|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
 |
April 13, 2016, 05:14:47 PM |
|
Hello
How can i get/buy some SIL?
i want to buy 1000 pieces any offer
You can buy some SIL using Novaexchange since a few days. 24h Volume: 0.154 BTC | 24h Change: 14.3% Sixeleven (SIL) | Bitcoin (BTC) --- Please support 611 (SixEleven) to get listed on C-CEX with your vote! --- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
|
April 13, 2016, 05:49:56 PM
Last edit: April 13, 2016, 07:02:45 PM by PatrickMacH |
|
[...]
Where can i merge mine 611 with BTC?
I have a couple of S3+ miners sitting idle, Actually they make more noise than money but im looking to use them in some genuine coins. [...]
Hint for the miners: current BTC 0.0003xxx vs. sha256 difficulty 10859803.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
 |
April 14, 2016, 09:13:50 PM
Last edit: April 14, 2016, 09:32:31 PM by PatrickMacH |
|
any market for buying $SIL ?
At the moment Novaexchange (beta) is too illiquid to get a stable offer/demand price level. Orderbook sell orders are currently above 0.003 BTC per SIL; orderbook buy orders are at 0.00002xxx BTC. Seems that some market players are trying to make x10 profit with quick buy cheap sell at factor 10 orders.  At the moment a market player investing about 0.3 BTC could buy out the complete sell orderbook at Novaexchange and would own afterwards 1/363 of all SIL available! Currently about 158 SIL are mined per day. To be able to register an object within the 611 (SixEleven) blockchain which can be used to distribute information to any Internet device using the Domain Name System (dns resolve requests) you need 0.1922 SIL. In contrast to many other great coins, 611 (SixEleven) provides a clear ressource pool. 611 (SixEleven) is number #1 again on the C-CEX vote list. Hopefully we get listed there next week.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
|
April 16, 2016, 07:45:31 PM |
|
Wow It solved almost instantly when i wrote them an email and i am little impressed with the timing, even poloniex doesnt respond this quick which is supposedly the best exchange atm lol... Request getting listed on Poloniex is still open. We did not receive any response, yet  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
April 18, 2016, 10:24:33 PM |
|
is implementing the getblocktemplate RPC call planned?
i love the nostalgia but getwork is ancient.
|
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
|
April 19, 2016, 10:53:29 PM
Last edit: April 19, 2016, 11:05:40 PM by PatrickMacH |
|
is implementing the getblocktemplate RPC call planned?
i love the nostalgia but getwork is ancient.
Yes, I love the nostalgia of 611 (SixEleven), too. Feels like driving down Highway 1 with a good old Cadillac Eldorado from the roots of crypto into the future.  I'll have a look if we can backport this feature into 611d, like submitblock and getmininginfo. Let me know if you have the official patch of bitcoind adding this feature at hand. |
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
April 20, 2016, 12:38:21 AM |
|
i attempted to splice getblocktemplate in last night; however json 2.0 calls are also not implemented which makes it a bit more difficult (resulting in errors relating to batch rpc). will release the code on my github as a fork if i have any success.
|
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
April 20, 2016, 05:48:47 PM |
|
some progress: root@loderunner:~/sixeleven/src# ./611d -server -daemon -rpcuser=barrystyle -rpcpassword= -datadir=datadir -maxconnections=4 getblocktemplate error: {"code":-1,"message":"getblocktemplate [params]\nIf [params] does not contain a \"data\" key, returns data needed to construct a block to work on:\n \"version\" : block version\n \"previousblockhash\" : hash of current highest block\n \"transactions\" : contents of non-coinbase transactions that should be included in the next block\n \"coinbaseaux\" : data that should be included in coinbase\n \"coinbasevalue\" : maximum allowable input to coinbase transaction, including the generation award and transaction fees\n \"target\" : hash target\n \"mintime\" : minimum timestamp appropriate for next block\n \"curtime\" : current timestamp\n \"mutable\" : list of ways the block template may be changed\n \"noncerange\" : range of valid nonces\n \"sigoplimit\" : limit of sigops in blocks\n \"sizelimit\" : limit of block size\n \"bits\" : compressed target of next block\n \"height\" : height of the next block\nIf [params] does contain a \"data\" key, tries to solve the block and returns null if it was successful (and \"rejected\" if not)\nSee https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0022 for full specification."} however, stratum still can't connect; because 611d doesnt understand json 2.0 rpc batch.. i'm about halfway through on that.. |
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
|
April 20, 2016, 09:58:46 PM |
|
some progress: root@loderunner:~/sixeleven/src# ./611d -server -daemon -rpcuser=barrystyle -rpcpassword= -datadir=datadir -maxconnections=4 getblocktemplate error: {"code":-1,"message":"getblocktemplate [params]\nIf [params] does not contain a \"data\" key, returns data needed to construct a block to work on:\n \"version\" : block version\n \"previousblockhash\" : hash of current highest block\n \"transactions\" : contents of non-coinbase transactions that should be included in the next block\n \"coinbaseaux\" : data that should be included in coinbase\n \"coinbasevalue\" : maximum allowable input to coinbase transaction, including the generation award and transaction fees\n \"target\" : hash target\n \"mintime\" : minimum timestamp appropriate for next block\n \"curtime\" : current timestamp\n \"mutable\" : list of ways the block template may be changed\n \"noncerange\" : range of valid nonces\n \"sigoplimit\" : limit of sigops in blocks\n \"sizelimit\" : limit of block size\n \"bits\" : compressed target of next block\n \"height\" : height of the next block\nIf [params] does contain a \"data\" key, tries to solve the block and returns null if it was successful (and \"rejected\" if not)\nSee https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0022 for full specification."} however, stratum still can't connect; because 611d doesnt understand json 2.0 rpc batch.. i'm about halfway through on that.. can you please check if the latest 611 (SixEleven) version on Github works for you? |
|
|
|
|
barrysty1e
|
|
April 20, 2016, 11:27:03 PM |
|
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -D_MT -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -I../contrib/db48/include -o obj/nogui/bitcoinrpc.o bitcoinrpc.cpp
bitcoinrpc.cpp: In function ‘json_spirit::Value getblocktemplate(const Array&, bool)’:
bitcoinrpc.cpp:2335:43: error: ‘PROTOCOL_VERSION’ was not declared in this scope
CDataStream ssTx(SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
^
bitcoinrpc.cpp:2346:78: error: no matching function for call to ‘CTransaction::GetValueIn(MapPrevTx&)’
entry.push_back(Pair("fee", (int64_t)(tx.GetValueIn(mapInputs) - tx.GetValueOut())));
^
bitcoinrpc.cpp:2346:78: note: candidate is:
In file included from headers.h:101:0,
from bitcoinrpc.cpp:5:
main.h:602:11: note: int64 CTransaction::GetValueIn() const
int64 GetValueIn() const
^
main.h:602:11: note: candidate expects 0 arguments, 1 provided
bitcoinrpc.cpp:2356:38: error: ‘class CTransaction’ has no member named ‘GetLegacySigOpCount’
int64_t nSigOps = tx.GetLegacySigOpCount();
^
bitcoinrpc.cpp:2357:31: error: ‘class CTransaction’ has no member named ‘GetP2SHSigOpCount’
nSigOps += tx.GetP2SHSigOpCount(mapInputs);
^
bitcoinrpc.cpp:2365:44: error: ‘COINBASE_FLAGS’ was not declared in this scope
aux.push_back(Pair("flags", HexStr(COINBASE_FLAGS.begin(), COINBASE_FLAGS.end())));
^
bitcoinrpc.cpp: In function ‘json_spirit::Value submitblock(const Array&, bool)’:
bitcoinrpc.cpp:2416:49: error: ‘PROTOCOL_VERSION’ was not declared in this scope
CDataStream ssBlock(blockData, SER_NETWORK, PROTOCOL_VERSION);
^
Makefile:107: recipe for target 'obj/nogui/bitcoinrpc.o' failed
make: *** [obj/nogui/bitcoinrpc.o] Error 1
nope - you're about where i was about a day or two ago |
my father wears sneakers in the pool
|
|
|
|
|
|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
 |
April 23, 2016, 12:13:25 AM |
|
Hey barry, Wow, that's awesome! Thank you for sharing your great patch.  Adding getblocktemplate (and slightly patching submitblock) should make 611 (SixEleven) compatible with CoiniumServ, a famous next-gen crypto currency mining pool software. If anyone can setup a CoiniumServ pool supporting (merge-mining) of 611 (SixEleven) SIL coins please share your results. |
|
|
|
|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
 |
April 23, 2016, 01:12:42 AM |
|
 |
CALL FOR YOUR FEEDBACK:
611.to is really a nice and short domain name for a blockchain URL shortening service:
- Are you using public (or private) URL Shortener?
- Do you like to have this feature included into the 611 (SixEleven) blockchain?
|
|
|
|
|
forzendiablo
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the grandpa of cryptos
|
|
April 23, 2016, 06:26:52 PM |
|
|
CALL FOR YOUR FEEDBACK:
611.to is really a nice and short domain name for a blockchain URL shortening service:
- Are you using public (or private) URL Shortener?
- Do you like to have this feature included into the 611 (SixEleven) blockchain?
|
yes please add with 301 redirects |
yolo
|
|
|
|
|
Mig-23
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 24, 2016, 10:12:50 AM |
|
Wow It solved almost instantly when i wrote them an email and i am little impressed with the timing, even poloniex doesnt respond this quick which is supposedly the best exchange atm lol... Request getting listed on Poloniex is still open. We did not receive any response, yet based in my experience its so hard for a coins to get listed on polo i dont know what their requirements to be added on there as the alternative maybe we can request to alcurex ,.etc |
|
|
|
|
|
PatrickMacH (OP)
|
|
April 25, 2016, 01:04:47 AM |
|
Hi James, does 611-rc3 work fine for you? |
|
|
|
|
