|
cuz0882 (OP)
|
 |
July 22, 2012, 11:28:03 PM
Last edit: August 05, 2012, 08:04:48 PM by cuz0882 |
|
This week's payment?
Payments sent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
chunglam
Donator
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 229
Merit: 106
|
|
July 22, 2012, 11:41:37 PM |
|
This week's payment?
Payments sent. Received, thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
Shadow383
|
|
July 30, 2012, 01:51:35 AM |
|
In an ideal world, what I (and I suspect many others) are looking for in mining assets is something very much like this, but as a share rather than a bond. IPO it, set it so that half the mining proceeds (less the cost of your cheap power + 5% or so for yourself) get paid out as dividends and the rest get spent on new hardware for the company. You'd end up with quite a large hashrate quite quickly. I'd certainly be happy to invest  There's no reason why you couldn't do a second IPO  |
|
|
|
|
|
cuz0882 (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2012, 04:02:25 AM |
|
In an ideal world, what I (and I suspect many others) are looking for in mining assets is something very much like this, but as a share rather than a bond. IPO it, set it so that half the mining proceeds (less the cost of your cheap power + 5% or so for yourself) get paid out as dividends and the rest get spent on new hardware for the company. You'd end up with quite a large hashrate quite quickly. I'd certainly be happy to invest There's no reason why you couldn't do a second IPO You can always reinvest your dividends. If you reinvested half your dividends you should end up with nearly the same result. |
|
|
|
|
|
cuz0882 (OP)
|
|
August 05, 2012, 08:02:45 PM |
|
Payments Issued 8-5
|
|
|
|
|
sunnankar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1031
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 06, 2012, 05:52:40 AM |
|
I have made a update regarding the ASIC announcement. I set the bond price at 1.73 btc.
Is there something unclear about the announcement that would lead to uncertainty or are these currently undervalued compared to GIGAMINING or BITBONDS? GIGAMINING - 1.13 - .226 BITBONDS - 0.45 - .214 HYDRO.BONDS - 1.335 - .1335 |
|
|
|
|
cuz0882 (OP)
|
|
August 06, 2012, 06:58:14 AM
Last edit: August 09, 2012, 07:45:14 PM by cuz0882 |
|
I have made a update regarding the ASIC announcement. I set the bond price at 1.73 btc.
Is there something unclear about the announcement that would lead to uncertainty or are these currently undervalued compared to GIGAMINING or BITBONDS? GIGAMINING - 1.13 - .226 BITBONDS - 0.45 - .214 HYDRO.BONDS - 1.335 - .1335 Some of the older more popular bonds are being overvalued. It's hard to believe bonds invested in gpu's would hold a value that high with ASIC's coming out. |
|
|
|
|
Jurek
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
August 09, 2012, 09:58:18 PM |
|
So you are offering free upgrade to 215Mh/s per bond, right? That's 1.325/215Mh/s ~ 0.006BTC per 1Mh/s after upgrade. That's about two times cheaper than what Bitbond offers. What's the catch? * Free: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 12.5Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for free
* Small upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 45Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 0.25 btc
* Large upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 450Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 5.5 btc
In other words, assuming a value of 0.50 BTC per BITBOND share: Free: 12.5 Mh/s for 0.50 BTC = 25 Mh/s per BTC, or 0.0400 BTC / 1 Mh/s Small: 45 Mh/s for 0.75 BTC = 60 Mh/s per BTC, or 0.0167 BTC / 1 Mh/s Large: 450 Mh/s for 6 BTC = 75 Mh/s per BTC, 0.0133 BTC / 1 Mh/s |
|
|
|
|
labestiol
|
|
August 09, 2012, 10:17:27 PM |
|
So you are offering free upgrade to 215Mh/s per bond, right? That's 1.325/215Mh/s ~ 0.006BTC per 1Mh/s after upgrade. That's about two times cheaper than what Bitbond offers. What's the catch? * Free: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 12.5Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for free
* Small upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 45Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 0.25 btc
* Large upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 450Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 5.5 btc
In other words, assuming a value of 0.50 BTC per BITBOND share: Free: 12.5 Mh/s for 0.50 BTC = 25 Mh/s per BTC, or 0.0400 BTC / 1 Mh/s Small: 45 Mh/s for 0.75 BTC = 60 Mh/s per BTC, or 0.0167 BTC / 1 Mh/s Large: 450 Mh/s for 6 BTC = 75 Mh/s per BTC, 0.0133 BTC / 1 Mh/s That's an easy one, bitbond & gigamining are making a profit from the transition to asics, he's not. (disclosure, I own some hydromining bonds) |
1BestioLC7YBVh8Q5LfH6RYURD6MrpP8y6
|
|
|
|
cuz0882 (OP)
|
|
August 11, 2012, 05:57:36 AM |
|
So you are offering free upgrade to 215Mh/s per bond, right? That's 1.325/215Mh/s ~ 0.006BTC per 1Mh/s after upgrade. That's about two times cheaper than what Bitbond offers. What's the catch? * Free: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 12.5Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for free
* Small upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 45Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 0.25 btc
* Large upgrade: 2M/s BITBOND converts to 450Mh/s BITBOND.ASIC for 5.5 btc
In other words, assuming a value of 0.50 BTC per BITBOND share: Free: 12.5 Mh/s for 0.50 BTC = 25 Mh/s per BTC, or 0.0400 BTC / 1 Mh/s Small: 45 Mh/s for 0.75 BTC = 60 Mh/s per BTC, or 0.0167 BTC / 1 Mh/s Large: 450 Mh/s for 6 BTC = 75 Mh/s per BTC, 0.0133 BTC / 1 Mh/s This bond is only invested in butterfly singles. The bonds you are talking about are invested in gpu equipment. It's a whole different situation for them. |
|
|
|
|
Jurek
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
August 11, 2012, 08:03:33 AM |
|
Thanks for pointing this out. I got to the bitcoin game a bit late, there is a lot to catch up!
|
|
|
|
Jurek
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
August 20, 2012, 04:47:40 AM |
|
Dividends?
|
|
|
|
kidgorgeous
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
October 01, 2012, 07:08:31 PM |
|
If the announced increase in hashrate of the butterfly SC singles does pan out (60GH versus 40 GH) will the bonds get the extra increase included in their hash rate? Would it work out to something like 320MH per bond. Also what's you SC upgrade order number?
-A happy Hydrobond holder.
|
1KHxCRniFNmS7ChiPqaewmokuCABk2PRQn
|
|
|
Jurek
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
October 01, 2012, 09:39:25 PM |
|
There is no such thing as a happy BOND holder...
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1031
|
|
October 02, 2012, 03:36:19 AM |
|
If the announced increase in hashrate of the butterfly SC singles does pan out (60GH versus 40 GH) will the bonds get the extra increase included in their hash rate? Would it work out to something like 320MH per bond. Also what's you SC upgrade order number?
-A happy Hydrobond holder.
Yeah, I'm surprised there has been no increase in the price of this bond... guess it's time to get some more on the cheap |
|
|
|
|
