AMERICA PRESIDENT WHO YOU PREFER?

[snipie]

....

I don't see how Trump would deal w/ military though..
Seems he would 'go all in' and start WWIII.

Your view on all that?

There are no facts that warrant such an opinion, are there?

Is it just kind of, looking at the way the guy acts, and projecting from that how he might act in a difficult political matter in which war was one possible outcome?

I think that everyone should stick to his field.
Trump has ZERO political experience (to avoid saying minus), thanks to the media everyone is talking about him now, he needs to learn many things before simply jumping in the presidency race.
If Lionel Messi will try to become the Argentina president will you support him? I think it is a bad idea to have a famous/rich figure in the white-house while you have no idea who is the real person(s) that take the important decisions. At least Obama took few ones. (don't like him too much either).

[1715356433]

1715356433

[1715356433]

1715356433

[1715356433]

1715356433

[1715356433]

1715356433

[1715356433]

1715356433

[Spendulus]

....

I don't see how Trump would deal w/ military though..
Seems he would 'go all in' and start WWIII.

Your view on all that?

There are no facts that warrant such an opinion, are there?

Is it just kind of, looking at the way the guy acts, and projecting from that how he might act in a difficult political matter in which war was one possible outcome?

I think that everyone should stick to his field.
Trump has ZERO political experience (to avoid saying minus), thanks to the media everyone is talking about him now, he needs to learn many things before simply jumping in the presidency race.
If Lionel Messi will try to become the Argentina president will you support him? I think it is a bad idea to have a famous/rich figure in the white-house while you have no idea who is the real person(s) that take the important decisions. At least Obama took few ones. (don't like him too much either).

Good points.

If we look back at several decades, the best presidents were something other than just lawyers, which is what senators and congressmen basically are.  For example, state governors.  (Reagan, Bush Jr, Clinton, ... the exception is Carter)

A fair part of the Prez job is administration, not political.

[LouisVuitton]

I would have to go with Donald Trump

[Racey]

This is for all you Clinton supporters.

Clinton 2016? Conspiracy Shocker! Must See Documentary!

Published on Apr 19, 2015

Absolutely shocking suppressed documentary about the full blown drug smuggling, money laundering, womanizing, murder, political favors, killing anybody who talked; both Clintons crime syndicate, including the murder of children! Some of this I read about in Cathy O'brian's "Trance-Formation of America", but this documentary takes the revelation on the Clintons to a whole new level. I simply cannot believe it! Full drugs and murder of anyone who spoke out!

[x_Molotov]

This is for all you Clinton supporters.

Clinton 2016? Conspiracy Shocker! Must See Documentary!

Published on Apr 19, 2015

Absolutely shocking suppressed documentary about the full blown drug smuggling, money laundering, womanizing, murder, political favors, killing anybody who talked; both Clintons crime syndicate, including the murder of children! Some of this I read about in Cathy O'brian's "Trance-Formation of America", but this documentary takes the revelation on the Clintons to a whole new level. I simply cannot believe it! Full drugs and murder of anyone who spoke out!

Complete fucking smear campaign.

FOH w/ that bullshit.

[subSTRATA]

This is for all you Clinton supporters.

Clinton 2016? Conspiracy Shocker! Must See Documentary!

Published on Apr 19, 2015

Absolutely shocking suppressed documentary about the full blown drug smuggling, money laundering, womanizing, murder, political favors, killing anybody who talked; both Clintons crime syndicate, including the murder of children! Some of this I read about in Cathy O'brian's "Trance-Formation of America", but this documentary takes the revelation on the Clintons to a whole new level. I simply cannot believe it! Full drugs and murder of anyone who spoke out!

even if im not a clinton supporter, that snippet just reeks of bullshit to me.

[x_Molotov]

This is for all you Clinton supporters.

Clinton 2016? Conspiracy Shocker! Must See Documentary!

Published on Apr 19, 2015

Absolutely shocking suppressed documentary about the full blown drug smuggling, money laundering, womanizing, murder, political favors, killing anybody who talked; both Clintons crime syndicate, including the murder of children! Some of this I read about in Cathy O'brian's "Trance-Formation of America", but this documentary takes the revelation on the Clintons to a whole new level. I simply cannot believe it! Full drugs and murder of anyone who spoke out!

even if im not a clinton supporter, that snippet just reeks of bullshit to me.

Same here.

Not Clinton, but that is utter garbage.

[chennan]

I'd just like to add.. Since this forum is a forum about crypto currencies and all... Which president do you think will be more lenient on crypto currencies/a supporter of such things?

[SaltySpitoon]

They are all terrible, but for different reasons. In short it comes down to a few actual candidates, and the others are just sort of along for the ride. Hillary, Bernie, Trump, and Jeb. Hillary is the worst option. Her policies are scary. During the whole confederate flag debate, she was the one to say flatout that they should be banned, even for private residences and such. Not that I support or understand the symbolism behind the flag, but banning things like that scares me. I actually support some of Bernie Sander's idealogy, in the sense that he means well, but socialism flat out doesn't work in larger countries. Every country with a successful socialist system has ~30 million people or under. It has just never historically worked for larger countries. Trump is interesting. I don't support a lot of his views, but he wouldn't be quite as terrible as a lot of people think. Hes outspoken which is refreshing, and not in bed with other politicians. Bribes and corruption wouldn't effect him nearly as much. The worst I can see him doing is giving his own companies some tax breaks or something. People that think hes going to go start world war 3 aren't considering that in order to become a businessman that is as successful as himself, you need to make deals with representitives from other countries. Hes not going to start insulting people from other countries, any more than he would when doing a business deal. The man knows that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, he just doesn't care to catch Rosie ODonald or reporters, etc. Jeb is more qualified than George Bush, but, that isn't necessarily saying much. Some of his policies make sense to me, but I definitely wouldn't say I support the man.

Long story short, its a losing battle. People get caught up in nonsubstantial issues and party loyalty. Pushing to be more "progressive" completely overrides the real issues, and it just becomes a popularity contest. The people that vote don't care about the economy, civil liberties, or the fixing the real issues that come up. They want to be protected from terrorists, support or not support abortion, and prove that they aren't racist or misogynstic. Chances are good that Hillary will be voted in solely because we need to prove that we are ok with a female president.

But remember, a vote for Trump means a vote for the Trump dome. Start collecting leeches just in case!

If Trump would just say, "I don't know about these things too much, I'll hire some of the best advisors in the field to help me figure these things out" the Trump dome would be sooooo much closer to being a reality.

[x_Molotov]

I'd just like to add.. Since this forum is a forum about crypto currencies and all... Which president do you think will be more lenient on crypto currencies/a supporter of such things?

Excellent question.

Not Trump.
Not Sanders, probably. Even though I am still voting for him.



Clinton or rest of capitalist-leaning republicans.

Does someone's strong bitcoin opinion sway who I vote for?

Def. not.
However, it is very interesting on what Bitcoin's future will be due to the next POTUS

[Racey]

Well-researched documentary, Hillary Clinton Exposed.

Hillary Clinton Exposed, Movie She Banned From Theaters Full Movie

Proof please that its all bullshit 

[Spendulus]

....
If Trump would just say, "I don't know about these things too much, I'll hire some of the best advisors in the field to help me figure these things out" the Trump dome would be sooooo much closer to being a reality.

That's what he has said multiple times.  Hire experts, let them do their job.  Don't hire people you owe favors to.

[TheGr33k]

I'm personally with Bernie Sanders for the USA presidency. I feel like 80% of the candidates interested in running are not focused on any issues that are significant towards positive change and most of them are corporate puppets.

Bernie Sanders seems genuine and has views I can agree with.

[chennan]

I'm personally with Bernie Sanders for the USA presidency. I feel like 80% of the candidates interested in running are not focused on any issues that are significant towards positive change and most of them are corporate puppets.

Bernie Sanders seems genuine and has views I can agree with.

But I was thinking about this yesterday... So first thing Bernie does is make bitcoins the valid payment option for the US.  There are quite a lot of people who hold a lot of bitcoins right now in the US, so would the first course of action be that Bernie makes those people who have bitcoins distribute them out EVENLY amongst EVERY American citizen from the get go?  If so I would be one pissed off summamma bitch.

[anthonycamp]

i vote ed for my granpa if he could be elected but he was european and dead now soo jed bush

[TheGr33k]

i vote ed for my granpa if he could be elected but he was european and dead now soo jed bush

Why does anyone think that electing another Bush would be a good plan for USA?
If I remember properly, Daddy-Bush was shady and Son-Bush was retarded.

Why would another Bush do any good?

[chennan]

i vote ed for my granpa if he could be elected but he was european and dead now soo jed bush

Why does anyone think that electing another Bush would be a good plan for USA?
If I remember properly, Daddy-Bush was shady and Son-Bush was retarded.

Why would another Bush do any good?

I mean, I lean more on the right side of the spectrum... just a little bit, but even I know that Bush's will/where be horrible presidents. Everything they did was just awful. Maybe "No child left behind" was OK in a sense that it helped schools here in the south... but still... MOST of everything he did was god awful.

[TheGr33k]

i vote ed for my granpa if he could be elected but he was european and dead now soo jed bush

Why does anyone think that electing another Bush would be a good plan for USA?
If I remember properly, Daddy-Bush was shady and Son-Bush was retarded.

Why would another Bush do any good?

I mean, I lean more on the right side of the spectrum... just a little bit, but even I know that Bush's will/where be horrible presidents. Everything they did was just awful. Maybe "No child left behind" was OK in a sense that it helped schools here in the south... but still... MOST of everything he did was god awful.

I was raised republican and used to be pretty heavily Right-Sided as well. Then the two Bushs' really changed my perspective of things. I had my entire political opinion flipped upside down because of the harm they did to our country. It wasn't ALL bad, but it was mostly bad and the impact they had is something still holding back USA .

Plz no Bush.

[chennan]

i vote ed for my granpa if he could be elected but he was european and dead now soo jed bush

Why does anyone think that electing another Bush would be a good plan for USA?
If I remember properly, Daddy-Bush was shady and Son-Bush was retarded.

Why would another Bush do any good?

I mean, I lean more on the right side of the spectrum... just a little bit, but even I know that Bush's will/where be horrible presidents. Everything they did was just awful. Maybe "No child left behind" was OK in a sense that it helped schools here in the south... but still... MOST of everything he did was god awful.

I was raised republican and used to be pretty heavily Right-Sided as well. Then the two Bushs' really changed my perspective of things. I had my entire political opinion flipped upside down because of the harm they did to our country. It wasn't ALL bad, but it was mostly bad and the impact they had is something still holding back USA .

Plz no Bush.

Well I mean, you can't really hold your political ideological beliefs in a point where it can change in an instant because of a bad president... your beliefs of what would make a good president, assuming he is a truthful and good person, is what should matter.  That's a pretty harsh turn around though, to go from republican, to basically supporting a socialist candidate.  I couldn't do that, but most people now and days are sick of the way our government has worked, so maybe in time I'll convert too... but for right now, I've held the same beliefs since I was a youngin'.

[Spendulus]

i vote ed for my granpa if he could be elected but he was european and dead now soo jed bush

Why does anyone think that electing another Bush would be a good plan for USA?
If I remember properly, Daddy-Bush was shady and Son-Bush was retarded.

Why would another Bush do any good?

I mean, I lean more on the right side of the spectrum... just a little bit, but even I know that Bush's will/where be horrible presidents. Everything they did was just awful. Maybe "No child left behind" was OK in a sense that it helped schools here in the south... but still... MOST of everything he did was god awful.

I was raised republican and used to be pretty heavily Right-Sided as well. Then the two Bushs' really changed my perspective of things. I had my entire political opinion flipped upside down because of the harm they did to our country. It wasn't ALL bad, but it was mostly bad and the impact they had is something still holding back USA .

Plz no Bush.

Well I mean, you can't really hold your political ideological beliefs in a point where it can change in an instant because of a bad president... your beliefs of what would make a good president, assuming he is a truthful and good person, is what should matter.  That's a pretty harsh turn around though, to go from republican, to basically supporting a socialist candidate.  I couldn't do that, but most people now and days are sick of the way our government has worked, so maybe in time I'll convert too... but for right now, I've held the same beliefs since I was a youngin'.

I'm unable to take promises of politicians - and it's the liberal socialist that makes the most promises - seriously.

"We'll give this to you, and this to you and this too, too."

That just means they'll print money.  But we'll be up to a debt of $22T when the next president starts, and that basically means the joy ride is over.  Next will be high interest rates and scarce money, possibly heavy inflation or hyperinflation.  And the next president will have to deal with that.

Sure, they can make promises, but they won't be able to fulfill the promises that have to do with giving you or me a bunch of free stuff.  And they all know this.   So plan to hear a bunch of lying.