I stumbled accross this on Bitcointalk today:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=204751I am trying to work out, if people just randomely give people negative trust and why, if someone is a scammer do people not have refeences or evidence of it, as there is no way to tell without evidence!
I am in NO way of knowledge of this user, this is just an example I plucked from the lats post I was on, I am NOT liable for anything posted here or for involuntarily accusing the users of scamming themselves!THIS IS NOT A REASON TO GIVE ME NEGATIVE TRUST!Huh , don't see any abuse of trust there. Three trust ratings were given from DT members, of which two had a reference link, with one(xetrs) being a highly trusted member, who himself requested to be taken off the DT and was "forcibly" added by BadBear again. Anyway, that was off the topic, if you trust someone decision(feedback) you should be able to do so without a reference and just "trust them on it". If you don't trust their decisions/opinions just remove them from your trust list. There's a reason why everyone has the ability to and is recommended to manage a custom trust list of their own.
