You should be thankful we didn't need a hard fork to introduce the 1MB cap in the first place, otherwise there's a possibility it might still be 32MB (or was it 33.5MB?). I suppose you think Bitcoin would have broken and died by now if the 1MB cap hadn't happened?
I wonder how it is relevant here, but yes, I believe Bitcoin would be in trouble already. I suppose you think the 1Mb cap was introduced for no reason?
You can detest it all you like, but if you use Bitcoin, this is what you're signing up for. Bitcoin can fork at any time for any reason if enough users want it to. If you can't handle that, there are plenty of closed-source projects that might suit you better. You have a vote if you choose to use it, but that's all. Either go with the flow or go somewhere else. It's up to you.
You're fighting a straw man here. I never said I can't handle Bitcoin forking if enough users want it (the so-called economic majority). I said that I don't consider 75% of miners being
enough users.
I'm not one of those people who are too stubborn to admit when they're wrong (as per my previous post). If you can convince me I'm wrong, I'll concede. It's not my fault you're doing a really bad job of convincing me.
It must be very convenient to ignore the very essence of my post while commenting only less important parts, and even there you manage to fight a straw man. Well done! What's the point of arguing then?
Not. An. Altcoin.
Keep telling yourself that.
