha

[Marvell1]

so bottom line it for us here what did you use that lowered your temps AS5 then ? or MG ?

I have have a large repasting project for my Scrypt Asics , a 10-15 degree reduction in temps would be great for me as well

[alh]

My understanding is that Spondoolies didn't originally add a "glue bond" on the SP20, but did later in order to prevent the heatsink from rocking during shipment. I haven't heard that the glue bond was to actually improve thermal performance. It's too bad they didn't just originally use a 4-screw heatsink design.

[Sweminer777]

so bottom line it for us here what did you use that lowered your temps AS5 then ? or MG ?

I have have a large repasting project for my Scrypt Asics , a 10-15 degree reduction in temps would be great for me as well

I used AS5, i only put like a drop ans squished gently the heatsink back after screwing the 2 screws as it get loose, i watched on the side to see the paste to spread a bit.

   
Re: Repasting sp20 spoondolies?
Today at 04:16:51 PM
   
Reply with quote  #32
My understanding is that Spondoolies didn't originally add a "glue bond" on the SP20, but did later in order to prevent the heatsink from rocking during shipment. I haven't heard that the glue bond was to actually improve thermal performance. It's too bad they didn't just originally use a 4-screw heatsink design.

Yeapp, what i understand the glue have no thermal benefits and is only for shipment requirments to prevent damage on the chips.


a 4 screw thermal sinks would have been good, i was even checking for watercooling possiblilities but whit 2 holes the water blocks wont hold tight, will need to do some modifications that might not even be worth the time and money.

So i will just let the sp20 run untill it dies.

[goxed]

The chip that I removed the heatsink from, on the SP20, would not reach > 0.60V until I applied epoxy glue to the glue spots and pressed it until it stuck w/o wobble.
The 2 screws do a crappy job of applying uniform pressure on the die. Air is a great thermal insulator.
 


Ever seen a heatsink bolted on to a large die GPU with just 2 diagonal screws?

[philipma1957]

My understanding is that Spondoolies didn't originally add a "glue bond" on the SP20, but did later in order to prevent the heatsink from rocking during shipment. I haven't heard that the glue bond was to actually improve thermal performance. It's too bad they didn't just originally use a 4-screw heatsink design.

classic example of 'stupid cheap'  or to be politically correct:

'pennywise pound foolish'

[alh]

It's kind of odd too considering all the good, and not cheap, choices that Spondoolies made on the SP20. I've seen the 2-screw diagonal heatsinks on small chips on a motherboard, but never the CPU. Maybe the chips weren't level enough on the board and it need a little "give" to avoid cracking the ASIC.

[Sweminer777]

It's kind of odd too considering all the good, and not cheap, choices that Spondoolies made on the SP20. I've seen the 2-screw diagonal heatsinks on small chips on a motherboard, but never the CPU. Maybe the chips weren't level enough on the board and it need a little "give" to avoid cracking the ASIC.

spoondolies have already stated that cracked chips won't reduce the perfomance, my chips were also cracked, perfomance have not been reduced.

The thing as they "hang" vertically, the weight counts down onto one side, the heatsinks are really heavy for what they are.

The sp20 is well build but it could have been better, small details were left out.

as said previously 4 holes would have made the possibilitie for water cooling , blocks wont sit tight whit only 2 holes. It is possible to build some kind of holder but it will have to go around the entire board as you can't touch mostly any part of the board, everything is covered whit sensetive electronics.

You can see that Jew enginering was aswell thinking on the economics a well build board whit crucial details left out, and those details were ment to cut down cost and maximise profit.

[alh]

Has anyone tried turning an SP20 on it's side? It would seem you could eliminate the "hanging heatsink" if you rotated the SP 20 so that the blades are horizontal and not vertical. It would look a bit odd, but I wonder how it would change the temps.

[Sweminer777]

Has anyone tried turning an SP20 on it's side? It would seem you could eliminate the "hanging heatsink" if you rotated the SP 20 so that the blades are horizontal and not vertical. It would look a bit odd, but I wonder how it would change the temps.

I did think about it, but i removed it from entire case, it's really hard to put it on something else if it's not original case, there is no kind of extra hole to put them firmly onto some plates.

But from side might reduce the tension, i don't know about the heat, fan is to noisy and the case makes the noise louder, my main problem was the noisy thats why i opted for removing it from the case.

[Prelude]

The chip that I removed the heatsink from, on the SP20, would not reach > 0.60V until I applied epoxy glue to the glue spots and pressed it until it stuck w/o wobble.
The 2 screws do a crappy job of applying uniform pressure on the die. Air is a great thermal insulator.
 
Ever seen a heatsink bolted on to a large die GPU with just 2 diagonal screws?

Once the 2 screws are completely tightened you're saying there isn't enough pressure on the die? Would it be possible to add a washer to each screw between it and the top of the heatsink to increase pressure?

[goxed]

The chip that I removed the heatsink from, on the SP20, would not reach > 0.60V until I applied epoxy glue to the glue spots and pressed it until it stuck w/o wobble.
The 2 screws do a crappy job of applying uniform pressure on the die. Air is a great thermal insulator.
 
Ever seen a heatsink bolted on to a large die GPU with just 2 diagonal screws?

Once the 2 screws are completely tightened you're saying there isn't enough pressure on the die? Would it be possible to add a washer to each screw between it and the top of the heatsink to increase pressure?

There are spacers on the two screws which limit the amount of tigtening force to protect the die. 2 screw setup is not the most stable, since it allows for wobble.

[vapourminer]

we must have gone to different schools


Im still waiting for you to re-paste the other 7 chips on your SP20 and post the before and after results Mr Scientist

Not before you leap down that cliff and let us know the gravitation acceleration that was measured.   

Some scientist you are...you should know that gravity is a constant  ...want an apple to race with?

he said the acceleration of gravity which on earth is 32 feet per second per second

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_acceleration