Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 07:14:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Pool efficiency  (Read 3221 times)
Coma (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 03:17:30 PM
 #1

Is it possible that a pool might be more efficient mining than other?

I mean, deepbit charges a 3% fee. But if it's 3% more efficient than any other pool, it should be theoretical the same to use a no-fee pool than deepbit.
But what if deepbit is 5% more efficient?
1715066059
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715066059

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715066059
Reply with quote  #2

1715066059
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
soul4soul
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 03:24:39 PM
 #2

theoretically all mining has the same chance any pool or non pooled mining rig in the end should all payout the same. the only way a pool can be more efficiently then another pool is by having better coding and network setup. if you get a lot of stale shares in a pool then you should switch to another one.
Coma (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 04:11:36 PM
 #3

theoretically all mining has the same chance any pool or non pooled mining rig in the end should all payout the same. the only way a pool can be more efficiently then another pool is by having better coding and network setup. if you get a lot of stale shares in a pool then you should switch to another one.

Better coding is what I'm takling about.
But does this only reflects on stale shares?
gentakin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 10, 2011, 05:25:38 PM
 #4

If a pool gets a lot of invalid blocks (say, the coding causes the pool to tell other bitcoin nodes about a found block only after a 120s delay, or it is connected to the network in a bad way) but doesn't pay for them, that's also less efficient.

I don't know a pool where this is a problem though, so.. Huh

1HNjbHnpu7S3UUNMF6J9yWTD597LgtUCxb
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!