MTGOX ordering DDOS ATTACKS!?!?!?!!?

[crazy_rabbit]

Just now on BTC-E support has come back online and said they were told MTGOX is behind the DDOS attacks on BTC-E right now.

COMMENTS?!

[1715439751]

1715439751

[1715439751]

1715439751

[jwzguy]

Told by someone in their web-chat room? 
This is patently absurd.

[beekeeper]

Just now on BTC-E support has come back online and said they were told MTGOX is behind the DDOS attacks on BTC-E right now.

COMMENTS?!

What? Pictures?

Ah, lol, found it myself:
https://i.imgur.com/0LXum.jpg

[Spekulatius]

Can they back that up?
Otherwise its just a bold claim.

[elux]

Just now on BTC-E support has come back online and said they were told MTGOX is behind the DDOS attacks on BTC-E right now.

COMMENTS?!

Yeah...

[crazy_rabbit]

Just now on BTC-E support has come back online and said they were told MTGOX is behind the DDOS attacks on BTC-E right now.

COMMENTS?!

What? Pictures?

Ah, lol, found it myself:
https://i.imgur.com/0LXum.jpg

Thanks for posting the pics. It's their support saying it, so.....

[Yuhfhrh]

BTC-e support has to be joking right? Would Mtgox really order a ddos against them?

Unless someone has control over the BTC-e server...

[beekeeper]

Thanks for posting the pics. It's their support saying it, so.....

YW, luckily I had one tab open on BTC-e.

[ElectricMucus]

Tinfoilhat area imo.

But either way, it's disappointing that this community still hasn't outgrown these kind of things, if it is an actual attack or a false accusation either way.

[nobbynobbynoob]

"Oh, those Russians!"

[repentance]

That's one hell of an accusation to make without evidence, and making it without proving it can only damage BTC-e's reputation.

Explain yourself BTC-e support.

[SgtSpike]

That's one hell of an accusation to make without evidence, and making it without proving it can only damage BTC-e's reputation.

Explain yourself BTC-e support.

Seriously, that could be grounds for a lawsuit under slander/libel.

[stevegee58]

God I love this place.

[cedivad]

Tell them that you can configure the max connections per ip variable on nginx and its one line of config.

[Armando]

Hard to believe that industry leader will order ddos attack agains competitor with turnouts 20 time smaller. BTC-e has reason to order ddos-atack against MtGox, hoping that some customers will use then as alternative, but not vice versa. So I suppose support was really on drugs) or mistyped somehow))

[SaintDevil]

MtGox have like the biggest customer base and I see no reason for them to do that.
Wouldn't btc-e have to prove it with images showing ip address of an attacker?

Hard to believe that industry leader will order ddos attack agains competitor with turnouts 20 time smaller. BTC-e has reason to order ddos-atack against MtGox, hoping that some customers will use then as alternative, but not vice versa. So I suppose support was really on drugs) or mistyped somehow))

it would be funny if someone actually got drunk "sorry for the false accusation, one of the employees had a little bit to much".

[Yuhfhrh]

Down again?

Edit: NVM

[MPOE-PR]

http://web.archive.org/web/20010605024447/http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm

[Yuhfhrh]

http://web.archive.org/web/20010605024447/http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm

Thanks, I found it very interesting.

[thezerg]

Folks, a semi-competent script kiddie can drop a billion IP packets on the internet directed to btc-e (for example) with any "from" address you want (like mt-gox).  All the responses will go to the "from" address... so its pretty useless for everything except DDOS attacks.  Smart routers might drop the packets, but I guess not in this case.

This is the most likely explanation...

[beekeeper]

Folks, a semi-competent script kiddie can drop a billion IP packets on the internet directed to btc-e (for example) with any "from" address you want (like mt-gox).  All the responses will go to the "from" address... so its pretty useless for everything except DDOS attacks.  Smart routers might drop the packets, but I guess not in this case.

This is the most likely explanation...

Yeah, ofc, still, I guess btc-e wouldn't launch such a rumor without some solid intel.

[repentance]

Folks, a semi-competent script kiddie can drop a billion IP packets on the internet directed to btc-e (for example) with any "from" address you want (like mt-gox).  All the responses will go to the "from" address... so its pretty useless for everything except DDOS attacks.  Smart routers might drop the packets, but I guess not in this case.

This is the most likely explanation...

The thing is that anyone competent would know that.  The fact that BTC-e support is accusing MtGox of organising a DDOS against them rather than assuming that it's just a script kiddie using the MtGox address for shit and giggles makes me question the technical knowledge and competence of BTC-e staff.

[DoomDumas]

http://web.archive.org/web/20010605024447/http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm

heh - thanks for this nice story from Gibson.. I love that guy scince 1999    This link was such a pleasure to read.. Thanks You MPOE-PR !

[Nolo]

That's one hell of an accusation to make without evidence, and making it without proving it can only damage BTC-e's reputation.

Explain yourself BTC-e support.

Seriously, that could be grounds for a lawsuit under slander/libel.

Yes it could.  That is an extremely serious allegation.  

Edit:  But we don't have the entire conversation.  Support could have said:  "All these rumors about the DDOS need to stop."  And the question could have been asked:  "What is the rumor that is going around?"  And support could have replied: "mtgox ordered it."

One screenshot can be taken completely out of context. 

[niko]

Just now on BTC-E support has come back online and said they were told MTGOX is behind the DDOS attacks on BTC-E right now.

COMMENTS?!

What? Pictures?

Ah, lol, found it myself:
https://i.imgur.com/0LXum.jpg

I've been avoiding this thread based on its title, and finally decided to peek in before going to bed. I am happy I did, and can go to sleep laughing. This is priceless.

[cedivad]

Folks, a semi-competent script kiddie can drop a billion IP packets on the internet directed to btc-e (for example) with any "from" address you want (like mt-gox).  All the responses will go to the "from" address... so its pretty useless for everything except DDOS attacks.  Smart routers might drop the packets, but I guess not in this case.

This is the most likely explanation...

Absolutely not.

There is not such a thing as the "from" addresses, these are not mails.

The attack you are taking about requires exploit (serious ones) on the edge routers among the attacker and the attacked.

No, that's not going to happen nor has happend.

It's simply them being unable to put in place a minimal dos (I think) or ddos (unlikely) protection in place and blaming their ignorance on their competitor to gain some fan.

Stupid move, dear.

[Yuhfhrh]

That's one hell of an accusation to make without evidence, and making it without proving it can only damage BTC-e's reputation.

Explain yourself BTC-e support.

Seriously, that could be grounds for a lawsuit under slander/libel.

Yes it could.  That is an extremely serious allegation.  

Edit:  But we don't have the entire conversation.  Support could have said:  "All these rumors about the DDOS need to stop."  And the question could have been asked:  "What is the rumor that is going around?"  And support could have replied: "mtgox ordered it."

One screenshot can be taken completely out of context. 

I witnessed it. It's not out of context at all, in fact that is the only thing support said.

[ElectricMucus]

There is not such a thing as the "from" addresses, these are not mails.

Dude, every TCP/IP package includes a source address, how do you think communication is facilitated?
And under normal circumstances one can "spoof" this source address.

[01BTC10]

Folks, a semi-competent script kiddie can drop a billion IP packets on the internet directed to btc-e (for example) with any "from" address you want (like mt-gox).  All the responses will go to the "from" address... so its pretty useless for everything except DDOS attacks.  Smart routers might drop the packets, but I guess not in this case.

This is the most likely explanation...

Absolutely not.

There is not such a thing as the "from" addresses, these are not mails.

The attack you are taking about requires exploit (serious ones) on the edge routers among the attacker and the attacked.

No, that's not going to happen nor has happend.

It's simply them being unable to put in place a minimal dos (I think) or ddos (unlikely) protection in place and blaming their ignorance on their competitor to gain some fan.

Stupid move, dear.

Wait wut?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address_spoofing

[cedivad]

Routers are designed to reject these packets.
It's a security flaw if that wouldn't happend.

[panda1]

Wow talk about taking out your competition...

[01BTC10]

Routers are designed to reject these packets.
It's a security flaw if that wouldn't happend.

Routers drop spoofed internal network address but I don't think they can filter spoofed WAN address.

Some more interesting reading"

Impersonation. In the DNS attacks, each attacking host uses the targeted name server's IP address as its source IP address rather than its own. The effect of spoofing IP addresses in this manner is that responses to DNS requests will be returned to the target rather than the spoofing hosts.

http://www.watchguard.com/infocenter/editorial/41649.asp

[cedivad]

Your ISP should lock ips coming from outside their allocated network, same should a server provider.
Quite curious on how easy/hard it's to fake an ip source anyway.

[01BTC10]

Your ISP should lock ips coming from outside their allocated network, same should a server provider.
Quite curious on how easy/hard it's to fake an ip source anyway.

With nmap that's just a switch so must be trivial with DDOS tools.

-S <IP_Address> (Spoof source address)
In some circumstances, Nmap may not be able to determine your source address (Nmap will tell you if this is the case). In this situation, use -S with the IP address of the interface you wish to send packets through.

Another possible use of this flag is to spoof the scan to make the targets think that someone else is scanning them. Imagine a company being repeatedly port scanned by a competitor! The -e option and -Pn are generally required for this sort of usage. Note that you usually won't receive reply packets back (they will be addressed to the IP you are spoofing), so Nmap won't produce useful reports.

http://nmap.org/book/man-bypass-firewalls-ids.html

[Yuhfhrh]

Why has BTC-e not posted a response on this yet?

[cedivad]

It's trivial to generate packets with the wrong source ip, it's not trivial to have some ISP not dropping these packets.

[BlackHeartFund]

Yes it could.  That is an extremely serious allegation.  

Edit:  But we don't have the entire conversation.  Support could have said:  "All these rumors about the DDOS need to stop."  And the question could have been asked:  "What is the rumor that is going around?"  And support could have replied: "mtgox ordered it."

One screenshot can be taken completely out of context. 

+1 this exactly

Is there anything more to this than the one post? If not, it certainly isn't clear what the support person was saying.

They should clear it up, though.

[chmod755]

Proof?

Sounds like BTC-e is trying to get some Mt.Gox customers

Well played BTC-e.

[MPOE-PR]

http://web.archive.org/web/20010605024447/http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm

Thanks, I found it very interesting.

http://web.archive.org/web/20010605024447/http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm

heh - thanks for this nice story from Gibson.. I love that guy scince 1999    This link was such a pleasure to read.. Thanks You MPOE-PR !

Over 9000 Internet Years ago....

[ElectricMucus]

It's trivial to generate packets with the wrong source ip, it's not trivial to have some ISP not dropping these packets.

Nobody said it's trivial. Mere possible.
That many DDOS attacks succeed because of poor routing and firewall practices is nothing new.

[cedivad]

It's trivial to generate packets with the wrong source ip, it's not trivial to have some ISP not dropping these packets.

Nobody said it's trivial. Mere possible.
That many DDOS attacks succeed because of poor routing and firewall practices is nothing new.

Usually your upstream providers disconnects your link (no matter how much you pay them) if their routers detects packets coming from your link and from a range that wasn't assigned to you.

However i have to say that i really lack knowledge on how hard is it to do such an attack.

[moni3z]

That's one hell of an accusation to make without evidence, and making it without proving it can only damage BTC-e's reputation.

Explain yourself BTC-e support.

Seriously, that could be grounds for a lawsuit under slander/libel.

I don't think Russian courts care about slandering Japanese or American businesses doubt this lawsuit would go anywhere. I also doubt Gox would denial of service their competitors when they don't really have any on their level.

More likely some guy had his money seized by BTC-E for shady trading and reacted by slamming their servers and 'support' is just joking with the idiots in chat

[Ilikeham]

I don't think Russian courts care about slandering Japanese or American businesses doubt this lawsuit would go anywhere. I also doubt Gox would denial of service their competitors when they don't really have any on their level.

More likely some guy had his money seized by BTC-E for shady trading and reacted by slamming their servers and 'support' is just joking with the idiots in chat

Yeah that, it was very tongue in cheek from a non native English speaker. If you've been around and seen the user "support" 's mishandling of dialogue and sense of humor, you know it wasn't a real accusation, just a quip to say they're number two and getting more serious everyday.

Support had no idea who was DDOSing them when asked and assumed it was a random idiot like we all do.

[niko]

I don't think Russian courts care about slandering Japanese or American businesses doubt this lawsuit would go anywhere. I also doubt Gox would denial of service their competitors when they don't really have any on their level.

More likely some guy had his money seized by BTC-E for shady trading and reacted by slamming their servers and 'support' is just joking with the idiots in chat

Yeah that, it was very tongue in cheek from a non native English speaker. If you've been around and seen the user "support" 's mishandling of dialogue and sense of humor, you know it wasn't a real accusation, just a quip to say they're number two and getting more serious everyday.

Support had no idea who was DDOSing them when asked and assumed it was a random idiot like we all do.

Great, what a culture shock for some!

[MasterX]

http://web.archive.org/web/20010605024447/http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm

heh - thanks for this nice story from Gibson.. I love that guy scince 1999    This link was such a pleasure to read.. Thanks You MPOE-PR !

+1