Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 12:09:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: The mining focus is bad - we need better clients ;)  (Read 2626 times)
jerfelix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 03:31:40 PM
 #21

Just make sure you're printing on acid-free, high-quallity paper and that it's stored in an environment to prevent decay, yellowing, and other environmental issues.  Because if just 1 tiny little block in the QR code becomes unreadable, or the ink/toner flakes off. 

Flat out false.  QR Codes have redundancy in them.  Level H codes can recover from errors up to 30%.


That's like keeping all of your money in a safe deposit box, in cash, and only spending cash for purchases.

You need to be considering the case of people who have substantial amounts of wealth in Bitcoins.  Say I have $100,000 worth of Bitcoins.  What you are suggesting is that I make a $100,000 wager that I can keep my computer free of zero-day viruses, FOR LIFE.  I am not willing to make that bet.  It is, after all, a Windows machine.

Making backup wallets and storing them for years makes a lot of sense.  Paper is far more durable than any electronic medium.  What medium would you suggest that is going to last 100 years?  Floppy?
1714867770
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714867770

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714867770
Reply with quote  #2

1714867770
Report to moderator
1714867770
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714867770

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714867770
Reply with quote  #2

1714867770
Report to moderator
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714867770
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714867770

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714867770
Reply with quote  #2

1714867770
Report to moderator
1714867770
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714867770

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714867770
Reply with quote  #2

1714867770
Report to moderator
Rob P.
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
June 10, 2011, 04:06:07 PM
 #22

quote author=pickerin link=topic=12271.msg193197#msg193197 date=1307658904]
That's like keeping all of your money in a safe deposit box, in cash, and only spending cash for purchases.
[/quote]

You need to be considering the case of people who have substantial amounts of wealth in Bitcoins.  Say I have $100,000 worth of Bitcoins.  What you are suggesting is that I make a $100,000 wager that I can keep my computer free of zero-day viruses, FOR LIFE.  I am not willing to make that bet.  It is, after all, a Windows machine.

Making backup wallets and storing them for years makes a lot of sense.  Paper is far more durable than any electronic medium.  What medium would you suggest that is going to last 100 years?  Floppy?
[/quote]

Any single media?  None.  However, I have electronic documents that I've kept around for 25+ years.  How?  I keep the media they are stored on current.  When I upgrade my laptop, the documents get moved to a new one.  That laptop is then backed up in 3 different places.  So, I have four copies in different locations.

You're comparing a medium that has been around for thousands of years, to a medium that has been around for less than 100.  You have no idea which will prove better in the long run.

If you wish to backup your life savings in Bitcoins to a paper document, knock yourself out.  I'll be backing mine up electronically.

My argument wasn't which was better as a backup medium (go back to the first page), it was an argument against paper as a way of safeguarding bitcoins against errors in coding and/or viruses.  I'm not saying paper won't work.  I'm saying if you're putting it on paper to avoid problems in the electronic environment, you're kidding yourself, because in order to use the paper, you have to make it electronic again, and at that point, you have all of the detriments of it being electronic again.


--

If you like what I've written here, consider tipping the messenger:
1GZu4CtHa6ai8iWoWiVFxV5VVoNte4SkoG

If you don't like what I've written, send me a Tip and I'll stop talking.
Nesetalis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 10, 2011, 04:10:56 PM
 #23

actually they have proven the viability dates on most of the modern media.. its atrocious.

the best CDs, glass with pure metal film sandwiched between.. can go for maybe 100 or 200 years they guess.. but outside that, your best bet is actually microfilm stored in a dark dark place, or paper.

ZOMG Moo!
jerfelix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 04:20:23 PM
 #24

I'm saying if you're putting it on paper to avoid problems in the electronic environment, you're kidding yourself, because in order to use the paper, you have to make it electronic again, and at that point, you have all of the detriments of it being electronic again.
And once again, I'll repeat that there's a substantial difference between betting that you don't have a virus twice - once at storage time and once at retrieval time - and betting that you won't EVER have a virus between today and the date the funds are needed.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!