fabianhjr (OP)
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Do The Evolution
|
 |
June 08, 2011, 03:15:03 PM
Last edit: June 08, 2011, 03:28:53 PM by fabianhjr |
|
The objective is to determine the adoption rate. I want to get the approximate number of current users. For this I will get the average of BTC per person. Your submission is anonymous. Please be honest.
Everyone is welcomed to post the calculations after they voted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
fabianhjr (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Do The Evolution
|
|
June 08, 2011, 03:19:56 PM |
|
So far the average is 29K per user. I would really appreciate help, for science.
|
|
|
|
fabianhjr (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Do The Evolution
|
|
June 08, 2011, 03:25:05 PM
Last edit: June 08, 2011, 03:37:42 PM by fabianhjr |
|
You have reason, I will reset the poll. Edit: Also, you are also welcomed to give your estimates  |
|
|
|
TTBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1136
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 08, 2011, 03:39:55 PM |
|
I have less than 100k, should I answer <100k?
|
good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment
|
|
|
fabianhjr (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Do The Evolution
|
|
June 08, 2011, 04:12:54 PM |
|
Yes and that is a lot. Congratz on your investment.
|
|
|
|
rever8000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 04:16:34 PM |
|
So far the average is 29K per user. I would really appreciate help, for science.
That seems like a lot |
|
|
|
|
fabianhjr (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Do The Evolution
|
|
June 08, 2011, 04:17:51 PM |
|
Ok, using the averake method we are right now looking at 12K per user
Getting the sqrt of the sum of the votes gets me about 448, which is more feasible. Dunno if I am using the power law correctly, can anyone help with this statics?
|
|
|
|
RTJakarta
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
June 08, 2011, 09:48:08 PM |
|
More than 100, less than 200.
|
|
|
|
|
russelljohnson
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 08, 2011, 10:34:16 PM |
|
Uhm, if you have <5, you also have <10, <20, <200, etc...
Maybe you need a range instead?
|
If you've found my post helpful, send me some bitcoins!
1FkGxXmesGbhoFewYGrtNEmifzwvNaNCXH
|
|
|
|
Freakin
|
|
June 08, 2011, 10:57:45 PM |
|
Uhm, if you have <5, you also have <10, <20, <200, etc...
Maybe you need a range instead?
yeah if I have 1 BTC i'm in the <100,000 group... |
|
|
|
|
uk1chad
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
June 09, 2011, 02:29:28 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabianhjr (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Do The Evolution
|
|
June 09, 2011, 02:52:34 AM |
|
Please, it is quite reasonable. In our imperfect world I hope you have the capacity to decide which is the most appropriate answer.
Maybe I had too much hope.
|
|
|
|
kokojie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1003
|
|
June 09, 2011, 03:48:25 AM |
|
should make it a range instead of <
|
btc: 15sFnThw58hiGHYXyUAasgfauifTEB1ZF6
|
|
|
|
Poll
