Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 05:00:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin Ownership Defined  (Read 539 times)
freedombit (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 11, 2015, 05:18:56 AM
 #1

There have been some headlines circulating that indicate a Japanese district court ruled that Bitcoin cannot be owned. It surprises me that there is not more discussion on this subject here. This has implications that reach beyond Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, but certainly has a direct impact.

1) Can anyone provide a source for this ruling beyond the news website headlines?

2) I'm not an attorney, but it sounds like the argument is that Bitcoin is being considered "open access property" based on the Wiki definition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_rights_%28economics%29.

3) The idea of "ownership" and "access" is important in that the rules of engagement are being established by society; whether that society is the smaller Bitcoin/cryptocurrency circle, or the larger world population, or something in between.


One of the articles for reference:
http://www.engadget.com/2015/08/06/japanese-court-bitcoin-ownership-ruling/

1714971642
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714971642

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714971642
Reply with quote  #2

1714971642
Report to moderator
1714971642
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714971642

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714971642
Reply with quote  #2

1714971642
Report to moderator
1714971642
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714971642

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714971642
Reply with quote  #2

1714971642
Report to moderator
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714971642
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714971642

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714971642
Reply with quote  #2

1714971642
Report to moderator
1714971642
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714971642

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714971642
Reply with quote  #2

1714971642
Report to moderator
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073


View Profile
August 11, 2015, 06:43:28 AM
 #2

Property rights can be viewed as an attribute of an economic good. This attribute has four broad components and is often referred to as a bundle of rights:
 
 1.the right to use the good {We can use Bitcoin}
 2.the right to earn income from the good {Yes, we do receive a income from it}
 3.the right to transfer the good to others {For sure, we can transfer Bitcoin from person to person}
 4.the right to enforcement of property rights {The Blockchain makes it easy to provide proof of ownership throught the private key, so property rights can be enforced}

What do the Japanese dispute in these 4 attributes?  Huh Huh

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
Possum577
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250

Loose lips sink sigs!


View Profile WWW
August 11, 2015, 06:49:49 AM
 #3

Interesting, this is the first I'm hearing of it (thanks for sharing with all.)

If bitcoin can be considered "open access property" can't any fiat currency? We all trade the bills we use for cash, no one claims distinct ownership for one specific bill with one unique serial number on it, do they?

It's unfortunate that the country of origin (presumably) for Bitcoin is taking the largest stance against it.

tonycamp
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 11, 2015, 07:08:11 AM
 #4

well forget that i have plenty BTC and try to put a name in anon=also my nae into BTC addy and Fiscal reference its good to its japan.

██████████    YoBit.net - Cryptocurrency Exchange
█████████    <<  ● Free Coins every 24hrs!  >>
██████████    <<  ● REGISTER NOW and GET 1000 DOGE for FREE!  >>
AtheistAKASaneBrain
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509


View Profile
August 11, 2015, 09:17:34 AM
 #5

The mental masturbation on ownership by governments will never change the objective fact that says if you own the private keys, those keys are you, therefore, those Bitcoins are yours. Period. Everything else is abstract shit with hidden agendas and motives, don't get fooled by the local govs. At the end of the day it all comes to that.
ikydesu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500

fb.com/Bitky.shop | Bitcoin Merch!Premium Quality!


View Profile WWW
August 11, 2015, 10:13:29 AM
 #6

Property rights can be viewed as an attribute of an economic good. This attribute has four broad components and is often referred to as a bundle of rights:
 
 1.the right to use the good {We can use Bitcoin}
 2.the right to earn income from the good {Yes, we do receive a income from it}
 3.the right to transfer the good to others {For sure, we can transfer Bitcoin from person to person}
 4.the right to enforcement of property rights {The Blockchain makes it easy to provide proof of ownership throught the private key, so property rights can be enforced}

What do the Japanese dispute in these 4 attributes?  Huh Huh


Agree with you, i don't know the reason why the Japanese is not admin Bitcoin can be owned. Maybe because they anger about Mt.Gox Huh
freedombit (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 13, 2015, 06:59:00 AM
 #7

Property rights can be viewed as an attribute of an economic good. This attribute has four broad components and is often referred to as a bundle of rights:
 
 1.the right to use the good {We can use Bitcoin}
 2.the right to earn income from the good {Yes, we do receive a income from it}
 3.the right to transfer the good to others {For sure, we can transfer Bitcoin from person to person}
 4.the right to enforcement of property rights {The Blockchain makes it easy to provide proof of ownership throught the private key, so property rights can be enforced}

What do the Japanese dispute in these 4 attributes?  Huh Huh


I would like to see the court docs. Anyone in Japan know where this can be found?

Also did a little cross reference to the leaked list...didn't find anyone with that amount of Bitcoin on it. Who filed?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!