Muhammed Zakir owes me some btc[RESOLVED]

[guitarplinker]

Glad to see that this loan has finally been repaid. I've removed the negative trust I left on MZ's profile because of this.

[Blazr]

So what happened to Zakir exactly?
I was pretty worried initially. Hope he is alright now.

[mrhelpful]

So what happened to Zakir exactly?
I was pretty worried initially. Hope he is alright now.

Most likely was too busy to respond here, and handling stuff in real life is my guess like everyone elses.

Glad this issue has been resolved though.

[SM23031997]

I have removed the negative trust I left on his profile As this loan has finally been repaid and Glad to see this issue has been resolved though.

[Scamalert]

Glad to see that this loan has finally been repaid. I've removed the negative trust I left on MZ's profile because of this.

I have removed the negative trust I left on his profile As this loan has finally been repaid and Glad to see this issue has been resolved though.

I find it pretty untrustworthy take to a loan and disappear for 6 month.

[Quickseller]

Glad to see that this loan has finally been repaid. I've removed the negative trust I left on MZ's profile because of this.

I have removed the negative trust I left on his profile As this loan has finally been repaid and Glad to see this issue has been resolved though.

I find it pretty untrustworthy take to a loan and disappear for 6 month.

I think it is a good policy to remove a negative rating after someone repays an old debt in order to give them an incentive to make good on bad debts and to pay other money owed. The neutral warnings should serve as a warning to others in case he were to try to borrow money again in the future.

[Scamalert]

Glad to see that this loan has finally been repaid. I've removed the negative trust I left on MZ's profile because of this.

I have removed the negative trust I left on his profile As this loan has finally been repaid and Glad to see this issue has been resolved though.

I find it pretty untrustworthy take to a loan and disappear for 6 month.

I think it is a good policy to remove a negative rating after someone repays an old debt in order to give them an incentive to make good on bad debts and to pay other money owed. The neutral warnings should serve as a warning to others in case he were to try to borrow money again in the future.

I see your point.

In my opinion: an honest and trustworthy person would not need an "incentive" to pay their debt.
They would pay their debt no mater what..... since it is in their nature to do so.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Um, did I get the wrong impression or did someone pay MZ's debt for him?  It sounded like that's the way it happened and if that's the case the trust ought to stay as it is.  What a weird situation, he was so trusted before all this.  Something must have happened.

Edit:  Nevermind, I misread shorena's post.  Still, it's too bad.

[janggernaut]

Just NOW , I got a Message from Shorena that MZ has contacted him and has sent him funds of my loan which he will be sending to me

So seems like MJ's gonna be clear now

I got a message via twitter from MZ and after the usual sign a message please so I know its actually you I was asked to handle the repayment.

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
this is shorena from bitcointalk.org and today is 2016 june 7th
I will repay the loan for Muhammed Zakir to chronicsky with the funds received on the address below
1PU9NZo6BFji8m8znbu4NJE3Rwc1jSz1qT
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
18uTXyQubfaYrkbQDdaXhzd2ALEY5YN77B
HyKXGcfTN1m0SJJp5L2G07q9J/R+Qgx1aKG9gxU4cg49BlZVzKEyfe4Dj7kdPvdxHssk5hdnibPyOHd5vb3fk28=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Repayment has been done to -redacted-[1] with -redacted-[1] and is confirmed now.

He didnt share much with me and I will share even less here, because I dont think its my place to do so. Just this much: dont expect them to be back any time soon.

[1] chronicsky can confirm.

RECEIVED

CONFIRMED!!!!

since this problem already resolved, i think its better if you add "SOLVED" or something like that on this thread (or maybe lock), isn't it?