Building a 2-of-(1+(1-of-2)) multisig transaction [i.e A + (B or C)]

[weex]

Seems like that will work fine. Just for my own understanding, is there any reason that couldn't be  a 1 + (1 of 2). I suppose then it would depend more about how individual signatures are handled.

[1715174479]

1715174479

[amaclin]

Seems like that will work fine. Just for my own understanding, is there any reason that couldn't be  a 1 + (1 of 2).
I suppose then it would depend more about how individual signatures are handled.

It could be any of (k + (m of n)) where k + m + n <= 15

Update: where k + n <= 15

[weex]

I meant for this case. The second part only needs to be 1 of 2 so the transaction could be smaller.

[thelink2012]

It's easily changeable how many k, m and n you'll use on the form  
Left the PR in coinbin, though their broadcaster doesn't seem to accept those transactions at all, one have to use the blockchain.info broadcaster for instance.

If there's already a name for this kind of p2sh let me know, I named it Mandatory Multisig for the lack of imagination.

[amaclin]

thelink2012, perfect work!

http://webbtc.com/script/cdf3b234610e4224116220ef08198a5fa354451490983972c077fd2cf57efa43:0
2 + ( 2 of 3 )

http://webbtc.com/script/d04b2d714737f355d6cbc6d2d2307ed383835e425a85d06757689ce50ba0bccf:0
1 + ( 1 of 2 )

http://webbtc.com/script/1edccd06efaf2d7d610f45911506437a0ac258f8f902616fc26f260b6f30a5fd:0
3 + ( 1 of 3 )

[weex]

It's easily changeable how many k, m and n you'll use on the form  
Left the PR in coinbin, though their broadcaster doesn't seem to accept those transactions at all, one have to use the blockchain.info broadcaster for instance.

If there's already a name for this kind of p2sh let me know, I named it Mandatory Multisig for the lack of imagination.

Thanks thelink2012, I'll check it out shortly.