Atlas (OP)
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
|
 |
October 03, 2012, 07:29:04 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
nameface
|
|
October 03, 2012, 07:46:41 AM |
|
I get it near the top of page 3  |
|
|
|
|
Atlas (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
|
|
October 03, 2012, 07:48:05 AM |
|
I get it near the top of page 3 Google lies to everyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
Liquid
|
|
October 04, 2012, 06:41:01 AM |
|
page 2 for me in Australia
|
Bitcoin will show the world what hard money really is.
|
|
|
Uuno
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
October 04, 2012, 09:20:22 AM |
|
Bottom of third page here.
|
Send all your money here: 1CRTegc4fdeJYwTPGYTuGq3nFBbgvHc23c
|
|
|
|
Vladimir
|
|
October 04, 2012, 09:37:51 AM |
|
I get it near the top of page 3 Google lies to everyone. Indeed they are. Love it or hate it but bitcointalk does deserve a spot on the first page of search results for "bitcoin". Too bad that G was driven insane recently by SEO guys. According to SEO people advising me the latest iteration of G algo makes no sense whatsoever, quality of SERP's is very bad. G basically brings random low quality websites on top while burying hiqh quality authority websites. G reportedly slowly comes back to its senses after the last update but not by much so far. Too bad that they have sacrificed search results relevance in favor of hell knows what. One suggestion I heard is that they make more money on ads by having worse search results quality and thus pushing people to click on paid ads (that are suddenly more relevant than natural search) and by making people click on pages 2 3 4 etc... in search of something relevant. |
-
|
|
|
chmod755
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1020
|
|
October 05, 2012, 07:30:49 PM |
|
One suggestion I heard is that they make more money on ads by having worse search results quality and thus pushing people to click on paid ads (that are suddenly more relevant than natural search) and by making people click on pages 2 3 4 etc... in search of something relevant. Makes sense if Google needs money quickly, but in the long term users will use other search engines… bitcointalk.org is somewhere in the middle of page 2 for me (in Austria). |
|
|
|
Akka
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 05, 2012, 07:33:51 PM |
|
Germany, first one on page 3.
|
All previous versions of currency will no longer be supported as of this update
|
|
|
quasarbtc
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
October 06, 2012, 05:09:51 AM |
|
Top of page 2 here. With BFL ads.
|
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5180
Merit: 12884
|
|
October 06, 2012, 05:31:17 AM |
|
Bottom of the first page for me. Indeed they are. Love it or hate it but bitcointalk does deserve a spot on the first page of search results for "bitcoin". Too bad that G was driven insane recently by SEO guys. According to SEO people advising me the latest iteration of G algo makes no sense whatsoever, quality of SERP's is very bad. G basically brings random low quality websites on top while burying hiqh quality authority websites. G reportedly slowly comes back to its senses after the last update but not by much so far. Too bad that they have sacrificed search results relevance in favor of hell knows what.
One suggestion I heard is that they make more money on ads by having worse search results quality and thus pushing people to click on paid ads (that are suddenly more relevant than natural search) and by making people click on pages 2 3 4 etc... in search of something relevant.
I've noticed that Google's quality has declined over the past couple of years. From time to time I try to use a different search engine, but they all seem worse than Google. Maybe searching has just become more difficult. |
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
cedivad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 06, 2012, 05:36:38 AM |
|
I get it near the top of page 3 Google lies to everyone. Indeed they are. Love it or hate it but bitcointalk does deserve a spot on the first page of search results for "bitcoin". Too bad that G was driven insane recently by SEO guys. According to SEO people advising me the latest iteration of G algo makes no sense whatsoever, quality of SERP's is very bad. G basically brings random low quality websites on top while burying hiqh quality authority websites. G reportedly slowly comes back to its senses after the last update but not by much so far. Too bad that they have sacrificed search results relevance in favor of hell knows what. One suggestion I heard is that they make more money on ads by having worse search results quality and thus pushing people to click on paid ads (that are suddenly more relevant than natural search) and by making people click on pages 2 3 4 etc... in search of something relevant. Yes, them providing low quality result is the reason everyone use them, you are correct. Belive me, you are wrong on ALL THE LINE. |
My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive: Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers |
|
|
cedivad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
|
|
October 06, 2012, 05:38:28 AM |
|
Bottom of the first page for me. Indeed they are. Love it or hate it but bitcointalk does deserve a spot on the first page of search results for "bitcoin". Too bad that G was driven insane recently by SEO guys. According to SEO people advising me the latest iteration of G algo makes no sense whatsoever, quality of SERP's is very bad. G basically brings random low quality websites on top while burying hiqh quality authority websites. G reportedly slowly comes back to its senses after the last update but not by much so far. Too bad that they have sacrificed search results relevance in favor of hell knows what.
One suggestion I heard is that they make more money on ads by having worse search results quality and thus pushing people to click on paid ads (that are suddenly more relevant than natural search) and by making people click on pages 2 3 4 etc... in search of something relevant.
I've noticed that Google's quality has declined over the past couple of years. From time to time I try to use a different search engine, but they all seem worse than Google. Maybe searching has just become more difficult. The web is simply more filled with spam websites, aggregators, etc. I always have top quality results from my searches. |
My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive: Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers |
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
October 06, 2012, 05:59:25 AM |
|
Forth down on second page for me.
~Bruno K~
|
|
|
|
|
|
JayCoin
|
|
October 06, 2012, 06:13:17 AM |
|
Screw Google. Use AltaVista instead.
|
Hello There!
|
|
|
|
Valalvax
|
|
October 06, 2012, 02:56:02 PM |
|
I believe results are heavily weighted on the votes people submit these days
|
|
|
|
|
|
