Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 03:44:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][OC] Orangecoin v2.0.4 ✦ PoS ✦ Anon ✦ Masternode Whitepaper ✦ Get Juiced!  (Read 72432 times)
soopy452000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001

Founder - NavCoin Ⓝ


View Profile WWW
September 01, 2015, 05:35:42 AM
 #101

Got past 262799 with the bootstrap, but with the previous version (2.0 did not get past it)

Now trying to switch to 2.0... It's getting stuck :/

Also the July fix seems to have been reverted in 2.0 with a "version bump" comment, alongside actual version bump commits, could that be the bug?

yes it was reverted and reevaluated and re applied to avoid any further issues. Smiley


Working/Online Times
04:00:00 GMT - 12:00:00 GMT / 00:00:00 EDT - 08:00:00 EDT

Coin Developments & Contributions 1. SherlockCoin (SHC) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=454981) 2. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Life to Growthcoin (GRW) , Community Backed Development! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469464) 3. [ANN][66][New Maintainer] ★Coin 66★ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=493987) 4. [RE-ANN] Galaxycoin Revival!-FORK AT BLOCK 255145, KGW, RANDOM BLOCK REWARDS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495693) 5. [RESURRECTION] Taking Astrocoin to the Moon,KGW Implemented + HARD FORK AT 17520 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516549 6. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Electric back to the grid, Community Backed Development! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514790
1710819865
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710819865

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710819865
Reply with quote  #2

1710819865
Report to moderator
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710819865
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710819865

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710819865
Reply with quote  #2

1710819865
Report to moderator
1710819865
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710819865

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710819865
Reply with quote  #2

1710819865
Report to moderator
1710819865
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710819865

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710819865
Reply with quote  #2

1710819865
Report to moderator
Halofire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


@halofirebtc


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 05:59:13 AM
 #102

At least I can finally relax a little bit, since soopy is now aware of everything.

Thanks for everyone's help today. We will get through this, there's no question there. Smiley

OC Development - oZwWbQwz6LAkDLa2pHsEH8WSD2Y3LsTgFt
SMC Development - SgpYdoVz946nLBF2hF3PYCVQYnuYDeQTGu
Friendly reminder: Back up your wallet.dat files!!
raven7886
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1041



View Profile
September 01, 2015, 06:01:39 AM
 #103

At least I can finally relax a little bit, since soopy is now aware of everything.

Thanks for everyone's help today. We will get through this, there's no question there. Smiley

Indeed, Such an AWESOME TEAM! Keep up the hard work, Halo have a beer!
Halofire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


@halofirebtc


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 06:30:10 AM
 #104

I do like my beer.  Wink  Grin

OC Development - oZwWbQwz6LAkDLa2pHsEH8WSD2Y3LsTgFt
SMC Development - SgpYdoVz946nLBF2hF3PYCVQYnuYDeQTGu
Friendly reminder: Back up your wallet.dat files!!
fairglu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1100
Merit: 1030


View Profile WWW
September 01, 2015, 08:11:46 AM
 #105

I have been getting a few blocks on v2 for the last hours, are these on the right fork?
(this includes blocks mined by rich list list #12 and #9, so if it's a fork, they would be on it as well)

Appreciating your thoughts on risks , but this was actually provided by the development team and if you cannot trust the development team , I do not know who you will. Wink

Technically speaking, the file is not provided by the team, but by a link to a mediafire url.
The trust issue is not about the dev team, but about whether the data you get may or may not actually be from the dev team Smiley

The github source code is trustable, as it is hosted on an https server, with a well identified url and a list of recent changes/commit and git's own tamper-proof hashing, so any hijacking attempt would not go unnoticed, but the mediafire link on the other hand is "meaningless", http, and the data itself hosted by a 3rd party. This is vulnerable to several vectors of attack.

When replacing the db, the wallet will only check the last 2500 blocks, while when using a bootstrap.dat, the wallet will check the whole blockchain, making hijacking attempts as hard as a full-scale 51% attack, so it's okay to host the bootstrap.dat anywhere.


soopy452000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001

Founder - NavCoin Ⓝ


View Profile WWW
September 01, 2015, 09:03:11 AM
 #106

I have been getting a few blocks on v2 for the last hours, are these on the right fork?
(this includes blocks mined by rich list list #12 and #9, so if it's a fork, they would be on it as well)

Appreciating your thoughts on risks , but this was actually provided by the development team and if you cannot trust the development team , I do not know who you will. Wink

Technically speaking, the file is not provided by the team, but by a link to a mediafire url.
The trust issue is not about the dev team, but about whether the data you get may or may not actually be from the dev team Smiley

The github source code is trustable, as it is hosted on an https server, with a well identified url and a list of recent changes/commit and git's own tamper-proof hashing, so any hijacking attempt would not go unnoticed, but the mediafire link on the other hand is "meaningless", http, and the data itself hosted by a 3rd party. This is vulnerable to several vectors of attack.

When replacing the db, the wallet will only check the last 2500 blocks, while when using a bootstrap.dat, the wallet will check the whole blockchain, making hijacking attempts as hard as a full-scale 51% attack, so it's okay to host the bootstrap.dat anywhere.



Oh Okay mate , got you there the trust issue was with the hosting provider. Smiley I get you now. Believe it was a communication mishap. Smiley Appologies mate.
Enjoy a beer shall we?

Warm Regards,
~SoopY~

Working/Online Times
04:00:00 GMT - 12:00:00 GMT / 00:00:00 EDT - 08:00:00 EDT

Coin Developments & Contributions 1. SherlockCoin (SHC) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=454981) 2. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Life to Growthcoin (GRW) , Community Backed Development! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469464) 3. [ANN][66][New Maintainer] ★Coin 66★ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=493987) 4. [RE-ANN] Galaxycoin Revival!-FORK AT BLOCK 255145, KGW, RANDOM BLOCK REWARDS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495693) 5. [RESURRECTION] Taking Astrocoin to the Moon,KGW Implemented + HARD FORK AT 17520 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516549 6. [RESURRECTION] Bringing Electric back to the grid, Community Backed Development! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514790
raven7886
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1041



View Profile
September 01, 2015, 04:05:08 PM
 #107

We are officially a global network: 11 Countries across the globe. Any news on yesterdays events? Any fixes? I noticed the chain over at chainz hasn't moved for ten hours... I am at work currently so I cannot check my node unfortunately.

Cheers!

-Raven

PS Halo I hope you didn't over indulge the beer, Haha! Good Morning Everyone!
GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 04:23:58 PM
 #108

My wallet is not staking, but last recorded block is 288443

TimC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1022


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 05:18:08 PM
 #109

We are officially a global network: 11 Countries across the globe. Any news on yesterdays events? Any fixes? I noticed the chain over at chainz hasn't moved for ten hours... I am at work currently so I cannot check my node unfortunately.


The chain just moved some and my node is still the same block height as chainz.cryptoid.info/oc/ which is block 288476. Difficulty of 0.0613  and going up.


Halofire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


@halofirebtc


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 05:59:34 PM
 #110

I have been getting a few blocks on v2 for the last hours, are these on the right fork?
(this includes blocks mined by rich list list #12 and #9, so if it's a fork, they would be on it as well)

Appreciating your thoughts on risks , but this was actually provided by the development team and if you cannot trust the development team , I do not know who you will. Wink

Technically speaking, the file is not provided by the team, but by a link to a mediafire url.
The trust issue is not about the dev team, but about whether the data you get may or may not actually be from the dev team Smiley

The github source code is trustable, as it is hosted on an https server, with a well identified url and a list of recent changes/commit and git's own tamper-proof hashing, so any hijacking attempt would not go unnoticed, but the mediafire link on the other hand is "meaningless", http, and the data itself hosted by a 3rd party. This is vulnerable to several vectors of attack.

When replacing the db, the wallet will only check the last 2500 blocks, while when using a bootstrap.dat, the wallet will check the whole blockchain, making hijacking attempts as hard as a full-scale 51% attack, so it's okay to host the bootstrap.dat anywhere.



The blockchain download will be coming off the website once we sort out our issues, bootstraps will take the place. I hated having to put the full db up because it isn't how crypto was meant to flow, but it's what worked at the time. We were dev-less, and I had to do what I had to do to keep the chain alive in my position. I've stated I attempted to make bootstraps in the past, they didn't work out. We have bootstrap capabilities now, so downloading those from mediafire shouldn't be an issue as you stated. Smiley


OC Development - oZwWbQwz6LAkDLa2pHsEH8WSD2Y3LsTgFt
SMC Development - SgpYdoVz946nLBF2hF3PYCVQYnuYDeQTGu
Friendly reminder: Back up your wallet.dat files!!
Halofire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


@halofirebtc


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 06:19:46 PM
 #111

We are officially a global network: 11 Countries across the globe. Any news on yesterdays events? Any fixes? I noticed the chain over at chainz hasn't moved for ten hours... I am at work currently so I cannot check my node unfortunately.

Cheers!

-Raven

PS Halo I hope you didn't over indulge the beer, Haha! Good Morning Everyone!

Nope, I had a handle on things, mainly my stein. HAHA!
Nah, I don't own a stein. I'm not that sophisticated.  Cool

If I'm not mistaken, chainz used 1.0.9 to get the chain synced, then switched to 2.0.0.

As far as news,
Soopy is aware of all that transpired and he has a idea for a fix, he's possibly encountered a similar problem in the past.
He agrees that the MINT fix works and that it's discrepancies in the yearlyblockcount and the fork that's throwing everything off.

OC Development - oZwWbQwz6LAkDLa2pHsEH8WSD2Y3LsTgFt
SMC Development - SgpYdoVz946nLBF2hF3PYCVQYnuYDeQTGu
Friendly reminder: Back up your wallet.dat files!!
raven7886
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1041



View Profile
September 01, 2015, 06:44:33 PM
 #112

I have been getting a few blocks on v2 for the last hours, are these on the right fork?
(this includes blocks mined by rich list list #12 and #9, so if it's a fork, they would be on it as well)

Appreciating your thoughts on risks , but this was actually provided by the development team and if you cannot trust the development team , I do not know who you will. Wink

Technically speaking, the file is not provided by the team, but by a link to a mediafire url.
The trust issue is not about the dev team, but about whether the data you get may or may not actually be from the dev team Smiley

The github source code is trustable, as it is hosted on an https server, with a well identified url and a list of recent changes/commit and git's own tamper-proof hashing, so any hijacking attempt would not go unnoticed, but the mediafire link on the other hand is "meaningless", http, and the data itself hosted by a 3rd party. This is vulnerable to several vectors of attack.

When replacing the db, the wallet will only check the last 2500 blocks, while when using a bootstrap.dat, the wallet will check the whole blockchain, making hijacking attempts as hard as a full-scale 51% attack, so it's okay to host the bootstrap.dat anywhere.



The blockchain download will be coming off the website once we sort out our issues, bootstraps will take the place. I hated having to put the full db up because it isn't how crypto was meant to flow, but it's what worked at the time. We were dev-less, and I had to do what I had to do to keep the chain alive in my position. I've stated I attempted to make bootstraps in the past, they didn't work out. We have bootstrap capabilities now, so downloading those from mediafire shouldn't be an issue as you stated. Smiley



So that obviously helped yesterday with the bootstrap command, Cheers!
Halofire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


@halofirebtc


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 06:53:50 PM
 #113

I have been getting a few blocks on v2 for the last hours, are these on the right fork?
(this includes blocks mined by rich list list #12 and #9, so if it's a fork, they would be on it as well)

Appreciating your thoughts on risks , but this was actually provided by the development team and if you cannot trust the development team , I do not know who you will. Wink

Technically speaking, the file is not provided by the team, but by a link to a mediafire url.
The trust issue is not about the dev team, but about whether the data you get may or may not actually be from the dev team Smiley

The github source code is trustable, as it is hosted on an https server, with a well identified url and a list of recent changes/commit and git's own tamper-proof hashing, so any hijacking attempt would not go unnoticed, but the mediafire link on the other hand is "meaningless", http, and the data itself hosted by a 3rd party. This is vulnerable to several vectors of attack.

When replacing the db, the wallet will only check the last 2500 blocks, while when using a bootstrap.dat, the wallet will check the whole blockchain, making hijacking attempts as hard as a full-scale 51% attack, so it's okay to host the bootstrap.dat anywhere.



The blockchain download will be coming off the website once we sort out our issues, bootstraps will take the place. I hated having to put the full db up because it isn't how crypto was meant to flow, but it's what worked at the time. We were dev-less, and I had to do what I had to do to keep the chain alive in my position. I've stated I attempted to make bootstraps in the past, they didn't work out. We have bootstrap capabilities now, so downloading those from mediafire shouldn't be an issue as you stated. Smiley



So that obviously helped yesterday with the bootstrap command, Cheers!

Oh of course, it's a better way to get the blockchain more naturally.

OC Development - oZwWbQwz6LAkDLa2pHsEH8WSD2Y3LsTgFt
SMC Development - SgpYdoVz946nLBF2hF3PYCVQYnuYDeQTGu
Friendly reminder: Back up your wallet.dat files!!
Halofire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


@halofirebtc


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 07:14:46 PM
 #114

By the way, I'm doing sync testing for soopy. I cannot provide any current block stats.

OC Development - oZwWbQwz6LAkDLa2pHsEH8WSD2Y3LsTgFt
SMC Development - SgpYdoVz946nLBF2hF3PYCVQYnuYDeQTGu
Friendly reminder: Back up your wallet.dat files!!
raven7886
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1041



View Profile
September 01, 2015, 07:24:03 PM
 #115



By the way, I'm doing sync testing for soopy. I cannot provide any current block stats.
OrangecoinTeam (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 08:17:09 PM
 #116

OP updated to include:
- a link to BTCgarden's forum under OC services
- "meet the team" was updated for ravens OP status at said forum
- Chainz nodes list link added under orangecoin.conf

We are looking forward to getting juicier! Smiley
nonissan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 01, 2015, 09:03:48 PM
 #117

Hey all. I updated to 2.0, and I have been stuck on syncing since yesterday; 5294 blocks remaining. Do I need to do any other updates?

Still stuck. Can somebody please explain the steps I need to take to get my updated 2.0 working?

Thanks
raven7886
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1041



View Profile
September 01, 2015, 09:47:17 PM
Last edit: September 02, 2015, 12:34:15 AM by raven7886
 #118

Checking in for block: 288513 generated an hour ago...

Hey all. I updated to 2.0, and I have been stuck on syncing since yesterday; 5294 blocks remaining. Do I need to do any other updates?

Still stuck. Can somebody please explain the steps I need to take to get my updated 2.0 working?

Thanks

I Had this issue. I stopped the wallet and restarted a few times. ALSO MAKE SURE TO ONLY USE OP THREAD NODES! I was using Chainz node list there's still spoofed chains within the list meaning 1.0.9 versions thinking they're on the 2.0 chain thus causes confusion to the client.

Here's my CONF if you want to replicate the settings:


Quote
EDIT: COPIED PASTED TEXT FROM CLIP ON PHONE! FOR INVESTIGATION!
This is my CONF:
port=18872
addnode=orangecoinseednode1.no-ip.org
addnode=orangecoinseednode2.no-ip.org
addnode=orangecoinseednode3.no-ip.org
addnode=orangecoinseednode4.no-ip.org
addnode=orangecoinseednode5.no-ip.org
addnode=75.130.163.51:18872
addnode=92.19.22.234:18872
addnode=50.188.13.41:18872
addnode=149.202.102.73:18872


ALSO: HOW IS THIS PERSON ABLE TO CONNECT AND STILL 1.0.9! Details:
addr" : "93.123.163.96:18872",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1441143202,
"lastrecv" : 1441144269,
"conntime" : 1441119184,
"version" : 60604,
"subver" : "/OrangeCoin:1.0.9/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 289031,
"banscore" : 0

Not even on my list! I am going to give them a banscore! If they do not update! But inbound is false so we shouldn't have anything coming from him... If I understand correctly about inbounds true or false. Pleae let me know if you need ANY HELP. I also have a chain downloaded\bootstrap for 286K of blocks. Again please let me know, send me a PM or twat @rfarrow7886

Cheers!

-Raven
crazyearner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1001



View Profile
September 01, 2015, 09:50:08 PM
 #119

Well updated to latest wallet and was up to date and now today after not running for 24/48 hours. Closed and re opened client a number of times and it will not update currently stuck block 287972. 541 blocks remaining and not downloading yet have 11 active connections using most resent nodes. Any ideas to resolve this ?

=
  R E B E L L I O U S 
  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄                           ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄
▄▀        █▄▄                     ▄▄█        ▀▄
█            █████████████████████            █
█▄          ██       ██ ██       ██          ▄█
█        █            █            █        █
  █    █               █               █    █
   █ ██               █ █               ██ █
    █ █               █ █               █ █
    █ ███▄  █████▄   ██ ██   ▄█████  ▄███ █
    █     ███     █         █     ███     █
     █   █   ▀███ █  █   █  █ ███▀   █   █
     █   █      █ █  █   █  █ █      █   █
     █   █      ██  █     █  ██      █   █
      █  █     ██  █       █  ██     █  █
      █  █    ██  █ ███████ █  ██    █  █
      █ ███   ██  █         █  ██   ███ █
       █   ▀███      █   █      ███▀   █
        █     ██       █       ██     █
         █      █   ▄▄███▄▄   █      █
          ███   ███▀       ▀███   ███
             █████           █████
                  ███████████
  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄                           ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄
▄▀        █▄▄                     ▄▄█        ▀▄
█            █████████████████████            █
█▄          ██       ██ ██       ██          ▄█
█        █            █            █        █
  █    █               █               █    █
   █ ██               █ █               ██ █
    █ █               █ █               █ █
    █ ███▄  █████▄   ██ ██   ▄█████  ▄███ █
    █     ███     █         █     ███     █
     █   █   ▀███ █  █   █  █ ███▀   █   █
     █   █      █ █  █   █  █ █      █   █
     █   █      ██  █     █  ██      █   █
      █  █     ██  █       █  ██     █  █
      █  █    ██  █ ███████ █  ██    █  █
      █ ███   ██  █         █  ██   ███ █
       █   ▀███      █   █      ███▀   █
        █     ██       █       ██     █
         █      █   ▄▄███▄▄   █      █
          ███   ███▀       ▀███   ███
             █████           █████
                  ███████████
  R E B E L L I O U S
raven7886
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1041



View Profile
September 01, 2015, 10:12:02 PM
 #120

Well updated to latest wallet and was up to date and now today after not running for 24/48 hours. Closed and re opened client a number of times and it will not update currently stuck block 287972. 541 blocks remaining and not downloading yet have 11 active connections using most resent nodes. Any ideas to resolve this ?

you can create a batch file and have it look like this: "OrangeCoin-Qt.exe  -debugnet" <!!!!!---- JUST THAT TEXT WITHOUT QUOTES!

And then keep an eye on the debug.log in the %appdata% folder Pm me the tail end of it like 25-50 lines (notepad2 helps with numbering)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!