Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 03:19:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 ... 764 »
  Print  
Author Topic: IOTA  (Read 1471694 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 08:44:38 PM
 #461

What is the difference between iota and qubic?

The former stores state transitions but can operate on global scale. The latter stores final state only but can operate on local scale only and requires special mechanisms for interoperability of clusters.
1711725564
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711725564

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711725564
Reply with quote  #2

1711725564
Report to moderator
1711725564
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711725564

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711725564
Reply with quote  #2

1711725564
Report to moderator
1711725564
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711725564

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711725564
Reply with quote  #2

1711725564
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711725564
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711725564

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711725564
Reply with quote  #2

1711725564
Report to moderator
1711725564
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711725564

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711725564
Reply with quote  #2

1711725564
Report to moderator
allwelder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1004



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 01:23:28 AM
 #462


I get an idea from Jinn's Dutch Auction for distribution: a maximum target is set for ICO, say 5,000 Bitcoins, and then the small depositions will be included if the total depositions are greater than the target. For example, the biggest one is 200 BTC, and now the total is 5050 BTC, so the biggest one 200 BTC is excluded, so right now the total funding is 4850 BTC and there is also 150 BTC can be put into the pool. Of course, it can be gamed with many small depositions, but a single Satoshi can also take party in and get some token.


Problem is how to determine the max IPO target.
I think they want to raise  as much as possible.

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.CryptoTalk.org.|.MAKE POSTS AND EARN BTC!.🏆
allwelder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1004



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 01:27:06 AM
 #463

Some investors here trying to set a max cap for ICO (5000 BTC) or the maximum amount which other investors can send (500 USD). They think that this will affect their RoI.
They are wrong. Crypti set the maximum cap for itself as 750 BTC and is in deep shit now. Ethereum has gathered 30 000 BTC and it's investors made around x6 RoI.
So the key to good RoI is not low max cap for ICO.
This works well for NXT raised only 21BTC. Cheesy

 
                                . ██████████.
                              .████████████████.
                           .██████████████████████.
                        -█████████████████████████████
                     .██████████████████████████████████.
                  -█████████████████████████████████████████
               -███████████████████████████████████████████████
           .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       ..████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████..
       .   .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
       .      .████████████████████████████████████████████████.

       .       .██████████████████████████████████████████████
       .    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████
       .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████.
        .███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
           .█████████████████████████████████████████████████████
              .████████████████████████████████████████████████
                   ████████████████████████████████████████
                      ██████████████████████████████████
                          ██████████████████████████
                             ████████████████████
                               ████████████████
                                   █████████
.CryptoTalk.org.|.MAKE POSTS AND EARN BTC!.🏆
Tobo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 02:37:20 PM
 #464

will a Jinn chip be small enough to be put inside of a iwatch or a fitbit bracelet?
rigel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1240
Merit: 1001


Thank God I'm an atheist


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 02:41:26 PM
 #465

Any ETA for first release?
iotatoken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 02:52:54 PM
 #466

will a Jinn chip be small enough to be put inside of a iwatch or a fitbit bracelet?

Jinn's design is a bit different from regular processors in that we go for an extreme amount of cores for parallel concurrent computation, but yes.

iotatoken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 03:26:49 PM
 #467

Any ETA for first release?

~Christmas

daxiake
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 688
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 09:02:26 PM
 #468

seem this project copy the XTC,tilepay.
have a look at tilepay.org,or their bitcointalk thread:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=761852.0

http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4NTQwMDg0Nw==&mid=400293346&idx=1&sn=53abcda6d5867c686f07b7c9a548d35b&scene=23&srcid=1030GEYds7oAVImz7wodyaS4#wechat_redirect
iotatoken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 09:11:27 PM
 #469

seem this project copy the XTC,tilepay.
have a look at tilepay.org,or their bitcointalk thread:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=761852.0

http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4NTQwMDg0Nw==&mid=400293346&idx=1&sn=53abcda6d5867c686f07b7c9a548d35b&scene=23&srcid=1030GEYds7oAVImz7wodyaS4#wechat_redirect

No copy. How is this anything like Tilepay other than similar market?

alicex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 12:34:44 AM
 #470

seem this project copy the XTC,tilepay.
have a look at tilepay.org,or their bitcointalk thread:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=761852.0

http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA4NTQwMDg0Nw==&mid=400293346&idx=1&sn=53abcda6d5867c686f07b7c9a548d35b&scene=23&srcid=1030GEYds7oAVImz7wodyaS4#wechat_redirect

No copy. How is this anything like Tilepay other than similar market?

but light blockchain is smart chiose
Tobo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 01:33:13 AM
Last edit: November 02, 2015, 12:24:12 PM by Tobo
 #471

@CfB, @iotatoken-

A suggestion-

If you want to attract new and serious buyers and investors, you should create a Team page on you website to show the resumes and photos of your team member like Augur does - http://www.augur.net/

This is the way for you to tell people you are serious and determined about and confident on your project. Time has changed in the cryto world. Good resumes and real persons with photos and real names are the wise things to do.
AltcoinScamfinder
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 04:32:31 AM
 #472

Some investors here trying to set a max cap for ICO (5000 BTC) or the maximum amount which other investors can send (500 USD). They think that this will affect their RoI.
They are wrong. Crypti set the maximum cap for itself as 750 BTC and is in deep shit now. Ethereum has gathered 30 000 BTC and it's investors made around x6 RoI.
So the key to good RoI is not low max cap for ICO.
This works well for NXT raised only 21BTC. Cheesy

Helps if you are only 5 people owning 99% of all coin so you can pump it at will when you need money..

FOR RENT.
alicex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 05:34:29 AM
 #473

Some investors here trying to set a max cap for ICO (5000 BTC) or the maximum amount which other investors can send (500 USD). They think that this will affect their RoI.
They are wrong. Crypti set the maximum cap for itself as 750 BTC and is in deep shit now. Ethereum has gathered 30 000 BTC and it's investors made around x6 RoI.
So the key to good RoI is not low max cap for ICO.
This works well for NXT raised only 21BTC. Cheesy

Helps if you are only 5 people owning 99% of all coin so you can pump it at will when you need money..

so you should surprise why NXT sitll not die? lol
Tobo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 12:11:26 PM
 #474

Some investors here trying to set a max cap for ICO (5000 BTC) or the maximum amount which other investors can send (500 USD). They think that this will affect their RoI.
They are wrong. Crypti set the maximum cap for itself as 750 BTC and is in deep shit now. Ethereum has gathered 30 000 BTC and it's investors made around x6 RoI.
So the key to good RoI is not low max cap for ICO.
This works well for NXT raised only 21BTC. Cheesy
Helps if you are only 5 people owning 99% of all coin so you can pump it at will when you need money..
so you should surprise why NXT sitll not die? lol

The problem is what Iota team can achieve with 21 btc. Can they work on Iota and Jinn full time to make the projects big and successful with 21 btc as their resources for themselves and their families? To make the projects big, real, and successful they need 21 thousands of btc.
alicex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 12:35:03 PM
 #475

Some investors here trying to set a max cap for ICO (5000 BTC) or the maximum amount which other investors can send (500 USD). They think that this will affect their RoI.
They are wrong. Crypti set the maximum cap for itself as 750 BTC and is in deep shit now. Ethereum has gathered 30 000 BTC and it's investors made around x6 RoI.
So the key to good RoI is not low max cap for ICO.
This works well for NXT raised only 21BTC. Cheesy
Helps if you are only 5 people owning 99% of all coin so you can pump it at will when you need money..
so you should surprise why NXT sitll not die? lol

The problem is what Iota team can achieve with 21 btc. Can they work on Iota and Jinn full time to make the projects big and successful with 21 btc as their resources for themselves and their families? To make the projects big, real, and successful they need 21 thousands of btc.

show all investor why you need 21 thousands btc?
Tobo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 763
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 01:03:14 PM
Last edit: November 02, 2015, 01:19:01 PM by Tobo
 #476

show all investor why you need 21 thousands btc?

You don't need them to tell you why. You can figure it out yourself according to your own daily life.

Btw, 21K is just an analogy. The more the better for the projects.

Edit - the investors will decide how much they will get. They have to sell it very hard to get an ideal number. Smiley
DrBeer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 1782

Non-custodial BTC Wallet


View Profile WWW
November 02, 2015, 01:36:19 PM
 #477

ICO is expected? Or what options will be available to early-stage investment?
stdset
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 572
Merit: 506



View Profile
November 02, 2015, 02:17:25 PM
 #478

Any ETA for first release?

~Christmas

So did mthcl and CfB already fix this vulnerability:

This is the scenario I'm talking about. Green filled, black edged are transactions of the honest network. Red edged - are transactions of the attacker. The doublespends are filled with yellow.
As far as I understand your algo, weight of the red tip is greater by 3 than weight of the green tip.


?

patmast3r
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 02, 2015, 02:28:47 PM
 #479

Any ETA for first release?

~Christmas

So did mthcl and CfB already fix this vulnerability:

This is the scenario I'm talking about. Green filled, black edged are transactions of the honest network. Red edged - are transactions of the attacker. The doublespends are filled with yellow.
As far as I understand your algo, weight of the red tip is greater by 3 than weight of the green tip.


?


Why would the weight of the red tip be greater (not saying it can't be) ? Afaik tips only have their "own weight" since they are tips and therefore haven't "inherited" any weight yet. Which afair means that their weight depends on the POW of those tx (tips).

stdset
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 572
Merit: 506



View Profile
November 02, 2015, 02:40:10 PM
 #480

Any ETA for first release?

~Christmas

So did mthcl and CfB already fix this vulnerability:

This is the scenario I'm talking about. Green filled, black edged are transactions of the honest network. Red edged - are transactions of the attacker. The doublespends are filled with yellow.
As far as I understand your algo, weight of the red tip is greater by 3 than weight of the green tip.


?


Why would the weight of the red tip be greater (not saying it can't be) ? Afaik tips only have their "own weight" since they are tips and therefore haven't "inherited" any weight yet. Which afair means that their weight depends on the POW of those tx (tips).
It was already discussed several pages earlier.

But the cumulative weight of that tx is not so big, so why the merchant should accept it?
NP, the merchant waits of course for normal amount of confirmations.
On your picture it has 1 confirmation only?..
I can draw more pictures. But I don't think it's necessary. Imagine that the attacker started preparing for the attack a month ago. He spent the whole month to accumulate PoW on top of the second doublespend. He published no transactions during the month. Then he publishes the first doublespending transaction, provides the first confirmation, thus attaching it to recent part of the tangle, waits for the merchant to send him his puchase. Then publishes his secret subtangle and attaches in to the legit subtangle. The first doublespending transaction now is rejected by the network, the second doublespend has more weight.
He would have to attach it "below" the merchant's tx, but yes, you're right, it's a possible attack vector. Anyhow, the referencing algorithm is not yet finished, so we are discussing it with CfB right now.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 ... 764 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!