Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 10:32:05 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: BFL ASIC production process speculation  (Read 1139 times)
cedivad (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 23, 2012, 07:02:50 PM
 #1

What do you think their production process to be?

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
1715682725
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715682725

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715682725
Reply with quote  #2

1715682725
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715682725
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715682725

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715682725
Reply with quote  #2

1715682725
Report to moderator
creativex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 23, 2012, 07:36:58 PM
 #2

65nm...no particular reason. Their estimated power consumption spec is pretty aggressive.

Not sure what ASICminer or Reclaimer will use but BTCFPGA is on 90nm and Avalon is on 110nm so it stands to reason that BFL will need a higher density process to meet their power specs.

quasarbtc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 25, 2012, 06:04:48 AM
 #3

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119669.0

BFL suggests it's less than 90 nm, but greater than 14 nm. I've seen a lot of suggestions for 65 nm, but based on their power estimates, maybe it'll be a bit smaller than that?
creativex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 25, 2012, 06:18:37 AM
 #4

Possible, but I still see 65nm as more likely given their competitive pricing. More likely they're just going to miss their power spec...again. 

ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
October 25, 2012, 08:25:47 PM
 #5

None of the above - possibly Altera Hardcopy.

So 65nm fpga conversion, about as efficient as a 180nm asic, but cheaper.
Power consumption multiple times as advertised.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!