FrictionlessCoin
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
|
 |
June 15, 2013, 01:59:47 PM |
|
are they shipping in bulk yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the
core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
peter79
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
June 15, 2013, 02:12:26 PM |
|
They shipping in 2 weeks  |
|
|
|
|
Inaba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 15, 2013, 02:40:40 PM |
|
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic) I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s) Why do you think it should be 1024 MH? These aren't bytes... (or bits, from whence your confusion likely springs) |
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
|
FloridaBear
|
|
June 15, 2013, 03:23:41 PM |
|
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic) I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s) Why do you think it should be 1024 MH? These aren't bytes... (or bits, from whence your confusion likely springs) Correct. It's just a standard metric system (giga) prefix meaning 10 9 Even hard drive manufactures use even 1,000s when specifying size--the 2 10 multiplier only applies to RAM as far as I know. |
|
|
|
|
|
anykeywhy
|
|
June 15, 2013, 03:38:20 PM |
|
anyone selling there?
|
|
|
|
|
darkmule
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 15, 2013, 05:47:41 PM |
|
Well, you know what Mel Brooks says: never give a saga an even break. |
|
|
|
|
|
oroboras
|
|
June 16, 2013, 02:17:19 AM |
|
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic) I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s) Why do you think it should be 1024 MH? These aren't bytes... (or bits, from whence your confusion likely springs) Yup - that was where my initial confusion came from - logic dictated that it would be a straight 1000, but some tiny bit of me wanted that extra 24 (it is my optimistic side, and therefore tiny, sadly) At least I have the right of it now. Cheers  |
|
|
|
|
dben428
Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
|
June 16, 2013, 02:23:07 AM |
|
1 GHash/s = 1,000 Mhash/s so 6.8 Ghash
I always wondered about that - cos really it should be 1024MH/s (call me pedantic) I know the difference is not much, but it really does add up, if you are running a decent set up (like my upgraded LS & Jalapeno will be putting out a combined 37GH/s - which if it was 1024MH/s per Gh/s would be the equivalent of an extra 888MH/s) Why do you think it should be 1024 MH? These aren't bytes... (or bits, from whence your confusion likely springs) Yup - that was where my initial confusion came from - logic dictated that it would be a straight 1000, but some tiny bit of me wanted that extra 24 (it is my optimistic side, and therefore tiny, sadly) At least I have the right of it now. Cheers I'd agree and say that it is confusing. A lot of people just use it incorrectly, and aren't aware of the difference between a megabyte (MB) and a mebibyte (MiB) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte |
|
|
|
|
Deroba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2013, 02:27:26 AM |
|
I requested a refund and I had it within a day back in my PP.
The reason was I don't want BTC anymore. I prefer LTC.
|
|
|
|
|
QuestionAuthority
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
|
|
June 16, 2013, 02:43:08 AM
Last edit: June 16, 2013, 03:48:27 PM by QuestionAuthority |
|
I requested a refund and I had it within a day back in my PP.
The reason was I don't want BTC anymore. I prefer LTC.
Really, how much did they refund you? Can you black out your info on the PP statement and post it for us to see? I don't believe you. I think you are just another BFL sock puppet account. |
|
|
|
Holla4dolla
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2013, 02:43:49 AM |
|
Not for me.
|
|
|
|
|
M8R-lfitc6
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2013, 04:32:31 AM |
|
Good thing I didnt preorder back in march
|
|
|
|
|
publicist
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2013, 07:19:09 AM |
|
I was going to order from here, but decided not to. Seems like if everyone had pooled their money in bitcoin last year instead of equipment...they'd be much further ahead. Instead, Butterfly labs did that for you  |
|
|
|
|
Jumpsu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2013, 08:34:14 AM |
|
Waiting my jalapeno...  maybe 3-4 months when i have... |
|
|
|
|
rafi365
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2013, 08:38:48 AM |
|
When you will receive your jalapeno after 3-4 months you won't get payback of your investment for long time - check how diff rise in this month...
|
|
|
|
|
Jumpsu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2013, 08:59:44 AM |
|
i think diff is big when i have jalapeno, but i guess that will payback at least several months. |
|
|
|
|
|
joae1975
|
|
June 16, 2013, 09:59:31 AM |
|
i think diff is big when i have jalapeno, but i guess that will payback at least several months. A $300 jalapeño will ROI in 2 months right now. |
1PewuG8KZJUPK3CtvAkAs1Uw42rQgUv5Jk
|
|
|
|
firefop
|
|
June 16, 2013, 06:06:17 PM |
|
A $300 jalapeño will ROI in 2 months right now.
True but a single would roi in under a week. |
|
|
|
|
nerFohanzo
|
|
June 16, 2013, 06:10:43 PM |
|
A $300 jalapeño will ROI in 2 months right now.
True but a single would roi in under a week. Yes these would be good. Does BFL Single exist? |
|
|
|
|
|
Photon939
|
|
June 16, 2013, 06:38:16 PM |
|
One retail single has been shipped, "more" coming this week according to BFL. Once my little single arrives I'll be sure to post pics, I have an early order
|
|
|
|
|
|
