Scammer: mark coins

[Invulner]

Are you serious or what.



Complete and utterly bullshit. It's you who is ripping everyone off here.

I'll leave you a negative trust feedback as well since this hasn't been sorted out after a few weeks and you're still actively posting(i.e. spamming) on the forum.

(Probable) Alt account(unless already sold): smith coins

[1714041653]

1714041653

[1714041653]

1714041653

[1714041653]

1714041653

[1714041653]

1714041653

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I can't believe no one from the dt list gave him a negative.   He really deserves it.  I'm sure his signature campaign would not like that.

[mexxer-2]

I can't believe no one from the dt list gave him a negative.   He really deserves it.  I'm sure his signature campaign would not like that.

Personally , in my book, going back on your bid is not a scammy behaviour, shady at best.

[subSTRATA]

I can't believe no one from the dt list gave him a negative.   He really deserves it.  I'm sure his signature campaign would not like that.

Personally , in my book, going back on your bid is not a scammy behaviour, shady at best.

i wouldve agreed on it being shady at best if it were not for the fact that mark coins was active and posting after op pmed him about winning the auction. if he had just taken the 5 seconds to say 'sorry i have to go back on my bid, stuff happens ya know,' that wouldve been completely fine. mark coins tried to avoid the issue and only responded after the issue was brought to the public's attention.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I can't believe no one from the dt list gave him a negative.   He really deserves it.  I'm sure his signature campaign would not like that.

Personally , in my book, going back on your bid is not a scammy behaviour, shady at best.

I agree but one's behavior doesn't have to be scammy in order to earn a negative trust here, it just has to be untrustworthy.  at least that's been my observation.

[zazarb]

I can't believe no one from the dt list gave him a negative.   He really deserves it.  I'm sure his signature campaign would not like that.

Personally , in my book, going back on your bid is not a scammy behaviour, shady at best.

I agree but one's behavior doesn't have to be scammy in order to earn a negative trust here, it just has to be untrustworthy.  at least that's been my observation.

lost time, frustrated auction, means you not considered to be a loss?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I can't believe no one from the dt list gave him a negative.   He really deserves it.  I'm sure his signature campaign would not like that.

Personally , in my book, going back on your bid is not a scammy behaviour, shady at best.

I agree but one's behavior doesn't have to be scammy in order to earn a negative trust here, it just has to be untrustworthy.  at least that's been my observation.

lost time, frustrated auction, means you not considered to be a loss?

I don't understand what you're asking about the bolded part.  It's probably that you don't understand written English well enough.

[ajrah]

I can't believe no one from the dt list gave him a negative.   He really deserves it.  I'm sure his signature campaign would not like that.

Personally , in my book, going back on your bid is not a scammy behaviour, shady at best.

I agree but one's behavior doesn't have to be scammy in order to earn a negative trust here, it just has to be untrustworthy.  at least that's been my observation.

lost time, frustrated auction, means you not considered to be a loss?

I don't understand what you're asking about the bolded part.  It's probably that you don't understand written English well enough.

I think what zazarb meant is if mexxer does not consider "lost time & frustrated auction" due to mark coins actions as scammy.

[yahoo62278]

The whole situation is extremely shady and my neg will stay on him. While he never screwed anyone per say out of btc to his wallet, he did screw the OP out of a sale to another potential buyer. I believe someone from DT should flag him as a lesson to others that if you want to pad your post count do it in other sections(not that im condoning the behavior) but do it in sections that may not waste other users time and money

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I can't believe no one from the dt list gave him a negative.   He really deserves it.  I'm sure his signature campaign would not like that.

Personally , in my book, going back on your bid is not a scammy behaviour, shady at best.

I agree but one's behavior doesn't have to be scammy in order to earn a negative trust here, it just has to be untrustworthy.  at least that's been my observation.

lost time, frustrated auction, means you not considered to be a loss?

I don't understand what you're asking about the bolded part.  It's probably that you don't understand written English well enough.

I think what zazarb meant is if mexxer does not consider "lost time & frustrated auction" due to mark coins actions as scammy.

Yes, well he responded to the quote pyramid that had my entry as the last one and he bolded my quote, and I still don't understand what he was trying to say.  Anyway, moving on.