Stars (OP)
|
|
September 06, 2015, 11:00:49 PM |
|
The top 5 people currently leading for the 5 BTC wagered competition are - 1st place is currently - MaherWins with 223 BTC wagered 2nd place is currently - Jasperin07 with 11.4 BTC wagered 3rd place is currently - ShawannaGalloway1980 with 7.6 BTC wagered 4th place is currently - StinkyCrew with 7.4 BTC wagered 5th place is currently - Yahoo with 4.5 BTC wagered The prizes are as follows : 1st place wins 2.5 BTC 2nd place wins 1.5 BTC 3rd place wins 1 BTC Note: There are only 3 winners, the reason I list 5 is so 4th and 5th place know how close they are to getting in the top 3. The competition ends on the 11th of September see this thread for more information - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1170910.0why in this classific don't appared the user ZZ11 and in the other is first with more of 250 btc wagered? ZZ11 wagered 250+ BTC a few hours after I made that list. That's why he's not on it. I will update the current 5 players leading tomorrow
|
|
|
|
TriggerX
|
|
September 06, 2015, 11:24:02 PM |
|
Is there going to be a prize for the 1 millionth roll?
|
Hi!
|
|
|
michietn94
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 07, 2015, 04:57:45 AM |
|
Just received my first payout rom this campaign First I try 90 % my luck, SUCCESS then I try my 0.01 % my luck, BIG SUCCESS But I'm feel regret to bet win 100 satoshi only..anyway this site is awesome
|
.. FANSUNITE | █ █ ███ ███ ███ ▄ ▀ ███ ███ ███ ███ █ █ | | █ █ ███ ███ ███ ▄ ▀ ███ ███ ███ ███ █ █ | |
|
|
|
confirmation120
|
|
September 07, 2015, 05:06:45 AM |
|
Just received my first payout rom this campaign First I try 90 % my luck, SUCCESS then I try my 0.01 % my luck, BIG SUCCESS But I'm feel regret to bet win 100 satoshi only..anyway this site is awesome -snip- I've been playing dice for almost a year from different dice sites and I never hit 9900x. You're so lucky! Congrats I'm going to check this site out . I'll try my luck here
|
|
|
|
powrslave
|
|
September 07, 2015, 05:19:42 AM |
|
so a bet of <.01 hits when .01 is rolled, ok
|
|
|
|
shulio
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
|
|
September 07, 2015, 06:09:40 AM |
|
so a bet of <.01 hits when .01 is rolled, ok
Thats very weird yeah, I think it is rounding issue but with 0.01 hit can be the winner then the house edge for the 9900x bet is lower than 1 % so I think the player is in advantage, but the owner should fix this issue soon. So many dice site has rounding issue too I think
|
|
|
|
Patejl
|
|
September 07, 2015, 06:13:56 AM |
|
so a bet of <.01 hits when .01 is rolled, ok
Huh seems like you found a bug( pretty serious one, as it gives the player the advantage), you should contact the admins on the site, and most probably you will get a bounty for this discovery, good work.
|
|
|
|
confirmation120
|
|
September 07, 2015, 06:18:32 AM |
|
so a bet of <.01 hits when .01 is rolled, ok
Better contact stars or cryptasm regarding this, it seems strange or you can just send an email to their support with more details.
|
|
|
|
Coef
|
|
September 07, 2015, 06:23:55 AM |
|
so a bet of <.01 hits when .01 is rolled, ok
And the chance to win a x9900 bet becomes doubled as 0.02%, causing the bet to have a hugely positive EV (+98%). I wonder if any players have noticed it and took advantage of it. Better contact stars or cryptasm regarding this, it seems strange or you can just send an email to their support with more details.
I see NLNico mentioning the problem on the site chat and Cryptasm is there as well, so the bug should be fixed soon.
|
|
|
|
Patejl
|
|
September 07, 2015, 06:32:39 AM |
|
so a bet of <.01 hits when .01 is rolled, ok
And the chance to win a x9900 bet becomes doubled as 0.02%, causing the bet to have a hugely positive EV (+98%). I wonder if any players have noticed it and took advantage of it. Better contact stars or cryptasm regarding this, it seems strange or you can just send an email to their support with more details.
I see NLNico mentioning the problem on the site chat and Cryptasm is there as well, so the bug should be fixed soon. Yeah I think it should be fixed till tomorrow at the least, as the dev is in another time zone, so crypt being online has only a small significant effect on bug being fixed soon. On a side note, I wouldn't report the bug until I(as the guy who found the bug,powrslave) got a screenshot of it or can replicate it.
|
|
|
|
confirmation120
|
|
September 07, 2015, 06:34:07 AM |
|
so a bet of <.01 hits when .01 is rolled, ok
And the chance to win a x9900 bet becomes doubled as 0.02%, causing the bet to have a hugely positive EV (+98%). I wonder if any players have noticed it and took advantage of it. Better contact stars or cryptasm regarding this, it seems strange or you can just send an email to their support with more details.
I see NLNico mentioning the problem on the site chat and Cryptasm is there as well, so the bug should be fixed soon. Oh, there's a guy who posted here just won at 990x, backread a bit , you'll see his post. I don't know if he's aware of it and took the advantage
|
|
|
|
shulio
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
|
|
September 07, 2015, 06:41:40 AM |
|
Oh, there's a guy who posted here just won at 990x, backread a bit , you'll see his post. I don't know if he's aware of it and took the advantage
He dont even know the bug before someone siad it so I dont think he take advantage of that. If he dont win that bet then no one will know that this rounding bug is there so thanks to him the site now know it
|
|
|
|
Chemistry1988
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 07, 2015, 06:55:41 AM Last edit: September 07, 2015, 07:15:20 AM by Chemistry1988 |
|
Most likely the programmer accidentally uses <= instead of < in the code somewhere, and it should be very easy to check and to fix it. OP could also check whether there was a sudden influx of gamblers flat betting 9900x in the past hours, to assess the site's loss (if any).
|
|
|
|
cryptasm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 997
Merit: 1002
Gamdom.com
|
|
September 07, 2015, 07:08:58 AM |
|
Most likely the programmer accidentally uses <= instead of < in the code somewhere, and it should be very easy to check and to fix it. OP could also check whether there was a sudden influx of gamblers flat betting 9900x in the past hours, to access the site's loss (if any).
working on the problem right now
|
|
|
|
ndnh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
|
|
September 07, 2015, 07:10:51 AM |
|
Most likely the programmer accidentally uses <= instead of < in the code somewhere, and it should be very easy to check and to fix it. OP could also check whether there was a sudden influx of gamblers flat betting 9900x in the past hours, to access the site's loss (if any).
Chances of hitting : 1 in 5000 rolls. 1 hit : 9900 times. Positive EV : 98%. Pretty decent odds to play. But still a little bit risky.
|
|
|
|
Patejl
|
|
September 07, 2015, 07:12:40 AM |
|
Most likely the programmer accidentally uses <= instead of < in the code somewhere, and it should be very easy to check and to fix it. OP could also check whether there was a sudden influx of gamblers flat betting 9900x in the past hours, to access the site's loss (if any).
Chances of hitting : 1 in 5000 rolls. 1 hit : 9900 times. Positive EV : 98%. Pretty decent odds to play. But still a little bit risky. Hmm about decent odds, definetely. You could keep rolling 100 sats at 9900x with est 0.1btc bankroll and according to maths you should always be in positive.
|
|
|
|
dzatplan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
September 07, 2015, 09:57:54 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
NLNico
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
September 07, 2015, 09:59:49 AM |
|
scamanalyze.com is a joke. Anyone can leave an anonymous comment there. No big deal at all.
|
|
|
|
FanEagle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1129
|
|
September 07, 2015, 11:40:24 AM |
|
A fair rule was: Everyone starts with faucet, who wagers more wins In this case, who's more rich, wins.
|
|
|
|
katerniko1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 07, 2015, 11:57:52 AM |
|
this wagering contest sucks guy come with 2 btc and rolls on 1.0102x and i need like 5 hours to make 2 btc wager with 1mb XD
|
|
|
|
|