Who will win WW3?

[bryant.coleman]

Well in WW1 en WW2 Eu and US won the war so I just expect that if WW3 comes that they will win also.

The European Union won the World War 1 and the World War 2? Do you even know when the European Union was established? And Germany, which is the de facto leader of the European Union right now, was the loser in both the WW1 and the WW2. And do you really think that the Americans won the WW1? You are in serious need of some history lessons.

[1715141207]

1715141207

[1715141207]

1715141207

[maartenhaha]

Well in WW1 en WW2 Eu and US won the war so I just expect that if WW3 comes that they will win also.

The European Union won the World War 1 and the World War 2? Do you even know when the European Union was established? And Germany, which is the de facto leader of the European Union right now, was the loser in both the WW1 and the WW2. And do you really think that the Americans won the WW1? You are in serious need of some history lessons.

yea... some one really needs a history lesson and not only the movies, discovery and national geographic ones lol.

[BADecker]

If ww3 really happen between eastern and western block, and nukes and other weapons of mass destruction will be used, we all lose. There is already enough nukes to destroy life on earth multiple times. Chances to ww3 stay conventional are 0 so i hope that will never happen.

Stick to living in the mountains. In America, there are the Rockies and the Appalachians that are best. In Russia, the Urals. China is full of mountains.

Mountainous terrain helps to block nuclear.

And vodka.

Mountain people in America are deemed a backward people by the media and the governments and schools. But they distill some of the best and strongest alcohol. The difference between American and Russian brews is the strain of corn that they use... the kinds of biogenic trace materials that make it into the ethanol... and to some extent, the minerals in the water. But, you can find this in the various brands of Russian vodka, as well.

[a7mos]

I do not think that there will be a world war soon.
There will be some global financial crisis like what happened in 2008

[BADecker]

I do not think that there will be a world war soon.
There will be some global financial crisis like what happened in 2008

All the world wars are wars of value ownership. Money is the system that makes value ownership easily transferable. It also makes it easier to rip people off. The American/European form of debt money is the way that banks and governments rip their own citizens off, without their citizens knowing it. War is a method to hide and enhance this system.

See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1270603.msg13111302#msg13111302. This is what world wars are all about.

[tn211]

No one will win, because making war is just pointless.

And I don't think it will come a war with NATO vs Russian and China.

[BADecker]

No one will win, because making war is just pointless.

And I don't think it will come a war with NATO vs Russian and China.

Posting in Bitcointalk is kinda pointless, too. Yet many people do it.   

[bryant.coleman]

No one will win, because making war is just pointless.

Wars have been waged ever since the humans evolved as a distinct species. Millions of years ago, wars were being fought by various tribes, for the control of natural resources and hunting grounds. And even now, most of the battles are being fought over the dispute on sharing the natural resources. I assume that this will remain the case, a million years from now as well.

[BADecker]

Only God will win the final world war. Then people will see that the universe is only less than 10,000 years old.

[Snipe85]

I don't think there will be a third world war. People were taught so much by the previous ones that they will try to avoid an all out conflict and rather choose commando hits assassinations and manipulation.
The only war I see in the future is the muslim world vs the rest.

[ridery99]

Russian Su-34 Fullbacks Fly First Syria Sorties Loaded With Air-To-Air Missiles 

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/russian-su-34-fullbacks-fly-first-syria-sorties-loaded-1745307472

[bryant.coleman]

Russian Su-34 Fullbacks Fly First Syria Sorties Loaded With Air-To-Air Missiles 
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/russian-su-34-fullbacks-fly-first-syria-sorties-loaded-1745307472

I would advise the Turks to stay away from the Su-34 aircraft. These fighter jets can target enemy aircraft as much as 60 km away from them. The Russian Su-34 are fitted with advanced air-to-air missiles such as AA-12 Adder, AA-11 Archer, and AA-10 Alamo. The Turkish F-16 jets won't stand a chance against these missiles.

[Come-from-Beyond]

I would advise the Turks to stay away from the Su-34 aircraft. These fighter jets can target enemy aircraft as much as 60 km away from them. The Russian Su-34 are fitted with advanced air-to-air missiles such as AA-12 Adder, AA-11 Archer, and AA-10 Alamo. The Turkish F-16 jets won't stand a chance against these missiles.

I have just seen an article about Turkey activating Koral system to disable S-400 of Russians (in Google). I followed the link and saw 404 error. Looks like informational war is already here.

[bryant.coleman]

I would advise the Turks to stay away from the Su-34 aircraft. These fighter jets can target enemy aircraft as much as 60 km away from them. The Russian Su-34 are fitted with advanced air-to-air missiles such as AA-12 Adder, AA-11 Archer, and AA-10 Alamo. The Turkish F-16 jets won't stand a chance against these missiles.

I have just seen an article about Turkey activating Koral system to disable S-400 of Russians (in Google). I followed the link and saw 404 error. Looks like informational war is already here.

The Koral is an ordinary electronic jamming system with a range of less than 10 km. On the other hand, the S-400 is having a range of 400 km. Also, the Koral will be useless against the technically advanced 40N6 missile, which is being used in the S-400. Another factor is that the Koral offers protection only to the ground assets, and not to any fighter jet operating in the skies.

[RealBitcoin]

I would advise the Turks to stay away from the Su-34 aircraft. These fighter jets can target enemy aircraft as much as 60 km away from them. The Russian Su-34 are fitted with advanced air-to-air missiles such as AA-12 Adder, AA-11 Archer, and AA-10 Alamo. The Turkish F-16 jets won't stand a chance against these missiles.

I have just seen an article about Turkey activating Koral system to disable S-400 of Russians (in Google). I followed the link and saw 404 error. Looks like informational war is already here.

The Koral is an ordinary electronic jamming system with a range of less than 10 km. On the other hand, the S-400 is having a range of 400 km. Also, the Koral will be useless against the technically advanced 40N6 missile, which is being used in the S-400. Another factor is that the Koral offers protection only to the ground assets, and not to any fighter jet operating in the skies.

If the russians use jamming system, wont that also make their electronic communication useless?

Or they only jam their enemies frequencies?

[Come-from-Beyond]

If the russians use jamming system, wont that also make their electronic communication useless?

Or they only jam their enemies frequencies?

Theoretically, if it's deterministic white noise and you know the seed you can subtract it from the signal completely.

[butragenjo]

russia+china:(

[Faradey100]

Russia and china. Usa and eu is nothing for too big forces.

[ngocdhbk2]

Einstien once said - don't know who will win Third World War but the fourth world war would be fought with fists, sticks and stones.

[galdur]

Einstien once said - don't know who will win Third World War but the fourth world war would be fought with fists, sticks and stones.

Well, it didn´t really take an Einstein to figure out this wisdom after WW2 and he was pretty late in regurgitating it from other people

http://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/06/16/future-weapons/#more-679