B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 277
liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !
|
 |
August 28, 2016, 05:08:20 PM |
|
A little report: I have a masternode and staking address on the same wallet. Both work perfectly since a few days. I average 3 staking payments for 1 masternode. It's great!
|
When the people of the world will get that covid was intentionally released to frame china, steal the election from trump, assure massive bail outs and foster the forced vaccination agendas...they will forget, like 911, wmds in irak, uss liberty or pedogate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
August 28, 2016, 09:34:46 PM |
|
I have just set up a DNET MN and it's been running for around 36 hours and no payments yet. What's the best way to monitor the MN and make sure it's running correctly? Is there a site like for DASH where you can monitor masternodes?
To add to the response you got, also see if you can find your txid in the "masternode list" output. If you can see it in there along with your status looking good both from the masternode (masternode status) and from controller (masternode list-conf), then it's all good. Right now, it's about 36 to 48 hours for first payment. After that, you'll get a payment roughly every 12 hours or so currently. The MN payment info page is actually made by the DASH dev for DNET.  http://178.254.23.111/~pub/DN/DN_masternode_payments_stats.html |
|
|
|
|
kokokoin
|
|
August 29, 2016, 09:13:25 AM |
|
Only 2 of all my MNs are missing after weekend and it is server-side issue. Looks good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tombtc
|
|
August 29, 2016, 12:26:01 PM |
|
Is it better to have one big wallet or many smaller wallets for staking?
|
|
|
|
|
4x13 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
|
August 29, 2016, 01:22:28 PM |
|
Is it better to have one big wallet or many smaller wallets for staking?
One wallet, many smaller inputs. 2k-5k are good input sizes |
|
|
|
|
B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 277
liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !
|
|
August 29, 2016, 07:39:19 PM |
|
Is it better to have one big wallet or many smaller wallets for staking?
One wallet, many smaller inputs. 2k-5k are good input sizes Hello, It's not clear to me what you mean by having many smaller inputs. Is it to have a wallet.dat with different addresses with each one 2k-5k? Or one single address with everything on it? I think it's the first one. However I don't understand the logic behind it. Could you please explain a little bit more on that? |
When the people of the world will get that covid was intentionally released to frame china, steal the election from trump, assure massive bail outs and foster the forced vaccination agendas...they will forget, like 911, wmds in irak, uss liberty or pedogate.
|
|
|
|
StakeBox
|
|
August 29, 2016, 08:30:37 PM |
|
Is it better to have one big wallet or many smaller wallets for staking?
One wallet, many smaller inputs. 2k-5k are good input sizes Hello, It's not clear to me what you mean by having many smaller inputs. Is it to have a wallet.dat with different addresses with each one 2k-5k? Or one single address with everything on it? I think it's the first one. However I don't understand the logic behind it. Could you please explain a little bit more on that? As far as the staking is concerned there is no difference between a wallet that has 10 addresses, each with 2k DNET, and one address that you sent 2k DNET to 10 times. If you are experimenting with different input sizes trying to find the the most profitable way to set your wallet up for staking it may be convenient to use several addresses to better track things. There is a fine line between having inputs that are large enough to stake in a reasonable time frame and enough inputs to have good odds of being the next person to stake. I have experimented with different size inputs, and found that I get more stakes per day by letting them split down to the threshold where they stop splitting. I am not sure if you are aware, but whenever an input of yours stakes it splits into 2 inputs until splitting would drop the size of the inputs to less than nStakeSplitThreshold, which for DNET is 2000. This means that if left alone all of the inputs in your wallet will end up being between 2k and 4k. I have even gone ahead and compiled a wallet with a different nStakeSplitThreshold, trying many sizes up to and including 50k. That leads me to believe that the threshold we have chosen is close to ideal. In a future wallet we will be bringing the ability to adjust the threshold out to the end user, either via a command line option or an RPC command. |
|
|
|
|
kokokoin
|
|
August 30, 2016, 07:45:29 AM |
|
I have almost equal amount of DNET locked in masternodes and staking. Yesterday my masternodes earned 2.7x more DNET than staking wallet. Even minus VPS cost masternodes now more profitable.
|
|
|
|
|
sweet bird
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
August 30, 2016, 08:14:21 AM |
|
Its a POS project launched for shopping centers etc..
It includes many good features but it needs a lot of features to be added..
Hope to see it developed soon..
|
|
|
|
|
|
tombtc
|
|
August 30, 2016, 09:34:56 AM |
|
I have almost equal amount of DNET locked in masternodes and staking. Yesterday my masternodes earned 2.7x more DNET than staking wallet. Even minus VPS cost masternodes now more profitable.
Thanks for sharing this! I am only staking at the moment as I thought staking / masternoding will be balanced and equally profitable. I think you're getting more coins to your masternodes because more people staking than running masternodes so the system gives more coins to masternodes to balance it. |
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
August 30, 2016, 12:39:50 PM |
|
I have almost equal amount of DNET locked in masternodes and staking. Yesterday my masternodes earned 2.7x more DNET than staking wallet. Even minus VPS cost masternodes now more profitable.
Thanks for sharing this! I am only staking at the moment as I thought staking / masternoding will be balanced and equally profitable. I think you're getting more coins to your masternodes because more people staking than running masternodes so the system gives more coins to masternodes to balance it. Here's the dev's explanation of the seesaw reward mechanism that is used to determine the split between the masternode and the staker of the block: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1262920.msg15952720#msg15952720Also, you can see the current Stake vs Masternode block reward breakdown (near-real time) here: http://178.254.23.111/~pub/DN/DN_masternode_payments_stats.htmlFYI - Estimated Payment per Masternode is currently incorrect as it takes into account the DNET count of the stake reward as well. So you need to multiply the estimated payment by 31/45 to get the correct daily DNET payment & profitability of each masternode. |
|
|
|
|
kokokoin
|
|
August 30, 2016, 12:43:57 PM |
|
FYI - Estimated Payment per Masternode is currently incorrect as it takes into account the DNET count of the stake reward as well.
So you need to multiply the estimated payment by 31/45 to get the correct daily DNET payment & profitability of each masternode.
Thanks for info. PoS Phase X: PoS [blocks 648000-Forever] 30 days BTW, please fix this in OP. 30 days =/= forever  |
|
|
|
|
B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 277
liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !
|
|
August 30, 2016, 07:20:01 PM |
|
Is it better to have one big wallet or many smaller wallets for staking?
One wallet, many smaller inputs. 2k-5k are good input sizes Hello, It's not clear to me what you mean by having many smaller inputs. Is it to have a wallet.dat with different addresses with each one 2k-5k? Or one single address with everything on it? I think it's the first one. However I don't understand the logic behind it. Could you please explain a little bit more on that? If you are experimenting with different input sizes trying to find the the most profitable way to set your wallet up for staking it may be convenient to use several addresses to better track things. There is a fine line between having inputs that are large enough to stake in a reasonable time frame and enough inputs to have good odds of being the next person to stake. I have experimented with different size inputs, and found that I get more stakes per day by letting them split down to the threshold where they stop splitting. I am not sure if you are aware, but whenever an input of yours stakes it splits into 2 inputs until splitting would drop the size of the inputs to less than nStakeSplitThreshold, which for DNET is 2000. This means that if left alone all of the inputs in your wallet will end up being between 2k and 4k.I have even gone ahead and compiled a wallet with a different nStakeSplitThreshold, trying many sizes up to and including 50k. That leads me to believe that the threshold we have chosen is close to ideal. In a future wallet we will be bringing the ability to adjust the threshold out to the end user, either via a command line option or an RPC command. Hello, Thank you very much for your splendid explanation. I fully understand now the inner working of it. I am sorry if I was a little slow in understanding the optimization of staking. However it was important to me. Thanks again. What I have observed is that my stacking address got splitted in many inputs of around 2500 +/-. Will see how it evolves. But right now they have a tendency to go 2500+ as they don't split anymore. |
When the people of the world will get that covid was intentionally released to frame china, steal the election from trump, assure massive bail outs and foster the forced vaccination agendas...they will forget, like 911, wmds in irak, uss liberty or pedogate.
|
|
|
|
EcoChavCrypto
|
|
August 30, 2016, 07:52:36 PM |
|
I was away for the weekend with no internet access. I got loads of payouts when I opened my wallet but nodes needed reactivating. I was just wondering what might have caused them to stop?
I am also testing the obfuscation feature which seems to be stuck on 25% and either says obfuscation is idle, waiting in a queue or no compatable masternode is found.
Is there something in need to do or change?
|
|
|
|
|
mxnsch
|
|
August 30, 2016, 08:20:25 PM |
|
I have almost equal amount of DNET locked in masternodes and staking. Yesterday my masternodes earned 2.7x more DNET than staking wallet. Even minus VPS cost masternodes now more profitable.
For 1$/month per masternode, running a masternode is profitable for ages. Upgrade to my auto masternode setup script implementation for this and more upcoming ;-) |
██ ███ nope ██ ███
|
|
|
defunctec
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 31, 2016, 07:11:24 AM |
|
I have almost equal amount of DNET locked in masternodes and staking. Yesterday my masternodes earned 2.7x more DNET than staking wallet. Even minus VPS cost masternodes now more profitable.
For 1$/month per masternode, running a masternode is profitable for ages. Upgrade to my auto masternode setup script implementation for this and more upcoming ;-) $1 a month for a vps..... that's ridiculously competitive. I pay from $2.20 - $3.50  |
|
|
|
|
|
mxnsch
|
|
August 31, 2016, 10:45:27 AM |
|
I have almost equal amount of DNET locked in masternodes and staking. Yesterday my masternodes earned 2.7x more DNET than staking wallet. Even minus VPS cost masternodes now more profitable.
For 1$/month per masternode, running a masternode is profitable for ages. Upgrade to my auto masternode setup script implementation for this and more upcoming ;-) $1 a month for a vps..... that's ridiculously competitive. I pay from $2.20 - $3.50 Thats the price everybody can get now with some work on a small vultr instance and my setup script: Sneak preview:  |
██ ███ nope ██ ███
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
August 31, 2016, 12:44:35 PM |
|
For 1$/month per masternode, running a masternode is profitable for ages. Upgrade to my auto masternode setup script implementation for this and more upcoming ;-)
To try this out, I've deployed 1 Vultr Ubuntu 16.04 server with IPv6 and logged in as root. Then I downloaded your 0.2 script but not sure how to run it.... Is this correct? 1. Download the script. wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/marsmensch/masternode-vps-setup/master/dnet_vps.sh2. Before running it, edit the script and change the setup nodes count. (e.g. from 3 to 5) nano ./dnet_vps.sh 3. Run the script sh ./dnet_vps.sh When I do above, I get the following syntax error. Did I miss something? ./dnet_vps.sh: 59: ./dnet_vps.sh: Syntax error: "(" unexpected |
|
|
|
|
mxnsch
|
|
August 31, 2016, 12:53:55 PM |
|
For 1$/month per masternode, running a masternode is profitable for ages. Upgrade to my auto masternode setup script implementation for this and more upcoming ;-)
To try this out, I've deployed 1 Vultr Ubuntu 16.04 server with IPv6 and logged in as root. Then I downloaded your 0.2 script but not sure how to run it.... Is this correct? 1. Download the script. 2. Before running it, edit the script and change the setup nodes count. (e.g. from 3 to 5) 3. Run the script Wait 2 more days please, next version is so much better and have actually instructions (yes, i listen to your guys wishes actually ;-) If you insist for testing, yes that's correct. Just make sure you create a Ubuntu 16.04 instance AND activate an additional IPv6 address for that node. |
██ ███ nope ██ ███
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
August 31, 2016, 12:56:45 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2016, 01:12:18 PM by jakiman |
|
For 1$/month per masternode, running a masternode is profitable for ages. Upgrade to my auto masternode setup script implementation for this and more upcoming ;-)
To try this out, I've deployed 1 Vultr Ubuntu 16.04 server with IPv6 and logged in as root. Then I downloaded your 0.2 script but not sure how to run it.... Is this correct? 1. Download the script. 2. Before running it, edit the script and change the setup nodes count. (e.g. from 3 to 5) 3. Run the script Wait 2 more days please, next version is so much better and have actually instructions (yes, i listen to your guys wishes actually ;-) If you insist for testing, yes that's correct. Just make sure you create a Ubuntu 16.04 instance AND activate an additional IPv6 address for that node. Thanks. I can wait 2 more days.  btw, not sure how to activate an additional IPv6 address... (was that during the deployment? If so, it's already done) |
|
|
|
|
Poll
